Promoting Limb Salvage through Multi-Disciplinary Care of the Diabetic Patient

Bidirectional Irrigation System to Treat a Difficult Wound: A Case Series

AIMS

To date, there is no distinct principle determining whether to use irrigation under negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT). We developed a new economical device to manage difficult wounds, employing 1 of 2 techniques depending on the wound condition.

METHODS

This case series study was conducted in 12 patients with difficult wound, from 2017 to 2018. Four patients were treated with Type A bidirectional irrigation system (wound irrigation), while 8 patients were treated with Type B bidirectional irrigation system (wound irrigation combined with NPWT).

RESULTS

In the Type A device group, inflammatory profiles in case I, case IV, and case VIII were not monitored due to the stability of their wound. The mean recovery period was 3.75 weeks (2-8 weeks), with decreases in 100% healing rate. In the Type B device group, we noted an average of 71% reduction in inflammatory profiles. All patients' infections were resolved or were healing, and 7 patients recovered satisfactorily. The recovery period ranged from 4 to 17 weeks, with a median value of 7 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Bidirectional irrigation system decreases secondary infections and complications, and increases the healing rate in patients with difficult wound.

Palliative care aspects of wound healing in complex patients: a case report

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Risk Factors for Loss to Follow-Up in the Lower Extremity Limb Salvage Population

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage for chronic lower extremity wounds requires long-term care best delivered by specialized multidisciplinary centers. This optimizes function, reduces amputation rates, and improves mortality. These centers may be limited to urban/academic settings, making access and appropriate follow-up challenging. Therefore, the authors hypothesize that both system- and patient-related factors put this population at exceedingly high risk for loss to follow-up.

METHODS

Records were reviewed retrospectively for 200 new patients seen at the Georgetown Center for Wound Healing in 2013. The primary outcome was loss to follow-up, defined as three consecutive missed appointments despite explicit documentation indicating the need for return visits. Demographic, clinical, and geographic data were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for loss to follow-up status controlled for variables found significant in the bivariate analysis. Spatial dependency was evaluated using variograms.

RESULTS

Over a 6.5-year-period, 49.5 percent of patients followed were lost to follow-up. Male sex and increased driving distance to the limb salvage center were risk factors for loss to follow-up. Wound-specific characteristics including ankle and knee/thigh location were also associated with higher rates of loss to follow-up. There was no spatial dependency or discrete clustering of at-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first of its kind to investigate the demographic and clinical characteristics that predispose chronic lower extremity wound patients to loss to follow-up. These findings inform stakeholders of the high rates of loss to follow-up and support decentralized specialty care, in the form of telemedicine, satellite facilities, and/or dedicated case managers. Future work will focus on targeting vulnerable populations through focused interventions to reduce patient and system burden.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.