Do Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias Represent Primary Diagnoses or Points on a Continuum?

Other primary headache disorders: Data from the HEAD-MENA-A study in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East

OBJECTIVE

Other primary headache disorders (OPHD) are under-investigated compared to frequent primary headache types like migraine, tension-type headache, and trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. Knowledge of the distribution and characteristics of OPHD subtypes is crucial for their recognition. We aimed to determine the prevalence at the hospital and headache clinics and clinical characteristics of OPHDs in patients from 13 countries.

METHODS

We analyzed a large dataset from the cross-sectional study Head-MENA-A (Middle East, North Africa, Asia). Consecutive patients over 10 years of age presenting with headaches were included from outpatient, inpatient, and emergency settings. A structured questionnaire addressing demographics, headache characteristics, accompanying symptoms, and triggers was administered. Headache subtypes were diagnosed according to the ICHD-3 criteria.

RESULTS

Among patients complaining of headaches (n = 3722), 106 (2.9%) were diagnosed with OPHD. Fifty-two patients (1.4% of all headache patients) had only OPHD, while 54 (1.5%) had both OPHD and a co-existing primary headache (mostly migraine). All OPHDs were more common in females. The most frequent subtypes were new daily persistent headache and primary stabbing headache (0.2% each among all admitted patients). Photophobia and phonophobia were the most frequent accompanying symptoms, while physical activity (28.8%), stress (15.4%), and the Valsalva maneuver (15.4%) were the most common triggering factors. The majority of triggering factors were more pronounced in patients with both migraine and OPHD.

CONCLUSIONS

Other primary headaches are rare and heterogeneous. Their high co-existence with migraine suggests shared predisposing factors, hinting at a "headache continuum" concept for primary headaches.

Adverse effects of anti-epileptics in trigeminal neuralgiform pain

BACKGROUND

Side effects of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) have not been adequately documented in trigeminal neuralgia and its variants. The aim of this observational cross-sectional study was to compare the A-B Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS), which measures cognitive side effects to the Adverse Events Profile (AEP), which looks at a broader range of side effects, and to investigate drug/dosage relationships with questionnaire scores to help determine a point at which a drug change would be indicated.

METHODS

One hundred five patients were recruited from a facial pain clinic, over a 10-month period. Self-complete questionnaire scores were compared between patients using different AEDs.

RESULTS

A-B Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule score correlated well with AEP indicating that cognitive side effects were a significant burden. Toxic range on the ABNAS was estimated to occur when scores were >43/72 (95% CI: 37.4-48.6). Polytherapy is weakly associated with the higher scores. Oxcarbazepine dosage was found to linearly correlate with AEP and ABNAS scores, better than carbamazepine dosage. Memory alteration was least common with lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine, and there was less association between fatigues with oxcarbazepine/pregabalin.

CONCLUSION

Anti-epileptic drugs have significant side effects. The ABNAS questionnaire is a useful tool along with the AEP to recognize and monitor AEDs' side effects and to help to adjust medications to optimal dosage.