Appropriate and inappropriate use of dronedarone in 2013

Comparison of dronedarone vs. flecainide in the maintenance of sinus rhythm, following electrocardioversion in adults with persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To compare flecainide and dronedarone for sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance following electrocardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), in patients with minimal or no structural heart disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic search of publications using EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and MEDLINE (1989-2019), identified a total of 595 articles. No limitations were applied. Nine articles met the inclusion criteria [five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four cohort studies], encompassing 1349 persistent AF candidates. Two retrospective studies compared flecainide with dronedarone, indicating a 6% reduced risk of AF recurrence with flecainide; however, results were not statistically significant [risk ratio (RR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.24; P = 0.66]. One RCT compared dronedarone to placebo, demonstrating a 28% reduced risk of AF recurrence at 6 months (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.90; P = 0.004). Two RCTs compare flecainide to placebo, when a 16% decreased risk of AF recurrence at 6-12 months was indicated; however, these results were not statistically significant (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.07; P = 0.16). Within a 6- to 12-month follow-up period, a combined recurrence rate of AF was examined, in which flecainide and dronedarone maintained SR in 50% and 42%, respectively. Four articles satisfied quality appraisal, one of which focused on flecainide data.

CONCLUSION

Dronedarone and flecainide displayed similar efficacy in maintaining SR in patients following electrocardioversion for persistent AF. The SR maintenance was numerically but not statistically significant in the flecainide group. Side effects uncovered similar pro-arrhythmic activity. However, in light of the deficiency of volume and quality of available evidence, the writer acknowledges the requirement for future research.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of dronedarone , a new antiarrhythmic agent for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Dronedarone is a recent antiarrhythmic drug that has been developed for treatment of AF, with electrophysiological properties similar to amiodarone but with a lower incidence of side effects.

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluates the efficacy, safety, tolerability and side effects of dronedarone in the treatment of AF. In particular, the review includes studies comparing: dronedarone and placebo (ANDROMEDA, ATHENA, DAFNE, ERATO, EURIDIS/ADONIS, HESTIA, PALLAS trials), dronedarone and amiodarone (DIONYSOS trial), ranolazine and dronedarone given alone and in combination (HARMONY trial).

EXPERT OPINION

Dronedarone is an interesting antiarrhythmic agent in well-selected groups of patients. It also has several other pleiotropic effects that may potentially be beneficial in clinical practice, such as the reduction of the risk of stroke and acute coronary syndromes. In addition, combination therapies such as those with dronedarone and ranolazine, currently being investigated in the HARMONY trial, may provide another interesting approach to increase the antiarrhythmic efficacy and further reduce the incidence of side effects. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying dronedarone's pleiotropic actions is expected to facilitate the selection of patients benefiting from dronedarone, as well as the development of novel antiarrhythmic drugs for AF.

Pleiotropic effects of antiarrhythmic agents: dronedarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation remains the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Dronedarone is an antiarrhythmic drug for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. Dronedarone is an amiodarone derivative developed to reduce the number of extracardiovascular side effects. Dronedarone has undergone extensive experimental and clinical testing during the last decade. On the aggregate, these studies have highlighted a complex set of pleiotropic actions that may contribute to dronedarone's antiarrhythmic effects. In this review, we summarize the clinical studies that have evaluated dronedarone and provide an overview of dronedarone's electrophysiological and nonelectrophysiological pleiotropic actions.