Recent advances in the treatment of the seronegative spondyloarthropathies

Treatment update on spondyloarthropathy

Traditionally, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and disease-modifying antirheumatic agents (DMARDs) have been used to control the symptoms of spondyloarthropathy. With the advent of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-alpha) agents, however, it is now possible to slow disease progression, improve overall function, and provide symptomatic relief of arthritis, skin lesions, and bowel inflammation associated with these disorders. Here, Drs Anandarajah and Ritchlin explore the effectiveness of conventional therapies as well as biologic agents that are currently available or under development.

Efficacy of methotrexate in the treatment of a HLA-B27-positive Japanease patient with reactive arthritis

We report a case of reactive arthritis in a 21-year-old man who was successfully treated with methotrexate. In July 2008, the patient experienced arthritis in the left knee 3 days after being diagnosed as having urethritis by the urology clinic. The patient was treated with loxoprofen sodium and fosfomycin calcium at an orthopedic clinic. Antibiotics induced clinical improvement of urethritis, although arthritis became worse. Even after sulphasalazine and corticosteroid were started, polyarthritis remained persistent. Finally, methtrexate was added ; thereafter, polyarthritis and elevated CRP were resolved. HLA-B270502 was positive. Methotrexate could be one of the choices for sulphasalazine-resistant reactive arthritis.

Reactive arthritis which occurred one year after acute chlamydial urethritis

A 30-year-old Japanese man developed dactylitis with sausage-like fingers in addition to balanitis and stomatitis. One year prior to these symptoms, acute chlamydial urethritis had been successfully treated by levofloxacin. On admission, Chlamydia trachomatis DNA was not detected in the urine sediment by PCR method, however, he was diagnosed to have reactive arthritis based on the clinical findings of asymmetric dactylitis, circinate balanitis, stomatitis and positivity for HLA B27 antigen. He was treated with methotrexate and his arthritis improved. The past chlamydial infection may have been involved in the pathogenesis of reactive arthritis in this patient.

Drug Insight: different mechanisms of action of tumor necrosis factor antagonists—passive-aggressive behavior?

Antagonists of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) have revolutionized the treatment of selected inflammatory diseases. In rheumatology, this has been most notable for ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Despite their specificity for TNF, these agents, which include the soluble p75 receptor etanercept and the anti-TNF antibodies adalimumab and infliximab, have demonstrated differential clinical efficacy in studies of rheumatoid arthritis; patients who do not respond to one antagonist often respond to another. Therapeutic disparity of these agents is also seen in specific diseases, most notably Crohn's disease. Differences in pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and mechanisms of action, as well as disease heterogeneity, have been proposed to account for these effects. Reverse signaling by transmembrane TNF in response to anti-TNF antibodies, but not soluble receptor, might also influence the therapeutic response.

Newer Therapeutic Approaches: Spondyloarthritis and Uveitis

Over the last 5 years considerable progress has taken place in the therapeutic approach to spondyloarthritis (SpA). This progress is due in large part to the development of effective biologic therapies and to improved clinical trial design and implementation. This article summarizes treatment advances in SpA with emphasis on the efficacy and safety of biologic agents in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy, and uveitis.

Psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: role of patient advocacy organisations in the twenty first century

All the psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis patient advocacy organisations are devoted to promoting public awareness and patient education; supporting access to effective treatments and physicians committed to the welfare of patients; working with physicians and other organisations to facilitate development of new treatments; and supporting research for more effective treatments and a cure for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. They have participated in the remaking of health politics in the late twentieth century. This was an era in which small patient support and advocacy groups were transformed into sophisticated national health organisations integral to the formation of national health policy and research, treatment, and education funding by working with physicians, legislators, pharmaceutical companies, third party payors, and the media. As we enter the twenty first century, some of these groups have done critical surveys of patients and physicians to discern needs that are redirecting their programming and reshaping directions in the field. Many national leagues have united to form international organisations. Although differences in their national healthcare systems, the age of their organisations, and the diseases they cover are reflected in the focus of their individual activities, much unites them. Whatever their size, as their roles have come to be recognised in the healthcare community, the patient advocacy organisations welcome being invited to the decision making table. This report describes a sampling of these organisations.

Recent advances in the treatment of the spondyloarthropathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recently, there has been renewed interest in the spondyloarthropathy family of chronic inflammatory rheumatic conditions, which has been fueled to a large extent by the biologic era. Over the period of the past 2 years in particular, there have been several notable advances. First, there have been a number of large, high-quality randomized controlled trials evaluating the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers and conservative treatments such as physiotherapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for use in spondyloarthropathy. This has paved the way for the development of better tools to assess outcome in these patients both in daily practice and in the context of clinical trials. This review uses a systematic approach to outline the most recent (within the last 2 years) and the most pertinent advances in the treatments of the spondyloarthropathies, with particular emphasis on ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Supervised group exercise programs maintain flexibility and posture in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, and spa therapy is a cost-effective treatment option in ankylosing spondylitis. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have a role in symptom modification and, more importantly, may prevent structural disease progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis when administered continuously at a fixed dose. TNF blockers have been evaluated in a number of randomized controlled trials in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis and have been demonstrated to be safe and effective in the short-term management of these diseases. Longer-term trials are awaited with radiographic outcomes to comment on their disease-modifying properties and their long-term safety and efficacy profiles.

SUMMARY

There has been renewed interest in the spondyloarthropathy family of disorders, with an explosion in the number of trials evaluating outcome with the TNF blockers. To date, no cure has been found for the disease, but these agents are emerging as the best therapeutic option available for patients with ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis to date.