Pancreatic Endotherapy and Necrosectomy

Risk Factors of Multidrug Resistant Pathogens Induced Infection in Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Purpose:

A retrospective study was first performed to assess the multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogen in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) patients who were treated using the step-up approach. We aim to assess the risk factors between MDR pathogen and potential covariates in SAP patients.

Methods:

The clinical data of 51 SAP patients who were treated from June, 2013 to December, 2016 were retrospectively collected. A total of 23 patients in the MDR group and 28 patients in the non-MDR group were reviewed. The risk factors for MDR pathogen-induced infections in SAP patients were analyzed.

Results:

Hyperlipidemia was the leading cause of SAP in our study. The mean duration of hospital stay was significantly longer in the patients with MDR pathogen infections (P=0.0135). The hospitalization expenses of MDR group were much higher than those in non-MDR group. The mortality of MDR group (56.5%) was higher than that in non-MDR group (28.6%) (P=0.0436). Gram-negative isolates (63.8%) were commonly detected in SAP patients. Acinetobacter baumannii was the most common MDR pathogens. Systemic disease (P = 0.0136), initial use of carbapenem (P = 0.0438), and open necrosectomy (P = 0.0002) were the potential risk factors for MDR pathogen-induced infections in SAP. Furthermore, the logistic regression analysis revealed that open necrosectomy was the independent variable for MDR infections (OR: 15.6, 95% CI: 2.951–82.469, P = 0.0012).

Conclusions:

MDR pathogen-induced infections were common in SAP patients and Acinetobacter baumannii was the main pathogen. Meanwhile, open necrosectomy was the independent risk factor for the infection of MDR pathogen.

Comparison of endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage of symptomatic pancreatic necrosis in the early (< 4 weeks) phase of illness

Background and Objective

Pancreatic fluid collections in early phase of illness <4 weeks after onset of acute pancreatitis (AP) are usually treated with percutaneous drainage (PCD). There is a paucity of data comparing early (<4 weeks) endoscopic transluminal drainage (ETD) with PCD in patients with symptomatic pancreatic necrosis (PN). The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of early ETD with PCD in patients with symptomatic PN.

Patients and Methods

Retrospective analysis of database of patients with symptomatic PN treated early (<4 weeks of onset of AP) with either ETD (encapsulated wall on EUS) or PCD.

Results

Twenty-three patients (19 M; mean age: 36.1 years) were treated with ETD and 41 patients (29 M; mean age: 39.6 years) were treated with PCD, respectively. ETD and PCD were done 24.2 ± 2.3 and 24.2 ± 2.0 days after onset of AP, respectively (P = 0.84). In the ETD group, 35% of patients were treated with self-expanding metallic stents and 48% of patients required direct endoscopic necrosectomy. In the PCD group, 74% of patients were treated with multiple catheters and 91% of patients with either saline or streptokinase irrigation. As compared to the ETD group, patients in the PCD group took longer time for resolution (61.9 ± 22.9 days vs. 30.9 ± 5.6 days; P < 0.00001), increased need for surgery (30% vs. 4%; P = 0.01), and frequency of formation of external pancreatic fistula (EPF) (22% vs. nil; P = 0.02).

Conclusions

ETD of PN in early phase of illness is associated with a shorter duration for resolution and infrequent need of salvage surgery compared to PCD. EPF formation is a significant adverse event with PCD.

Endoscopic Management of Acute Biliopancreatic Disorders

PURPOSE

Endoscopy is playing an ever-increasing role in the management of acute biliopancreatic disorders. With the management paradigm shifting away from more invasive surgical approaches, surgeons need to be aware of the treatment options available to improve patient care. Our manuscript serves to improve surgeons' knowledge and understanding of these emerging treatment modalities to expand their algorithmic approach to biliopancreatic disorders.

METHODS

Specific acute biliopancreatic disorders were identified from the literature and personal practice to create a structured review of common problems experienced by a surgeon of the gastrointestinal tract. An exhaustive literature review was performed to identify and analyze endoscopic treatment modalities for these disorders.

RESULTS

Endoscopic therapies continue to expand rapidly with a robust supportive literature. Data on endoscopic treatment strategies for acute biliopancreatic disorders demonstrate valuable improvements in outcomes in a number of these disorders.

DISCUSSION

Acute biliopancreatic disorders represent one of the most challenging pathophysiologies that a surgeon of the gastrointestinal tract may face. This manuscript represents a review of available endoscopic instrumentation as well as the author's interpretation of the current literature regarding indications and outcomes of endoscopic management for acute biliopancreatic disorders. Although this article does not supplant formal training in therapeutic endoscopy, surgeons reading this article should understand the role endoscopy plays in the management of acute biliopancreatic disorders.

An overview of walled-off pancreatic necrosis for clinicians

Walled of pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is a new term coined for encapsulated fluid collection developing after acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP). It is a heterogeneous collection containing varying amount of liquid as well as solid necrotic material. The literature on its natural history as well as appropriate management is gradually expanding thereby improving treatment outcomes of this enigmatic disease. Areas covered: This review discusses currently available literature on etiology, frequency, natural history, and imaging features WOPN. Also, updated treatment options including endoscopic, radiological and surgical drainage are discussed. Expert opinion: WOPN is alocal complication of ANP occurring in the delayed phase of ANP and may be asymptomatic (50%) or present with pain, fever, jaundice, or gastric outlet obstruction. Natural courses of asymptomatic WOPN have been infrequently studied, and it appears that the majority remain asymptomatic and resolve spontaneously. Magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic ultrasound are the best imaging modalities to evaluate solid necrotic debris. Symptomatic WOPN usually needs immediate drainage, this can be done endoscopically, radiologically, or surgically. Current evidence suggests that endoscopic transluminal drainage is the preferred drainage technique as it is effective and associated with lower mortality, risk of organ failure, adverse effects, and length of hospital stay.

Endoscopic management of pancreatic ascites due to duct disruption following acute necrotizing pancreatitis

Background and Aim

Acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) can be associated with pancreatic duct (PD) disruption. PD disruption can lead to the formation of internal fistulae and consequent pancreatic ascites. Pancreatic ascites is reported very rarely following ANP, and therefore, the role of endotherapy in this setting is not defined. To retrospectively study the safety and efficacy of endoscopic drainage in patients with pancreatic ascites following ANP.

Methods

Over a period of 6 years, 12 patients (10 males; mean age: 35.9 ± 7.1 years) with pancreatic ascites following ANP underwent an attempted endoscopic drainage. Patients with a coexistent pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage of PFC whereas patients with pancreatic ascites alone underwent transpapillary drainage alone.

Results

Nine (75%) patients had coexistent PFC, whereas three patients presented with ascites only. The mean size of PFC was 7.2 ± 1.6 cm. Patients with PFC underwent successful EUS-guided transmural drainage (multiple plastic stents in eight and metal stent in one patient) with complete resolution of PFC as well as ascites within 2-3 weeks. Of three patients with ascites alone, one patient had complete PD disruption, whereas two patients had partial PD disruption. Both patients with partial disruption underwent successful placement of bridging transpapillary stent and resolution of ascites at 6 weeks. In patients with complete disruption, a nonbridging stent was placed into the disruption, and ascites resolved after 8 weeks. There has been no recurrence over 27.5 ± 17.7 weeks.

Conclusion

Endoscopic drainage is a safe and effective treatment modality for the treatment of pancreatic ascites following ANP.

Percutaneous catheter drainage followed by endoscopic transluminal drainage/necrosectomy for treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis in early phase of illness

Background and Objectives:

Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) in the early phase is treated with “step up approach” involving initial percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) followed by necrosectomy. There is a paucity of data on a combined approach of initial PCD followed by endoscopic drainage and necrosectomy. A retrospectively study on safety and efficacy of initial PCD followed by endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy in IPN.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of data of 23 patients with IPN who were treated with a combined approach. Patients were divided into two groups as follows: patients with central necrosis in whom PCD and endoscopic drainage were done in the same collection (n = 11) and patients with combined central and peripheral necrosis where PCD was placed in peripheral necrosis, and endoscopic drainage was done for central necrosis (n = 12).

Results:

Endoscopic drainage could be done successfully in all 23 patients with mean time for the resolution being 4.0 ± 0.9 weeks. Fifteen (65.2%) patients were successfully treated using multiple plastic stents while direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) was needed in 8 (34.8%) patients and fully covered self-expanding metal stent was inserted in 6 (26%) patients. The number of endoscopic sessions needed were 3 in 3 (13%), 4 in 9 (39%) patients, 5 in 5 (22%), 6 in 3 (13%), and 7 in 3 (13%) patients, respectively. Patients of central walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) with PCD catheter in situ needed more endoscopic sessions for resolution as well as more frequently needed DEN in comparison to patients with central WOPN with no PCD catheter.

Conclusion:

The combined approach of initial PCD followed by endoscopic drainage and necrosectomy is safe and effective treatment alternative for patients with IPN.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis in patients with portal hypertension and intra-abdominal collaterals

BACKGROUND

Acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) is complicated with segmental portal hypertension (PHT) and formation of venous collaterals. Presence of collaterals in vicinity of endoscopic transmural tract can lead to potentially catastrophic situation. Here, we report safety and outcome of EUS-guided transmural drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) in patients with PHT and intra-abdominal collaterals.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of collected database of patients (n=18; age 40.94±8.43 years; 17 males) who underwent EUS-guided transmural drainage of WOPN and had PHT with collaterals.

RESULTS

Etiology of ANP: alcohol in 14 and gallstones in 3 patients. Mean size of collection was 10.7±3.5 cm, and all 18 patients had splenic vein thrombosis with 1 patient also having portal vein thrombosis. Drainage was not feasible in 1 patient as no window free of collaterals could be found. One patient with gastric variceal bleeding underwent drainage after successful obliteration of varix with glue. Multiple plastic stents were placed in 15 patients and fully covered self-expanding metallic stent (FCSEMS) in 1 patient and 1 patient required direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN). Mean procedures required were 3 ± 0.79 and time to resolution was 4.4 ± 1.3 weeks. One patient had post-drainage bleeding that was successfully managed with intravenous terlipressin and intermittent irrigation via nasocystic catheter. Successfully treated patients have been asymptomatic over follow up period of 15.65±12.2 weeks.

CONCLUSION

EUS-guided drainage of WOPN seems to be safe and effective in patients with portal hypertension and intra-abdominal collaterals.

Endoscopic ultrasound guided transmural drainage of walled off pancreatic necrosis using a "step - up" approach: A single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Walled off necrosis (WON) can be treated endoscopically using multiple transmural plastic stents or fully covered self-expandable metallic stent (FCSEMS) and direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN). We evaluated the efficacy of "step-up" endoscopic transmural approach for treatment of WON.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of data of 86 patients with WON who were treated with attempted endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided "step up" transmural drainage during last 5 years was done. Initially multiple plastic stents were placed and patients not responding underwent FCSEMS placement and/or DEN.

RESULTS

Patients presented 10.8 ± 2.8 weeks after an acute attack of acute pancreatitis and mean size of WON was 10.7 ± 2.9 cm. EUS guided transmural drainage was technically successful in 85/86 (98.8%) patients and 70 (82.4%) were drained with multiple 7/10Fr plastic stents alone while DEN was needed in 9 (10.6%) and FCSEMS was inserted in 6 (7%) patients. All patients had successful outcome with none requiring surgery. The patients who needed DEN/FCSEMS presented earlier and had large size collection with more solid necrotic debris as compared to patients treated with multiple plastic stents alone. The complications were pneumoperitoneum (n = 1), bile leak following cholecystecomy (n = 1), development of external pancreatic fistula following percutaneous drainage (n = 1) and gastrointestinal bleed (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

"Step up" endoscopic transmural drainage using multiple plastic stents as an initial therapy is safe and effective treatment of WON and avoids more aggressive DEN in majority of patients. Large size WON with more necrotic debris may require DEN.