Ureteral Obstruction After Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: Does the Type of Injected Bulking Agent Matter?

Primary vesicoureteral reflux

Primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is one of the most common urological abnormalities in infants and children. The association of VUR, urinary tract infection (UTI) and renal parenchymal damage is well established. The most serious complications of VUR-associated reflux nephropathy are hypertension and proteinuria with chronic kidney disease. Over the past two decades, our understanding of the natural history of VUR has improved, which has helped to identify patients at increased risk of both VUR and VUR-associated renal injury. The main goals in the treatment of paediatric patients with VUR are the prevention of recurrent UTIs and minimizing the risk of renal scarring and long-term renal impairment. Currently, there are four options for managing primary VUR in infants and children: surveillance or intermittent treatment of UTIs with management of bladder and bowel dysfunction; continuous antibiotic prophylaxis; endoscopic subureteral injection of tissue-augmenting substances; and ureteral reimplantation via open, laparoscopic or robotic-assisted surgery. Current debates regarding key aspects of management include when to perform diagnostic imaging and how to best identify the paediatric patients that will benefit from continuous antibiotic prophylaxis or surgical intervention, including endoscopic injection therapy and minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation. Evolving technologies, such as artificial intelligence, have the potential to assist clinicians in the decision-making process and in the individualization of diagnostic imaging and treatment of infants and children with VUR in the future.

Vantris vs. deflux for treatment of paediatric vesicoureteral reflux: Efficacy and obstruction risk

INTRODUCTION

The aim was to compare the efficacy of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) injections and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/Ha) injections for the endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children.

MATERIAL

This retrospective cohort study included 189 young patients who had endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux from January 2012 to December 2019 in our center. Among them, 101 had PCC injections and 88 had Dx/Ha injections. Indications for treatment were vesicoureteral reflux with breakthrough urinary tract infection or vesicoureteral reflux with renal scarring on dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scan. Endoscopic injection was performed under the ureteral meatus. Early complications, recurrence of febrile urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux after endoscopic injection, ureteral obstruction and reintervention were evaluated and compared between groups.

RESULTS

Endoscopic treatment was successful in 90.1% of patients who had PPC injection and in 82% of patients who had Dx/Ha injection. Four patients presented a chronic ureteral obstruction after PPC injection, one with a complete loss of function of the dilated kidney. One patient in the Dx/Ha group presented a postoperative ureteral dilatation after 2 injections.

CONCLUSION

Despite a similar success rate after PPC and Dx/Ha injections for endoscopic treatment of VUR, there may be a greater risk of postoperative ureteral obstruction after PPC injections. The benefit of using PPC to prevent febrile UTI and renal scarring in children with low-grade VUR does not seem to outweigh the risk of chronic ureteral obstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Successful rescue pneumovesicoscopic surgery for post-Deflux® vesicoureteral junction obstruction

BACKGROUND

Vesicoureteral junction (VUJ) obstruction after Deflux® subureteral injection for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is rare and minimally invasive management has not been reported. This work investigated the patients who underwent Deflux® injection for VUR and identified those with subsequent VUJ obstruction.

METHODS

Medical records of matched patients from October 2003 to March 2022 were reviewed, and parameters were retrospectively studied. All patients underwent Deflux® injection. The injection was performed under general anesthesia using the same manner. For patients complicated with VUJ obstruction, the symptoms, signs, management, images, renal ultrasounds, Tc-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scintigraphy, histology of VUJ region, and outcomes were documented and reported. VUJ stenosis was diagnosed by performing renal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Totally 407 patients (554 ureterorenal units) received Dx/HA injections for VUR. VUJ obstruction was found in three patients (four ureterorenal units). Originally, three were grade V VUR, and one was grade IV. The repeated injection was not a risk factor for VUJ obstruction. The overall incidence of VUJ obstruction post-Dx/HA injection was 0.7% by ureter. The incidences were 0%, 0.75%, and 2.25% for grade I-III, IV, and V VUR, respectively. After the initial conversion case of pneumovesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation, the procedure was performed smoothly and successfully in the two following cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumovesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation offers an alternative for VUJ obstruction following Dx/HA injection for VUR. Fibrosis and foreign-body reaction may influence the feasibility. High-grade VUR and young age of injection were related to VUJ obstruction.

Vesicoureteral Reflux: Current Care Trends and Future Possibilities

Although investigations over the past 2 decades have improved our understanding of the natural history of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and helped identify those at higher risk of both VUR itself as well as its potential severe sequelae, debate exists regarding key aspects of care, including when to perform diagnostic imaging and which patients benefit from continuous antibiotic prophylaxis. Artificial intelligence and machine learning have the potential to distill large volumes of granular data into practical tools that clinicians can use to guide diagnosis and management decisions. Surgical treatment, when indicated, remains highly effective and is associated with low morbidity.

History of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux

Since its first clinical application in 1984, the endoscopic subureteral injection of bulking agents has become an alternative to long-term antibiotic prophylaxis and open surgical intervention in the treatment of VUR in children. The 15 min day care endoscopic procedure has gained worldwide popularity in the management of VUR in children. Over the years, multiple studies have demonstrated safety and long-term efficacy of this minimally invasive outpatient procedure. Nowadays almost 90% of the surgical treatment of VUR in Sweden is done by endoscopic procedure. In the current article, our aim was to review how the endoscopic treatment of VUR developed.

Endoscopic injection of bulking agents in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: a narrative review of the literature

In the last 20 years, endoscopic injection (EI) has affirmed as a valid alternative to open surgery for management of pediatric vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This study aimed to investigate and discuss some debated aspects such as indications, bulking agents and comparison, techniques of injection and comparison, predictive factors of success, use in specific situations. EI is minimally invasive, well accepted by patients and families, with short learning curve and low-morbidity profile. It provides reflux resolution rates approaching those of open reimplantation, ranging from 69 to 100%. Obviously, the success rate may be influenced by several factors. Recently, it is adopted as first-line therapy also in high grade reflux or complex anatomy such as duplex, bladder diverticula, ectopic ureters. The two most used materials for injection are Deflux and Vantris. The first is absorbable, easier to inject, has lower risk of obstruction, but can lose efficacy over time. The second is non-absorbable, more difficult to inject, has higher risk of obstruction, but it is potentially more durable. The two main techniques are STING and HIT. To date, the ideal material and technique of injection has not yet clearly established, but the choice remains dependent on surgeon's preference and experience.

A systematic review & meta-analysis comparing outcomes of endoscopic treatment of primary vesico ureteric reflux in children with polyacrylate poly alcohol copolymer versus dextranomer hyaluranic acid

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There are conflicting reports on the efficacy of bulking agents for vesico ureteric reflux (VUR). In this meta-analysis we have compared the outcomes of endoscopic treatment with polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) and dextranomer hyaluronic acid (DxHA).

METHODS

A systematic review of publications between 2010 and 2020 was conducted covering databases like PUBMED, MEDLINE etc. for (endoscopic treatment) AND (VUR) AND (PPC OR DxHA) AND (recurrence OR complications). PRISMA guidelines were followed and only comparative studies were included. Outcomes were early success defined as absence of VUR in voiding cystourethrogram at 3-months followup, urinary tract infections (UTI) and occurrence of vesico-ureteric-junction obstruction (VUJO). Risk of bias was analysed with Robvis tool and odds-ratios were compared with Revman-3.0.

RESULTS

Among nine studies (heterogeneity; I 2 69-79%) all cleared the risk of bias assessment. There was no significant difference in high grade VUR (p = 0.94) between PPC (40%) and DxHA (43%). Success rate after single injection was significantly higher (p = 0.0001) at 86% (477/555) for PPC vs 69% (474/685) for DxHA. UTI rate between PPC (12%) and DxHA (14.6%) was not statistically significant (p = 0.54). VUJO rate between PPC (3.9%) and DxHA (0.8%) was also not significantly different (p = 0.47). Significantly lesser volume (p = 0.02) was used for PPC (0.7 ml) compared to DxHA (0.9 ml).

CONCLUSION

Reflux resolution was significantly higher with PPC than DxHA. Postinjection UTI/VUJO incidence was not significantly different between them. Limitation of this meta-analysis was heterogeneity & small number of articles. Further studies should focus on long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Comparison of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA) for treatment of vesicoureteral reflux. A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer and Dextranomer-Hyaluronic Acid for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of science, Ovid, Cochrane databases, Google scholar have been searched for studies published until January 2022 in any language. Studies that compared the success rate for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children with two bulking agents, namely, "polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer." and "Dextranomer-Hyaluronic Acid" were included for this analysis.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in data synthesis for this meta-analysis. Pooled data with a total of 763 ureters in PPC group and 718 ureters in Dx/HA group indicated that ureters in PPC group were more likely to undergo complete reflux resolution than Dx/HA (OR 3.80, 95% CI: 2.71; 5.31). Among subgroup of patients with high grade reflux, PPC injection had more resolution rate compared to Dx/HA patients (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.19-7.16). In total, 95.81% of the PPC group and 86.52% of the Dx/HA group experienced success after the third injection. However a concerning complication of endoscopic treatment which is ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO) was more prevalent in PPC group. So the possible benefits arising from endoscopic treatment with PPC could be offset by the costs of re-implantation surgery or stenting in the case of UVJO.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that PPC injection for vesicoureteral reflux treatment was associated with a higher success rate, but concerningly, UVJO incidence was higher in the PPC group which might negate the possible benefits of PPC injection However, due to the lack of studies with long-term follow-up, we couldn't reach a definitive conclusion about the superiority of one of the bulking agents over the other.

Long-term results of endoscopic treatment in vesicoureteral reflux after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVES

To assess the long-term clinical outcomes and identify factors predicting success of endoscopic treatment for symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after kidney transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients who had a symptomatic VUR after renal transplantation at our centre between January 2000 and December 2020 was performed. VUR was documented by retrograde cystography and was determined by at least one episode of acute graft pyelonephritis (AGPN). Endoscopic injections of polydimethylsiloxane (MacroPlastique^™) or dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux^™) were performed by expert urologists via rigid cystoscopy with a bevelled needle system. The results of endoscopic treatment were evaluated by cystography at three months. The primary endpoint was clinical efficacy as defined by the absence of AGPN during follow-up. Radiological success was defined by the absence of VUR at the three months follow-up cystography.

RESULTS

Out of 2135 kidney transplantations, a total of 117 (5.5%) patients had symptomatic VUR: 100 (85.5%) underwent Deflux^™ and 17 (14.5%) MacroPlastique^™. Preoperative high-grade VUR was recorded in 71% of patients. One postoperative complication was observed, Clavien > II. After a median follow-up of 11.2 years (IQR 6.5-14.4), clinical success was achieved in 73 patients (62.4%). Radiological success was obtained in 42 patients (36%). Multivariable analysis failed to identify predictors of endoscopic treatment success, which was independent of the preoperative grade of VUR and the type of bulking agent used.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic treatment of VUR is a simple and well-tolerated procedure with long-term clinical efficacy.

Diagnosis and grading of vesicoureteral reflux on voiding cystourethrography images in children using a deep hybrid model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Vesicoureteral reflux is the leakage of urine from the bladder into the ureter. As a result, urinary tract infections and kidney scarring can occur in children. Voiding cystourethrography is the primary radiological imaging method used to diagnose vesicoureteral reflux in children with a history of recurrent urinary tract infection. Besides the diagnosis of reflux, it is graded with voiding cystourethrography. In this study, we aimed to diagnose and grade vesicoureteral reflux in Voiding cystourethrography images using hybrid CNN in deep learning methods.

METHODS

Images of pediatric patients diagnosed with VUR between 2016 and 2021 in our hospital (Firat University Hospital) were graded according to the international vesicoureteral reflux radiographic grading system. VCUG images of 236 normal and 992 with vesicoureteral reflux pediatric patients were available. A total of 6 classes were created as normal and graded 1-5 patients.

RESULTS

In this study, a hybrid-based mRMR (Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance) using CNN (Convolutional Neural Networks) model is developed for the diagnosis and grading of vesicoureteral reflux on voiding cystourethrography images. Googlenet, MobilenetV2, and Densenet201 models are used as a part of the hybrid architecture. The obtained features from these architectures are examined in concatenating process. Then, these features are classified in machine learning classifiers after optimizing with the mRMR method. Among the models used in the study, the highest accuracy value was obtained in the proposed model with an accuracy rate of 96.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

It shows that the hybrid model developed according to the findings of our study can be used in the diagnosis and grading of vesicoureteral reflux in voiding cystourethrography images.

Mid-Term Safety and Efficacy of the Modified Double Hydrodistention Implantation Technique (HIT), Termed Systematic Multi-Site HIT (SMHIT), for Patients with Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux

Purpose

To evaluate the treatment outcomes and postoperative complications associated with the systematic multi-site hydrodistention implantation technique (SMHIT) for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and to determine its mid-term efficacy and safety.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data for 17 ureters from 12 consecutive children, aged ≥1 year, with grade II-IV reflux and a history of febrile urinary tract infections (FUTI), who underwent a single-session of SMHIT. The primary outcome was the absence of postoperative FUTI (clinical success). The secondary outcome was improvement in reflux to grade 0-I on postoperative voiding cystourethrography (radiographic success).

Results

Five and 7 children had bilateral and unilateral reflux, respectively. Reflux was categorized as grade II, III, and IV reflux in 2, 12, and 3 ureters, respectively. Seven of 10 (70%) toilet-trained children had bladder-bowel dysfunction (BBD) preoperatively. The SMHIT was performed for all patients, after which BBD improved. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 6 years and 9 months. The clinical success rate was 100%. Radiographic success was achieved in 16/17 ureters (94%) at 3-4 months, 17/17 (100%) ureters at 1 year, and 17/17 (100%) ureters at 3 years postoperatively. Major complications did not develop postoperatively.

Conclusion

When prioritizing treatment of concomitant BBD in children with primary VUR and avoiding dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection therapy in contraindicated children according to the Food and Drug Administration recommendations, a single-session of SMHIT may be as effective and safe in the mid-term as performing open anti-reflux surgery.

Risk factors for obstructive complications after endoscopic correction of vesico-ureteral reflux using polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer

Use of polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) after endoscopic correction (EC) of vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) is highly effective but is associated with a higher risk of obstructive complications (OC) compared with other implants. We undertook a STROBE compliant retrospective investigation and studied the OC risk factors to increase the practical safety of PPC.Overall, 798 patients (464 [58.1%] girls and 334 [41.9%]) boys) from 5 hospitals in whom PPC was routinely used were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were subdivided into 2 groups. Group I consisted of 754 (94.5%) children (449 [59.5%] girls and 305 [40.5%] boys) without OC. Median age was 41 months [Q1: 18.0; Q3: 81.0]. Group II comprised 44 (5.5%) patients (29 [65.9%] boys and 15 [34.1%] girls) experiencing OC, and their median age was 21.5 months [Q1: 12.0; Q3: 43.0]. Clinical and renal ultrasound examinations were carried out 1 day and 1 month after EC, and then every 6 months after EC. At the follow-up examination approximately 6 months after EC, voiding cysto-urethrography (VCUG) was performed. All patients with OC underwent diuretic renography.OC occurred in 44 (5.5%) of 798 children, in some cases as late as 60 months after endoscopic injection of the bulking agent PPC for correction of VUR. Univariate analysis revealed that younger age (P < .001), higher grade of VUR (P < .001), male gender (P < .001), second injection (P = .003), and EC injection using hydrodistension implantation technique (HIT; P < .001) represented significant risk factors. At multivariate analysis, only male gender (P = .0078), younger age (P = .0044), HIT technique (P < .0001), and second injection (P = .04) represented significant risk factors for the occurrence of OC.We identified young age, male gender, high reflux grade, HIT technique, and second endoscopic injections as factors associated with the risk of OC after EC of VUR using PPC as a bulking agent. Thus, patients who have undergone EC with PPC must be monitored sonographically for occurrence of OC for at least 60 months after the intervention.