1
|
Cho A, Paulitschke V, Knobler R. Mode of action, indications and recommendations on extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP). J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2023; 21:1369-1380. [PMID: 37723908 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has gained importance in the treatment of several diseases. Initially introduced as a new therapeutic modality for the treatment of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, the indications for the use of ECP have expanded to include hematology and transplantation immunology. Extracorporeal photopheresis has found its place in the treatment plan of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, systemic sclerosis, graft-versus-host disease, organ transplantation such as heart and lung, sometimes as first-line therapy and very often in combination with various systemic immunosuppressive therapies. The procedure basically consists of three steps: leukapheresis, photoactivation and reinfusion. The following article presents possible theories about the mechanism of action, which is not yet fully understood, and discusses the five most common indications for ECP treatment with corresponding therapy recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ara Cho
- University Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Verena Paulitschke
- University Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Knobler
- University Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cho A, Paulitschke V, Knobler R. Wirkweise, Indikationen und Therapieempfehlungen der extrakorporalen Photopherese (ECP). J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2023; 21:1369-1381. [PMID: 37946642 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15167_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungDie extrakorporale Photopherese (ECP) hat in jüngster Zeit bei der Behandlung verschiedener Krankheiten an Bedeutung gewonnen. Ursprünglich als neue Therapie zur Behandlung von Patienten mit kutanem T‐Zell‐Lymphom vorgestellt, hat sich der Indikationsbereich für die ECP auf Hämatologie und Transplantationsimmunologie erweitert. Die ECP hat ihren festen Platz im Therapieplan bei kutanen T‐Zell‐Lymphomen, systemischer Sklerose, Graft‐versus‐Host‐Erkrankung, Organtransplantationen wie Herz und Lunge, teilweise als Erstlinientherapie und sehr häufig in Kombination mit verschiedenen systemischen immunsuppressiven Therapien. Das Verfahren besteht im Wesentlichen aus drei Schritten: Leukapherese, Photoaktivierung und Reinfusion. Im folgenden Artikel werden die noch nicht vollständig verstandenen Wirkmechanismen dargestellt, die fünf häufigsten Indikationen für die Behandlung mit ECP diskutiert und Therapieempfehlungen für die jeweilige Indikation gegeben.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ara Cho
- Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich
| | - Verena Paulitschke
- Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich
| | - Robert Knobler
- Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Delbrück C, Gambichler T, Susok L, Peinemann F. Extracorporeal photopheresis for systemic sclerosis. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Dermatol Ther 2022; 35:e15530. [PMID: 35445504 DOI: 10.1111/dth.15530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by excessive production of collagen. Extracorporeal photopheresis (photochemotherapy, phototherapy) (ECP) involves repeated exposure of peripheral blood lymphocytes to ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation. The rationale for treating patients with SSc by ECP lies in its presumed immunomodulatory effects, though, rigorous data on the specific effects of ECP are limited, particularly in patients with SSc. The objective was to evaluate the effects of extracorporeal photopheresis as a treatment modality for patients with SSc. METHODS We searched the databases CENTRAL and MEDLINE on 13 March 2022 and included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on patients diagnosed with SSc and treated with ECP. Primary outcome was the change of skin scores. We applied independent extraction and judgment by multiple observers. We conducted a meta-analysis applying the inverse variance method and the random effects model; the main outcome measure was standard mean difference of skin scores. RESULTS We identified three relevant randomized clinical trials including 162 randomized (132 analyzed) people who received ECP in a simple parallel design. Pooled data of the three studies were indifferent. We estimated a standard mean difference from baseline of -0.11 (95% confidence interval -0.45 to 0.23), p = 0.54, I2 = 0%. We did not identify serious treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The evidence base for extracorporeal photopheresis on skin scores in patients with systemic sclerosis was not high enough to support a superior effect when compared to no treatment, sham photopheresis, or D-penicillamine. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Delbrück
- Children's Hospital, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thilo Gambichler
- Department of Dermatology, Katholisches Klinikum St. Josef-Hospital, Bochum, Germany
| | - Laura Susok
- Department of Dermatology, Katholisches Klinikum St. Josef-Hospital, Bochum, Germany
| | - Frank Peinemann
- Children's Hospital, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,FOM University of Applied Science for Economics & Management, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Knobler R, Arenberger P, Arun A, Assaf C, Bagot M, Berlin G, Bohbot A, Calzavara-Pinton P, Child F, Cho A, French LE, Gennery AR, Gniadecki R, Gollnick HPM, Guenova E, Jaksch P, Jantschitsch C, Klemke C, Ludvigsson J, Papadavid E, Scarisbrick J, Schwarz T, Stadler R, Wolf P, Zic J, Zouboulis C, Zuckermann A, Greinix H. European dermatology forum: Updated guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis 2020 - Part 2. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 35:27-49. [PMID: 32964529 PMCID: PMC7821314 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Following the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma published in 1983, this technology has received continued use and further recognition for additional earlier as well as refractory forms. After the publication of the first guidelines for this technology in the JEADV in 2014, this technology has maintained additional promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multidisciplinary setting. It has confirmed recognition in well‐known documented conditions such as graft‐vs.‐host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection including lung, heart and liver and to a lesser extent inflammatory bowel disease. Materials and methods In order to further provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications, the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) again proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. All authors had the opportunity to review each contribution as it was added. Results and conclusion These updated 2020 guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion. The guidelines were divided into two parts: PART I covers Cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma, chronic graft‐vs.‐host disease and acute graft‐vs.‐host disease, while PART II will cover scleroderma, solid organ transplantation, Crohn’s disease, use of ECP in paediatric patients, atopic dermatitis, type 1 diabetes, pemphigus, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and erosive oral lichen planus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Knobler
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - P Arenberger
- Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - A Arun
- FRCPath, The Rotherham NHA Foundation Trust, Rotherham, United Kingdom
| | - C Assaf
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - M Bagot
- Hospital Saint Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - G Berlin
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - A Bohbot
- Onco-Hematology Department, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - F Child
- FRCP, St John's Institution of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Cho
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - L E French
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, München, Germany
| | - A R Gennery
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute Newcastle University Great North Children's Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - R Gniadecki
- Division of Dermatology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - H P M Gollnick
- Department Dermatology & Venereology Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - E Guenova
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne and Department of Dermatology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - P Jaksch
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Jantschitsch
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Klemke
- Hautklinik Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - J Ludvigsson
- Crown Princess Victoria Children's Hospital and Division of Pediatrics, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - E Papadavid
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - J Scarisbrick
- University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - T Schwarz
- Department of Dermatology, University Clinics Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - R Stadler
- University Clinic for Dermatology Johannes Wesling Medical Centre, UKRUB, University of Bochum, Minden, Germany
| | - P Wolf
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - J Zic
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Dermatology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - C Zouboulis
- Departments of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Immunology, Dessau Medical Center, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Dessau, Germany
| | - A Zuckermann
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - H Greinix
- LKH-Univ. Klinikum Graz, Division of Haematology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Padmanabhan A, Connelly-Smith L, Aqui N, Balogun RA, Klingel R, Meyer E, Pham HP, Schneiderman J, Witt V, Wu Y, Zantek ND, Dunbar NM, Schwartz GEJ. Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue. J Clin Apher 2019; 34:171-354. [PMID: 31180581 DOI: 10.1002/jca.21705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 760] [Impact Index Per Article: 152.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Padmanabhan
- Medical Sciences Institute & Blood Research Institute, Versiti & Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Laura Connelly-Smith
- Department of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance & University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nicole Aqui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rasheed A Balogun
- Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Reinhard Klingel
- Apheresis Research Institute, Cologne, Germany & First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Erin Meyer
- Department of Hematology/Oncology/BMT/Pathology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Huy P Pham
- Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jennifer Schneiderman
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Neuro-oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Volker Witt
- Department for Pediatrics, St. Anna Kinderspital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Yanyun Wu
- Bloodworks NW & Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Nicole D Zantek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Nancy M Dunbar
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wiese F, Reinhardt-Heller K, Volz M, Gille C, Köstlin N, Billing H, Handgretinger R, Holzer U. Monocytes show immunoregulatory capacity on CD4 + T cells in a human in-vitro model of extracorporeal photopheresis. Clin Exp Immunol 2018; 195:369-380. [PMID: 30411330 DOI: 10.1111/cei.13232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a widely used immunomodulatory therapy for the treatment of various T cell-mediated disorders such as cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL), graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) or systemic sclerosis. Although clinical benefits of ECP are already well described, the underlying mechanism of action of ECP is not yet fully understood. Knowledge on the fate of CD14+ monocytes in the context of ECP is particularly limited and controversial. Here, we investigated the immunoregulatory function of ECP treated monocytes on T cells in an in-vitro ECP model. We show that ECP-treated monocytes significantly induce proinflammatory T cell types in co-cultured T cells, while anti-inflammatory T cells remain unaffected. Furthermore, we found significantly reduced proliferation rates of T cells after co-culture with ECP-treated monocytes. Both changes in interleukin secretion and proliferation were dependent on cell-contact between monocytes and T cells. Interestingly, blocking interactions of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) to programmed death 1 (PD-1) in the in-vitro model led to a significant recovery of T cell proliferation. These results set the base for further studies on the mechanism of ECP, especially the regulatory role of ECP-treated monocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Wiese
- Tuebingen University Children's Hospital, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - K Reinhardt-Heller
- Tuebingen University Children's Hospital, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - M Volz
- Tuebingen University Children's Hospital, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - C Gille
- Tuebingen University Children's Hospital, Department of Neonatology, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - N Köstlin
- Tuebingen University Children's Hospital, Department of Neonatology, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - H Billing
- Tuebingen University Children's Hospital, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - R Handgretinger
- Tuebingen University Children's Hospital, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - U Holzer
- Tuebingen University Children's Hospital, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cho A, Jantschitsch C, Knobler R. Extracorporeal Photopheresis-An Overview. Front Med (Lausanne) 2018; 5:236. [PMID: 30211164 PMCID: PMC6119964 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been in clinical use for over three decades after receiving FDA approval for the palliative treatment of the Sézary Syndrome variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in 1988. After the first positive experiences with CTCL, additional indications have been successfully explored including areas such as graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD), scleroderma, and solid organ transplantation. The mechanism of action is still not fully resolved, but important steps in understanding ECP in recent years have been very informative. Originally, the primary hypothesis stated that psoralen and ultraviolet A (UVA) in combination induce apoptosis in the treated immune cells. This view shifted in favor of dendritic cell initiation, modification of the cytokine profile and stimulation of several T-cell lineages, in particular regulatory T-cells. A number of ECP guidelines have been produced to optimize treatment regimens in the clinical context. In CTCL, enough evidence is available for the use of ECP as a first line treatment for Sézary Syndrome (SS), but also as a second line or rescue treatment in therapy-refractory forms of mycosis fungoides (MF). ECP in the treatment of acute and chronic GVHD has shown promising results as second line therapy in steroid-refractory presentations. In solid organ transplantation, ECP has been used to increase tissue tolerance and decrease infections with opportunistic pathogens, attributed to the use of high doses of immunosuppressive medication. Infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a limiting factor affecting survival in solid organ transplantation and the role of ECP will be discussed in this review. A trend toward prophylactic use of ECP can be observed and may further contribute to improve the outcome in many patients. To further deepen our knowledge of ECP and thus facilitate its use in patients that potentially benefit most from it, future prospective randomized trials are urgently needed in this rapidly growing field. The aim of this review is to (1) introduce the method, (2) give an overview where ECP has shown promising effects and has become an essential part of treatment protocols, and (3) to give recommendations on how to proceed in numerous indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Robert Knobler
- Department of Dermatology, Medizinische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune connective tissue disease characterized by vascular dysfunction, fibrosis, inflammation and autoantibodies. The pathophysiology of SSc is not completely understood, and many patients acquire organ or tissue damage despite advances in treatment. Current treatments target affected organs with modest improvements. Areas covered: This review evaluates several treatment strategies for SSc based on involved organs including skin, pulmonary, cardiac, renal, musculoskeletal, and gastrointestinal. Currently, pulmonary hypertension and interstitial lung disease are the primary causes of increased mortality. We will outline an approach to treatment of SSc based on disease manifestations and current evidence. Expert commentary: This complex disease is currently treated with therapies developed for similar indications such as for vascular manifestations of SSc using idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension treatments. Future directions in this field may include combination and maintenance therapy that is currently used in other autoimmune diseases, and tailoring these treatments according to the patients' phenotype. This will hopefully increase the efficacy of available treatments and decrease mortality from SSc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maysoon Eldoma
- a Division of Rheumatology, St. Joseph's Health Care, Department of Medicine , University of Western Ontario , Ontario , Canada.,b Rheumatologist, Connective Tissue Disease Fellow , University of Western Ontario , Ontario , Canada.,c Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine , University of Calgary , Calgary , Alberta , Canada
| | - Janet Pope
- a Division of Rheumatology, St. Joseph's Health Care, Department of Medicine , University of Western Ontario , Ontario , Canada.,d Division Head Rheumatology and Professor of Medicine , University of Western Ontario , Ontario , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Szczepiorkowski ZM, Burnett CA, Dumont LJ, Abhyankar SH. Apheresis buffy coat collection without photoactivation has no effect on apoptosis, cell proliferation, and total viability of mononuclear cells collected using photopheresis systems. Transfusion 2018; 58:943-950. [PMID: 29451308 DOI: 10.1111/trf.14532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been approved for the treatment of advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma since 1988. While the precise mechanisms resulting in clinical effects are not fully understood, the photoactivation of mononuclear cells (MNCs) using ultraviolet A (UVA) light and methoxsalen is believed to be the predominant initiating process. The effects of MNC passage through the instrument without photoactivation are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of cell processing through the photopheresis instruments on MNCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Fourteen healthy male subjects underwent one simulated ECP procedure without reinfusion of buffy coats (BCs) in a two-center, open-label, prospective trial. Baseline peripheral blood BC, apheresis-separated untreated BC (BC1), and photoactivated BC (BC2) were evaluated in culture for viability by dye exclusion, apoptosis by annexin V binding, and cell proliferation response to phytohemagglutinin (PHA) stimulation by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation. RESULTS Photoactivation (BC2) resulted in 88% expression of annexin V by Day 1 of culture compared with 37 and 39% for baseline and untreated BC1. Cell viability by propidium iodide exclusion was reduced to 10% in BC2 on Day 1 versus 65 and 60% for baseline and BC1. The proliferative response to PHA stimulation was 97% inhibited in the photoactivated BC2. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate that the mechanical processes used for cell separation and processing of the BC in the absence of photoactivation do not induce a significant amount of apoptosis compared to the standard ECP with methoxsalen and UVA photoactivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zbigniew M Szczepiorkowski
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.,Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire.,Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Larry J Dumont
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.,Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Sunil H Abhyankar
- Bone Marrow Transplant Program, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| |
Collapse
|