1
|
Zhong W, Osther P, Pearle M, Choong S, Mazzon G, Zhu W, Zhao Z, Gutierrez J, Smith D, Moussa M, Pal SK, Saltirov I, Ahmad M, Hamri SB, Chew B, Aquino A, Krambeck A, Khadgi S, Sur RL, Güven S, Gamal W, Li J, Liu Y, Ferretti S, Kamal W, Ye L, Bernardo N, Almousawi S, Abdelkareem M, Durutovic O, Kamphuis G, Maroccolo M, Ye Z, Alken P, Sarica K, Zeng G. International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guideline on staghorn calculi management. World J Urol 2024; 42:189. [PMID: 38526675 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04816-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The stone burden based management strategy reported in the guidelines published by different associations is well known for a long time. Staghorn calculi, representing the largest burden and most complex stones, is one of the most challenging cases to practicing urologists in clinical practice. The International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) has released a series of guidelines on the management of urolithiasis. PURPOSE To develop a series of recommendations for the contemporary management management of staghorn calculi and to provide a clinical framework for urologists treating patients with these complex stones. METHODS A comprehensive literature search for articles published in English between 01/01/1976 and 31/12/2022 in the PubMed, OVID, Embase and Medline database is performed. A series of recommendations are developed and individually graded following the review of literature and panel discussion. RESULTS The definition, pathogenesis, pathophysiology, preoperative evaluation, intraoperative treatment strategies and procedural advice, early postoperative management, follow up and prevention of stone recurrence are summarized in the present document. CONCLUSION A series of recommendations regarding the management of staghorn calculi, along with related commentary and supporting documentation offered in the present guideline is intended to provide a clinical framework for the practicing urologists in the management of staghorn calculi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Zhong
- Department of Urology and Key Laboratory of Guangdong, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Palle Osther
- Department of Urology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Margaret Pearle
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Simon Choong
- Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital, University College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Giorgio Mazzon
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Wei Zhu
- Department of Urology and Key Laboratory of Guangdong, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhijian Zhao
- Department of Urology and Key Laboratory of Guangdong, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jorge Gutierrez
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Daron Smith
- Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital, University College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Mohamad Moussa
- Department of Urology, Al Zahraa Hospital University Medical Center and Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Iliya Saltirov
- Department of Urology and Nephrology, Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Mumtaz Ahmad
- Department of Urology, Ganga Ram Hospital, Ganga Ram Hospital and Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Saeed Bin Hamri
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ministry of the National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ben Chew
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Albert Aquino
- Department of Urology, Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center, Manila, Philippines
| | - Amy Krambeck
- Department of Urology, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sanjay Khadgi
- Department of Urology, Vayodha Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Roger L Sur
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Selcuk Güven
- Department of Urology, Meram School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Wael Gamal
- Department of Urology, Sohag University Hospital, Sohâg, Egypt
| | - Jianxing Li
- Department of Urology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Yongda Liu
- Department of Urology and Key Laboratory of Guangdong, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Wissam Kamal
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Liefu Ye
- Urology Department, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian, China
| | - Norberto Bernardo
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Shabir Almousawi
- Department of Urology, Sabah Al-Ahmad Urology Centre, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Mohamed Abdelkareem
- Department of Urology, Hazm Mebaireek General Hospital (HMGH), Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar
| | - Otas Durutovic
- Department of Urology, Clinic of Urology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Guido Kamphuis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marcus Maroccolo
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Base of the Federal District, Brasília, Brazil
| | - Zhangqun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Peter Alken
- Department of Urology, University Clinic Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Kermal Sarica
- Department of Urology, Medical School, Biruni University, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Guohua Zeng
- Department of Urology and Key Laboratory of Guangdong, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hou J, Wen X, Qu G, Chen W, Xu X, Wu G, Ji R, Wei G, Liang T, Huang W, Xiong L. A multicenter study on the application of artificial intelligence radiological characteristics to predict prognosis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1184608. [PMID: 37780621 PMCID: PMC10541026 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1184608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A model to predict preoperative outcomes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with renal staghorn stones is developed to be an essential preoperative consultation tool. Objective In this study, we constructed a predictive model for one-time stone clearance after PCNL for renal staghorn calculi, so as to predict the stone clearance rate of patients in one operation, and provide a reference direction for patients and clinicians. Methods According to the 175 patients with renal staghorn stones undergoing PCNL at two centers, preoperative/postoperative variables were collected. After identifying characteristic variables using PCA analysis to avoid overfitting. A predictive model was developed for preoperative outcomes after PCNL in patients with renal staghorn stones. In addition, we repeatedly cross-validated their model's predictive efficacy and clinical application using data from two different centers. Results The study included 175 patients from two centers treated with PCNL. We used a training set and an external validation set. Radionics characteristics, deep migration learning, clinical characteristics, and DTL+Rad-signature were successfully constructed using machine learning based on patients' pre/postoperative imaging characteristics and clinical variables using minimum absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithms. In this study, DTL-Rad signal was found to be the outstanding predictor of stone clearance in patients with renal deer antler-like stones treated by PCNL. The DTL+Rad signature showed good discriminatory ability in both the training and external validation groups with AUC values of 0.871 (95% CI, 0.800-0.942) and 0.744 (95% CI, 0.617-0.871). The decision curve demonstrated the radiographic model's clinical utility and illustrated specificities of 0.935 and 0.806, respectively. Conclusion We found a prediction model combining imaging characteristics, neural networks, and clinical characteristics can be used as an effective preoperative prediction method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Hou
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China
| | - Xiangyang Wen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China
| | - Genyi Qu
- Department of Urology, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, China
| | - Wenwen Chen
- Department of Radiology, Zixing First People’s Hospital, Chenzhou, China
| | - Xiang Xu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China
| | - Guoqing Wu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China
| | - Ruidong Ji
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China
| | - Genggeng Wei
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China
| | - Tuo Liang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China
| | - Wenyan Huang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China
| | - Lin Xiong
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harraz AM, El-Nahas AR, Nabeeh MA, Laymon M, Sheir KZ, El-Kappany HA, Osman Y. Development and validation of a simple stone score to estimate the probability of residual stones prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2020; 73:525-531. [PMID: 33256360 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.20.04055-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the present study was to develop and internally validate a simple stone score (SSS) to estimate the probability of clinically significant residual fragments (CSRF) prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). METHODS The files of 1170 PNL procedures between January and December 2015 were evaluated. CT-derived stone characteristics were examined. Caliceal stone distribution (CSD) was assigned three grades based on the number of calices involved regardless of the renal pelvis (I = no or single calix; II = more than one calix; and III = more than 2 calices or complete staghorn stones). CSRF was defined as any residuals >4 mm in postoperative CT. A logistic regression model to predict the CSRF was fitted, and coefficients were used to develop the SSS. The SSS was validated by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS Patients' data were split into training (936, 80%) and validating (234, 20%) datasets. In the training partition, independent predictors of CSRF were CSD-grade II (OR: 4.2; 95%CI: 2.5-7; P<0.001), grade III (OR: 7.8; 95%CI: 4.2-14.4; P<0.001) and largest stone diameter (LSD) (OR:1.3; 95%CI: 1.1-1.6; P<0.001). Score points 0, 1, 2, and 0, 3, 9 were given to LSD<30, 30-40, >40 mm, and CSD grades I, II, III, respectively. Discrimination of the SSS was 0.79 and after 10-fold cross-validation and internal validation was 0.86. The calibration plot and DCA highlighted the validity and clinical significance of the SSS. CONCLUSIONS The novel SSS could be used to describe the risk of CSRF prior to PNL. Further studies are invited for external validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed M Harraz
- Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt -
| | - Ahmed R El-Nahas
- Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mohamed A Nabeeh
- Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud Laymon
- Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Khalid Z Sheir
- Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | - Yasser Osman
- Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shahat AA, Abonnoor AEI, Allaham SMT, Abdel-Moneim AM, El-Anany FG, Abdelkawi IF. Critical Application of Adult Nephrolithometric Scoring Systems to Children Undergoing Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2020; 34:924-931. [PMID: 32363937 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate and compare the ability of the Guy's stone score (GSS), the S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry, and the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society (CROES) nomogram to predict the outcome of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPNL) in children, and to identify which of the predictors involved in these scoring systems can separately affect this outcome. Patients and Methods: All children younger than 14 years who had MPNL in our center over a period of 3 years were included prospectively. Bivariate analyses were done to evaluate the associations of the three scoring systems and the predictors composing them with single-session stone clearance and complications. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses of the three scoring systems were conducted to evaluate and compare their abilities to predict the outcomes. Decision curve analyses for the three scoring systems were conducted to evaluate the clinical benefit of using each of them to predict stone clearance. Results: We consecutively enrolled 92 renal units in 89 children with a median age of 9.5 years. Single-session stone clearance was achieved in 76 (82.6%) renal units. Complications occurred with 19 (20.7%) procedures. Stone multiplicity (p = 0.043), staghorn stone (p = 0.007), prior stone treatment (p < 0.001), number of calices involved (p = 0.006), stone burden (p = 0.003), GSS (p < 0.001), S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry (p = 0.012), and CROES nomogram (p < 0.001) had significant associations with stone clearance. Only stone attenuation was significantly associated with complications (p = 0.031). For prediction of stone clearance, CROES nomogram demonstrated the greatest area under the ROC curve and the greatest net benefit on decision curve analyses. Conclusions: For children undergoing MPNL, CROES nomogram is the best to predict stone clearance. However, none of the studied scoring systems predicted complications efficiently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed A Shahat
- Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt
| | | | - Shadi M T Allaham
- Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt
| | - Ahmad M Abdel-Moneim
- Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt
| | - Fathy G El-Anany
- Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt
| | - Islam F Abdelkawi
- Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Winoker JS, Chandhoke RA, Atallah W, Gupta M. Morphometry scores: Clinical implications in the management of staghorn calculi. Asian J Urol 2020; 7:78-86. [PMID: 32257799 PMCID: PMC7096674 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Revised: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to their large size, rapid growth, and attendant morbidity, staghorn calculi are complex clinical entities that impose significant treatment-related challenges. Moreover, their relative heterogeneity-in terms of both total stone burden and anatomic distribution-limits the ability to standardize their characterization and the reporting of surgical outcomes. Several morphometry systems currently exist to define the volumetric distribution of renal stones, in general, and to predict the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy; however, they fall short in their applicability to staghorn stones. In this review, we aim to discuss the clinical utility of morphometry systems and the influence of pelvicalyceal anatomy on the management of these complex calculi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared S Winoker
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryan A Chandhoke
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - William Atallah
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mantu Gupta
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|