Tips and Tricks for Intracorporeal Robot-Assisted Urinary Diversion

Comparison of Robotic vs Open Cystectomy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The benefits of a robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared to an open approach is still under debate. Initial data on RARC were from trials where urinary diversion was performed by an extracorporeal approach, which does not represent a completely minimally invasive procedure. There are now updated data for RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion that add to the evidence profile of RARC.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of RARC compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multiple databases were searched up to May 2022. We included randomised trials in which patients underwent RARC and ORC. Oncological and safety outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Seven trials of 907 participants were included. There were no differences seen in primary outcomes: disease progression [RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.23], major complications [RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.24] and quality of life [SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.38]. RARC resulted in a decreased risk of perioperative blood transfusion [RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.76], wound complications [RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.55] and reduced length of hospital stay [MD -0.62 days, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.13]. However, there was an increased risk of developing a ureteric stricture [RR 4.21, 95% CI 1.07 to 16.53] in the RARC group and a prolonged operative time [MD 70.4 minutes, 95% CI 34.1 to 106.7]. The approach for urinary diversion did not impact outcomes.

CONCLUSION

RARC is an oncologically safe procedure compared to ORC and provides the benefits of a minimally invasive approach. There was an increased risk of developing a ureteric stricture in patients undergoing RARC that warrants further investigation. There was no difference in oncological outcomes between approaches.

Oncologic Outcomes of Intracorporeal vs Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion After Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Multi-Institutional Korean Study

Background: We aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes of intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) and extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) following robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer. Materials and Methods: Medical records of 730 patients who underwent RARC between April 2007 and May 2019 in 11 tertiary referral centers were retrospectively reviewed. We assessed recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) in the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression models were used to identify factors associated with RFS, CSS, and OS. Results: Among 591 patients, neobladder diversion was performed more frequently in the ICUD group (70.8% vs 52.5%, p = 0.001). The median follow-up duration was shorter in the ICUD group than in the ECUD group (16 vs 26 months, p < 0.001). The rates of overall recurrence (36.5% vs 25.5%, p = 0.013) and pelvic recurrence (12.1% vs 5.9%, p = 0.031) were higher in the ECUD group. However, no differences in 5-year RFS (43.2% vs 58.4%, p = 0.516), CSS (79.3% vs 89.7%, p = 0.392), and OS (74.3% vs 81.4%, p = 0.411) were noted between the two groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that when compared to ICUD, ECUD was not associated with RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.982; p = 0.920), CSS (HR, 0.568; p = 0.126), and OS (HR, 0.642; p = 0.124). Conclusion: Although there was a difference in recurrence rate between the two groups, multivariable analysis indicated that the diversion technique after RARC did not affect the oncologic outcomes. Large prospective studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to verify the oncologic outcomes of ICUD and ECUD following RARC.

Evolution of robot-assisted orthotopic ileal neobladder formation: a step-by-step update to the University of Southern California (USC) technique

OBJECTIVE

To describe our, step-by-step, technique for robotic intracorporeal neobladder formation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The main surgical steps to forming the intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder are: isolation of 65 cm of small bowel; small bowel anastomosis; bowel detubularisation; suture of the posterior wall of the neobladder; neobladder-urethral anastomosis and cross folding of the pouch; and uretero-enteral anastomosis. Improvements have been made to these steps to enhance time efficiency without compromising neobladder configuration.

RESULTS

Our technical improvements have resulted in an improvement in operative time from 450 to 360 min.

CONCLUSION

We describe an updated step-by-step technique of robot-assisted intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder formation.

Management of Challenging Urethro-ileal Anastomosis During Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Neobladder Formation

BACKGROUND

Robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is increasingly being adopted, but intracorporeal neobladder formation remains a challenging procedure limited to selected centers. Common challenges with intracorporeal neobladder formation relate to fashioning a tension-free urethro-ileal anastomosis. In this paper, we describe a series of maneuvers to overcome these challenges that we believe will be of great utility to surgeons performing intracorporeal neobladder.

OBJECTIVE

To describe maneuvers to overcome challenges during intracorporeal urethro-ileal anastomosis formation and to report postoperative outcomes for patients in whom these maneuvers were used.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective review of medical records of patients who underwent RARC with intracorporeal neobladder performed by one surgeon (G.-P.H.) at our tertiary center from January 2012 to February 2015 in which at least one additional maneuver was required beyond preservation of urethral length, removal of the sigmoid colon from the pelvis, and careful ileal loop selection. The primary end point was 90-d complications. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 mo, and 16 patients had at least 1-yr follow-up.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

RARC with intracorporeal neobladder formation.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Clinical and operative data collected from a prospectively maintained, institutional review board-approved database. Maneuvers used during intracorporeal urethro-ileal anastomosis were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean operative time was 486 min (standard deviation: 112 min) with median hospitalization of 7 d (interquartile range: 7-9 d). Seven patients (36.8%) experienced a complication, with one (5.3%) major complication thought to be unrelated to surgery. No open conversions were required. There was no 90-d mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our stepwise approach can help overcome challenges of urethro-ileal anastomosis during intracorporeal neobladder formation.

PATIENT SUMMARY

When performing intracorporeal neobladder formation, challenges are often encountered in fashioning the urethro-ileal anastomosis. We describe a series of maneuvers that, when used in a stepwise manner, help overcome these challenges.