Comprehensive and Methodical: Diagnostic and Management Approaches to Rapidly Progressive Dementia

Patient characteristics and outcome in patients with anti-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) encephalitis

OBJECTIVE

Anti-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) encephalitis is a rare subtype of autoimmune encephalitis. We report patients diagnosed with anti-AMPAR encephalitis in western China, focusing on their clinical presentations, imaging results, treatment strategies, and prognosis.

METHODS

Data from patients diagnosed with anti-AMPAR encephalitis in the neurology center of West China Hospital from August 2018 to July 2021 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Based on the diagnostic criteria of autoimmune encephalitis, nine cases were included.

RESULTS

Four patients (44%) were males, and the median age at presentation was 54 years (range, 25-85). Short-term memory loss was the most common initial symptom. Additional types of autoantibodies were identified in three patients. After presentation, four patients were found to have tumors: two with small cell lung cancer, one with ovarian teratoma, and one with thymoma. All patients accepted first-line immune therapy, and follow-up was available from 8 patients (median 20 weeks, range 4-78). At the last follow-up, three patients showed good outcomes (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-2; 37.5%). Five patients showed poor outcomes (mRS 3-6; 62.5%): two had minimal changes and remained hospitalized, two had residual severe cognitive impairments, and one patient died during follow-up. Outcomes were worse among patients with tumors. Finally, only one patient experienced relapse during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Anti-AMPAR encephalitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis for middle- and senior-aged patients who present with predominantly acute or subacute short-term memory impairment. The long-term prognosis is correlated with the presence of a tumor.

Rapidly progressive dementias - aetiologies, diagnosis and management

Rapidly progressive dementias (RPDs) are a group of heterogeneous disorders that include immune-mediated, infectious and metabolic encephalopathies, as well as prion diseases and atypically rapid presentations of more common neurodegenerative diseases. Some of these conditions are treatable, and some must be diagnosed promptly because of their potential infectivity. Prion disease is considered to be the prototypical RPD, but over the past two decades, epidemiological reports and the identification of various encephalitis-mediating antibodies have led to a growing recognition of other encephalopathies as potential causes of rapid cognitive decline. Knowledge of RPD aetiologies, syndromes and diagnostic work-up protocols will help clinicians to establish an early, accurate diagnosis, thereby reducing morbidity and mortality, especially in immune-mediated and other potentially reversible dementias. In this Review, we define the syndrome of RPD and shed light on its different aetiologies and on secondary factors that might contribute to rapid cognitive decline. We describe an extended diagnostic procedure in the context of important differential diagnoses, discuss the utility of biomarkers and summarize potential treatment options. In addition, we discuss treatment options such as high-dose steroid therapy in the context of therapy and diagnosis in clinically ambiguous cases.

The term ‘rapidly progressive dementia’ (RPD) describes a cognitive disorder with fast progression, leading to dementia within a relatively short time. This Review discusses the wide range of RPD aetiologies, as well as the diagnostic approach and treatment options.

Definitions of rapidly progressive dementia (RPD) vary according to the aetiological background and relate to the speed of cognitive decline, time from first symptom to dementia syndrome and/or overall survival.

RPD can occur in rapidly progressive neurodegenerative diseases, such as prion diseases, or in primarily slowly progressive diseases as a consequence of intrinsic factors or concomitant pathologies.

Besides neurodegenerative diseases, inflammatory (immune-mediated and infectious), vascular, metabolic and neoplastic CNS diseases are important and frequent causes of RPD.

To identify treatable causes of RPD, the technical diagnostic work-up must include MRI and analyses of blood and cerebrospinal fluid, and further diagnostics might be indicated in unclear cases.

Therapeutic options for many non-neurodegenerative causes of RPD are already available; disease-modifying therapies for neurodegenerative RPDs are an important focus of current research and could become a treatment option in the near future.

Evolving Causes of Rapidly Progressive Dementia: A 5-Year Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Rapidly progressive dementia (RPD) is a clinical syndrome developing in <1 to 2 years. Recent progress in RPD evaluation is significant, so RPD's prevalence may change over time. The aim of our new case series was to estimate the relative frequency of RPDs' causative entities, considering the recent advances in RPDs' diagnosis, and compare the results with those of our previous report.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 47 patients who were referred to Attikon University Hospital during a 5-year period for a suspected RPD.

RESULTS

Neurodegenerative diseases were the most frequent causes (38%), followed by prion disease (19%) and autoimmune encephalopathy (AE, 17%). AE cases were by far more common than in our previous report, while other than AE secondary causes were significantly decreased. Mean time to dementia was 9 months in neurodegenerative diseases and 5 months in non-neurodegenerative. Main clinical findings across all patients were memory impairment (66%) and behavioral-emotional disturbances (48%).

CONCLUSIONS

Neurodegenerative diseases are common causes of RPD and have a slower evolution than non-neurodegenerative. Diagnostic novelties enabled the recognition of AE, whereas more common secondary causes are probably now diagnosed in primary settings since the recognition of RPD as distinct clinical entity is continually increasing.

Diagnostic challenges in rapidly progressive dementia

INTRODUCTION

Rapidly progressive dementia is a syndrome caused by numerous disease entities. Accurate diagnosis is crucial as substantial proportion of these diseases is highly treatable. Others might implicate specific hygienic problems. Still, differential diagnosis remains challenging because of a huge overlap of clinical presentations. Areas covered: The paper reviews PubMed-listed research articles with a focus on diagnosis and treatment of diseases showing rapid cognitive decline such as inflammatory diseases, rapidly progressive neurodegenerative diseases, toxic-metabolic encephalopathies and prion diseases. The literature was interpreted in the light of experience in clinically differentiating rapid progressing dementia in the framework of Creutzfeldt-Jakob-Disease (CJD) surveillance activities. An overview of relevant differential diagnoses and diagnostic pitfalls as well as therapeutic protocols is presented. Expert commentary: Over the last years, more and more neurologic disorders causing cognitive symptoms, in particular various types of immune-mediated diseases have been discovered. To identify treatable conditions and to enhance knowledge of differential diagnosis and epidemiology, we suggest an extended diagnostic work up in cases with rapidly progressing dementia. Besides standard methods, this should include the search for neoplasia as well as atypical encephalitis. High-dose steroid therapy should be considered in certain clinical situations even when no evidence for inflammation is present.