Chronic Visceral Right Upper Quadrant Pain Without Gallstones

Gastrointestinal Uses of Botulinum Toxin

Botulinum toxin (BT), one of the most powerful inhibitors that prevents the release of acetylcholine from nerve endings, represents an alternative therapeutic approach for "spastic" disorders of the gastrointestinal tract such as achalasia, gastroparesis, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, chronic anal fissures, and pelvic floor dyssynergia.BT has proven to be safe and this allows it to be a valid alternative in patients at high risk of invasive procedures but long-term efficacy in many disorders has not been observed, primarily due to its relatively short duration of action. Administration of BT has a low rate of adverse reactions and complications. However, not all patients respond to BT therapy, and large randomized controlled trials are lacking for many conditions commonly treated with BT.The local injection of BT in some conditions becomes a useful tool to decide to switch to more invasive therapies. Since 1980, the toxin has rapidly transformed from lethal poison to a safe therapeutic agent, with a significant impact on the quality of life.

Treatment of gastrointestinal sphincters spasms with botulinum toxin A

Botulinum toxin A inhibits neuromuscular transmission. It has become a drug with many indications. The range of clinical applications has grown to encompass several neurological and non-neurological conditions. One of the most recent achievements in the field is the observation that botulinum toxin A provides benefit in diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Although toxin blocks cholinergic nerve endings in the autonomic nervous system, it has also been shown that it does not block non-adrenergic non-cholinergic responses mediated by nitric oxide. This has promoted further interest in using botulinum toxin A as a treatment for overactive smooth muscles and sphincters. The introduction of this therapy has made the treatment of several clinical conditions easier, in the outpatient setting, at a lower cost and without permanent complications. This review presents current data on the use of botulinum toxin A in the treatment of pathological conditions of the gastrointestinal tract.

Update on biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the indications, success rates and complications associated with endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Pancreatic and/or biliary sphincterotomies are essential components of most current therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A current large body of evidence has established biliary sphincterotomy as effective in extraction of bile duct stones. The most common complications of biliary sphincterotomy are post-ERCP pancreatitis, as well as acute or delayed hemorrhage, the risks for which can be stratified according to well described patient and procedure related factors. Evidence is accumulating that pancreatic sphincterotomy is useful in at least some settings for treatment of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, chronic pancreatitis, and pancreas divisum. EBD provides an adjunct or an alternative to biliary sphincterotomy for extraction of stones from the bile duct when routine biliary sphincterotomy is inadequate or risk excessive.

SUMMARY

Sphincterotomy and EBD are useful in managing a variety of pancreatobiliary conditions. Attention to risks of these procedures is essential for their efficacy and safety.

Predictors of outcomes after biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy for sphincter of oddi dysfunction

BACKGROUND

There are few data on combined pancreatic and biliary sphincterotomy for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD), especially regarding clinical features that might predict outcomes. We sought to examine the relative importance of various clinical features and the presence or absence of objective biliary abnormalities in determining responses to endoscopic therapy.

METHODS

A cohort of consecutive patients with suspected SOD was treated with biliary sphincterotomy, with additional pancreatic sphincterotomy at initial or subsequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography if there was abnormal pancreatic manometry in conjunction with pain refractory to biliary sphincterotomy, continuous pain, or a history of amylase elevation. Repeat intervention was offered until response was achieved or complete ablation of all treated sphincters was achieved. Response was assessed by patients using a 5-point Likert scale, and multivariate logistic regression analysis used to identify predictors of response.

RESULTS

Of 121 patients, 112 (92%) were female, 105 (87%) postcholecystectomy, and by modified Milwaukee biliary classification 18 (15%) were type I, 53 (44%) type II, and 50 (41%) type III. All patients underwent biliary sphincterotomy and 49 (40%) pancreatic sphincterotomy. Good or excellent response at final follow-up was reported by 83 (69%) of 121 patients, including 37 (61%) of 61 patients requiring repeated intervention. Response was not significantly different between biliary types I, II, and III. Patient characteristics (with adjusted odds ratios) that were significant predictors of poor response were normal pancreatic manometry (4.6), delayed gastric emptying (6.0), daily opioid use (4.0), and age <40 (2.7). Abnormal liver function tests or dilated bile duct were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of SOD incorporating pancreatic and biliary sphincterotomy, patient characteristics and pancreatic sphincter manometry may be more important predictors of outcome than the traditional classification based on liver chemistries and bile duct dilation.