Pain in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome

Patients' preferred and retrospectively perceived levels of involvement during decision-making regarding carpal tunnel release

BACKGROUND

Patient-centered care requires physicians to respond to patients' preferences, including their preferences regarding treatment decision-making. The authors surveyed patients to determine their preoperative preferences and their retrospectively perceived levels of involvement in decision-making for carpal tunnel release, and they attempted to identify factors that affect patient preferences and experiences.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients who underwent carpal tunnel release for carpal tunnel syndrome were requested to indicate their preferred level of involvement preoperatively and to assess their actual levels of involvement postoperatively, using a Control Preferences Scale containing five levels that range from fully active to fully passive. Clinical and demographic factors that potentially affected patients' preoperative preferences and postoperative assessments of levels of involvement were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients (76%) indicated preoperatively that they preferred shared decision-making, and sixty-six (85%) thought postoperatively that they had experienced this type of decision-making. The correlation between preoperative and postoperative Control Preferences Scale assessments was significant (r = 0.525, p < 0.001). A history of a surgical procedure was independently associated with a preoperative preference for a more active role (odds ratio = 4.2), and patients with a caregiver (odds ratio = 4.0) or private insurance (odds ratio = 2.6) were more likely to experience an active role. Patients who preferred a collaborative role had lower scores on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire than those who preferred a fully active role (p = 0.002) or a fully passive role (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome preferred to share surgical decision-making with the surgeon, and those who preferred a collaborative role had less severe symptoms than those who preferred a fully active or a fully passive role. A history of a surgical procedure, having a caregiver, and having private insurance were associated with a more active role. This information may assist the establishment of patient-centered consultation in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Fibromyalgia: diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment

Fibromyalgia is characterized by chronic widespread pain and the presence of tender points, often accompanied by several non-specific symptoms, such as fatigue, depressive mood, and sleep disturbances. The apparent overlap between fibromyalgia and other syndromes, such as chronic fatigue and irritable bowel, is not sufficient cause to consider all these syndromes as manifestations of a single syndrome. Fibromyalgia is a multifaceted problem. Central afferent pain amplification and perhaps also impaired descending pain inhibition are supposed to underlie widespread pain. Neuroendocrine perturbations, sleep disturbances, health beliefs, mood disorder, and physical deconditioning play a role in the modulation and perseverance of pain and other symptoms. It is extremely difficult to mitigate chronic generalized pain and to deal with other symptoms in fibromyalgia. A uniform intervention strategy is missing. Essential in the tailored management of fibromyalgia are an enhancement of functional capacities and quality of life, and the symptomatic treatment of individual symptoms such as pain, distress, and sleep disturbances. Rather than analysing monotherapy per se, the objective in future evaluations should be to try to find the combined pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatment of choice for specific subgroups of patients.

Return to work after comparing outpatient multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment in general practice for patients with chronic widespread pain

Former studies have questioned the quality and effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation for working-age adults with fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain (CWP). High-quality trials are needed, and return to work should also be included as an outcome variable. This randomized study evaluated the return-to-work outcome of an extensive and a light multidisciplinary treatment program combining cognitive strategies and exercise versus treatment-as-usual initiated by a general practitioner, for CWP patients. The patients (n=208), on sick leave for 3 months on average, were randomized to the extensive program including group sessions, a light and more individual program, and to treatment-as-usual. The number of days absent from work and full return to work were used as an outcome, and follow-up lasted 54 months after the programs ended. The regression analysis showed that the extensive program was associated with significantly fewer days absent from work among women. For women, the mean effect of extensive treatment versus treatment-as-usual on total number of days absent from work was estimated to -206.95 days. Among men, the light program was associated with significantly more days absent from work compared to treatment-as-usual. Both among men and women, independent of type of treatment, patients with poorer health (poor prognosis) were absent from work more days than patients with good prognosis. In our sample, higher age significantly increased the number of days absent from work, but only for women. The extensive outpatient multidisciplinary treatment program was effective in returning women to work.

Explanatory and pragmatic perspectives regarding idiopathic physical symptoms and related syndromes

In recent years, research-methods literature mainly addressing controlled clinical trials has arisen regarding explanatory and pragmatic treatment trials. Explanatory trials tend to examine causal mechanisms and questions of efficacy and value internal validity (creating optimal study conditions) over generalizability (using study results to understand treatment effects in real-life patient populations). In contrast, pragmatic trials value "external relevance" (generalizability) of study results over "internal elegance" so that clinicians and health policymakers can better understand how treatments might impact their patients and policies. This review draws inspiration from these contrasting explanatory and pragmatic perspectives and develops them for clinical and research pertaining to idiopathic physical symptoms and related syndromes (eg, somatization disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple chemical sensitivities, irritable bowel syndrome). Explanatory and pragmatic perspectives are used to examine these idiopathies with regard to causation, case definition, labels, and treatment. It is concluded that idiopathic symptom syndromes are fundamentally pragmatic clinical and research challenges. For epidemiologic and methodologic reasons, the complex explanations for these syndromes remain largely elusive. Even so, scientific and clinical pragmatism offers the opportunity to reduce disagreement between competing medical disciplines and between clinicians and affected patients with regard to irreconcilable etiologic questions and to remain evidence-based in the care of patients.

Comparison of pain threshold, health and functional status of females with fibromyalgia and multiple sclerosis: a pilot study

Objectives. Fibromyalgia (FM) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are known to cause disability and have an impact on physical functioning, social functioning, and emotional well-being of affected individuals. The aim of this study was to compare pressure pain threshold, health and functional status in females with FM and MS who were ambulatory. Methods. Control point scores (CPS), total myalgic scores (TMS; using an algometer), tender point (TP) counts, and chronic widespread pain were assessed in females with FM and MS and in healthy age-matched female controls. The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), and the Nottingham Health Profile were performed. The Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was used to estimate the disability status of persons with MS. Results. Fibromyalgia patients have significantly lower CPS and TMS than MS patients and controls. Multiple sclerosis patients had similar CPS but significantly lower TMS compared to controls. Tender point counts were significantly higher in FM than MS patients and controls. Patients with MS had a higher numbers of TPs with respect to controls. Chronic widespread pain was reported by only three patients with MS and these patients did not meet FM criteria for tender point counts. Fibromyalgia patients had significantly lower FIQ-first item scores than MS patients. FM patients had higher NHP section scores in pain, social isolation, emotional reaction, sleep and energy, but similar physical mobility compared to MS patients. In MS patients energy and physical mobility dimension of NHP and FIQ-first item scores correlated with EDSS (r=0.42, P=0.047, r=0.83, P=0.001, and r=0.62, P=0.001, respectively). Conclusion. This cross-sectional study warrants further research comparing FM and MS, which share a lot of clinical and psychosocial features or may coexist. Chronic pain and related fatigue, social and emotional reactions and disability seem to be important components in FM, so taking care of these components, in other words a biopsychosocial model, may improve disease outcome and quality of life not only in FM but also in MS.

Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal and Autonomic Nervous System Functioning in Fibromyalgia

In general, there seems to be a reduction in some neuroendocrine and autonomic nervous system (ANS) responses to applied stresses in individuals who have fibromyalgia. This article presents an overview and discussion of these findings with respect to the role of the ANS and the neuroendocrine system in the response to stress, with emphasis on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the possible implication to fibromyalgia.

Person-centered approach to care, teaching, and research in fibromyalgia syndrome: justification from biopsychosocial perspectives in populations

OBJECTIVES

To describe complex interactions of multiple factors believed to contribute to fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) at a person-centered level to enhance approaches to care, teaching, and research. The main factors addressed were central nervous system sensory sensitization, autonomic nervous system (ANS) activation, neurohumoral perturbations, and psychosocial and environmental stressors. A person-centered approach is defined as attention to major biopsychosocial issues of affected individuals.

METHODS

Literature on classification, mechanistic pathways, course and outcomes, and management of FMS was reviewed to assess applications of person-centered approaches to care, teaching, and research. Various biopsychosocial influences were considered in relation to the heterogeneous subjective manifestations of this illness, including central hyperalgesia, ANS and other neurohumoral perturbations, functional hyperexcitability, nonrestorative sleep, and psychologic distress.

RESULTS

A person-centered approach to FMS can expand on and strengthen traditional biomedical concepts. Adding such a focus can help to untangle current controversies in the course, outcomes, and treatment of FMS. A person-centered approach can also help in the subgrouping of affected patients for greater specificity in care programs and in improved clinical investigations. In the biomedical model, diverse symptoms of FMS are often addressed separately and apart from their interconnectedness and linkages to the patient's individualized biopsychosocial factors. However, the causes of FMS symptomatology are not likely to be caused by uniform biologic abnormalities across populations. Rather, the syndrome likely results from personal reactivities to varied multifactorial biopsychosocial influences. Common denominators among individuals may include varying degrees of ANS activation (or personal susceptibility to ANS activation), nonrestorative sleep, negative affectivity, and other central pain sensitization mechanisms, among the pathways reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Innovative analytical methodologies will need to be developed to more effectively investigate complex interacting biopsychosocial dynamics at a person-centered level, including qualitative research, and multifactorial and multilevel techniques. Adding person-centered approaches to biopsychosocial concepts of FMS promises to show new physiopathogenetic insights and more effective treatment than current biomedical models alone. Person-centered approaches enhance patient-physician relationships and help prioritize patients' goals in mutually derived treatment plans.