1
|
Patel RA, Ungar RA, Pyke AL, Adimoelja A, Chakraborty M, Cotter DJ, Freund M, Goddard P, Gomez-Stafford J, Greenwald E, Higgs E, Hunter N, MacKenzie TMG, Narain A, Gjorgjieva T, Martschenko DO. Increasing equity in science requires better ethics training: A course by trainees, for trainees. CELL GENOMICS 2024; 4:100554. [PMID: 38697124 PMCID: PMC11099339 DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
Despite the profound impacts of scientific research, few scientists have received the necessary training to productively discuss the ethical and societal implications of their work. To address this critical gap, we-a group of predominantly human genetics trainees-developed a course on genetics, ethics, and society. We intend for this course to serve as a template for other institutions and scientific disciplines. Our curriculum positions human genetics within its historical and societal context and encourages students to evaluate how societal norms and structures impact the conduct of scientific research. We demonstrate the utility of this course via surveys of enrolled students and provide resources and strategies for others hoping to teach a similar course. We conclude by arguing that if we are to work toward rectifying the inequities and injustices produced by our field, we must first learn to view our own research as impacting and being impacted by society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshni A Patel
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Rachel A Ungar
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Alanna L Pyke
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Alvina Adimoelja
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | | | - Daniel J Cotter
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Malika Freund
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Pagé Goddard
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Justin Gomez-Stafford
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Emily Greenwald
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Emily Higgs
- Department of Cardiovascular Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Naiomi Hunter
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Tim M G MacKenzie
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Anjali Narain
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Tamara Gjorgjieva
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Daphne O Martschenko
- Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Quigley D, Levine A, Sonnenfeld DA, Brown P, Tian Q, Wei X. Survey on Using Ethical Principles in Environmental Field Research with Place-Based Communities. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2019; 25:477-517. [PMID: 29299754 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9981-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Researchers of the Northeast Ethics Education Partnership (NEEP) at Brown University sought to improve an understanding of the ethical challenges of field researchers with place-based communities in environmental studies/sciences and environmental health by disseminating a questionnaire which requested information about their ethical approaches to these researched communities. NEEP faculty sought to gain actual field guidance to improve research ethics and cultural competence training for graduate students and faculty in environmental sciences/studies. Some aspects of the ethical challenges in field studies are not well-covered in the literature. More training and information resources are needed on the bioethical challenges in environmental field research relating to maximizing benefits/reducing risks to local inhabitants and ecosystems from research; appropriate and effective group consent and individual consent processes for many diverse communities in the United States and abroad; and justice considerations of ensuring fair benefits and protections against exploitation through community-based approaches, and cultural appropriateness and competence in researcher relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianne Quigley
- Science and Technology Studies, Brown University, PO Box 1886, 150 Power St, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
| | - Alana Levine
- Science and Technology Studies, Brown University, PO Box 1886, 150 Power St, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
| | - David A Sonnenfeld
- State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY-ESF), 1 Forestry Dr., Syracuse, NY, 13210-2787, USA
| | - Phil Brown
- Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, 318INV, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Qing Tian
- Science and Technology Studies, PO Box 1886, 150 Power St, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
| | - Xiaofan Wei
- Science and Technology Studies, PO Box 1886, 150 Power St, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saltz D, Justus J, Huffaker B. The crucial but underrepresented role of philosophy in conservation science curricula. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2019; 33:217-220. [PMID: 29947116 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Revised: 05/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Article impact statement: Normative scientists must be trained in current thinking of the philosophy that underlies their fields, an issue not fully realized in conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Saltz
- Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, The Swiss Institute for Dryland Environmental and Energy Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sde Boqer Campus 8499000, Beersheba, Israel
| | - James Justus
- Department of Philosophy, Florida State University, 641 University Way, 154 Dodd Hall, Tallahassee, FL 32306, U.S.A
| | - Buddy Huffaker
- Aldo Leopold Foundation, P.O. Box 77, Baraboo, WI 53913, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hall TE, Piso Z, Engebretson J, O’Rourke M. Evaluating a dialogue-based approach to teaching about values and policy in graduate transdisciplinary environmental science programs. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0202948. [PMID: 30180190 PMCID: PMC6122781 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
This article discusses a formal evaluation of new curricular materials and activities designed to foster understanding of three key issues-expertise, risk, and sociopolitical constraints-related to values and policy in transdisciplinary environmental science. We begin by describing the three issues, along with current thinking about the most appropriate ways to address them in the context of transdisciplinary environmental science. We then describe how we created curricular materials and activities focusing on these three issues that could be tailored for use in a wide range of graduate environmental science programs. The curriculum was adapted by instructors for use in five graduate classes at two US universities, and we used a pre-test, post-test mixed methods design to evaluate its effects on students' ethical reasoning about values and policy. The results of this evaluation suggest that our semi-structured, dialogue-based curriculum enhances student awareness of and reasoning about values and policy in environmental research. We close with several educational recommendations for transdisciplinary environmental science programs that are grounded in our experience with this curriculum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Troy E. Hall
- Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Zachary Piso
- Department of Philosophy, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Jesse Engebretson
- Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Michael O’Rourke
- Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
- AgBioResearch, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
- Center for Interdisciplinarity, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|