Anaplastic Glioma

Survival, Prognostic Factors, and Volumetric Analysis of Extent of Resection for Anaplastic Gliomas

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival rate and prognostic factors of anaplastic gliomas according to the 2016 World Health Organization classification, including extent of resection (EOR) as measured by contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the T2-weighted MRI.

Materials and Methods

The records of 113 patients with anaplastic glioma who were newly diagnosed at our institute between 2000 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 62 cases (54.9%) of anaplastic astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type (AAw), 18 cases (16.0%) of anaplastic astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, and 33 cases (29.2%) of anaplastic oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) was 48.4 months in the whole anaplastic glioma group and 21.5 months in AAw group. In multivariate analysis, age, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale score, O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status, postoperative tumor volume, and EOR measured from the T2 MRI sequence were significant prognostic factors. The EOR cut-off point for OS measured in contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI and T2-weighted MRI were 99.96% and 85.64%, respectively.

Conclusion

We found that complete resection of the contrast-enhanced portion (99.96%) and more than 85.64% resection of the non-enhanced portion of the tumor have prognostic impacts on patient survival from anaplastic glioma.

Lipid metabolism reprogramming and its potential targets in cancer

Reprogramming of lipid metabolism is a newly recognized hallmark of malignancy. Increased lipid uptake, storage and lipogenesis occur in a variety of cancers and contribute to rapid tumor growth. Lipids constitute the basic structure of membranes and also function as signaling molecules and energy sources. Sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs), a family of membrane-bound transcription factors in the endoplasmic reticulum, play a central role in the regulation of lipid metabolism. Recent studies have revealed that SREBPs are highly up-regulated in various cancers and promote tumor growth. SREBP cleavage-activating protein is a key transporter in the trafficking and activation of SREBPs as well as a critical glucose sensor, thus linking glucose metabolism and de novo lipid synthesis. Targeting altered lipid metabolic pathways has become a promising anti-cancer strategy. This review summarizes recent progress in our understanding of lipid metabolism regulation in malignancy, and highlights potential molecular targets and their inhibitors for cancer treatment.

Lipid droplets, potential biomarker and metabolic target in glioblastoma

Lipid droplets (LDs) are subcellular organelles that store large amounts of the neutral lipids, triglycerides (TG) and/or cholesteryl esters (CE). LDs are commonly formed in adipocytes, liver cells and macrophages, and their formation has been shown to be associated with the progression of metabolic diseases, i.e., obesity, fatty liver and atherosclerosis. Interestingly, LDs are also found in some tumor tissues. We recently showed that LDs are prevalent in glioblastoma (GBM), the most deadly brain tumor, but are not detectable in low-grade gliomas and normal brain tissues, suggesting that LDs may serve as a novel diagnostic biomarker for GBM. This short review will briefly introduce LD biology, summarize recent observations about LDs in several types of cancer tissues, and discuss LD formation in GBM. Moreover, we will highlight the role of SOAT1 (sterol-O transferase 1), a key enzyme regulating CE synthesis and LD formation in GBM, in the regulation of SREBP (sterol regulatory-element binding protein) activation. The therapeutic potential of LDs and SOAT1 will be discussed.

microRNA-29 mediates a novel negative feedback loop to regulate SCAP/SREBP-1 and lipid metabolism

The membrane-bound transcription factors, SREBPs (sterol regulatory element-binding proteins), play a central role in regulating lipid metabolism. The transcriptional activation of SREBPs requires the key protein SCAP (SREBP-cleavage activating protein) to translocate their precursors from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi for subsequent proteolytic activation, a process tightly regulated by a cholesterol-mediated negative feedback loop. Our previous work showed that the SCAP/SREBP-1 pathway is significantly upregulated in human glioblastoma (GBM), the most deadly brain cancer, and that glucose-mediated N-glycosylation of SCAP is a prerequisite step for SCAP/SREBP trafficking. More recently, we demonstrated that microRNA-29 (miR-29) mediates a previously unrecognized negative feedback loop in SCAP/SREBP-1 signaling to control lipid metabolism. We found that SREBP-1, functioning as a transcription factor, promotes the expression of the miR-29 family members, miR-29a, -29b and -29c. In turn, the miR-29 isoforms reversely repress the expression of SCAP and SREBP-1. Moreover, treatment with miR-29 mimics effectively suppressed GBM tumor growth by inhibiting SCAP/SREBP-1 and de novo lipid synthesis. These findings, recently published in Cell Reports, strongly suggest that delivery of miR-29 in vivo may be a promising approach to treat cancer and metabolic diseases by suppressing SCAP/SREBP-1-regulated lipid metabolism.

Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor amplification and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene amplification and the EGFRvIII mutation may have prognostic value in patients with glioblastoma. This meta-analysis was to determine whether EGFR gene amplification or the EGFRvIII mutation are predictors of survival in patients with glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched until July 31, 2014. Studies were selected for inclusion in the analysis if they included patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and/or glioblastoma, EGFR and/or EGFRvIII mutation status was reported, and overall survival (OS) data were reported.

RESULTS

Of 113 articles initially identified, only eight contained data with respect to the outcome of interest and were included in the meta-analysis. The number of cases ranged from 14 to 268, and the majority of patients were 60 or more years of age. There was no significant difference in OS between EGFR amplification-positive and EGFR amplification-negative glioblastoma patients (pooled hazard ratio [HR] = 1.101, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.845, 1.434, P = 0.475) or anaplastic astrocytoma patients (pooled HR = 1.455, 95% CI 0.852, 2.482, P = 0.169). There was no significant difference in OS between EGFRvIII-positive and EGFRvIII-negative glioblastoma patients (pooled HR = 1.321, 95% CI: 0.881-1.981, P = 0.178). Significant heterogeneity existed between the studies, and the significance changed when the analysis was performed with studies removed in turn.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence that either EGFR amplification or the EGFRvIII mutation has prognostic value in patients with glioblastoma.

Patterns of Tumor Contrast Enhancement Predict the Prognosis of Anaplastic Gliomas with IDH1 Mutation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

It is proposed that isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation predicts the outcome in patients with high-grade glioma. In addition, contrast enhancement on preoperative MR imaging reflects tumor biologic features. Patients with anaplastic glioma with the IDH1 mutation were evaluated by using MR imaging to determine whether tumor enhancement is a prognostic factor and can be used to predict survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 216 patients with histologically confirmed anaplastic glioma was reviewed retrospectively. Tumor contrast-enhancement patterns were classified on the basis of preoperative T1 contrast MR images. Tumor IDH1 status was examined by using RNA sequencing. We used univariate analysis and the multivariate Cox model to evaluate the prognostic value of the IDH1 mutation and tumor contrast-enhancement pattern for progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

In all 216 patients, IDH1 mutation was associated with longer progression-free survival (P = .004, hazard ratio = 0.439) and overall survival (P = .002, hazard ratio = 0.406). For patients with IDH1 mutant anaplastic glioma, the absence of contrast enhancement was associated with longer progression-free survival (P = .038, hazard ratio = 0.473) and overall survival (P = .043, hazard ratio = 0.436). Furthermore, we were able to stratify the progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with IDH1 mutation by using the tumor contrast-enhancement patterns (P = .022 and 0.029, respectively; log-rank).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor enhancement on postcontrast MR imaging is a valuable prognostic factor for patients with anaplastic glioma and IDH1 mutation. Furthermore, the contrast-enhancement patterns could potentially be used to stratify the survival outcome of such patients.

Anaplastic glioma: current treatment and management

Anaplastic glioma (AG) is divided into three morphology-based groups (anaplastic astrocytoma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma, anaplastic oligoastrocytoma) as well as three molecular groups (glioma-CpG island methylation phenotype [G-CIMP] negative, G-CIMP positive non-1p19q codeleted tumors and G-CIMP positive codeleted tumors). The RTOG 9402 and EORTC 26951 trials established radiotherapy plus (procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine) chemotherapy as the standard of care in 1p/19q codeleted AG. Uni- or non-codeleted AG are currently best treated with radiotherapy only or alkylator-based chemotherapy only as determined by the NOA-04 trial. Maturation of NOA-04 and results of the currently accruing studies, CODEL (for codeleted AG) and CATNON (for uni or non-codeleted AG), will likely refine current up-front treatment recommendations for AG.

Update on treatment strategies for anaplastic glioma: a review of literature

Anaplastic gliomas (AG) include 6-10% of all newly diagnoses of primary brain tumors. They have an unfavourable prognosis and, to date, there is not an established treatment universally recognized. Four recent randomized clinical trials were identified for a total of 1,170 patients (anaplastic-astrocytomas, anaplasticoligoastrocytoma, anaplastic-oligodendroglioma), in order to define the better sequence and timing of chemo-radiotherapy, Three studies compared radiotherapy (RT) treatment vs. radio-chemotherapy with procarbazine-lomustine-vincristine (PCV) or temozolomide (TMZ) or dibromodulcitol and bichloroethylnitrosurea (DBD/BCNU) and only one compared RT vs chemotherapy (CT) with PCV or TMZ. Results show no significant differences in terms of PFS/OS between RT/CT alone or combined treatment although a trend toward an improvement of OS was observed after RT + CT treatment (m-OS in RT + adjuvant PCV was 42.3 vs. 30.6 months in RT alone p=0.0003). Grade 3-4 mielotoxicity has been observed in almost all cases of patients treated with PCV + RT. None of four studies reviewed conducted a head to head comparison between PCV vs. TMZ. Only a study randomized patients to PCV/TMZ without however providing data in terms of PSF and OS between the two treatments. It found no significant differences in PFS from initial RT and adjuvant CT (PCV-TMZ) at progression compared to initial CT followed by RT at progression. The optimal treatment of AG should reasonably consider not only the histology as well as the molecular markers of the tumor, but also clinical conditions, age of patients, life expectancy, Karnofsky-performance-status and tumor resection to achieve in future the personalization of care.