1
|
Yan C, Kim SR, Ruiz DR, Farmer JR. Microencapsulation for Food Applications: A Review. ACS APPLIED BIO MATERIALS 2022; 5:5497-5512. [PMID: 36395471 DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.2c00673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Food products contain various active ingredients, such as flavors, nutrients, unsaturated fatty acids, color, probiotics, etc., that require protection during food processing and storage to preserve their quality and shelf life. This review provides an overview of standard microencapsulation technologies, processes, materials, industrial examples, reasons for market success, a summary of recent applications, and the challenges in the food industry, categorized by active food ingredients: flavors, polyunsaturated fatty acids, probiotics, antioxidants, colors, vitamins, and others. We also provide a comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the most common microencapsulation technologies in the food industry such as spray drying, coacervation, extrusion, and spray cooling. This review ends with future perspectives on microencapsulation for food applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cuie Yan
- Division of Encapsulation, Blue California, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688, United States
| | - Sang-Ryoung Kim
- Division of Encapsulation, Blue California, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688, United States
| | - Daniela R Ruiz
- Division of Encapsulation, Blue California, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688, United States
| | - Jordan R Farmer
- Division of Encapsulation, Blue California, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Inhibitory Capacity of Chitosan Films Containing Lactic Acid Bacteria Cell-Free Supernatants against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. FOOD BIOPROCESS TECH 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s11947-022-02808-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
3
|
Xiao L, Li Y, Tian J, Zhou J, Xu Q, Feng L, Rui X, Fan X, Zhang Q, Chen X, Dong M, Li W. Influences of drying methods on the structural, physicochemical and antioxidant properties of exopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus helveticus MB2-1. Int J Biol Macromol 2020; 157:220-231. [PMID: 32344080 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
In this study, in order to evaluate influences of different drying methods on the structural characteristics, physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of exopolysaccharides (EPS) from Lactobacillus helveticus MB2-1, three drying methods, including spray-drying (SD), freeze-drying (FD) and spray freeze-drying (SFD), were applied to dry EPS. Results showed that different drying procedures had no significant influence on the primary structure and constituent monosaccharides of EPSs. However, the surface morphology of the three dried EPSs varied greatly in size and shape due to different drying processes. Among three dried EPSs, the particle size distribution of spray freeze-dried EPS (SF-EPS) was relatively narrower and uniform. Additionally, SF-EPS behaved better apparent viscosity and emulsifying property than spray-dried EPS (S-EPS) and freeze-dried EPS (F-EPS). SF-EPS exhibited stronger antioxidant activities when compared with S-EPS and F-EPS, according to the results of scavenging activities on different radicals and chelating activity on ferrous ion. Overall, SFD was the appropriate method for industrial production of EPS from Lactobacillus helveticus MB2-1 with better physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luyao Xiao
- College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, PR China
| | - Yingying Li
- College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, PR China
| | - Juanjuan Tian
- College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, PR China
| | - Jianzhong Zhou
- School of Food Science and Pharmacy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumchi, Xinjiang 830052, PR China
| | - Qian Xu
- College of Life Science, Tarim University, Alar, Xinjiang 843300, PR China
| | - Li Feng
- College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, PR China
| | - Xin Rui
- College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, PR China
| | - Xia Fan
- College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, PR China
| | - Qiuqin Zhang
- College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, PR China
| | - Xiaohong Chen
- College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, PR China
| | - Mingsheng Dong
- College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, PR China
| | - Wei Li
- College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|