Robotic pyeloplasty

Retroperitoneoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children: Value of Robotic Assistance

AIM

Retroperitoneal pyeloplasty (RP) for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) performed using retroperitoneoscopy (retro-RP) or robotic assistance (robo-RP) were compared.

METHODS

All subjects were Japanese, matched for age, weight, and RP diameters. All RP were performed in the lateral decubitus position at a single institute by the same team using identical protocols. Five independent surgeons were asked to score intraoperative video recordings for perceived difficulty of suturing (DOS; 5 = impossible; 4 = difficult; 3 = tedious; 2 = slow; 1 = easy) and rank RP as +1 if robo-RP appeared to be superior, 0 if they appeared to be the same, and -1 if robo-RP appeared to be inferior.

RESULTS

Robo-RP performed 2018-2022 (n = 22) were matched with retro-RP performed 2011-2019 (n = 34). Mean overall operative times were similar (robo-RP: 305.2 ± 57.8 min versus retro-RP: 340.0 ± 117.9 min; p = 0.19), but securing the larger retroperitoneal space required for robo-RP took significantly longer; 50.8 ± 13.9 min versus 24.3 ± 9.6 min; p < 0.0001. Total anastomotic time (TAT) and TAT per suture were both significantly shorter for robo-RP (p < 0.0001). The coefficient of variation for time taken to place one suture was smaller for robo-RP than for retro-RP. DOS was lower for robo-RP with less variance (p < 0.01). Robo-RP had shorter drainage tube insertion, ambulated quicker postoperatively, and shorter hospitalization. Retro-RP had anastomotic complications; leaks (n = 2) and strictures (n = 2, requiring conventional open re-pyeloplasty). Robo-RP had no anastomotic complications and was ranked +1 unanimously.

CONCLUSIONS

The RP anastomosis was quicker with less complications and more precise with robotic assistance in matched patients under similar circumstances. Should RP be indicated, robo-RP is recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Robotic radical prostatectomy: The new gold standard

Objectives

Open radical prostatectomy (RP) has been the standard and primary treatment for focal prostate cancer. However, in recent years this view has changed, as robot-assisted laparoscopic RP has gained acceptance among urologists. In this review we evaluate the importance and place of robotics in laparoscopic urological surgery, discussing several techniques that are currently being used and potentially new techniques that might be used in the future.

Methods

We systematically reviewed papers published between 1998 and 2011 using the keywords ‘robotic prostatectomy’ ‘gold standard’ and the Medline database. In addition, after selecting relevant reports we searched ‘related citations’ of the documents to find further supporting published papers.

Results

In all, 50 original papers were identified using the search criteria; we also found 28 through ‘related citations’ browsing. Papers were selected according to their relevance to the current topic (i.e. RP, original articles) and incorporated into this review. These papers were used for their information on the advantages of using robotics, as well as innovative ideas being used in the field of robotic urological surgery.

Conclusion

Almost a decade after the first robotic RP many reports show the benefits and advantages of incorporating robotics into urological surgery. Robotic surgery decreases the learning curve necessary for surgeons when compared with laparoscopic techniques. In addition, patients prefer robotics, as the procedure is less invasive, diminishes the duration of hospitalisation and speeds the return to function.

Vascular renal anatomy and the ureteropelvic junction: preoperative multidetector CT scanning with split-bolus injection as a predictor of laparoscopic findings

PURPOSE

To compare multidetector CT scan (MDCT) results with intraoperative findings in the detection of an inferior-pole pedicle crossing the ureteropelvic junction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over the 2-year study period, 35 patients receiving laparoscopic pyeloplasty underwent preoperative investigation with a novel MDCT protocol in order to detect crossing vessels. Postprocessing, including maximum intensity projection, volume-rendering technique, and multiplanar reconstruction, was used in addition to standard axial views.

RESULTS

All the arteries found during laparoscopic surgery were detected by MDCT, but one radiologic false-positive was noted at the beginning of the series. Seven veins were not detected with MDCT. In the only case featuring an isolated inferior-pole vein, the aberrant vessel was identified by MDCT.

CONCLUSION

Multidetector CT scanning is a highly accurate way of providing all the information necessary preoperatively concerning renal parenchymal anomalies, urinary stones, and collecting system and vessel anatomy. It helps physicians make appropriate therapeutic decisions and gives surgeons information about what they can expect during laparoscopic procedures.

[Surgical treatment of ureteropyelic junction stenosis using robotic-assisted laparoscopy]

Since the introduction of mini-invasive surgery approximately thirty years ago, Laparoscopic surgery has significantly evolved both in terms of its extended field of application and of the tools used which were diversified and improved. More recently, the development of robotic-assisted laparoscopy has brought, among other improvements, three-dimensional vision, dexterity, and a comfortable working position, which have reduced the surgeon's fatigability, the difficulties related to the operations and the learning curves of standard laparoscopy. Urology, which makes slightly less use of standard laparoscopy than general or gynaecological surgery, largely benefits from robotics concerning the precision of movements, and has much increased the operating indications of laparoscopy, including the treatment of pyeloureteral junction, kidney tumourectomy, living donor nephrectomy and radical prostactectomy. This chapter describes the operative technique used for the treatment of the ureteropyelic junction stenosis by robotic-assisted laparoscopy, as carried out in Nancy University Hospital with the da Vinci robot (Intuitive Surgical).

Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in the Pediatric Patient: Hand Sewn Anastomosis Versus Robotic Assisted Anastomosis—Is There a Difference?

PURPOSE

The most difficult portion of laparoscopic pyeloplasty is the intracorporeal suturing involved in the anastomosis. We identified whether there is a difference in outcomes between a laparoscopic hand sewn anastomosis and a robotic assisted anastomosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 29 patients who underwent pyeloplasty in the last 30 months, including a robotic assisted procedure in 15, a laparoscopic procedure in 12 and an aborted procedure in 2.

RESULTS

Followup was 10 to 122 weeks (average 41). All surgeries except 1 were deemed successful by resolution of hydronephrosis on ultrasound and symptomatic criteria. Intraoperative time for robotic assisted pyeloplasty was 150 to 290 minutes (average +/- SD 223.1 +/- 46.5). Laparoscopic time was 200 to 285 minutes (average 236.5 +/- 24.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic assisted and laparoscopic anastomosis produced similar outcomes in pediatric patients who underwent pyeloplasty. Overall operative times did not vary significantly between the 2 procedures. There appeared to be no quantifiable benefits between the 2 procedures.

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureteropyelostomy for Treatment of Prostatitis Secondary to Ectopic Ureteral Insertion of a Completely Duplicated Collecting System

Symptomatic presentation of a completely duplicated collecting system with upper-pole ectopic ureteral insertion is rare in the adult. We present a case of a 52-year-old man with recurrent prostatitis and hematuria secondary to an ectopic ureteral insertion from a left upper-pole moiety in a completely duplicated collecting system. He underwent a robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteropyelostomy with good results. We describe our technique in this unusual case.

Technology Insight: surgical robots--expensive toys or the future of urologic surgery?

There is an increasing demand for minimally invasive surgery, despite any controversy over whether patients benefit from minimally invasive procedures rather than undergoing open surgery. In the field of urology, the performance of more complicated procedures is still a challenge even for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Recently, robots have been introduced to enhance operative performance, increase applicability and precision of laparoscopy, and improve the learning curve for complicated minimally invasive procedures. With the introduction of master-slave systems where the surgeon is seated remotely from the robot and uses controls to maneuver the mechanical arms placed inside the patient, a new development in robot-assisted surgery has commenced. Several authors have suggested that surgical robots similar to the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), which have three-dimensional (3D) vision and wristed instruments thus giving a greater degree of freedom than rigid laparoscopic instruments, will facilitate the outcome of these more challenging laparoscopic procedures. Whether these features will translate into better functional and oncological results remains to be evaluated. Data published so far clearly suggest that the patient will benefit from less postoperative pain, decreased bleeding and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery, and that the surgeon benefits from a faster learning curve than for conventional laparoscopy. For the benefit of our patients and for the development of urology it is vital that we understand both the limitations of telerobotics and when it is appropriate to incorporate these new techniques in day-to-day urologic surgery.

Laparoscopic robotic-assisted management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in patients with horseshoe kidneys: technique and 1-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience with laparoscopic robotic-assisted management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) in patients with horseshoe kidneys.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2002 and May 2003, two men and a woman with horseshoe kidneys (mean age 44.6 years) had laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty with robotic assistance for PUJO with no division of the isthmus. Two patients had renal stones which were extracted during surgery. None of the patients had had previous abdominal surgery.

RESULTS

The mean operative duration was 148.3 min, the mean estimated blood loss was <100 mL and the mean hospital stay was 7.6 days. Renal function was preserved in all three patients during the immediate and long-term follow-up as measured by intravenous urography. The three patients had durable clinical and radiographic success during a mean follow-up of 21 months. One patient needed complementary extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, and one had an episode of pyelonephritis, which was treated successfully. There were no other significant complications before or after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pyeloplasty for horseshoe kidney is safe and feasible, offering the advantages of minimally invasive surgical procedures with enhanced laparoscopic skills related to the use of the robot.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty has been shown to have a success rate comparable to that of the open surgical approach. However, the steep learning curve has hindered its acceptance into mainstream urologic practice. The introduction of robotic assistance provides advantages that have the potential to facilitate precise dissection and intracorporeal suturing.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. A four-trocar technique was used. Most patients were discharged home on day 1, with stent removal at 3 weeks. Patency of the ureteropelvic junction was assessed in all patients with mercaptotriglycylglycine Lasix renograms at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, then every 6 months for 1 year, and then yearly.

RESULTS

Each patient underwent a successful procedure without open conversion or transfusion. The average estimated blood loss was 40 mL. The operative time averaged 122 minutes (range 60 to 330) overall. Crossing vessels were present in 30% of the patients and were preserved in all cases. The time for the anastomosis averaged 20 minutes (range 10 to 100). Intraoperatively, no complications occurred. Postoperatively, the average hospital stay was 1.1 days. The stents were removed at an average of 20 days (range 14 to 28) postoperatively. The average follow-up was 11.7 months; at the last follow-up visit, each patient was doing well. Of the 50 patients, 48 underwent one or more renograms, demonstrating stable renal function, improved drainage, and no evidence of recurrent obstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a feasible technique for ureteropelvic junction reconstruction. The procedure provides a minimally invasive alternative with good short-term results.

Technical Modifications for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) is gaining acceptance as a standard of care for the repair of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction, with results comparable to those of open repair. However, it remains a technically challenging procedure requiring intracorporeal suturing skills. Recent reports have demonstrated equally effective results with robot-assisted laparoscopy with shorter operative times. We present our modified technique for daVinci robot-assisted LP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From November 2002 to May 2004, 32 consecutive patients underwent LP with the daVinci robotic system for UPJ obstruction. Just prior to laparoscopy, 31 patients underwent retrograde pyelography and cystoscopic placement of a ureteral catheter just distal to the UPJ, which was prepared into the operative field. The remaining patient had an indwelling stent placed preoperatively. Three transperitoneal ports are placed for the robot. A fourth port is placed for retraction, suction, dissection, and suture passage by the bedside surgeon. This port was placed at McBurney's point in the first two patients and the subxiphoid area in the subsequent 30 patients. A ureteral stent was inserted retrograde intraoperatively with laparoscopic assistance after exchanging the ureteral catheter for a guidewire. A Jackson-Pratt drain was placed in all cases.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed laparoscopically. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty was performed in 31 patients, while Fengerplasty was performed in 1 patient. The average operative time was 300 minutes (initial 12 procedures: 384 minutes; last 10 procedures: 197 minutes). The average blood loss was approximately 50 mL and the average hospital stay 1.1 days. A crossing vessel was present in 44% of the cases. Stone extraction was performed in 5 cases (23%) and kidney biopsy in 1 case. The only perioperative complications were one migrated stent, which was repositioned under sedation without sequelae and one urinary tract infection. Of the 18 patients with follow-up exceeding 6 months (average 10.3 months), 16 have improved drainage and function and are asymptomatic. One patient with flank pain has no evidence of obstruction. One with delayed, although improved, drainage is asymptomatic.

CONCLUSIONS

The daVinci robot system can be used effectively for LP. Although initial operative times were long, there was a significant decrease after the first 12 cases. Having retrograde access to the ureter allows simple intraoperative stent placement. We found that the subxiphoid placement of the fourth port gave the bedside surgeon the optimal location for suction, dissection, and intracorporeal suture passage. This approach and technique have become standard in our treatment of UPJ obstruction.

Totally minimally invasive robot-assisted unstented pyeloplasty using the Zeus Microwrist Surgical System: an animal study

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive pyeloplasty is a difficult procedure even for an expert laparoscopic surgeon. The major difficulty is associated with the limitations of intracorporeal suturing and knot tying. Surgical robots, which hold minimally invasive surgical instruments, have wrists and provide tremor filtration and motion scaling that might be expected to facilitate complex procedures in newborns.

METHODS

Seven survival piglets (4.0-7.5 kg) underwent a totally minimally invasive robot-assisted unstented pyeloplasty employing the Zeus Robotic Microwrist System. The ureter was transected at the level of the ureteropelvic junction and 8 mm was resected. The unstented anastomosis was fashioned with running suture and intracorporeal knot tying. The animals were recovered and intravenous urography was performed at 1 month. After sacrifice, the anastomosis and the kidney were evaluated grossly and histologically for leak, caliber, and healing.

RESULTS

All animals survived the procedure without postoperative complications. The mean robotic setup time was 19 minutes (range, 10-30 min), mean anastomosis time 51 minutes (range, 39-63 min), and mean total operation time 76 minutes (range, 57-87 min). The urography showed hydronephrosis in the first animal. The other 6 animals had no abnormalities. Histopathology demonstrated severe hydronephrosis in the first pig and moderate hydronephrosis in the sixth and seventh. All other animals had no sign of hydronephrosis. All anastomoses were well healed and intact.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a technically feasible procedure with acceptable morbidity in an animal model. The robotic technology enhances surgical dexterity and precision. Robotic assistance can increase the applicability of minimally invasive surgery to complex procedures in children.

Robotic surgery in urology: fact or fantasy?

Advanced robotic surgery was first introduced into urology in 2000. The first studies showed the feasibility and safety of the daVinci (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) telemanipulator assistance in radical prostatectomy, pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction, and radical cystectomy and neobladder formation. The miniature endowristed tools offer a potential advantage over standard laparoscopy in the accuracy of preparation and suturing. Other features are a three-dimensional vision system and unimpaired hand-eye coordination. Complex laparoscopic tasks are learned faster by using the robot, which may also explain the shorter training required for radical prostatectomy than for manual laparoscopy. This new and expensive technology has spread rapidly over the last 4 years. By 2004, approximately 10% of radical prostatectomies in the USA will be robot-assisted. Data on the functional and oncological outcomes are accruing but not yet conclusive. There will be a further spread of robotic surgery, routine telesurgery, smaller and more affordable systems, the introduction of virtual reality, all developments which have the potential to urological surgeons to improve.

Role of robotics in laparoscopic urologic surgery

Robotic surgery is in its infancy. Small series of cases are emerging from various centers that indicate a strong role for robotics in the future of urology, surgery, and general medicine. Robotic technology is progressing on every level and will continue to be a driving force in the progress of science and medicine.