Sequential changes of bone metabolism in normal and delayed union of the spine

The impact of acute fracture on interpretation of bone turnover marker measurements for patients starting anti-resorptive therapies

INTRODUCTION

Bone turnover markers (BTM) are used in evaluating patients' response to anti-resorptive agents (ARA). Fracture and its healing process, however, can influence the measurements, which might make their interpretation difficult in patients with a recent fracture. We aimed to evaluate the effect of oral ARA on changes in BTM levels in patients with a recent distal radius fracture (DRF).

METHODS

In 143 women who had a new DRF and then received oral ARA including selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM, n = 101), and bisphosphonate (n = 42), we measured serum cross-linked C-telopeptides of type I collagen (CTXI) and osteocalcin, at baseline and six months, as well as lumbar and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline and one year after fracture. We determined the predictive value of BTM at six months in determining one-year responses in BMD.

RESULTS

Both BTM levels decreased significantly at six months, with the average decrease of 27 ± 63% for CTX-I and 11% ± 37% for osteocalcin. The percent changes of BTM at six months were independent predictors of the BMD change. Cutoff points of 50.0% CTX-I decrease and 23.5% for osteocalcin decrease had the highest sensitivities and specificities for detecting BMD responders for bisphosphonate users, but cutoffs could not be found for SERM users.

CONCLUSION

Although a fresh fracture can influence BTM, ARA therapy significantly reduced their levels and their percent change at six months could predict BMD improvement at one year. However, adjusted cutoff points can be necessary to increase sensitivity for detecting patients responsive to ARA treatment after a new DRF.

A pilot study of circulating levels of TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 as biomarkers of bone healing in patients with non-hypertrophic pseudoarthrosis of long bones

Background

Pseudoarthrosis or non-union is a complication with an incidence of 5-10% of bone fractures, most frequently located in the diaphysis of long bones. The management of this complication is addressed by means of complex surgical procedures and is a concern for orthopaedic and trauma surgeons nowadays. The use of biomarkers for diagnosing patients at risk of non-union would help us to establish special measures for early corrective treatment.

Methods

Prospective exploratory pilot study with a cohort of 20 patients diagnosed of non-hypertrophic pseudoarthrosis of long bones who were treated surgically with either autologous bone graft or a Tissue Engineering Product composed of bone marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Patients were followed for 12 months and plasma blood samples were obtained to determine circulating levels of Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1 and Beta 2 (TGF-β1 and TGF-β2, respectively) at inclusion, and at 1 week, 2 weeks, and months 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 after surgery. Radiological bone healing was evaluated by the Tomographic Union Score (TUS).

Results

Basal levels of TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 were determined in the twenty patients (26,702 ± 14,537 pg/mL and 307.8 ± 83.1 pg/mL, respectively). Three of them withdrew from the study, so complete follow-up was conducted on 17 patients (9 successfully healed vs. 8 that did not heal). Statistically significant differences between the bone healing group and the non-union group were found at month 12 for both TGF-β1 (p = 0.005) and TGF-β2 (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 are biomarkers that correlate with clinical evidence of bone regeneration and may be used to monitor patients, although early predictive value after intervention needs to be further studied in combination with other molecules.

Bone Metabolism in the Healing Process of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Temporal Changes of Bone Turnover Markers

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate temporal changes of bone turnover markers (BTMs) after lumbar spinal fusion in patients without osteoporosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Radiological studies are the standard method to monitor bony fusion, but they do not allow a timely assessment of bone healing. BTMs react rapidly to changes in bone metabolism during fusion process and could be an additional tool to monitor this process.

METHODS

A total of 78 nonosteoporosis patients who had undergone one- or two-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion were included. Fusion status was assessed using computed tomography sagittal and coronal images. Serum levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP), and osteocalcin (OC) were measured to assess bone formation, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) was measured to assess bone resorption. Serum samples were obtained before surgery and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 13, 26, 39, and 52 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

A solid fusion was achieved in 71 of 78 patients (91%), and seven patients resulted in pseudarthrosis. In the fusion group, the level of all BTMs once decreased at 1 postoperative week. Then, BAP and P1NP reached a peak at 4 weeks after surgery, and TRACP-5b and OC peaked at 8 weeks. Thereafter, the level of P1NP and TRACP-5b gradually got closer to the baseline over a year, and BAP kept high until 52 postoperative weeks. In the pseudarthrosis group, peak level of BTMs was significantly higher and the increased level of BAP and P1NP was kept until 52 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated dynamics of BTMs after lumbar spinal fusion in patients without osteoporosis. These normal population data contribute as a baseline to evaluate the effect of osteogenic agents on bone metabolism after spinal fusion.Level of Evidence: 2.

Predicting fracture healing with blood biomarkers: the potential to assess patient risk of fracture nonunion

Fracture non-union is a significant orthopaedic problem affecting a substantial number of patients yearly. Treatment of nonunions is devastating to patients and costly to the healthcare system. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of non-union is typically made in a reactionary fashion by an orthopaedic surgeon based on clinical assessment and radiographic features several months into treatment. For this reason, investigators have been trying to develop prediction algorithms; however, these have relied on population-based approaches and lack the predictive capability necessary to make individual treatment decisions. There is also a growing body of literature focussed on identifying blood biomarkers that are associated with non-union. This review describes the research that has been done in this area. Further studies of patient-centered, precision medicine approaches will likely improve fracture non-union diagnostic/prognostic capabilities.

Fracture-induced changes in biomarkers CTX, PINP, OC, and BAP-a systematic review

To assess the time from fracture until bone turnover markers (BTM), which are biochemical markers reflecting in vivo bone formation and resorptive activity, have returned to a stable level since BTM have been shown to be at least as good as bone mineral density in monitoring the effect of anti-resorptive treatment in osteoporosis. This study searched for articles in PUBMED, CINAHL, Medline, EM-BASE, and Cochrane, and identified 3486 unique articles. These articles were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seven articles addressing time to normalization of either CTX, PINP, osteocalcin, or bone-specific alkaline phosphatase after a recent fracture were identified and these were analyzed qualitatively. CTX appeared to return to baseline within 6 months. PINP appeared to return to baseline within 6 months and interestingly dip below baseline after a year. Osteocalcin was elevated throughout the first year after a fracture, with most changes in the first 6 months. Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) was increased for up to a year, however with a discrepancy between used assays. Seven studies were identified, showing CTX and PINP to return to baseline within 6 months. OC was elevated for 12 months. BAP was increased for up to a year. However, none of these studies had fasting patients and a long follow-up period with regular measurements. The studies could indicate that the BTM CTX and PINP have returned to baseline within 6 months; however, further studies are needed assessing pre-analytical factors while having a long follow-up. Bone turnover markers appear as good as or better than bone mineral density in monitoring the effect of anti-resorptive medication in osteoporosis. This study tries to identify the time from fracture until BTM are back at baseline. Most studies did not however take pre-analytical variation into consideration. Further research is therefore needed.

Defective Proliferation and Osteogenic Potential with Altered Immunoregulatory phenotype of Native Bone marrow-Multipotential Stromal Cells in Atrophic Fracture Non-Union

Bone marrow-Multipotential stromal cells (BM-MSCs) are increasingly used to treat complicated fracture healing e.g., non-union. Though, the quality of these autologous cells is not well characterized. We aimed to evaluate bone healing-related capacities of non-union BM-MSCs. Iliac crest-BM was aspirated from long-bone fracture patients with normal healing (U) or non-united (NU). Uncultured (native) CD271highCD45low cells or passage-zero cultured BM-MSCs were analyzed for gene expression levels, and functional assays were conducted using culture-expanded BM-MSCs. Blood samples were analyzed for serum cytokine levels. Uncultured NU-CD271highCD45low cells significantly expressed fewer transcripts of growth factor receptors, EGFR, FGFR1, and FGRF2 than U cells. Significant fewer transcripts of alkaline phosphatase (ALPL), osteocalcin (BGLAP), osteonectin (SPARC) and osteopontin (SPP1) were detected in NU-CD271^highCD45^low cells. Additionally, immunoregulation-related markers were differentially expressed between NU- and U-CD271^highCD45^low cells. Interestingly, passage-zero NU BM-MSCs showed low expression of immunosuppressive mediators. However, culture-expanded NU and U BM-MSCs exhibited comparable proliferation, osteogenesis, and immunosuppression. Serum cytokine levels were found similar for NU and U groups. Collectively, native NU-BM-MSCs seemed to have low proliferative and osteogenic capacities; therefore, enhancing their quality should be considered for regenerative therapies. Further research on distorted immunoregulatory molecules expression in BM-MSCs could potentially benefit the prediction of complicated fracture healing.

Factors Influencing Serum Homocysteine Levels in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Females - Comparison to Urinary Collagen Crosslinks

Purpose: The correlation between serum levels of homocysteine and bone mineral density remains controversial. The aim of this study was to identify the potential factors associated with the levels of serum total homocysteine (S-Hcy) and urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (U-NTX) in female osteoporotic patients. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 163 female osteoporotic patients, aged between 48 and 91 years, who had never been treated with anti-osteoporosis therapy. Background data including spine and hip bone mineral density, ongoing therapy for the metabolic disease, aortic calcification score as evaluated by lateral lumbar X-ray film, and recent fragility fracture history were obtained. S-Hcy, U-NTX levels, and creatinine clearance were measured. Results: Multiple linear regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between S-Hcy levels and aortic calcification score (p = 0.022), creatinine clearance (p = 0.004), and recent fracture history (within 1 year after fracture) (p = 0.028); conversely, U-NTX levels correlated significantly with total hip bone mineral density (p < 0.0001) and recent fracture history (p = 0.0007). Conclusions: S-Hcy levels had no correlation with bone mineral density, but were associated with the degree of aortic calcification, renal function, and fracture events. These confounding factors should be taken into consideration when the relationship between S-Hcy and bone mineral density is discussed.

Bone Turnover in Vertebral Fractures: Does it Effect the Decision of Surgery?

Background and Aim:

Instrumentation is commonly used in spinal surgery to stabilize the fracture. In the present study, we aimed to compare the early and late changes seen in bone production and degradation products in patients with traumatic spinal fracture who had been treated surgically or conservatively.

Materials and Methods:

Forty-three patients were admitted to the Neurosurgery Department with thoracolumbar or lumbar fracture in this prospective study. Patients were divided into two groups of surgically treated (n = 23) and nonsurgically/conservatively treated (n = 20) patients. The early and late changes seen in bone production and degradation products were compared in patients with traumatic spinal fracture who had been treated surgically or conservatively.

Results:

In conservatively treated patients, although osteocalcin level was slightly increased and deoxypiridinoline (DPD)/creatinine was slightly decreased after the treatment, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.08 and P = 0.539, respectively). There is no significant difference between admission time, posttreatment late period osteocalcin level, and DPD/creatinine ratio between the two group of patients (P = 0.215 and P = 0.236, respectively).

Conclusion:

We suggest that the healing and fusion processes in fractured vertebrae not only followed by the radiological examination but also by noninvasive biochemical changes seen in the serum levels of bone formation and resorption markers.

Toward the clinical use of circulating biomarkers predictive of bone union

Current methods for diagnosis of bone healing after treatment of trauma injuries rely on clinical findings and the use of imaging methodologies that provide conclusive results but only at mid/long-term post-intervention. In this Perspective we present and discuss incipient evidence on biomarkers that may serve for monitoring the progression of bone healing as well as predicting eventual nonunion outcomes.

The importance of assessing the rate of bone turnover and the balance between bone formation and bone resorption during daily teriparatide administration for osteoporosis: a pilot study

This study aimed to examine the importance of simultaneously measuring bone formation and resorption markers during daily teriparatide administration. In 135 women with osteoporosis, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at 0, 24, and 48 weeks after teriparatide administration. Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b were measured at 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks. Subanalyses were performed in groups divided according to the BMD change at 48 weeks (increased and decreased groups), history of fragility fracture (acute and chronic groups), and treatment prior to teriparatide administration (alendronate, raloxifene, and naïve groups). The scatter diagram of multiple of median formation (MoMf) and multiple of median resorption (MoMr) showed that the distribution gradually spread to a high turnover by week 24. A significant correlation was observed between the rate of change in BMD at week 48 and the turnover rate [√(MoMf(2) + MoMr(2))] at week 0. Significant differences were observed in the turnover rate between the acute and chronic groups at weeks 0 and 4 and between the groups divided according to prior treatment from week 0 to 24. Because the assessment of either bone formation markers or bone resorption markers may result in erroneous data, it is necessary to assess them together during teriparatide treatment. The turnover rate at treatment initiation is a useful indicator to predict changes in BMD. When evaluating the turnover rate and balance (MoMf/MoMr), one should consider patient characteristics, including history of fragility fracture and prior treatment.

Fracture non-union: Can biomarkers predict outcome?

Delayed bone healing and non-union occurs in approximately 10-15% of long bone fractures. Both pathologies may result in prolonged period of pain, disability and repetitive operative interventions. Despite intense investigations and progress done in understanding the pathophysiologic processes governing bone healing, the diagnostic tools have not been altered. The clinical findings and radiographic features remain the two important landmarks of diagnosing non-union and even when the diagnosis is established there is debate on the ideal timing and mode of intervention. Emerging evidence suggest that there are certain molecules and genes that can serve as predictors of potentially unsuccessful fracture union. This article summarises the current evidence on the available 'bio-markers'to predict fracture non-union.