Paclitaxel-Based Devices for the Treatment of PAD: Balancing Clinical Efficacy with Possible Risk

Use of paclitaxcel-coated balloons in clinical setting is not associated with increased mortality compared to plain balloon angioplasty in femoropopliteal lesions

OBJECTIVE

To investigate mortality and causes of death associated with the use of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) compared to plain balloon (PB) angioplasty in the treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions in real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent percutaneous femoropopliteal artery angioplasty without stenting between years 2014 and 2020. Patients were stratified into PCB and PB groups according to the index procedure. Those who had undergone any prior or subsequent intervention using drug-eluting technology were excluded from the PB group. Long-term survival was estimated up to 5 years using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factors for all-cause mortality were assessed in a multivariable analysis. Causes of death were retrieved from a national registry.

RESULTS

The study included 139 patients treated with PB and 190 with PCB. Patients treated with PCB had higher prevalence of chronic pulmonary disease (27% vs 17%; P=0.02) and were less often on anticoagulant therapy (34% vs 48%; P=0.01) compared to patients in the PB group. Those treated with PB were more likely to have chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI; 82% vs 72%; P=0.04). Ipsilateral perioperative amputation rate was significantly higher in the PB group (7% vs 1%; P=0.01). There were no major differences in other 30-day outcomes between the groups and no differences in the rates of reinterventions and ipsilateral amputations during a mean follow-up time of 2.7±1.9 years. Survival at 1-year in the PCB group was 83±3% compared to 73±4% in the PB group (P=0.0001). The 5-year survival estimates were 56±5% and 37±5%, respectively. PCB use was independently associated with decreased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.97). Independent risk factors for increased mortality were age (HR 1.04 per year; 95% CI 1.02-1.06), cardiac insufficiency (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.12-2.27), chronic renal insufficiency (HR 2.04; 95% CI 1.47-2.85), anticoagulation therapy (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16-2.34) and CLTI (HR 2.85; 95% CI 1.51-5.39). In the PCB group, 63% of deaths were due to cardiovascular causes compared to 42% in the PB group (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PCB is safe and there is no concern of increased mortality after the procedure based on the 5-year survival estimates.

The Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Is Not Associated with Increased Mortality or Amputations

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Strategies for the most effective treatment for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) remain controversial among clinicians. Several trials have shown improved primary patency of femoropopliteal interventions with the utilization of paclitaxel-coated balloons or stents (DCBS) compared to conventional balloons or stents. However, a 2018 meta-analysis suggested an increased mortality risk for patients receiving DCBS, resulting in an international pause in the use of DCBS. A 2021 meta-analysis by the same group suggested an increased risk of major amputation following DCBS use in peripheral arterial revascularization procedures. Here we report our long-term institutional outcomes comparing uncoated devices to DCBS.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent peripheral arterial angioplasty, stenting, atherectomy, or a combination between 2011 and 2020 within a regional healthcare system was performed. Univariate, multivariate and survival analyses were performed using standard statistical methods to assess the primary endpoints of overall survival, 5-year survival, and amputation-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 2717 patients were identified, of whom 1965 were treated with conventional uncoated devices and 752 were treated with DCBS. Univariate analysis showed that patients treated with non-DCBS had higher rates of overall mortality, major amputations, as well as mortality at 1, 3 and 5 years. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that use of conventional devices, age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, MI, TIA, warfarin use and atrial fibrillation all significantly increased the risk of 5-year mortality, overall mortality, and combined mortality and/or amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

DCBS are not associated with increased mortality or worse amputation-free survival in this real-world cohort of patients treated for PAD. Our data suggest that mortality is more closely linked with pre-existing patient comorbidities rather than device selection at the time of revascularization.

Three-Year Outcomes From the LIBERTY 360 Study of Endovascular Interventions for Peripheral Artery Disease Stratified by Rutherford Category

Purpose:

To report the 3-year results of the LIBERTY 360 study, which investigated outcomes of endovascular treatment of symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Materials and Methods:

The LIBERTY trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01855412) was a prospective, observational, core laboratory–assessed, multicenter study of endovascular interventions enrolling >1200 participants treated at 51 sites. Data from 1189 patients were stratified according to Rutherford category (RC) and analyzed [RC 2-3 (n=500), RC 4-5 (n=589), and RC 6 (n=100)]. The primary outcomes were major amputation of the target limb and all-cause death; secondary outcomes were target vessel revascularization (TVR) or target lesion revascularization (TLR); major adverse events (MAEs; death within 30 days, TVR or TLR, and major amputation); death or major amputation combined; and change in self-reported quality of life (QoL) measures (VascuQol-25). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was employed to estimate the outcomes; estimates are presented with the 95% confidence intervals (CI). Predictors of 3-year MAE, death, TVR, and major amputation were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression modeling.

Results:

The 36-month KM survival rates were 86.0% in RC 2-3, 79.8% in RC 4-5, and 62.0% in RC 6 groups. The KM estimates of freedom from major amputation at 36 months were 98.5% in RC 2-3, 94.0% in RC 4-5, and 79.9% in RC 6. The 36-month KM estimates for freedom from TVR/TLR were 71.1% in RC 2-3, 64.2% in RC 4-5 and 61.9% in RC 6 groups. Patients with claudication at baseline were at lower risk for MAEs compared with RC 4-5 and RC 6 patients during the 36-month follow-up. Vascular QoL improved from baseline and persisted up to 36 months in all patients.

Conclusion:

Endovascular therapy is a viable treatment option for patients with symptomatic PAD, with sustained improved quality of life in both claudicants and patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. These results provide important point estimates for midterm outcomes after modern endovascular interventions for PAD.

Mortality with Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in Peripheral Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

The results of a recent meta-analysis aroused concern about an increased risk of death associated with the use of paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloons and stents in lower-limb endovascular interventions for symptomatic peripheral artery disease.

METHODS

We conducted an unplanned interim analysis of data from a multicenter, randomized, open-label, registry-based clinical trial. At the time of the analysis, 2289 patients had been randomly assigned to treatment with drug-coated devices (the drug-coated-device group, 1149 patients) or treatment with uncoated devices (the uncoated-device group, 1140 patients). Randomization was stratified according to disease severity on the basis of whether patients had chronic limb-threatening ischemia (1480 patients) or intermittent claudication (809 patients). The single end point for this interim analysis was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

No patients were lost to follow-up. Paclitaxel was used as the coating agent for all the drug-coated devices. During a mean follow-up of 2.49 years, 574 patients died, including 293 patients (25.5%) in the drug-coated-device group and 281 patients (24.6%) in the uncoated-device group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.22). At 1 year, all-cause mortality was 10.2% (117 patients) in the drug-coated-device group and 9.9% (113 patients) in the uncoated-device group. During the entire follow-up period, there was no significant difference in the incidence of death between the treatment groups among patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (33.4% [249 patients] in the drug-coated-device group and 33.1% [243 patients] in the uncoated-device group) or among those with intermittent claudication (10.9% [44 patients] and 9.4% [38 patients], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized trial in which patients with peripheral artery disease received treatment with paclitaxel-coated or uncoated endovascular devices, the results of an unplanned interim analysis of all-cause mortality did not show a difference between the groups in the incidence of death during 1 to 4 years of follow-up. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02051088.).

Current developments in endovascular therapy of peripheral vascular disease

More than 200 million people worldwide have peripheral artery disease (PAD) or its most severe manifestation, critical limb ischemia (CLI). While endovascular treatment has become first line therapy in most cases, a number of challenges remain for optimal treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) or infrapopliteal (IP) disease, especially when these lesions are severely calcified, chronic total occlusions (CTOs) or in-stent restenosis (ISR). Continued evolution of technologies has significantly improved the outcomes for endovascular treatment. A number of new devices are in the pipeline right now, including new paclitaxel eluting stents and balloons, intravascular lithotripsy to treat severely calcified lesions, adventitial delivery of anti-restenotic agents to limit restenosis rates, and percutaneous femoro-popliteal bypass.