1
|
Fernández Aceñero MJ, Díaz del Arco C. Hereditary Gastrointestinal Tumor Syndromes: When Risk Comes with Your Genes. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2024; 46:6440-6471. [PMID: 39057027 PMCID: PMC11275188 DOI: 10.3390/cimb46070385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite recent campaigns for screening and the latest advances in cancer therapy and molecular biology, gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms remain among the most frequent and lethal human tumors. Most GI neoplasms are sporadic, but there are some well-known familial syndromes associated with a significant risk of developing both benign and malignant GI tumors. Although some of these entities were described more than a century ago based on clinical grounds, the increasing molecular information obtained with high-throughput techniques has shed light on the pathogenesis of several of them. The vast amount of information gained from next-generation sequencing has led to the identification of some high-risk genetic variants, although others remain to be discovered. The opportunity for genetic assessment and counseling in these families has dramatically changed the management of these syndromes, though it has also resulted in significant psychological distress for the affected patients, especially those with indeterminate variants. Herein, we aim to summarize the most relevant hereditary cancer syndromes involving the stomach and colon, with an emphasis on new molecular findings, novel entities, and recent changes in the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Jesús Fernández Aceñero
- Department of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Díaz del Arco
- Department of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bolivar AM, Duzagac F, Sinha KM, Vilar E. Advances in vaccine development for cancer prevention and treatment in Lynch Syndrome. Mol Aspects Med 2023; 93:101204. [PMID: 37478804 PMCID: PMC10528439 DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2023.101204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
Lynch Syndrome (LS) is one of the most common hereditary cancer syndromes, and is caused by mutations in one of the four DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, namely MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. Tumors developed by LS carriers display high levels of microsatellite instability, which leads to the accumulation of large numbers of mutations, among which frameshift insertion/deletions (indels) within microsatellite (MS) loci are the most common. As a result, MMR-deficient (MMRd) cells generate increased rates of tumor-specific neoantigens (neoAgs) that can be recognized by the immune system to activate cancer cell killing. In this context, LS is an ideal disease to leverage immune-interception strategies. Therefore, the identification of these neoAgs is an ongoing effort for the development of LS cancer preventive vaccines. In this review, we summarize the computational methods used for in silico neoAg prediction, including their challenges, and the experimental techniques used for in vitro validation of their immunogenicity. In addition, we outline results from past and on-going vaccine clinical trials and highlight avenues for improvement and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana M Bolivar
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fahriye Duzagac
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Krishna M Sinha
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eduardo Vilar
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A Canadian Provincial Screening Program for Lynch Syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:345-353. [PMID: 36219179 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Manitoba implemented the first Canadian provincial program of reflex screening through mismatch repair immunohistochemistry (MMR-IHC) for all colorectal cancers diagnosed at age 70 years or younger in December 2017. We evaluated compliance to universal reflex testing and for referrals to Genetics for individuals with MMR-deficient tumors. METHODS We searched the provincial pathology database with "adenocarcinoma" in the colorectal specimen pathology reports between March 2018 and December 2020. We cross-referenced with paper and electronic records in the Program of Genetics and Metabolism to determine whether patients with MMR-deficient tumors had been referred for Genetic assessment and what proportion of patients and first-degree relatives accepted an appointment and genetic testing. We performed logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of testing. RESULTS We identified 3,146 colorectal adenocarcinoma specimens (biopsies and surgical resections) from 1,692 unique individuals (mean age 68.66 years, male 57%). Of those aged 70 years or younger (n = 936), 89.4% received MMR-IHC screening. Individual pathologists (categorized by the highest, average, and lowest screening rates) were the biggest predictors of MMR-IHC screening on multivariable analysis (highest vs lowest: odds ratio 17.5, 95% confidence interval 6.05-50.67). While only 53.4% (n = 31) of 58 screen-positive cases were referred by pathologists for genetic assessment, other clinicians referred an additional 22.4% (n = 13), resulting in 75.8% overall referral rate of screen-positive cases. Thirteen (1.4%) patients (1.1%, aged 70 years or younger) were confirmed to experience Lynch syndrome through germline testing, and 8 first-degree relatives (an average of 1.6 per patient) underwent cascade genetic testing. DISCUSSION The first Canadian Lynch syndrome screening program has achieved high rates of reflex testing.
Collapse
|
4
|
Sei S, Ahadova A, Keskin DB, Bohaumilitzky L, Gebert J, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Lipkin SM, Kloor M. Lynch syndrome cancer vaccines: A roadmap for the development of precision immunoprevention strategies. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1147590. [PMID: 37035178 PMCID: PMC10073468 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1147590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS) account for 5~10% of all cancer diagnosis. Lynch syndrome (LS) is one of the most common HCS, caused by germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Even with prospective cancer surveillance, LS is associated with up to 50% lifetime risk of colorectal, endometrial, and other cancers. While significant progress has been made in the timely identification of germline pathogenic variant carriers and monitoring and early detection of precancerous lesions, cancer-risk reduction strategies are still centered around endoscopic or surgical removal of neoplastic lesions and susceptible organs. Safe and effective cancer prevention strategies are critically needed to improve the life quality and longevity of LS and other HCS carriers. The era of precision oncology driven by recent technological advances in tumor molecular profiling and a better understanding of genetic risk factors has transformed cancer prevention approaches for at-risk individuals, including LS carriers. MMR deficiency leads to the accumulation of insertion and deletion mutations in microsatellites (MS), which are particularly prone to DNA polymerase slippage during DNA replication. Mutations in coding MS give rise to frameshift peptides (FSP) that are recognized by the immune system as neoantigens. Due to clonal evolution, LS tumors share a set of recurrent and predictable FSP neoantigens in the same and in different LS patients. Cancer vaccines composed of commonly recurring FSP neoantigens selected through prediction algorithms have been clinically evaluated in LS carriers and proven safe and immunogenic. Preclinically analogous FSP vaccines have been shown to elicit FSP-directed immune responses and exert tumor-preventive efficacy in murine models of LS. While the immunopreventive efficacy of "off-the-shelf" vaccines consisting of commonly recurring FSP antigens is currently investigated in LS clinical trials, the feasibility and utility of personalized FSP vaccines with individual HLA-restricted epitopes are being explored for more precise targeting. Here, we discuss recent advances in precision cancer immunoprevention approaches, emerging enabling technologies, research gaps, and implementation barriers toward clinical translation of risk-tailored prevention strategies for LS carriers. We will also discuss the feasibility and practicality of next-generation cancer vaccines that are based on personalized immunogenic epitopes for precision cancer immunoprevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shizuko Sei
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States
- *Correspondence: Shizuko Sei, ; Steven M. Lipkin, ; Matthias Kloor,
| | - Aysel Ahadova
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Derin B. Keskin
- Translational Immunogenomics Laboratory, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Broad Institute of The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States
- Department of Computer Science, Metropolitan College, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Lena Bohaumilitzky
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Gebert
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steven M. Lipkin
- Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
- *Correspondence: Shizuko Sei, ; Steven M. Lipkin, ; Matthias Kloor,
| | - Matthias Kloor
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Shizuko Sei, ; Steven M. Lipkin, ; Matthias Kloor,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thompson CA, Tiedt J, Beqiri M, Smith DW. A Retrospective Evaluation of a Nurse Practitioner-Led Cancer Genetics Program. J Nurse Pract 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
6
|
Gudgeon JM, Wallentine JC, Bonham EM, McLaughlin HD, Dodson MK. Determination of test performance of two contemporary screening tests for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer: A clinical trial. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:34-38. [PMID: 34689999 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Published data on the performance of the immunohistochemistry (IHC) test for mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression to detect Lynch syndrome (LS) index cases suggests it is highly variable; its performance in our system was unknown. Moreover, a brief family history questionnaire (bFHQ) developed by Eiriksson and colleagues in Canada demonstrated 100% sensitivity for LS case identification thus was of interest to us, but its performance outside of its original setting was unknown. Determination of the performance of these tests requires complete LS case identification in the testing population. METHODS Two hundred women were recruited during routine care for endometrial cancer (EC) to administer the bFHQ and perform genetic testing for the LS genes. Independently, the IHC test was performed to screen for presumptive LS cases. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the bFHQ and IHC test as well as simulating outcomes of the complete protocols. RESULTS Genetic testing all participants identified 8 cases of LS out of 200 (4% prevalence), the bFHQ identified 5 of 8 of these cases (62.5%, CI: 31.5%-87.6%), and the IHC test identified 6 or 7 of 8 cases (mean of 75% or 87.5%) depending on interpretation of test results. The specificities of the bFHQ and IHC test were 56.8% (CI: 49.8%-63.7%) and 79.8% (CI: 73.6%-85.1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first, to our knowledge, to test the effectiveness of the bFHQ in an EC population since its original reporting; our results are consistent with many reports of the challenges of collecting family health history. The performance of the IHC test as a screen falls within ranges reported in the literature but do not provide the confidence to drive a decision for or against continued use of this test as a LS screen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Gudgeon
- Intermountain Precision Genomics, 383 West Vine Street, Suite 300, Murray, UT 84123, USA.
| | - Jeremy C Wallentine
- Intermountain Central Laboratory, 5252 South Intermountain Drive, Murray, UT 84107, USA.
| | - Emily M Bonham
- Intermountain Precision Genomics, 383 West Vine Street, Suite 300, Murray, UT 84123, USA.
| | - Hannah D McLaughlin
- Department of OB/GYN, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Utah, 50 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
| | - Mark K Dodson
- Department of OB/GYN, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Utah, 50 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maratt JK, Rubenstein JH. Tailoring Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Lynch Syndrome: More Is Not Always Better. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:411-412. [PMID: 33961883 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Maratt
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana; Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Joel H Rubenstein
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, LTC Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
He X, Cheng G, Xiao F, Zhang L, Jin G, Zhao X, Liu Y, Liang J, Li Y, Liu Z, Yuan Q, Ren H, Wu Q, Wu J, Xue L, Feng J, Wang Z, Xing Y, Wu W, Li Z, Wei D, Song X. miR-4477b gene as a novel pathogenic mutation occurring during the transformation of colorectal adenoma into colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:69-78. [PMID: 33708425 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Polyps may develop into colorectal cancer (CRC) after 10-20 years. The occurrence of polyps and tumors caused by somatic gene mutations is considered a main pathogenesis of CRC. Among all general patients with polyps or CRC, some had adenoma of varying degrees that were consistent with familial colorectal adenomas. A patient with CRC (the propositus) and his brothers and sister, all of whom had varying degrees of colorectal polyps showed different adenomas with different members in a family. Methods In the present study, a total of 9 family members were investigated, and a family tree was drawn. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral venous blood samples from family members, and whole-exome sequencing (WES) and Sanger sequencing were performed on the DNA samples. The result of WES was compared with compared directly to the reference genome (hg19) with Burrows-Wheeler Aligner, which is as control group from. Results We identified a base substitution in the miR-4477b gene (c.68415368T>G, chromosome 9 q13), predicted the target gene of miR-4477b through the biologic website, and analyzed the Gene Ontology (GO) and signal pathway of the target gene. The GO functional annotation analysis of the target gene of mir4477b revealed that these genes are involved mainly in the G1/S transition of the mitotic cell cycle, activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase activity, protein phosphorylation, and membrane, centrosome, cytoplasm, zinc ion-binding, protein-binding, and ligase activity. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genomes pathway analysis revealed that miR-4477b regulates target genes mainly involved in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway, regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, proteoglycans in cancer, pathways in cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. Conclusions The mutation of the has-mir-4477b gene likely leads to the occurrence of adenoma and CRC. In-depth studies of patients from the same family with different stages of adenoma can avoid errors caused by gene diversity, incomplete clinical data, and uncertain disease development. The has-mir-4477b gene may represent a key gene mutation in colorectal carcinogenesis and a multiyear cancer risk for patients that requires further attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu He
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Guohua Cheng
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Feng Xiao
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Gang Jin
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xin Zhao
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Ying Liu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Juan Liang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Yarong Li
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Zhaoyu Liu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Qiang Yuan
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Hongwei Ren
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Qilong Wu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Jinrong Wu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Lili Xue
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Jing Feng
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Zhihui Wang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Yueming Xing
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Wei Wu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Zheng Li
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Dong Wei
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xiang Song
- Department of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Spinosa D, Acosta T, Wong J, Kurtovic K, Mewshaw J, Collins S, Kauff N, Havrilesky LJ, Strickland KC, Previs RA. Universal screening for Lynch syndrome in uterine cancer patients: A quality improvement initiative. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 160:169-174. [PMID: 33393478 PMCID: PMC7577655 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a quality improvement initiative (QI) to adopt universal screening for Lynch syndrome in uterine cancer patients at an institution that previously employed age-based screening. METHODS Prior to the initiative, tumors of patients with uterine cancer diagnosed at age ≤ 60 years were screened for mismatch repair deficiency (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI). The QI process change model adopted universal testing of all uterine cancer specimens and implemented provider training, standardized documentation, and enhanced use of the electronic medical record (EMR). We compared screening rates, results of screening, follow up of abnormal results, and final diagnoses from the pre- and post-implementation periods. RESULTS Pre- and post-implementation screening rates for women age ≤ 60 years at the time of diagnosis were 45/78 (57.7%) and 64/68 (94.5%), respectively. The screening rate for all patients with uterine cancer increased from 73/190 (38.4%) to 172/182 (94.5%). The rate of abnormal screening results increased from 15/190 (7.9%) to 44/182 (24.0%) cases. Genetics referral rates among screen positives increased from 3/15 (20.0%) to 16/44 (36.4%). Germline diagnoses increased from 2/190 (1.1%) with two Lynch syndrome diagnoses to 4/182 (2.2%) including three Lynch syndrome diagnoses and one BRCA1 germline diagnosis. The number of patients errantly not screened decreased from at least 32 patients to 3 patients after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to screening guidelines significantly improved after interventions involving provider education, optimal use of the EMR, and simplification of screening indications. These interventions are feasible at other institutions and translatable to other screening indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Spinosa
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
| | - Tatiana Acosta
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Janice Wong
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Kelli Kurtovic
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Mewshaw
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Sarah Collins
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Noah Kauff
- Clinical Cancer Genetics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Laura J Havrilesky
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Kyle C Strickland
- Department of Pathology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Rebecca A Previs
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ibarvo Gracia HM, Saldaña Sanchez IG, Natour AK. On Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: What Is the Appropriate Surgical Technique? CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-020-00457-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|