Fecal incontinence

Does the radiofrequency procedure for fecal incontinence improve quality of life and incontinence at 1-year follow-up?

PURPOSE

Fecal incontinence is a socially isolating disease that causes physical and psychologic distress. Radiofrequency delivered to the anal canal is a surgical modality for fecal incontinence that has been noted to be safe and potentially effective. The aim of this study was to evaluate improvement in fecal incontinence and quality of life after the radiofrequency procedure at 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, patients with fecal incontinence for at least 3 months were prospectively recruited between March 2003 and June 2004. Patients enrolled in the study underwent the Secca procedure. The Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire were completed at the first visit and then at 12-month follow-up. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze the difference between baseline and follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients (23 females) were enrolled in the study, and 16 were available at the 12-month follow-up visit. The main causes of fecal incontinence were either idiopathic or included obstetric injury, aging, and trauma from previous anorectal surgeries. The mean operative time was 45.5 +/- 8.3 minutes, and the mean number of radiofrequency lesions in the anal canal was 65.5 +/- 13.8. There were 3 self-limited episodes of postoperative bleeding and 1 instance of constipation that was resolved with laxatives. There were no delayed complications. The mean Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score improved from a mean of 15.6 (+/- 3.2) at baseline to 12.9 (+/- 4.6) at 12 months (P = .035). The mean Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire score improved in all subsets except for the depression subscore.

CONCLUSION

Radiofrequency is a safe, minimally invasive tool for treating patients with fecal incontinence. Improvement in fecal incontinence and quality of life was maintained at 12 months without delayed morbidity. The actual significance of this improvement is yet to be determined.

[Current indications, surgical technique and results of anterior sphincter repair as a treatment of faecal incontinence]

Faecal incontinence is a high prevalence disease in the general population. This pathology is commonly under-estimated and causes a great impact on clinical status and on the quality of life of affected patients. The prevalence of faecal incontinence in several studies has been estimated between 2% and 15% of the general population. The prevalence increases if we study selected populations, such as elderly people. The main cause of faecal incontinence is obstetric anal sphincter damage. In the past years, the presence of incontinence due to sphincter lesions, especially the obstetric ones, was an absolute indication of anterior anal sphincter repair. Actually, after knowing the long term follow up results of this technique, as well as the evolving knowledge on faecal incontinence and the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, this technique might be selected for cases with large sphincter defects. However there is limited information in the current literature on indications, surgical technique and results of anterior sphincter repair. The aim of this review is to analyse scientific evidence on current indications, surgical technique features and results of anterior sphincter repair as a therapy for faecal incontinence, also giving our point of view on controversial issues. A bibliography search was undertaken using Medline database including articles published from January 1985 to January 2009.

Evolving therapy for fecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

Fecal incontinence is common and can be socially debilitating. Nonoperative management of fecal incontinence includes dietary modification, antidiarrheal medication, and biofeedback. The traditional surgical approach is sphincteroplasty if there is a defect of the external sphincter. Innovative treatment modalities have included sacral nerve stimulation, injectable implants, dynamic graciloplasty, and artificial bowel sphincter.

DISCUSSION

This review was designed to assess the various surgical options available for fecal incontinence and critically evaluate the evidence behind these procedures. The algorithm in the surgical treatment of fecal incontinence is shifting. Injectable therapy and sacral nerve stimulation are likely to be the mainstay in future treatment of moderate and severe fecal incontinence, respectively. Sphincteroplasty is limited to a small group of patients with isolated defect of the external sphincter. A stoma, although effective, can be avoided in most cases.