Recent Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery

Identification of Tissue miRNA Signatures for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), a neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, is the most common pancreatic malignancy (90%) and the fourth highest cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Surgery intervention is currently the only strategy able to offer an advantage in terms of overall survival, but prognosis remains poor even for operated patients. Therefore, the development of robust biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognostic stratification in clinical practice is urgently needed. In this work, we investigated deregulated microRNAs (miRNAs) in tissues from PDAC patients with high (G3) or low (G2) histological grade and with (N+) or without (N-) lymph node metastases. miRNA expression profiling was performed by a comprehensive PCR array and subsequent validation by RT-qPCR. The results showed a significant increase in miR-1-3p, miR-31-5p, and miR-205-5p expression in G3 compared to G2 patients (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; *** p < 0.001). miR-518d-3p upregulation and miR-215-5p downregulation were observed in N+ compared to N- patients. A statistical analysis performed using OncomiR program showed the significant involvement (p < 0.05) of two miRNAs (miR-31 and miR-205) in the histological grade of PDAC patients. Also, an expression analysis in PDAC patients showed that miR-31 and miR-205 had the highest expression at grade 3 compared with normal and other tumor grades. Overall, survival plots confirmed that the overexpression of miR-31 and miR-205 was significantly correlated with decreased survival in TCGA PDAC clinical samples. A KEGG pathway analysis showed that all three miRNAs are involved in the regulation of multiple pathways, including the Hippo signaling, adherens junction and microRNAs in cancer, along with several target genes. Based on in silico analysis and experimental validation, our study suggests the potential role of miR-1-3p, miR-31-5p, and miR-205-5p as useful clinical biomarkers and putative therapeutic targets in PDAC, which should be further investigated to determine the specific molecular processes affected by their aberrant expression.

A Paradigm Shifts: Neoadjuvant Therapy for Clearly Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Over the past decade, neoadjuvant therapy has become the standard of care for patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The surgical community remains divided regarding the value of neoadjuvant therapy for patients who present with clearly resectable disease. Thus far, randomized controlled trials comparing neoadjuvant therapy with conventional upfront surgical strategies for patients with clearly resectable pancreatic cancer have been plagued by poor accrual, and are often underpowered. Nonetheless, meta-analyses of the results of these trials suggest that neoadjuvant therapy can be offered as an acceptable standard of care for patients with clearly resectable pancreatic cancer. Previous trials used neoadjuvant gemcitabine, but more recent studies have demonstrated superior survival for patients who were able to tolerate neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin). The increased utilization of FOLFIRINOX may be shifting the treatment paradigm in favor of neoadjuvant therapy among patients with clearly resectable disease. Randomized controlled trials assessing the value of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in clearly resectable pancreatic cancer, which are expected to provide more conclusive recommendations, are still ongoing. This review outlines the rationale, considerations, and current level of evidence for the use of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with clearly resectable pancreatic cancer.

European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC): Pancreatic Cancer

European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC) are written by experts representing all disciplines involved in cancer care in Europe. They give patients, health professionals, managers and policymakers a guide to essential care throughout the patient journey. Pancreatic cancer is an increasing cause of cancer mortality and has wide variation in treatment and care in Europe. It is a major healthcare burden and has complex diagnosis and treatment challenges. Care must be carried out only in pancreatic cancer units or centres that have a core multidisciplinary team (MDT) and an extended team of health professionals detailed here. Such units are far from universal in European countries. To meet European aspirations for comprehensive cancer control, healthcare organisations must consider the requirements in this paper, paying particular attention to multidisciplinarity and patient-centred pathways from diagnosis, to treatment, to survivorship.

Pancreatic Cancer (PDAC): Introduction of Evidence-Based Complementary Measures into Integrative Clinical Management

The most common form of pancreatic cancer is pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which comprises some 85% of all cases. Currently, this is the fourth highest cause of cancer mortality worldwide and its incidence is rising steeply. Commonly applied clinical therapies offer limited chance of a lasting cure and the five-year survival rate is one of the lowest of the commonly occurring cancers. This review cultivates the hypothesis that the best management of PDAC would be possible by integrating 'western' clinical medicine with evidence-based complementary measures. Protecting the liver, where PDAC frequently first spreads, is also given some consideration. Overall, the complementary measures are divided into three groups: dietary factors, nutraceutical agents and lifestyle. In turn, dietary factors are considered as general conditioners, multi-factorial foodstuffs and specific compounds. The general conditioners are alkalinity, low-glycemic index and low-cholesterol. The multi-factorial foodstuffs comprise red meat, fish, fruit/vegetables, dairy, honey and coffee. The available evidence for the beneficial effects of the specific dietary and nutraceutical agents was considered at four levels (in order of prominence): clinical trials, meta-analyses, in vivo tests and in vitro studies. Thus, 9 specific agents were identified (6 dietary and 3 nutraceutical) as acceptable for integration with gemcitabine chemotherapy, the first-line treatment for pancreatic cancer. The specific dietary agents were the following: Vitamins A, C, D and E, genistein and curcumin. As nutraceutical compounds, propolis, triptolide and cannabidiol were accepted. The 9 complementary agents were sub-grouped into two with reference to the main 'hallmarks of cancer'. Lifestyle factors covered obesity, diabetes, smoking, alcohol and exercise. An integrative treatment regimen was devised for the management of PDAC patients. This involved combining first-line gemcitabine chemotherapy with the two sub-groups of complementary agents alternately in weekly cycles. The review concludes that integrated management currently offers the best patient outcome. Opportunities to be investigated in the future include emerging modalities, precision medicine, the nerve input to tumors and, importantly, clinical trials.

Assessing the influence of experience in pancreatic surgery: a risk-adjusted analysis using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database

BACKGROUND

The association between higher surgical volume and better perioperative outcomes after pancreatectomy has been extensively demonstrated. However, how different notions of experience impact outcomes of surgeons operating within high-quality scenarios remains unclear.

METHODS

Self-reported experience parameters from ACS-NSQIP HPB-Collaborative surgeons were merged with 2014-2016 ACS-NSQIP clinical data. The association of various experience parameters with outcomes was investigated through uni- and multivariable analyses. Hierarchical regression assessed surgeon performance.

RESULTS

111/151 HPB-Collaborative surgeons provided responses (73.5%). Compared to the other 532 ACS-NSQIP surgeons performing pancreatectomy, HPB-Collaborative surgeons performed 7692/16,239 of the overall pancreatectomies (47.3%), with improved outcomes of serious morbidity, pancreatic fistula, reoperation, duration of stay and readmissions. Median age of respondents was 49 years and 92.8% were fellowship-trained. Median career and annual pancreatectomy volume were 400 and 35, respectively; median annual institutional volume was 100 resections. On unadjusted analyses, several aspects of experience were associated with the outcomes studied, especially for pancreatoduodenectomy; however, none remained significant after multivariable adjustment. Surgeons' profiling showed substantial homogeneity in performance for both pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary data shows that for surgeons operating in high quality settings clinical outcomes are largely independent of indicators of greater experience.

Defining the practice of distal pancreatectomy around the world

BACKGROUND

Best management practices for distal pancreatectomy (DP) have not been conclusively defined. The aim of this study was to analyze the practice of DP worldwide and to compare surgeons' behavior with the best available evidence.

METHODS

A survey assessing management approaches for DP was distributed worldwide, in eight native-language translations. Regions were clustered: North-America, South/Central America, Asia/Australia, and Europe/Africa/Middle East.

RESULTS

Overall, 721/797 (91%) responding surgeons (median age = 48; years of experience = 14) indicated their region, representing six continents and 68 nations. Use of minimally-invasive (MI) techniques is diverse-highest in North-America (p < 0.001). Laparoscopy is the most common MI approach, while robotic techniques are rarely performed outside North-America. The preferred means of pancreatic remnant closure is via stapler - more commonly applied in North-America than in Europe/Africa/Middle East. Management techniques for the remnant and other fistula mitigation strategies display significant regional variability. The use of drains is also diverse, with the biggest disparity between North-American and Asian/Australian surgeons (selective and routine drainers, respectively).

CONCLUSION

There is wide heterogeneity in practices for DP worldwide, which is influenced by the surgeon's region of practice. Variability in practice reflects the lack of solid evidence on the benefit of any given strategy, underlining areas for improvement.

Outcomes of Primary Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Importance

Chemotherapy is the recommended induction strategy in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, the associated results on an intention-to-treat basis are poorly understood.

Objective

To investigate pragmatically the treatment compliance, conversion to surgery, and survival outcomes of patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing primary chemotherapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective study took place in a national referral center for pancreatic diseases in Italy. Consecutive patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were enrolled at the time of diagnosis (January 2013 through December 2015) and followed up to June 2018.

Exposures

The chemotherapy regimen, assigned based on multidisciplinary evaluation, was delivered either at a hub center or at spoke centers. By convention, primary chemotherapy was considered completed after 6 months. After restaging, surgical candidates were selected based on radiologic and biochemical response. All surgeries were carried out at the hub center.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Rates of receipt and completion of chemotherapy, rates of conversion to surgery, and disease-specific survival.

Results

Of 680 patients, 267 (39.3%) had borderline resectable and 413 (60.7%) had locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Overall, 66 patients (9.7%) were lost to follow-up. The rate of chemotherapy receipt was 92.9% (n = 570). The chemotherapeutic regimens most commonly used included FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) (260 [45.6%]) and gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel (123 [21.6%]). Nineteen patients (3.3%) receiving chemotherapy died within 6 months, mainly for disease progression. The treatment completion rate was 71.6% (408 of 570). The overall rate of resection was 15.1% (93 of 614) (borderline resectable, 60 of 249 [24.1%]; locally advanced, 33 of 365 [9%]; resection:exploration ratio, 63.3%). Independent predictors of resection were age, borderline resectable disease, chemotherapy completion, radiologic response, and biochemical response. The median survival for the whole cohort was 12.8 (95% CI, 11.7-13.9) months. Factors independently associated with survival were completion of chemotherapy, receipt of complementary radiation therapy, and resection. In patients who underwent resection, the median survival was 35.4 (95% CI, 27.0-43.7) months for initially borderline resectable and 41.8 (95% CI, 27.5-56.1) months for initially locally advanced disease. No pretreatment and posttreatment factors were associated with survival after pancreatectomy.

Conclusions and Relevance

This pragmatic observational cohort study with an intention-to-treat design provides real-world evidence of outcomes associated with the most current primary chemotherapy regimens used for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery in Europe

BACKGROUND

The objective of this article is a review and an analysis of the current state of centralization of pancreatic surgery in Europe. Numerous recent publications demonstrate higher postoperative in-hospital mortality rates in low-volume clinics after pancreatic resection than previously assumed due to their not publishing significantly worse outcomes when compared to high-volume centres. Although the benefits of centralization of pancreatic surgery in high-volume centres have been demonstrated in many studies, numerous countries have so far failed to establish centralization in their respective health care systems.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the Medline database for studies concerning centralization of pancreatic surgery in Europe was conducted. The studies were reviewed independently for previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We included 14 studies with a total of 117,634 patients. All data were extracted from or provided by health insurance company or governmental registry databases.

RESULTS

Thirteen out of the 14 studies demonstrate an improvement in their respective outcome related to volume. Twelve studies showed a significantly lower postoperative mortality rate in the highest annual volume group in comparison to overall postoperative mortality rate in the whole patient cohort.

CONCLUSION

As the available data indicate, most European countries have so far failed to establish centralization of pancreatic surgery to high-volume centres due to numerous reasons. Considering a plateau in survival rates of patients undergoing treatment for pancreatic cancer in Europe during the last 15 years, this review enforces the worldwide plea for centralization to lower post-operative mortality after pancreatic surgery.

Pancreatic cancer – What's next?

This chapter focuses on the most recent advantages in the medical treatment of localized pancreatic cancer.

Primarily resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma - to operate or to refer the patient to an oncologist?

The aim of this work is to investigate the optimal therapeutic sequence of resectable pancreatic cancer - primary surgery with adjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant followed by resection. Application of the neoadjuvant approach in routine treatment of pancreatic cancer is rapidly growing every year, despite the lack of final results from randomized trials. Recent advancements in the adjuvant therapy, due to the more effective chemotherapy regimens, favor the upfront surgery strategy. On the other hand, theoretical background and metaanalyses favor the neoadjuvant strategy. Currently, primary resection with adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard approach in resectable pancreatic cancer, but the first recommendations considering the neoadjuvant approach as an option seem to arise among the scientific societies with a global impact. Preliminary results of Prodige 24 study and PREOPANC-1 trial demonstrates that both options are worth further evaluation in clinical trials. Their results should soon provide more answers to this important clinical questions.

Efficacy and safety of CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in primary and secondary malignancies of the pancreas

PURPOSE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of CT-guided iBT in patients with primary and secondary malignancies of the pancreas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

13 patients with 13 lesions of the pancreatic corpus and tail were included: 8 secondary malignancies (metastatic lesions = ML) and 5 primary malignancies, including 3 primary tumors (PT) and 2 isolated locoregional recurrences (ILR) after surgical resection were treated with image-guided iBT using a 192iridium source (single fraction irradiation). Every 3 months after treatment clinical and imaging follow-up were conducted to evaluate efficacy. Peri- and postinterventional complications were assessed descriptively.

RESULTS

The median diameter of the gross tumor volume (GTV) was 3 cm (range 1-6.5 cm), treated with a median D100 (minimal enclosing tumor dose) of 15.3 Gy (range 9.2-25.4 Gy). Local tumor control (LTC) was 92.3% within a median follow-up period of 6.7 months (range 3.2-55.7 months). Cumulative median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.2 months (range 2.8-25.7 months; PFS of primary and secondary malignancies was 5.8 and 6.2 months, respectively). Cumulative median over all survival (OS) after iBT was 16.2 months (range 3.3-55.7 months; OS of primary and secondary malignancies was 7.4 months and 45.6 months, respectively). 1 patient developed mild acute pancreatits post iBT, spontanously resolved within 1 week. No severe adverse events (grade 3+) were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Image-guided iBT is a safe and particularly effective treatment in patients with primary and secondary malignancies of the pancreas and might provide a well-tolerated additional therapeutic option in the multidisciplinary management of selected patients.

Impact of Operative Time on Outcomes after Pancreatic Resection: A Risk-Adjusted Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database

BACKGROUND

Longer operative time (OT) has been associated with negative outcomes in various surgical procedures, but its role in pancreatic resection, a complex, high-acuity endeavor, is not yet well defined. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between OT and pancreatectomy outcomes in a risk-adjusted fashion.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) between 2014 and 2015 using the procedure-targeted pancreatectomy database of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP. Univariable analyses and multiple backward stepwise conditional logistic regression models were used to assess the impact of OT on postoperative occurrences.

RESULTS

Among 10,157 patients, 6,844 PDs and 3,313 DPs were performed. Median operative time was 358 minutes (interquartile range 282 to 444 minutes) for PD and 213 minutes (interquartile range 157 to 285 minutes) for DP. Male sex, younger age, obesity, neoadjuvant treatment, minimally invasive approaches, and vascular/concurrent organ resections were associated with longer OT for both procedures. Morbidity increased in a stepwise manner with increasing OT. After risk adjustment, increasing OT was negatively associated with overall morbidity, major complications, pancreatectomy-specific complications, infectious complications, and prolonged hospital stay. These associations were independent from patients' preoperative characteristics, operative approach, vascular or concurrent organ resection, and postoperative diagnosis. These findings held true for both PD and DP. Conversely, the association between OT and mortality was mainly driven by the excessive operative durations for PDs, and was not significant for DPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer OT is independently associated with worse perioperative outcomes after pancreatic resection, and should be considered a relevant parameter in risk-adjustment processes for outcomes evaluation. These findings suggest possible areas of quality improvement through individual and system-level initiatives.

Contemporary Management of Localized Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer is the third most common cause of cancer deaths in the United States. Surgical resection with negative margins still constitutes the cornerstone of potentially curative therapy, but is possible only in 15–20% of patients at the time of initial diagnosis. Accumulating evidence suggests that the neoadjuvant approach may improve R0 resection rate in localized resectable and borderline resectable diseases, and potentially downstage locally advanced disease to achieve surgical resection, though the impact on survival is to be determined. Despite advancements in the last decade in developing effective combinational chemo-radio therapeutic options, preoperative treatment strategies, and better peri-operative care, pancreatic cancer continues to carry a dismal prognosis in the majority. Prodigious efforts are currently being made in optimizing the neoadjuvant therapy with a better toxicity profile, developing novel agents, imaging techniques, and identification of biomarkers for the disease. Advancement in our understanding of the tumor microenvironment and molecular pathology is urgently needed to facilitate the development of novel targeted and immunotherapies for this setting. In this review, we detail the current literature on contemporary management of resectable, borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer with a focus on future directions in the field.