1
|
Zhang X, Wu X, Min Y, Lu J, Zhang X, Chen W, Zou L, Lv X, Cui L, Xu B. Effect of prednisone treatment for 30 and 90 days on bone metabolism in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rats. J Bone Miner Metab 2018; 36:628-639. [PMID: 29124434 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-017-0880-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Glucocorticoids (GCs) are often prescribed to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the long term, but there is still controversy in the administration of GCs, mainly because of the adverse reactions such as osteoporosis. Numerous studies have demonstrated that osteoporosis could be induced by GCs in normal rats. However, few experiments have focused on whether osteoporosis could be induced or aggravated by GCs in collagen induced arthritis (CIA) rats. We have investigated bone changes in CIA rats treated with prednisone at 4.5 mg/kg/day for 30 and 90 days by bone histomorphometry, bone mineral density (BMD), micro-CT, biomechanical test, and enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay. We found that high bone turnover osteoporosis was shown in CIA rats. Prednisone treatment for 30 and 90 days improved articular structure and decelerated the degeneration of the femur in CIA rats, but did not improve BMD and bone biomechanics. We conclude that osteoporosis was not aggravated in CIA rats treated with prednisone for 30 and 90 days. On the contrary, prednisone treatment for 30 and 90 days could prevent bone loss of the femur in CIA rats. There was a negative effect on bone metabolism in CIA rats treated with prednisone for 90 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinle Zhang
- Department of Pharmacology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Natural Drugs, Guangdong Medical University, No. 2, Wenming Donglu, Xiashan District, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China
| | - Xuna Wu
- Department of Pharmacology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Natural Drugs, Guangdong Medical University, No. 2, Wenming Donglu, Xiashan District, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China
| | - Yalin Min
- Department of Pharmacology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Natural Drugs, Guangdong Medical University, No. 2, Wenming Donglu, Xiashan District, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiaqi Lu
- Department of Pharmacology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Natural Drugs, Guangdong Medical University, No. 2, Wenming Donglu, Xiashan District, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China
- Department of Pharmacy, Huizhou First People's Hospital, Huizhou, 516002, Guangdong, China
| | - Xuemei Zhang
- Department of Pharmacology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Natural Drugs, Guangdong Medical University, No. 2, Wenming Donglu, Xiashan District, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China
| | - Wenshuang Chen
- Department of Pharmacology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Natural Drugs, Guangdong Medical University, No. 2, Wenming Donglu, Xiashan District, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China
| | - Liyi Zou
- Department of Pharmacology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Natural Drugs, Guangdong Medical University, No. 2, Wenming Donglu, Xiashan District, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaohua Lv
- Department of Pharmacology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Natural Drugs, Guangdong Medical University, No. 2, Wenming Donglu, Xiashan District, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China
| | - Liao Cui
- Department of Pharmacology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Natural Drugs, Guangdong Medical University, No. 2, Wenming Donglu, Xiashan District, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China
| | - Bilian Xu
- Department of Pharmacology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Natural Drugs, Guangdong Medical University, No. 2, Wenming Donglu, Xiashan District, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mohn ES, Kern HJ, Saltzman E, Mitmesser SH, McKay DL. Evidence of Drug-Nutrient Interactions with Chronic Use of Commonly Prescribed Medications: An Update. Pharmaceutics 2018; 10:E36. [PMID: 29558445 PMCID: PMC5874849 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10010036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Revised: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The long-term use of prescription and over-the-counter drugs can induce subclinical and clinically relevant micronutrient deficiencies, which may develop gradually over months or even years. Given the large number of medications currently available, the number of research studies examining potential drug-nutrient interactions is quite limited. A comprehensive, updated review of the potential drug-nutrient interactions with chronic use of the most often prescribed medications for commonly diagnosed conditions among the general U.S. adult population is presented. For the majority of the interactions described in this paper, more high-quality intervention trials are needed to better understand their clinical importance and potential consequences. A number of these studies have identified potential risk factors that may make certain populations more susceptible, but guidelines on how to best manage and/or prevent drug-induced nutrient inadequacies are lacking. Although widespread supplementation is not currently recommended, it is important to ensure at-risk patients reach their recommended intakes for vitamins and minerals. In conjunction with an overall healthy diet, appropriate dietary supplementation may be a practical and efficacious way to maintain or improve micronutrient status in patients at risk of deficiencies, such as those taking medications known to compromise nutritional status. The summary evidence presented in this review will help inform future research efforts and, ultimately, guide recommendations for patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily S Mohn
- Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, and Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
| | - Hua J Kern
- Nutrition & Scientific Affairs, Nature's Bounty Co., Ronkonkoma, NY 11779, USA.
| | - Edward Saltzman
- Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, and Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
| | - Susan H Mitmesser
- Nutrition & Scientific Affairs, Nature's Bounty Co., Ronkonkoma, NY 11779, USA.
| | - Diane L McKay
- Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, and Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schüle S, Rossel JB, Frey D, Biedermann L, Scharl M, Zeitz J, Freitas-Queiroz N, Kuntzen T, Greuter T, Vavricka SR, Rogler G, Misselwitz B. Widely differing screening and treatment practice for osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the Swiss IBD cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e6788. [PMID: 28562531 PMCID: PMC5459696 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000006788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Revised: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Low bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis remain frequent problems in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Several guidelines with nonidentical recommendations exist and there is no general agreement regarding the optimal approach for osteoporosis screening in IBD patients. Clinical practice of osteoporosis screening and treatment remains insufficiently investigated.In the year 2014, a chart review of 877 patients included in the Swiss IBD Cohort study was performed to assess details of osteoporosis diagnostics and treatment. BMD measurements, osteoporosis treatment, and IBD medication were recorded.Our chart review revealed 253 dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans in 877 IBD patients; osteoporosis was prevalent in 20% of tested patients. We identified widely differing osteoporosis screening rates among centers (11%-62%). A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified predictive factors for screening including steroid usage, long disease duration, and perianal disease; even after correction for all risk factors, the study center remained a strong independent predictor (odds ratio 2.3-21 compared to the center with the lowest screening rate). Treatment rates for patients with osteoporosis were suboptimal (55% for calcium, 65% for vitamin D) at the time of chart review. Similarly, a significant fraction of patients with current steroid medication were not treated with vitamin D or calcium (treatment rates 53% for calcium, 58% for vitamin D). For only 29% of patients with osteoporosis bisphosphonate treatment was started. Treatment rates also differed among centers, generally following screening rates. In patients with longitudinal DXA scans, calcium and vitamin D usage was significantly associated with improvement of BMD over time.Our analysis identified inconsistent usage of osteoporosis screening and underuse of osteoporosis treatment in IBD patients. Increasing awareness of osteoporosis as a significant clinical problem in IBD patients might improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solvey Schüle
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich
| | - Jean-Benoît Rossel
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne
| | - Diana Frey
- Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich
| | - Luc Biedermann
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich
| | - Michael Scharl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich
| | - Jonas Zeitz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich
| | - Natália Freitas-Queiroz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich
| | - Thomas Kuntzen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich
| | - Thomas Greuter
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich
| | - Stephan R. Vavricka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gerhard Rogler
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich
| | - Benjamin Misselwitz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kenanidis E, Potoupnis ME, Kakoulidis P, Leonidou A, Sakellariou GT, Sayegh FE, Tsiridis E. Management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: clinical data in relation to disease demographics, bone mineral density and fracture risk. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2015; 14:1035-53. [PMID: 25952267 DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2015.1040387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is the most common type of secondary osteoporosis. Patient selection and the treatment choice remain to be controversial. None of the proposed management guidelines are widely accepted. We evaluate the available clinical data, the efficacy of current medication and we propose an overall algorithm for managing GIOP. AREAS COVERED This article provides a critical review of in vivo and clinical evidence regarding GIOP and developing evidence-based algorithm of treatment. Data base used includes MEDLINE® (1950 to May 2014). EXPERT OPINION Patient-specific treatment is the gold standard of care. Glucocorticoid (GC)-treated patients must comply with a healthy lifestyle and receive 1000 mg of calcium and at least 800 mg of Vitamin D daily. Bisphosphonate (BP) therapy is the current standard of care for prevention and treatment of GIOP. Most of bisphosphonates demonstrated benefit in lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) and some in hip BMD. Alendronate, risedronate and zoledronate showed vertebral anti-fracture efficacy in postmenopausal women and men. Scarce data however when compared head to head with BP efficacy. In post-menopausal women, early antiresorptive BP treatment appears to be efficient and safe. In premenopausal women and patients at high risk of fracture receiving long-term GC therapy however, teriparitide may be advised alternatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eustathios Kenanidis
- Aristotle University Medical School, Academic Orthopaedic Unit , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|