Benefits of Retroperitoneoscopic Surgery in Pediatric Urology

Comparative study of different surgical approaches for treatment of UPJ obstruction according to the degree/severity of hydronephrosis factor

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of two different surgical approaches during and after pyeloplasty according to the degree/severity of hydronephrosis factor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty child patients with UPJ obstruction admitted to our hospital from August 2019 to October 2021 were collected. Patients who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RPLP) were enrolled into Group A (n = 20), while those who received transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty (TLP) were selected as Group B (n = 40). Clinical parameters, including gender, age, laterality of UPJ obstruction, degree/severity of hydronephrosis, body weight, operation time, drainage tube indwelling time, complete oral feeding time, and length of hospital stay, were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

All 60 child patients were operated upon successfully without conversion to open surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, laterality of UPJ obstruction, and body weight between the two groups, while the operation time of TLP was shorter than that of RPLP, indicating a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). The differences in complete oral feeding time, drainage tube indwelling time, and length of hospital stay were statistically significant between the two groups, and RPLP was superior to TLP in terms of postoperative recovery time (P < 0.001). A stratified comparison showed that there were no statistically significant differences in anteroposterior diameter ≤ 20 mm, while there were statistically significant differences in anteroposterior diameter >20 mm. Hydronephrosis is reviewed after 3 months of the operation, degree/severity of hydronephrosis have been reduced.

CONCLUSION

Both RPLP and TLP are safe and feasible in the treatment of UPJ obstruction, and their overall surgical effects are equivalent. For child patients with anteroposterior diameter ≤ 20 mm, RPLP is available, while patients with anteroposterior diameter >20 mm, TLP is recommended.

Enhancing recovery after minimally invasive surgery in children: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely implemented after minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) in adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current evidence available on ERAS after MIS in children.

METHODS

Using a defined search strategy (PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus), we performed a systematic review of the literature, searching for studies reporting on ERAS after MIS (thoracoscopy, laparoscopy, retroperitoneoscopy) in children (1975-2019). This study was registered with PROSPERO-international prospective register of systematic reviews. A meta-analysis was conducted using comparative studies for length of stay (LOS), complication rates, and readmission rates.

RESULTS

Of 180 abstracts screened, 20 full-text articles were analyzed, and 9 were included in our systematic review (1 randomized controlled trial, 3 prospective, and 5 retrospective studies), involving a total number of 531 patients. ERAS has been applied to laparoscopy for digestive (n = 7 studies) or urologic surgeries (n = 1), as well as thoracoscopy (n = 1). Mean LOS was decreased in ERAS children compared to controls (6 studies, -1.12 days, 95%IC: -1.5 to -0.82, p < 0.00001). There was no difference in complication rates between ERAS children and control children (5 studies, 13% vs 14%, OR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.49-1.44, p = 0.52). The 30-day readmission rate was decreased in ERAS children compared to controls (6 studies, 4% vs 10%, OR = 0.34, 95%CI: 0.18-0.66, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the evidence regarding ERAS in MIS is scarce, these protocols seem safe and effective, by decreasing LOS and 30-day readmission rate, without increasing post-operative complication rates.

Retroperitoneoscopic renal and adrenal specimen resection surgery in children

Introduction

The most common indication for retroperitoneoscopy in children is poorly functioning kidney, related to reflux or obstruction. Few pediatric urologists attempt to conduct a mass resection operation under retroperitoneoscopy, especially in infants with oncological diseases.

Aim

In this study, we describe our experience in a series of resection operations under retroperitoneoscopy to demonstrate its safety and efficacy in children, especially in the treatment of pediatric urology tumor.

Material and methods

A retrospective review of 18 consecutive retroperitoneoscopic resection operations from December 2017 to July 2019 was made. Then a comparison study between retroperitoneoscopy and transperitoneal laparoscopy for exclusively oncological patients was conducted.

Results

Retroperitoneoscopic surgery was successfully performed on 18 patients, 11 having solid tumors, 2 with cysts, and 5 with nonfunctioning or poorly functioning kidneys. The mean age was 69.5 ±46.9 months. The mean operative time was 138.6 ±57.7 min, while the mean size of the mass was 6.4 ±3.8 cm in the largest diameter. Two patients were converted to open surgery because of large diameter of the mass. The 11 solid tumors which were operated on by retroperitoneoscopic surgery were then compared with 13 consecutive oncological patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopy. Retroperitoneoscopy has a lower transfusion rate (p < 0.05) and faster recovery (p < 0.01) compared to transperitoneal laparoscopy.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the resection operation of a renal or adrenal specimen under retroperitoneoscopy is feasible and safe in children. It is useful not only to treat patients with benign diseases but also in oncological patients. Retroperitoneoscopy is a recommended surgical approach for children.

Laparoscopic or Robotic Deroofing Guided by Indocyanine Green Fluorescence and Perirenal Fat Tissue Wadding Technique of Pediatric Simple Renal Cysts

Purpose: To present the outcomes of the laparoscopic and robotic treatment of pediatric simple renal cysts with two novel modifications: the indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence and the perirenal fat tissue wadding technique. Methods: Between 2012 and 2019, 13 patients with solitary renal cysts were treated through minimally invasive approach. Preoperative work-up included ultrasonography and computed tomography or magnetic resonance. A cyst deroofing was performed in all cases. In the last 3 cases, the ICG fluorescence technique enabled a clear identification and safe puncture of the cyst dome. Five cysts were filled with perirenal fat tissue after deroofing. Results: Thirteen patients (9 boys) were treated through laparoscopic (6 patients), retroperitoneoscopic (3 patients), or robotic approach (4 patients). Median age was 8 years (5-15 years). The median cyst size was 70 mm (42-160 mm). Eight cysts were located in the right kidney. All cysts were progressive and symptomatic. Thirteen cysts (100%) were graded as type II according to the Bosniak classification. No conversion was recorded. The median operative time for laparoscopy was 50 minutes (35-90 minutes) and 85 minutes for robotics (65-120 minutes) including surgical and docking time. No intraoperative complications occurred. The median hospital stay was 2 days (36-96 hours). No residual liquid was detected on follow-up after deroofing and fat tissue wadding technique. Conclusions: Cyst deroofing is an effective and durable treatment for symptomatic simple renal cysts. Robotics enables excellent tissue dissection and ergonomics. The perirenal fat tissue wadding of the cyst seems to reduce the recurrence rate. The ICG fluorescence technique allows for better identification of the cyst and safer surgical procedure.

Retroperitoneoscopic resection of a T11-L2 right-sided ganglioneuroma

Paraspinal tumors arising from the sympathetic chain include those on the ganglioneuroma-neuroblastoma spectrum. Accurate diagnosis often requires excision owing to the histopathologic heterogeneity of these tumors and the risk of false negative biopsy results. Choice of approach is dictated by location and extirpation is usually amenable to minimally invasive techniques. We present a patient whose paraspinal tumor included the T11-L2 vertebral body levels and was removed using a retroperitoneoscopic approach. This approach is rarely considered in pediatric general surgery and afforded a useful alternative to thoracoscopy or laparoscopy.

Access for retroperitoneoscopic surgery

Retroperitoneoscopic surgery is used for a variety of renal and adrenal procedures in the paediatric population. This can be a challenging procedure but has advantages over open and transperitoneal laparoscopic approaches. This VideoBank article aims to aid the surgeon in gaining safe and efficient access for retroperitoneal surgery by demonstrating key steps including patient positioning and optimal trocar placement.

Predictors of complications following retroperitoneoscopic total and partial nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Recent reports in the literature suggest an increased risk of complications with retroperitoneal as opposed to transperitoneal approach to partial nephrectomy (PN) and total nephrectomy (TN). We are a large unit performing predominantly retroperitoneoscopic PN and TN. We aim to review our outcomes and perform analysis to elucidate the predictors of complications following the retroperitoneal approach for extirpative kidney surgery.

METHODS

We performed a single center retrospective review of children undergoing MIMS TN and PN between 2005 and 2015. Variables were tested for association with outcomes using Chi² and Spearman's Rho correlation.

RESULTS

We performed 173 MIMS nephrectomies, 119 total and 54 partial. Median age and weight were 5 years (6 months to 18 years) and 24.9 kg (7.7 to 85 kg) and operative time 147 min. There were 4 conversions and 17 postoperative complications. 19.6% children required further surgery, including 8 completion stumpectomies. Retroperitoneal approach did not have increased risk compared to transperitoneal for need of further surgery. Partial nephrectomy was not associated with higher rate of intraoperative complication or LOS. Predictors of intraoperative complication were vessel closure technique. Associations with need for further surgery were: ESRF, contralateral disease, bladder dysfunction, presence of PD catheter, and need for concomitant procedure.

CONCLUSION

Our conversion rate (1.9%) and need for further surgery (13.1%) following the retroperitoneal approach to the kidney are favorable to the literature. Need for reoperation is often associated with the underlying diagnosis and the natural sequelae of the disease process.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Retroperitoneoscopy in urology: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

In the past years, several authors have focused on the role of retroperitoneoscopic laparoscopy in the treatment of urological diseases. Aim of our study is to systematically review the available literature on retro-peritoneoscopic laparoscopy in urology.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of the literature using the Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for relevant articles published until June 2018 was performed using both the Medical Subjects Heading and free test protocols. The MeSH search was conducted by combining the following terms: "retroperitoneoscopy," "posterior laparoscopy," "retroperitoneoscopic." Only randomized clinical trials were included in the analysis. Risk of bias assessment and forest plots were used to summarize data.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Nine RCTs on simple, partial and radical nephrectomy, pyeloplasty, ureterolithotomy and nephrolithotomy comparing RP to other techniques were included in the analysis. Retroperitoneoscopic approach in simple or radical nephrectomy is to be considered a valid alternative to transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Outcomes and safety profiles (6-8% conversion rate) are similar and the approach depends on surgeon's preferences. Randomized studies analyzing retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty showed better results in terms of perioperative morbidity (tramadol use: 147 vs. 179 mg, P=0.002) and return to normal activities when compared to either anterior laparoscopic either to minimally invasive open approach. Two randomized studies have confirmed the efficacy (stone-free rate: 94%) and safety (no Clavien-Dindo >II complications) of ureterolithotomy and nephrolithotomy (stone-free rate: 95%) in the management of large renal and ureteral stones.

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneoscopic approach in urological diseases is a valid alternative to the anterior approach. Evidence suggest lower morbidity for the retroperitoneoscopic approach however technical complexity may limit its widespread.

Resection of a thoracoabdominal ganglioneuroma via a retroperitoneal minimally invasive approach

A 10-year-old girl presented to her pediatrician with a history of cough and fever. A chest radiograph revealed a paraspinal mass. On cross-sectional imaging, the mass traversed the diaphragm, extending from T9 to L1 spinal levels with involvement of the T10–12 neural foramen. Vanillylmandelic and homovanillic acid levels were normal. On review of historical radiographs, the mass had increased in size. Thus, surgical resection was recommended for diagnosis and treatment.

The patient was placed in left lateral decubitus position. The retroperitoneal space was accessed inferior to the twelfth rib. One 12 mm and two 5 mm ports were used. Development of the retroperitoneal space was achieved with both blunt dissection and a vessel-sealing device. The diaphragm was incised to resect the thoracic component of the mass. The tumor was adherent at the neural foramen and was resected flush with the spine. The diaphragm repaired primarily. She was discharged home on post-operative day four without complication. Pathology demonstrated a ganglioneuroma. The patient was well at her follow-up, and imaging one year postoperatively was without recurrence. No additional treatment was required.

A laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach allows for a safe, minimally invasive resection of a thoracoabdominal mass without violation of the abdominal cavity.