Robotic Ureteral Reimplant—the Current Role

Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Repair of Kidney Transplant Ureteral Strictures

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes of robotic-assisted transplant ureteral repair (RATUR) for the management of kidney transplant ureteral strictures (TUS).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 41 consecutive patients who underwent RATUR for TUS at multiple tertiary referral centers between January 2016 and December 2022. RATUR was performed utilizing a robotic-assisted transperitoneal approach. The primary outcome was stricture recurrence rate and secondary outcomes included postoperative complicate rate, determining factors impacting with allograft functional recovery, and rate of conversion to open surgery. Categorical and continuous variables are displayed as total number (Percentage) or median [Interquartile Range], respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient was utilized to assess categorical variable correlation with creatinine.

RESULTS

The median age was 56years [44,66]. The female-to-male ratio was 1.1:1. Approximately 66% of patients were dialysis-dependent prior to kidney transplantation. TUS was identified at a median time of 4months [2, 15.5] following kidney transplant. Median stricture length was 2 cm [1.22, 2.9 cm]. There were no TUS recurrences with a median follow-up of 36months [24,48]. There were 3 Clavien grade 2 and 1 Clavien grade 3 complications (9.5%). No baseline characteristics or preoperative diagnostics were correlated with a long-term decline in renal allograft function.

CONCLUSION

RATUR has excellent and durable outcomes with low complication rates. These findings encourage the use of a minimally invasive definitive repair as a first-line treatment option for the management of TUS.

Open versus minimally invasive ureteroneocystostomy: trends and outcomes in a NSQIP-P cohort

Although surgical intervention has commonly been performed using an open approach for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), this is rapidly changing due to adoption of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Success rates with MIS are similar to open for re-implantation (> 90%); however, open ureteral re-implantation is still widely considered the gold standard. Using national surgical quality improvement program-pediatric (NSQIP-P) data, this manuscript evaluates recent large population trends of open versus robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy for complications and factors associated with worse outcomes. Cases were identified in the 2012-2019 NSQIP-P database using the ureteroneocystostomy operative codes and vesicoureteral reflux post-operative diagnosis codes. A 1:1 propensity score match (PSM) analysis was performed comparing surgical outcomes while matching patients with similar characteristics to reduce bias. A total of 4183 patients were included; 621 patients with MIS and 3562 with open approach. Patients in the MIS approach tended to be older (67 months vs. 53 months) and non-Caucasian (12.9% vs. 6.3%) with no differences in other demographics. After 1:1 PSM, 30-day complications after ureteroneocystostomy showed no significant differences in readmission, reoperation, or extended hospital stay. A multivariate analysis found patients with CNS structural abnormalities (such as spina bifida) had 4.5 times greater odds of experiencing a reoperation (p value < 0.05). Similarly, patients with an ASA above two had 2.0 times greater odds of an UTI (p value < 0.05). The cohorts undergoing open and MIS approaches are well matched overall, without profound differences in outcomes overall.

Ureteroneocystostomy without ureteral remodeling for grade III-V vesicoureteral reflux treatment

BACKGROUND

Ureteral remodeling (tapering or tailoring) is often performed alongside ureteroneocystostomy (ureteric reimplantation) procedures despite limited evidence on its role in promoting reflux resolution.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of ureteroneocystostomy in the absence of adjuvant ureteral remodeling for promoting reflux resolution in grade III-V vesicoureteral reflux.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis identified pediatric patients who underwent open or robotic assisted ureteroneocystostomy (OUN and RAUN, respectively) without ureteral remodeling (tailoring or tapering) at a single tertiary care center. The primary endpoint of reflux resolution was defined as no reflux on latest follow up postoperative voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). Ureteral dilation was analyzed using the ureteral diameter ratio (UDR), which normalized for image characteristics. Inclusion criteria was as follows: grade III-V reflux, accessible postoperative VCUG scan, RAUN after June 2013 following technique optimization, and no other structural urologic abnormality or associated neurogenic bladder.

RESULTS

A total of 68 ureters were analyzed (Grade III = 28, Grade IV = 27, Grade V = 13, OUN = 23, RAUN = 45). Complete reflux resolution was achieved postoperatively in 96% (27/28) of grade III, 100% (27/27) of grade IV and 100% (13/13) grade V cases, for a combined resolution rate of 99%. In the one failed case, the preoperative UDR was in the second quartile and postoperatively, reflux diminished from grade III to grade I. Notably, no cases with UDRs in the largest quartile required tapering/tailoring for complete reflux resolution.

DISCUSSION

Ureteral tapering and tailoring were unnecessary to achieve reflux resolution in grade III-V VUR by both OUN and RAUN. Additionally, the unsuccessful case was classified as grade III with a UDR value in the second quartile, suggesting that high grade reflux (IV-V) can be repaired without tapering with equal success rates to that of grade III VUR repair, which is classically not tapered. Tapering was unnecessary for complete reflux resolution in the cases with the largest ureteral diameter ratios (UDR). These findings are limited by the single center retrospective nature of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that vesicoureteral reimplantation for resolution of grade III-V reflux is successful in the absence of ureteral remodeling techniques.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplant: A single-center experience

Introduction:

Open ureteral reimplant has been the gold standard for management of lower ureteric strictures. With the widespread acceptance of robotic surgery, robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplant (RALUR) is becoming the preferred choice for performing ureteral reimplant. We present our single-institution and single-surgeon experience of performing RALUR.

Materials and Methods:

We performed a retrospective analysis of 40 patients who underwent RALUR at our institute in the last 5 years. Demographic data were recorded along with presenting complaint and diagnosis. Intraoperative variables included operative and docking time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, technique, and procedure performed. Postoperative data that were analyzed included complications, hospital stay, and outcomes. Patient satisfaction score was calculated using a numerical scale of points 1–6.

Results:

The mean age of patients was 31.5 ± 9.8 years (r = 4–45). Male: female ratio was 3:5. The most common presenting symptom was flank pain, and the most common etiology was iatrogenic strictures in adults and congenital vesicoureteral reflux in children. The mean operative time and blood loss were 135.3 ± 45.1 min (r = 84–221) and 67.7 ± 31.4 ml (r = 32–118), respectively. There were no intraoperative complications and nil conversion to open surgery. The mean length of hospital stay was 4.5 ± 2.3 days (r = 3–9). Radiographic success was achieved in 41 out of 44 ureters. Eighty-five percent of the patients were completely satisfied with robotic approach and its outcomes.

Conclusion:

RALUR is a minimally invasive, safe, feasible, less morbid technique with good outcome.

Robotic Urologic Surgery in the Infant: a Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this article is to review the current role of robotic urologic surgery in the infant population across a spectrum of diseases and procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Robotic urological surgery has been performed in the infant population across a variety of conditions including ureteropelvic junction obstruction, vesicoureteral reflux, and duplicated and nonfunctional renal moieties. However, most of the durable evidence showing safety and success remains in the repair of the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Included in this review are also strategies to address the limitations imposed by the unique physiology and anatomy of the infant. Robotic urologic surgery remains an alternative to other surgical approaches in the properly selected infant in the hands of experienced surgeons. As additional larger studies are performed, the utility of the robotic platform in this population will be clearer.