Postdural Puncture Headache-Risks and Current Treatment

Lumbar Puncture

Lumbar puncture (LP) is a procedural skill that is required for practice in the emergency care setting, most often for diagnostic purposes. Rarely, it can also be used therapeutically, to alleviate the pain of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute headache from idiopathic intracranial hypertension. In either case, LP constitutes an invasive procedure in which the subarachnoid space is entered in order to obtain a sample of cerebrospinal fluid from one of the most vulnerable areas of the human anatomy. It is essential for the emergency clinician to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of LP, to ensure informed consent when possible, and to proceed in a manner that ensures optimal patient safety and effectiveness. This article reviews current recommendations and considerations around performing LP, in addition to the process for performing the procedure.

Intracranial findings in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: Does the severity of abnormalities correspond with certainty and/or multifocality of cerebrospinal fluid leaks?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is caused by spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. This study assessed whether the certainty and/or multifocality of CSF leaks is associated with the severity of intracranial sequelae of SIH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was completed of patients with suspected SIH that underwent digital subtraction myelogram (DSM) preceded by brain MRI. DSMs were evaluated for the presence or absence of a CSF leak, categorized both as positive/negative/indeterminate and single versus multifocal. Brain MRIs were assessed for intracranial sequelae of SIH based on two probabilistic scoring systems (Dobrocky and Mayo methods). For each system, both an absolute "numerical" score (based on tabulation of findings) and "categorized" score (classification of probability) were tabulated.

RESULTS

174 patients were included; 113 (64.9%) were female, average age 52.0 ± 14.3 years. One or more definite leaks were noted in 76 (43.7%) patients; an indeterminate leak was noted in 22 (12.6%) patients. 16 (16.3%) had multiple leaks. There was no significant difference in the severity of intracranial findings between patients with a single versus multiple leaks (p values ranged from .36 to .70 using categorized scores and 0.22-0.99 for numerical scores). Definite leaks were more likely to have both higher categorized intracranial scores (Mayo p = .0008, Dobrocky p = .006) and numerical scores (p = .0002 for Mayo and p = .006 for Dobrocky).

CONCLUSIONS

Certainty of a CSF leak on diagnostic imaging is associated with severity of intracranial sequelae of SIH, with definite leaks having significantly more intracranial findings than indeterminate leaks. Multifocal leaks do not cause greater intracranial abnormalities.

Management of Post-Dural Puncture Headaches in Pediatric Patients with Epidural Blood or Saline Patch: An Educational Focused Review

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common adverse outcome following puncture of the dura. It can occur after inadvertent dural puncture during epidural catheter placement or following diagnostic or therapeutic LP. The incidence of PDPH in pediatric patients has been estimated at 1-15% depending on patient factors (age, gender, body mass index) and needle factors (size and needle bevel/point type). The larger the needle gauge, the higher the incidence of PDPH. Various options have been proposed to treat PDPH including observation, bed rest, hydration, caffeine, and epidural blood/saline patch. The current manuscript provides a review of the use of epidural blood/saline patch in pediatric-aged patients with PDPH.

Sphenopalatine ganglion blocks for post-dural puncture headache: A case report in a 3-year-old child

Post-dural puncture headache is a distressing complication that may occur after lumbar puncture or unintentional dural puncture. Risk factors in the pediatric population have not been well elicited, and the true incidence is unknown. Conservative management includes conservative physical measures and medical therapies. Epidural blood patch remains the gold standard for managing severe refractory headache, but greater occipital nerve blocks and sphenopalatine ganglion blocks have been used with success. Sphenopalatine ganglion blocks are easy to perform, minimally invasive and, in the postoperative setting where epidural analgesia is utilized, provide an alternative that should be considered.

Update and Advances on Post-dural Puncture Headache

This document provides an overview of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), covering its historical perspective, anatomy and physiology of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment options. PDPH is a common complication of dural puncture, characterized by a postural headache due to CSF leakage. The understanding of CSF and dural anatomy has evolved over time, leading to advancements in diagnosing and managing PDPH. Treatment options range from conservative measures to epidural blood patch, intrathecal catheter, and regional techniques like sphenopalatine ganglion block and greater occipital nerve block. Further research is needed to optimize treatment approaches and improve patient outcomes.

Clinical management of dural defects: A review

Dural defects are common in spinal and cranial neurosurgery. A series of complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage, occur after rupture of the dura. Therefore, treatment strategies are necessary to reduce or avoid complications. This review comprehensively summarizes the common causes, risk factors, clinical complications, and repair methods of dural defects. The latest research progress on dural repair methods and materials is summarized, including direct sutures, grafts, biomaterials, non-biomaterial materials, and composites formed by different materials. The characteristics and efficacy of these dural substitutes are reviewed, and these materials and methods are systematically evaluated. Finally, the best methods for dural repair and the challenges and future prospects of new dural repair materials are discussed.

Efficacy of pharmacological therapies for preventing post-dural puncture headaches in obstetric patients: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a major complication of neuraxial anesthesia. PDPH usually occurs after Caesarean section in obstetric patients. The efficacy of prophylactic pharmacological therapies remains controversial.

METHODS

Seven pharmacological therapies (aminophylline (AMP), dexamethasone, gabapentin/pregabalin (GBP/PGB), hydrocortisone, magnesium, ondansetron (OND), and propofol (PPF)), were studied in this Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of PDPH within 7 days. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of PDPH at 24 and 48 h postoperatively, the severity of headache in PDPH patients (24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

RESULTS

Twenty-two randomized controlled trials with 4,921 pregnant women (2,723 parturients received prophylactic pharmacological therapies) were included. The analyses demonstrated that PPF, OND, and AMP were efficient in decreasing the cumulative incidence of PDPH during the follow-up period compared to the placebo group (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.70; OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.87; OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.84, respectively). PPF and OND had the lower incidence of PONV compared to the placebo group (OR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.30; and OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.63). No significant difference in other outcomes was found among different therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on available data, PPF, OND, and AMP may have better efficacy in decreasing the incidence of PDPH compared to the placebo group. No significant side effects were revealed. Better-designed studies are requested to verify these conclusions.

Image-Guided Spine Interventions for Pain: Ongoing Controversies

An expanding array of image-guided spine interventions have the potential to provide immediate and effective pain relief. Innovations in spine intervention have proceeded rapidly, with clinical adoption of new techniques at times occurring before the development of bodies of evidence to establish efficacy. Although new spine interventions have been evaluated by clinical trials, acceptance of results has been hindered by controversies regarding trial methodology. This article explores controversial aspects of four categories of image-guided interventions for painful conditions: spine interventions for postdural puncture headache resulting from prior lumbar procedures, epidural steroid injections for cervical and lumbar radiculopathy, interventions for facet and sacroiliac joint pain, and vertebral augmentations for compression fractures. For each intervention, we summarize the available literature, with an emphasis on persistent controversies, and discuss how current areas of disagreement and challenge may shape future research and innovation. Despite the ongoing areas of debate regarding various aspects of these procedures, effective treatments continue to emerge and show promise for aiding relief of a range of debilitating conditions.