Treatment and Prophylaxis of Hematologic Malignancy in the Central Nervous System

Differentiating central nervous system infection from disease infiltration in hematological malignancy

Hematological malignancies place individuals at risk of CNS involvement from their hematological disease and opportunistic intracranial infection secondary to disease-/treatment-associated immunosuppression. Differentiating CNS infection from hematological disease infiltration in these patients is valuable but often challenging. We sought to determine if statistical models might aid discrimination between these processes. Neuroradiology, clinical and laboratory data for patients with hematological malignancy at our institution between 2007 and 2017 were retrieved. MRI were deep-phenotyped across anatomical distribution, presence of pathological enhancement, diffusion restriction and hemorrhage and statistically modelled with Bayesian-directed probability networks and multivariate logistic regression. 109 patients were studied. Irrespective of a diagnosis of CNS infection or hematological disease, the commonest anatomical distributions of abnormality were multifocal-parenchymal (34.9%), focal-parenchymal (29.4%) and leptomeningeal (11.9%). Pathological enhancement was the most frequently observed abnormality (46.8%), followed by hemorrhage (22.9%) and restricted diffusion (19.3%). Logistic regression could differentiate CNS infection from hematological disease infiltration with an AUC of 0.85 where, with OR > 1 favoring CNS infection and < 1 favoring CNS hematological disease, significantly predictive imaging features were hemorrhage (OR 24.61, p = 0.02), pathological enhancement (OR 0.17, p = 0.04) and an extra-axial location (OR 0.06, p = 0.05). In conclusion, CNS infection and hematological disease are heterogeneous entities with overlapping radiological appearances but a multivariate interaction of MR imaging features may assist in distinguishing them.

Ponatinib therapy in recurrent Philadelphia chromosome-positive central nervous system leukemia with T315I mutation after Allo-HSCT

Central nervous system leukemia (CNSL) relapse is relatively common among Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) leukemia patients who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The prognosis of patients is dismal for those with a BCR-ABL T315I mutation, which is resistant to TKIs including second-generation drugs. We assessed ponatinib for nine patients with recurrent Ph+ CNSL and a T315I mutation after allo-HSCT, including five patients with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia and four with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Five patients experienced isolated CNSL relapse, and four experienced CNSL with hematologic relapse. All patients received ponatinib combined with intrathecal chemotherapy, and four patients with hematologic relapse received systemic chemotherapy and/or donor lymphocyte infusion. All patients achieved a deep molecular response and central nervous system remission (CNSR) at a median time of 1.5 (range: 0.7-3) months after ponatinib treatment. Two patients experienced a second CNSL relapse due to ponatinib reduction, but they achieved CNSR again after an increase to the standard dosage. Six patients developed graft versus host disease. By April 1, 2019, eight patients were alive, and one died of pneumonia. The median time of survival after the first CNSL relapse posttransplantation was 18 (range: 11.2-48.5) months. Our data from a small number of samples suggests that ponatinib is effective for recurrent Ph+ CNSL patients with a BCR-ABL T315I mutation after allo-HSCT and warrants broader clinical evaluation.

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of malignancies located in the central nervous system

CNS malignancies include primary tumors that originate within the CNS as well as secondary tumors that develop as a result of metastatic cancer. The delicate nature of the nervous systems makes tumors located in the CNS notoriously difficult to reach, which poses several problems during diagnosis and treatment. CSF can be acquired relatively easy through lumbar puncture and offers an important compartment for analysis of cells and molecules that carry information about the malignant process. Such techniques have opened up a new field of research focused on the identification of specific biomarkers for several types of CNS malignancies, which may help in diagnosis and monitoring of tumor progression or treatment response. Biomarkers are sought in DNA, (micro)RNA, proteins, exosomes and circulating tumor cells in the CSF. Techniques are rapidly progressing to assess these markers with increasing sensitivity and specificity, and correlations with clinical parameters are being investigated. It is expected that these efforts will, in the near future, yield clinically relevant markers that aid in diagnosis, monitoring and (tailored) treatment of patients bearing CNS tumors. This chapter provides a summary of the current state of affairs of the field of biomarkers of different types of CNS tumors.

Evaluation of standardized triple intrathecal therapy toxicity in oncohematological pediatric patients

Background The administration of triple intrathecal therapy with methotrexate, cytarabine and a corticosteroid for the prophylaxis and treatment of neoplastic cell infiltration in the central nervous system in hematological malignancies is a widespread practice. There is limited information available about its toxicity profile. Several factors related to intrathecal preparation can affect toxicity. Thus, it was decided to standardize intrathecal chemotherapy, trying to obtain the best toxicity profile. Objective To assess the toxicity of a standardized triple intrathecal chemotherapy in oncohematological pediatric patients and to establish risk factors of toxicity. Setting Oncohematological pediatric unit from a tertiary hospital in Spain. Methods Prospective, descriptive and observational study in which all the administrations of standardized triple intrathecal chemotherapy in pediatric patients were registered. Main outcome measure Toxicity of the intrathecal therapy was recorded and possible risk factors were assessed. Results A total of 269 administrations of triple intrathecal chemotherapy were registered in 41 patients (mean age = 6.6 ± 3.9 years). In 16.7% of the procedures, an adverse event was reported (total number of adverse events = 61). 47.5% were grade 1, 47.5% grade 2 and 4.9% grade 3. The administration of intrathecal chemotherapy inpatient and patient age ≥3 years were risk factors of toxicity in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions The administration of standardized triple intrathecal chemotherapy is related to a low frequency of toxicity and most of the adverse events registered were mild/moderate. The detection of adverse effects was significantly greater in children with age greater than or equal to three years and in hospitalized patients.