Atrial Flutter

Acute and long-term efficacy and safety of catheter cryoablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus for treatment of type 1 atrial flutter

BACKGROUND

Atrial flutter (AFL) is commonly treated by radiofrequency catheter ablation. Catheter-based cryoablation may be an effective alternative with potential advantages.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to study the acute and long-term safety and efficacy of catheter-based cryoablation for treatment of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent (typical and reverse typical) AFL.

METHODS

Catheter-based cryoablation was performed with a 10Fr catheter in 160 patients with cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent AFL (122 men and 38 women; mean age 63.1 +/- 9.3 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 54.6% +/- 10.4%); 94 (58.8%) of these patients also had atrial fibrillation (AF). All patients underwent right atrial (RA) activation mapping and pacing at the cavotricuspid isthmus to demonstrate concealed entrainment and confirm cavotricuspid isthmus dependence of AFL. Catheter-based cryoablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus was performed with multiple freezes (average freeze time 2.3 +/- 0.5 minutes) until bidirectional block was demonstrated during pacing from the low lateral RA and coronary sinus, respectively. Patients were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months and underwent weekly and symptomatic event monitoring. Acute procedural success was defined as cavotricuspid isthmus block persisting 30 minutes after ablation. Long-term success was defined as absence of AFL during follow-up.

RESULTS

Acute success was achieved in 140 (87.5%) of 160 patients. Total procedure time was 200 +/- 71 minutes, ablation time (including a 30-minute waiting period after ablation) was 139 +/- 62 minutes, and fluoroscopy time was 35 +/- 26 minutes. An average of 20.5 +/- 11.3 freezes, for a total ablation time of 47.4 +/- 24.3 minutes, were required to achieve cavotricuspid isthmus block, with average and nadir temperatures of -81.5 degrees C +/- 3.7 degrees C and -85.6 degrees +/- 3.6 degrees C, respectively. Four patients (2.5%) had procedure-related adverse events. Of 132 patients with acute efficacy who completed 6-month follow-up, 8 (6%) were lost to follow-up or were noncompliant with event recordings. Using survival analysis, 106 (80.3%) remained free of AFL on strict analysis of event recordings only, and 119 (90.2%) remained clinically free of AFL.

CONCLUSION

This large pivotal study demonstrated the acute and long-term efficacy and safety of catheter-based cryoablation for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent AFL, similar to rates previously reported for radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Conversion efficacy of intravenous ibutilide compared with intravenous amiodarone in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter

AIM

The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ibutilide and amiodarone (intravenously) in converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (Af) to sinus rhythm (SR).

METHODS

The study was prospective, randomized and included 152 (103 men and 49 women) consecutive patients with AF or Af of 3-48 h duration. Ibutilide is a selective class III antiarrhythmic agent which when administered intravenously can terminate AF and Af. Amiodarone is also a class III antiarrhythmic agent that when given intravenously or orally has proved to be more effective than other agents in terminating AF and Af [B.N. Singh, F.V. Mody, B. Lopez, J.S. Sarma. Antiarrhythmic agents for atrial fibrillation: focus on prolonging atrial repolarization. Am J Cardiol 1999 Nov 4; 84: 161R-173R.]. Seventy-nine patients (56 with AF and 23 with Af) that consisted group A were treated with ibutilide. Seventy-three (52 with AF and 21 with Af) consisted group B and were treated with intravenous infusion of amiodarone.

RESULTS

The conversion rate of group A (ibutilide) was significantly higher than the conversion rate of group B (amiodarone) (80% vs. 57%, p=0.0054). As regards the kind of arrhythmia separately, for AF there wasn't significant difference (77% vs. 69%, p=ns) whereas for Af ibutilide was superior to amiodarone (87% vs. 29%, p=0.003). The conversion rates of ibutilide didn't differ for AF and Af (77% vs. 87%, p=ns).

CONCLUSIONS

Ibutilide is more effective than amiodarone in converting recent-onset Af to SR whereas both drugs are equally effective in converting recent-onset AF to SR.

Recurrence rate of atrial flutter after initial presentation in patients on drug treatment

Atrial flutter (AFl) recurrence after initial in-patient presentation, cardioversion, and drug treatment is almost universal, often leading to rehospitalization and risk of serious clinical consequences. Radiofrequency ablation of AFl, which has an excellent safety record, should be evaluated as a first-line approach for most patients with AFl.