Conservative treatment of Campanacci grade III proximal humerus giant cell tumors

Reduced recurrence rate and comparable functionality after wide resection and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with allograft-prosthetic composite versus curettage for proximal humeral giant cell tumor: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTBs) are rare, aggressive tumors, and the proximal humerus is a relatively rare location for GCTBs; limited evidence exists on which surgical approaches and reconstruction techniques are optimal. In the largest case series to date, we evaluated the recurrence rate of proximal humeral GCTBs and the functional outcomes of different resection and reconstruction options in this multicenter study.

METHODS

All 51 patients included in this study received initial surgical treatment for proximal humeral GCTBs from January 2007 to December 2020, with a minimum 2-year follow-up period. Local recurrence and functional outcomes were statistically analyzed in relation to demographic, clinical, and primary surgical variables. Functional outcomes were reported by patients and were assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score and QuickDASH instrument (shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand instrument).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 81.5 months (range, 30-191 months), and the overall recurrence rate was 17.6% (9 of 51 patients). The majority of recurrences (n = 7) occurred in the first 2 years of follow-up. The intralesional curettage group (n = 23) showed a statistically significant difference in the recurrence rate compared with the en bloc resection group (n = 28) (34.8% vs. 3.6%, P = .007). Among shoulders receiving en bloc resection, 16 were reconstructed with hemiarthroplasty; 8, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) with allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) reconstruction; and 4, arthrodesis. On the basis of intention-to-treat analysis, the mean functional Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores of the groups undergoing curettage, rTSA with APC, hemiarthroplasty, and arthrodesis were 26.0 ± 3.1, 26.0 ± 1.7, 20.3 ± 2.8, and 22.5 ± 1.3, respectively (P < .001 [with P < .001 for curettage vs. hemiarthroplasty and P = .004 for rTSA with APC vs. hemiarthroplasty]) and the mean QuickDASH scores were 14.0 ± 11.0, 11.6 ± 4.5, 33.1 ± 11.8, and 21.6 ± 4.7, respectively (P < .001 [with P < .001 for curettage vs. hemiarthroplasty and P = .003 for rTSA with APC vs. hemiarthroplasty]).

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of our data, en bloc resection followed by reverse shoulder arthroplasty showed a lower recurrence rate and no significant difference in functional outcome scores for proximal humeral GCTBs compared with intralesional curettage. Therefore, we believe that rTSA with APC may be reasonable for the initial treatment of proximal humeral GCTBs.

"A New Clinical and Radiological Classification of Grading GCT and Its Impact on the Management"

Background

The management of the GCT continues to be controversial. The most accepted treatment reported is extended curettage with various adjuvants. However, the rate of recurrence has been very high (10-66%). For better understanding of the lesion and its management, it has become necessary to revise the existing grading system.

Materials and Methods

The recommendation of the proposed grading is based on 480 cases of GCT along with the analysis of other major reports published. Out of these, 279 were grade-II and 109 grade-III which were subjected to en bloc excision and reconstruction with non-vascularized fibular graft. Depending on the site, the grafts were stabilized with a suitable plate or extra long Kirschner wires.

Results

The observations made in 480 cases over a period of 5 decades revealed that for Campanacci grade-II and grade-III lesions, en bloc excision and suitable reconstruction resulted in minimum recurrence rate of 1.2%. The fibular reconstruction after excision has proved advantageous to our patients as it provides a stable joint in the form of an arthrodesis of the neighboring joint.

Conclusion

GCT of bone has been a challenging lesion. Extended curettage has been recommended as the choice of treatment but the reported rate of recurrence has been high. En bloc excision and suitable reconstruction with fibular strut graft have resulted in 1.2% recurrence. It is, therefore, suggested the existing grading system should be revised mainly for grade-II and grade-III lesions which can bring down the high rate of recurrence in this unpredictable tumor.

Level of Evidence

Level-IV.

Resection and reconstruction with and without neoadjuvant denosumab in campanacci grade III giant cell tumors of proximal humerus: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumors (GCT) of the proximal humerus are rarely reported case that requires complex surgeries due to involvement of the shoulder joint. Therefore, we report the first retrospective comparative study where the postoperative functional outcomes, recurrence rate and complications in patients who underwent arthrodesis of shoulder after resection of grade III GCT with and without neoadjuvant denosumab are compared.

METHODS

A retrospective review of eight cases of grade III GCT of proximal humerus receiving resection and fibular strut graft and arthrodesis between January 2014 and December 2019 is performed. They were stratified into two groups: one group of four patients received once-weekly denosumab 120 mg for 4-weeks before resection and reconstruction, while the other group of four patients did not receive denosumab before surgery. Primary outcomes included the functional outcomes assessed by revised Musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) score and shoulder pain and disability index (SPDI) at 6-weeks and 12-months postoperatively while secondary outcomes included complications and recurrences.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in terms of SPDI at 6 weeks and 12 months, MSTS at 12 months, complications, recurrence among denosumab and non-denosumab groups. At 6-weeks follow-up, a significantly better pain score in SPDI and MSTS was acquired in the denosumab group.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection and reconstruction with or without neoadjuvant denosumab for Grade III GCT of proximal humerus had similar functional outcomes and with no major differences in recurrence and complications. Hence, postoperative pain relief while long-term benefits were not discovered with the use of neoadjuvant denosumab.

Surgical management of rare benign tumors of the sternum

Primary benign tumors of the sternum are an exceedingly rare entity. Surgical techniques regarding intervention for these lesions are not clearly defined in the literature given their scarcity. Operative techniques include en-bloc resection of the tumor, and this has proven to be successful in preventing local recurrence despite benign nature of the lesion. Given the often extensive defect created by the excision, reconstruction is frequently necessary; depending on the size of the defect, either autologous bone grafting or the use of synthetic materials may be indicated. This study serves to present two cases of rare primary benign tumors of the sternum, giant cell tumors and osteoma spongiosum and to summarize the available literature. We present a review of the literature of 17sternal giant cell tumor cases reported so far including our patient and unique case of osteoma spongiosum of the sternum, that discusses their surgical management, as well as reconstructive techniques that provided an excellent clinical result and a lack of recurrence on long term follow-up.

Pulmonary metastasis of giant cell tumour: a retrospective study of three hundred and ten cases

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumour (GCT) is an invasive benign bone tumour, and the incidence of pulmonary metastasis is rare. We are aiming to analyze risk factors of pulmonary metastasis and clinical prognosis for giant cell tumour patients with pulmonary metastasis.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective study of 310 patients with GCT between December 2004 and December 2016. Risk factors of pulmonary metastasis were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Then, the influence of risk factors of overall LR (local recurrence), recurrent tumor at presentation, LR after our therapy, and with soft tissue mass on the pulmonary metastasis-free survival rates was analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up of the present cohort was 45.6 ± 35.3 months (median, 36.6 months; range, 6.1-193.4 months). Eighteen (5.8%) of 310 patients developed pulmonary metastasis. The average interval from surgery of primary tumour to detection of pulmonary metastasis was 15 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed overall local recurrence was the independent risk factor of developing pulmonary metastasis. Among 18 patients with pulmonary metastasis, sixteen cases had history of local recurrence (88.9%, 16/18), including eleven (68.8%, 11/16) with local recurrence at presentation before receiving our therapy and seven (43.8%, 7/16) with local recurrence after receiving treatment in our hospital. Time to local recurrence had obvious difference between patients with and without pulmonary metastasis. Patients with pulmonary metastasis were prone to recur earlier. Furthermore, overall local recurrence, local recurrence after our therapy, recurrent tumor at presentation, and tumour with a soft tissue mass showed statistical differences in the pulmonary metastasis-free survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Giant cell tumour patients with soft tissue mass and overall local recurrence are prone to develop pulmonary metastasis. Although giant cell tumour is a benign tumor, more attention should be paid to the problem of pulmonary metastatic lesions, and chest CT scan should be recommended during follow-up.

Giant cell tumor of bone at the proximal epiphysis of humerus in a skeletally immature patient: A case report

•

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) at proximal humerus in skeletally immature (SI) patients is rare.

•

MRI and clinical evaluation are paramount for the GCTB diagnosis.

•

Tumor resection with cementation and adjuvant therapy is described as GCTB treatment.

•

GCTB should be suspected in all SI cases with enlarged proximal humerus lesions.

Introduction

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in skeletally immature (SI) patients are rare benign lesions that have locally aggressive growth pattern and high risk of recurrence. The presence of GCTB at the proximal epiphysis of humerus in SI patients has never been described in literature.

Presentation of case

This report shows the case of a 10-year-old SI male who presented with a GCTB at the proximal epiphysis of humerus that was treated with curettage, cement and adjuvant therapy.

Discussion

The presence of a lytic growing lesion at the proximal humerus in a SI patient should alert clinicians to consider GCTB in their differential diagnosis. The management of GCTB in SI patients is challenging for orthopaedic surgeons. Tumor resection with cementation and adjuvant therapy has been described as a method rationale to prevent the recurrence and preserve the joint function in SI patients with GCTB at the proximal epiphysis of humerus. Clinicians should continue to monitor these patients with radiographic imaging for possible recurrence, metastasis or growth plate injury.

Conclusion

Tumor resection with cementation and adjuvant therapy offers a treatment alternative to prevent the recurrence and preserve the joint function in SI patients with GCTB at the proximal epiphysis of humerus. The use of a prothesis in a SI patient should avoided if possible, to prevent implant-related complications and damage to the growth plate.

Does Osteoarticular Allograft Reconstruction Achieve Long-term Survivorship after En Bloc Resection of Grade 3 Giant Cell Tumor of Bone?

BACKGROUND

En bloc resection of benign tumors is only indicated in aggressive lesions with substantial destruction of the affected bone. Few reports have evaluated the long-term outcome of Grade 3 giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB; defined as severe bone destruction and soft tissue extension) treated with en bloc resection and reconstruction with a massive allograft. We recently reported that patients with benign tumors achieved better allograft reconstruction survivorship compared with those treated for a malignant bone tumor. In light of that finding, we wondered whether osteoarticular allografts would be a viable long-term alternative for Grade 3 GCTB, which could be important in some countries because of greater availability and lower costs compared with endoprostheses.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We analyzed a group of patients with Grade 3 GCTBs treated with en bloc resection and osteoarticular allograft reconstruction in terms of (1) survivorship free from allograft removal at 10 years; (2) survivorship free from reoperation for any reason at 10 years, (3) functional results as measured by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, (4) assessment of arthrosis at the knee.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients with a Grade 3 GCTB treated between 1980 and 2007. Only patients treated with en bloc resection and reconstruction with massive osteoarticular allografts were included in the analysis. The indication for osteoarticular reconstruction during that time included severe bone destruction with intraarticular compromise of the tumor, intraarticular fracture because of tumor growth, the presence of inadequate remaining subchondral bone to resist normal loading (for the distal femur or proximal tibia), and the preservation of a soft-tissue component (ligaments or meniscus) for articular stability. During the period, 75 patients were treated with en bloc resection. Patients treated with intralesional curettage (n = 7), reconstruction with an endoprosthesis (n = 2), intercalary arthrodesis (n = 13), or unicondylar reconstruction (n = 14) were excluded. Of the original 75 treated with en bloc resection, 52% (39) were treated with osteoarticular allograft reconstruction, and no patient was lost to follow-up before 2 years or had substantial missing data. However, of the 39 patients, another 21% (8) have not been seen in the last 5 years, but these were included here because they reached the 10-year minimum surveillance period before being lost. Twenty-three of those 39 patients were previously reported by our group and 16 new patients (treated between 1980-1985) were included in this series (eight distal radius, six distal femur, two proximal tibias), extending the follow-up period and including more patients for analysis. The median (range) follow-up duration was 26 years (10 to 34). We assessed survivorship using a Kaplan-Meier analysis, we drew MSTS scores retrospectively from patients´ medical records, and we graded arthrosis using the Ahlbäck scale for the knee (which was by far the most common joint involved, n = 31, and so it was the joint we assessed for the presence of arthrosis).

RESULTS

The survivorship free from allograft removal was 85% at 10 years (95% CI 74 to 96). The allograft survivorship free from reoperation for any reason at 10 years was 72% (95% CI 59 to 87). The median (range) MSTS score was 28 points (19 to 30). The grade of arthrosis in the knee at last follow-up was analyzed in 20 patients and classified in nine as Ahlbäck Type 4, in six as Type 3, in three as Type 2 and in two as Type 5.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoarticular allograft reconstruction after a Grade 3 GCTB en bloc resection showed excellent long-term survivorship. We believe these results compare favorably with other studies on endoprosthetic reconstruction and head-to-head studies of these approaches should be performed; these would need to be multicenter trials. In the meantime, in locations where endoprostheses are unavailable or too expensive, we believe our results support the use of osteoarticular allografts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Analysis of clinical outcome for adolescent patients undergoing conservative nerve-sparing surgery based on the proposed resection classification for sacral giant cell tumor

The most common of age distribution ranges from second to fourth decade of life and patients with giant cell tumors (GCT) aged less than 18 years is more uncommon. We are aiming to reveal what the conservative nerve-sparing surgery values for adolescent patients with sacral GCT. We retrospectively reviewed 15 adolescent patients with sacral GCT aged <eighteen years, who received the conservative nerve-sparing surgery at our center from 2007 to 2018. Four patients presented with tumor of Campanacci grade II and 11 patients with grade III. According to the location of tumor at the sacrum, we classified the surgical resection of sacral giant cell tumor into three types. In our adolescent cohort, nine had the aortic balloon occlusion and five received the selective arterial embolization. All patients were free of disease and no one had the pulmonary metastasis or died of disease. All five wound complications required the debridement. 6 out of 15 patients had the local recurrence that required surgery treatment. The average time to recurrence after initial surgery in the present adolescent cohort was 22.4 months. Two patients had the surgical site infection and three had the wound dehiscence. One had the femoral artery thrombosis due to the aortic balloon occlusion and received the surgical removal of thrombosis. With the help of preoperative selective embolization and intraoperative aortic balloon occlusion, adolescent patients undergoing conservative nerve-sparing surgery for giant cell tumor of sacrum based on the proposed surgical resection classification have an acceptable clinical outcome and neurologic function.

Is Treatment with Denosumab Associated with Local Recurrence in Patients with Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Treated with Curettage? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to receptor activation of nuclear factor-kappa ß ligand (RANKL), has been used as a drug to treat aggressive giant cell tumors of bone. It is unclear whether preoperative denosumab therapy is associated with the local recurrence risk in patients with giant cell tumors of bone treated with curettage. Early evidence suggests that denosumab treatment is associated with a reduction in local recurrence, but other studies have questioned that premise. Curettage after a short course of denosumab (3 to 4 months) has been recommended, especially for large, aggressive giant cell tumors in which complete curettage is difficult to achieve. No randomized studies have documented the benefit of this approach, and some investigators have reported higher local recurrence after denosumab treatment. Due to this confusion, we performed a systematic analysis of existing reports to attempt to answer this question and determine whether the appropriate preoperative denosumab therapy duration could be established.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is the use of preoperative denosumab associated with local recurrence risk in patients with giant cell tumors of bone treated with curettage compared with those treated with curettage alone? (2) Is the preoperative denosumab therapy duration associated with local recurrence after curettage?

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases on April 26, 2019 and included both randomized and non-randomized studies that compared local recurrence between patients who had giant cell tumors of bone and were treated with curettage after preoperative denosumab and patients treated with curettage alone. Two authors independently screened the studies. There were no randomized studies dealing with denosumab in giant cell tumors of bone, and generally, denosumab was used for more aggressive tumors. We assessed the quality of the included studies using the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies, with a moderate overall risk of bias. We registered our protocol in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42019133288). We selected seven eligible studies involving 619 patients for the final analysis.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with local recurrence ranged from 20% to 100% in the curettage with preoperative denosumab group and ranged from 0% to 50% in the curettage-alone group. The odds ratio of local recurrence ranged from 1.07 to 37.80 in no more than 6 months of preoperative denosumab duration group and ranged from 0.60 to 28.33 in more than 6 months of preoperative denosumab duration group.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence for the benefit of denosumab in more aggressive giant cell tumors is inconclusive, and denosumab treatment may even be associated with an increase in the proportion of patients experiencing local recurrence. Because there are no randomized studies and the existing studies are of poor quality due to indication bias (the most aggressive Campanacci 3 lesions or those where even a resection would be difficult and result in morbidity are generally the patients who are treated with denosumab), the evidence to suggest a disadvantage is weak. Denosumab treatment should be viewed with caution until more definitive, randomized studies documenting a benefit (or not) have been conducted. Furthermore, we could not find evidence to suggest an appropriate length of preoperative denosumab before curettage.

Comparison of outcomes of 2 surgical treatments for proximal humerus giant cell tumors: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of giant cell tumors in the proximal humerus is low. We evaluated 2 surgical treatments for giant cell tumors of the proximal humerus and postoperative upper-extremity function.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 27 cases of giant cell tumors of the proximal humerus at 4 Chinese medical centers specializing in bone oncology collected between January 2002 and June 2015. All patients were followed up for more than 2 years. The surgical procedures performed for treatment included curettage in 14 patients and segmental resection in 13. The Campanacci grade, occurrence of pathologic fracture, surgical method, complications, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score were recorded for each cohort.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate was 7.1% in the curettage group and 15.4% in the segmental resection group. Other postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients with segmental resection, including resorption of the osteoarticular allograft in 2, subluxation of the glenohumeral joint in 1, and prosthetic loosening and exposure in 1. A significant difference in postoperative upper-extremity function was noted between the 2 groups (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative upper-extremity function in the curettage group was significantly better than that in the segmental resection group. Segmental resection and reconstruction with a large segmental osteoarticular allograft were considered unadvisable. We suggest that extensive curettage should be selected to treat proximal humerus giant cell tumors as much as possible.

Curettage as first surgery for bone giant cell tumor : adequate surgery is more important than oncology training or surgical management by high volume specialized teams

We reviewed the files of 203 patients with extremities GCTB treated with curettage as first surgery from 1990 to 2013. Median follow-up was 84.2 months. We evaluated whether the years of practice and training in orthopaedic oncology are associated with local recurrences, function and complications after curettage as first surgery for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). Local recurrences were not significantly different between orthopaedic oncology trained and non-trained orthopaedic surgeons and between orthopaedic surgeons with < 10 years and ≥ 10 years of practice. Function was not significantly different between orthopaedic oncology trained and non-trained surgeons and between orthopaedic surgeons with < 10 years and ≥ 10 years of practice. The only important univariate and multivariate predictor for local recurrence was PMMA adjuvant. Complications were not significantly different between orthopaedic oncology trained and non-trained orthopaedic surgeons and between orthopaedic surgeons with < 10 years and ≥ 10 years of practice. Curettage may be effectively performed as first surgery for GCTB by early-career (< 10 years of practice) non-trained orthopaedic oncology orthopaedic surgeons. PMMA adjuvant is recommended after appropriate curettage.

Early postoperative compilations of bone filling in curettage defects

Background

Curettage is widely used in orthopedic oncology; the defect created frequently requires filling for mechanical and functional stability for the bones and adjacent joint. Allograft, bone graft substitute, and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) are the most common substances used each with their benefits and drawbacks. The aim of the study is to show that good functional result can be achieved with curettage and bone filler, regardless of type.

Methods

A series of 267 cases were reviewed between 1994 and 2015 who received curettage treatment and placement of a bone filler. Endpoints included fracture, infection, cellulitis, pulmonary embolism, and paresthesia. Complication rates at our single institution were compared against literature values for three study cohorts: allograft, bone graft substitute, and PMMA bone fillers. Friedman test, Wilcoxon test, and Z-score for two populations were used to compare our subset against literature values and between different bone filling types.

Results

Our cases included 18 autografts, 74 allografts, 121 bone graft substitute, and 54 PMMA of which the bulk of complications occurred. Our overall complication rate was 3.37%. Allograft has a complication rate of 1.35%, bone graft substitute of 4.13%, and PMMA of 5.56%. Other techniques did not yield any complications. Combination filling techniques PMMA + allograft and PMMA + bone graft substitute had sample sizes too small for statistical comparison. Statistical comparison yielded no significant difference between complications in any of the filling groups (P = 0.411).

Conclusions

Some has even argued that bone defects following curettage do not require bone filling for good outcome. However, many structural or biologic benefits that aid in earlier return to functionality can be conferred by filling large bone defects. There was no significant difference in postoperative complication rates between allograft, bone graft substitute, and PMMA when compared at our institution and with literature values. Nevertheless, one complication with a large defect filled with allograft, requiring a subsequent reconstruction using vascularized fibular graft. Taking everything into account, we see bone graft substitute as a suitable alternative to other bone filling modalities.

The prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in giant cell tumor of the extremities

Background

In this study, the influence of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on the prognosis of giant cell tumor (GCT) of the extremities were investigated.

Methods

The clinical parameters of 163 patients who were diagnosed with GCT of the extremities between July 2008 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Optimal cutoff values of NLR and PLR were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. According to optimal cutoff values, patients were divided into high NLR and low NLR groups or high PLR and low PLR groups. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods were used to compare the recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the high and low NLR groups, and between the high and low PLR groups. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the influence of age, gender, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, platelet count, white blood cell count, tumor size, surgical approach and Campanacci stage on the prognosis of giant cell tumor of bone. The main predictors of RFS were determined by Cox multivariate regression analysis.

Results

The optimal cutoff value of NLR in giant cell tumor of the extremities was 2.32, which was used to classify patients into high and low NLR groups. The optimal cutoff value of PLR was 116.81, and was used to classify patients into high and low PLR groups. Campanacci stage, tumor maximum diameter, alkaline phosphatase, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly associated with the high NLR and PLR. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that the Campanacci stage (HR = 3.28, 95% CI: 1.24~8.69) and NLR (HR = 4.18, 95% CI: 1.83~9.57) were independent prognostic factors for giant cell tumor of the extremities.

Conclusion

As a novel inflammatory index, NLR has some predictive power for the prognosis of patients with giant cell tumor of the extremities.

Present day controversies and consensus in curettage for giant cell tumor of bone

BACKGROUND

The ideal treatment for giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether curettage was successful in the treatment of GCTB. Intralesional curettage with adjuvant therapies, such as high-speed burring, polymethylmethacrylate, phenol, ethanol, and liquid nitrogen, may be used to reduce the local recurrence rate. However, there is no consensus on the optimal use of curettage, along with fillers and adjuvants, to limit the recurrence rate.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of articles using the terms long bones, GCTB, and treatment. Case reports, reviews, opinion articles, or technique notes were excluded based on the abstract. Twenty-six articles included in this review were then studied to establish the index in suggesting the surgical treatment of GCTB.

RESULTS

The patient's gender, their age, the Campanacci grade of their tumor, and the type of surgery they had were not significantly associated with the local recurrence rate. Local recurrences seemed to be associated with the site of the tumor, occurring more frequently in the proximal femur or distal radius. A pathological fracture was not a contraindication for intralesional curettage. Treatment with denosumab did not decrease the local recurrence rate in patients who had been treated with curettage.

CONCLUSION

The current literature seems to suggest that the ideal treatment for GCTB is to remove the tumor while preserving as much of the joint as possible. Local recurrent tumors can be treated with curettage to keep the re-recurrence rate within an acceptable limit. The choice for how to treat GCTB in the proximal femur or distal radius requires special attention.

Denosumab May Increase the Risk of Local Recurrence in Patients with Giant-Cell Tumor of Bone Treated with Curettage

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical studies have suggested that denosumab is associated with tumor response and reduced surgical morbidity in patients with giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB). We therefore evaluated the recurrence-free survival rate of patients who had GCTB in an extremity and were treated with surgery and denosumab, to determine the influence of denosumab and clinical factors on the risk of local recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 408 patients treated for GCTB in an extremity in a single institution from 1990 through 2013. Two hundred and forty-seven patients underwent curettage (intralesional surgery) with a high-speed burr, and 161 underwent resection. Phenol adjuvant was used in 221 of the 247 patients who had curettage. We also reviewed the medical records of 30 patients treated surgically (25 with curettage and 5 with resection) and with denosumab from 2010 through 2013 and compared their clinical results with 378 historical control subjects. The overall minimum duration of follow-up was 24 months.

RESULTS

The local recurrence rates were 60% (15) of 25 patients treated with curettage and denosumab and 16% (36) of 222 patients treated with curettage alone. The joint preservation rates were 80% (20) of 25 patients treated with curettage and denosumab and 94% (209) of 222 patients treated with curettage alone. Univariate and multivariable analyses showed that denosumab was the only independent factor associated with a poor prognosis when recurrence-free survival and joint preservation were considered. The overall median duration of follow-up was 85.6 months (interquartile range, 54.3 to 125.1 months). Viable tumor was present in all 30 specimens from patients treated with denosumab.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a higher rate of recurrence in the cohort exposed to denosumab. Because there were substantial differences in the cohorts and randomization was not applied, however, causation could not be evaluated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Giant cell tumor locally advanced around the knee: treatment and literature review

Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a benign bone tumor with aggressive characteristics. They are more prevalent in the third decade of life and demonstrate a preference for locating in the epiphyseal region of long bones. They have a high local recurrence rate, which depends on the type of treatment and initial tumor presentation. The risk of lung metastases is around 3%.

Between October 2010 and August 2014, nine patients diagnosed with locally advanced GCT or with pathological fracture to the knee level underwent surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the treatment, particularly with regard to relapse, and to conduct a literature review.

There was a predominance of males (77.7%). The most common location was the distal femur. Four patients (44%) developed local recurrence in the first year after surgery, three in distal femur and one in proximal tibia. Of the two patients with pathologic fracture at diagnosis, one of them presented recurrence after five months.

The treatment of GCT is still a challenge. The authors believe that the best treatment method is wide resection and reconstruction of bone defects with non-conventional endoprostheses. Patients should be aware and well informed about the possible complications and functional losses that may occur as a result of the surgical treatment chosen and the need for further surgery in the medium and long term.

How safe and effective is denosumab for bone giant cell tumour?

Recent clinical studies have suggested that denosumab is associated with beneficial tumour response, surgical down-staging, and reduced surgical morbidity in patients with giant cell tumour of bone. However, these studies reported results of patients still on denosumab treatment, or patients after denosumab treatment but with a short follow-up. Other studies reported that the new osseous tumour matrix and thickened cortical bone that develop with denosumab treatment does not allow the surgeon to delineate the true extent of the tumour, and probably increases the risk for local recurrence. A study showed that cell proliferation is only diminished by denosumab; the cells continue to proliferate in vitro, albeit at a slower rate. More importantly, nine cases of malignant transformation of GCT during denosumab therapy without previous radiation exposure have been reported; inhibition of RANKL may increase the risk of new malignancies due to immunosuppression. With these concerns in mind, this article is an attempt to put essential information in one place, creating a comprehensive review that the curious reader would find interesting and informative.

Higher local recurrence rates after intralesional surgery for giant cell tumor of the proximal femur compared to other sites

PURPOSE

The treatment of giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone remains controversial. Intralesional surgery (curettage) results in a higher rate of local recurrence, but better functional results compared to resection. The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of curettage was successful in the treatment of GCT of long bones. We evaluated the influence of adjuvant treatment, local tumor presentation, and demographic factors on the risk of recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients treated for GCT of long bones between 1990 and 2013, using curettage. No patient had any treatment other than surgery. After detailed curettage, the bone cavity was filled with bone allografts and/or cement. Recurrence rates, risk factors for recurrence and the development of pulmonary metastases were determined. The minimum follow-up was 24 months.

RESULTS

We enrolled 210 patients with GCT of long bones treated by curettage. The rate of local recurrence was 16.2% (34/210 patients). The median follow-up was 89.2 months. In the multivariate analysis, no significant statistical effect on the local recurrence rate could be identified for gender, patient's age, Campanacci's grading, or cement versus bone allografts. The only independent risk factor related to the local recurrence was the site, with a statistically significant higher risk for patients with GCT of the proximal femur.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observation on the correlation of tumor location and risk of local recurrence is new. We suggest that patients with GCT of bone in the proximal femur should be followed closely soon after surgery to identify any possible recurrence.

Giant cell tumour of bone: a new evaluating system is necessary

Giant cell tumour (GCT) of bone is still one of the most obscure and intensively studied tumours of bone. The histogenesis of GCT remains unclear. The recommended therapy of GCT evolved during the 20th century. The best treatment should ensure local control and maintain function. Curettage has been the preferred treatment for most GCTs. Good results have also been published on the use of high-speed burr and local adjuvants. Local tumour control can be satisfactorily achieved by wide excision. However, treatment options for GCT have remained fairly static over the past 30 years and there is no widely held consensus regarding the standard treatment selection for all patients. This challenge may result from the fact that there are no single clinical, radiographic, histological or morphological aspects that allow surgeons to accurately predict the trend of a single lesion to recur. In this research, a comprehensive review of the previously described radiographic staging systems by Enneking and Campanacci et al. and the shortfalls associated with them are provided, and then the possible risk factors of predicting local recurrence or evaluating functional outcome of GCT are also discussed. A new preoperative evaluating system of GCT may be necessary and feasible, so that surgeons may accurately assess the aggressiveness or severity of GCT in order to reliably guide treatment decisions and predict outcomes.

Recurrence in giant cell tumour of bone: imaging features and risk factors

PURPOSE

This study was done to investigate X-ray, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features of recurrence in giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) and to evaluate risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records and imaging data were reviewed for 55 cases of recurrent GCTB. All images were reviewed retrospectively and independently by two radiologists experienced in skeletal musculature. The common radiological findings; factors related to tumour recurrence such as gender, age, location; pathological fracture, Campanacci grading and surgical procedure were analysed by nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney U test for two independent samples test and Kruskal-Wallis H test for multiple independent samples test). p values <0.05 were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

RESULTS

The imaging features of recurrent GCTB were as follows: osteolytic destruction or bone resorption of graft bone or around the polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), soft tissue mass formation and expansile change. Tumour parenchyma showed markedly heterogeneous enhancement, except for necrotic cystic cavities, on contrast-enhanced MR images. Wide resection had a smaller (p=0.031) risk of local recurrence than did intralesional curettage. There was no statistical significance in gender, age, location, pathological fracture and Campanacci staging (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of recurrence in GCTB was influenced by the type of surgery and adjuvants. Bone transformaresorption, soft tissue mass formation and aggravated expansile change are reliable signs of recurrence on imaging.

Pre-operative selective arterial embolization as a neoadjuvant therapy for proximal humerus giant cell tumor of bone: radiological and histological evaluation

The management of giant cell tumor of the proximal humerus that extends to the joint is challenging. Here, we report a case of proximal humerus giant cell tumor with cortical bone destruction extending to the shoulder joint. Pre-operative selective arterial embolization induced peripheral tumor ossification. Subsequently, the lesion was removed by intralesional curettage, and the cavity was filled with cement. Macroscopically, the inner wall of the cavity was found to be lined with a thick fibrous membrane. Histologically, massive fibrosis and resultant remodeling of the destroyed cortical bone were induced, which was consistent with the peripheral ossification on the plain radiograph. We believe that selective arterial embolization can be an effective neoadjuvant therapy for giant cell tumors of the extremities, especially for tumors with large cortical defects or joint involvement.

Phenol procedure for pilonidal sinus disease and risk factors for treatment failure

BACKGROUND

The present study was designed to evaluate the results of phenolization for pilonidal sinus disease and the risk factors for treatment failure.

METHODS

Between June 2005 and July 2009, 76 consecutive patients with nonrecurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were treated with a phenol treatment and included in the study. The clinical (age, sex, story of treatment for abscess formation, and comorbidity), operative (localization and number of sinus openings and volume of cavity), and follow-up data (healing time, time off work, postoperative complications, morbidity, and number of phenolization sessions) of the patients was recorded. Gender, age, history of abscess drainage, number of sinus openings, localization of sinus openings, volume of cavity, and the number of phenolization sessions were analyzed as risk factors for treatment failure.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 67% (51 of 76 patients). The mean time to complete healing was 16 days (range, 10-45). The time off work was 0 days. Age and gender were not found to be risk factors for treatment failure (P > .05 and P > .05, respectively). Patients with a history of abscess drainage and more than 3 sinus openings had a significantly higher risk of treatment failure (P = .001 and P = .046, respectively). There was no difference between the localization of sinus openings and treatment failure (P > .05). There were statistically significant differences between treatment failure and both the cavity volume and number of phenolization sessions (P = .016 and P = .001, respectively). Patients were followed up for a mean period of 25 months (range, 13-48). One patient (2%) showed recurrence.

CONCLUSION

With an early return to work and low rates of complications and recurrence, phenolization is a simple outpatient procedure for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease in selected patients.

Giant cell tumor of the extremity: A review of 349 cases from a single institution

Giant cell tumor is still one of the most controversial and discussed bone tumors. Surgical treatment options include intralesional excision or segmental resection. Curettage has a higher recurrence rate but does preserve adjacent joint function. After curettage, the use of adjuvant therapies is still controversial. Three hundred forty-nine patients with giant cell tumors of the extremity, treated in a single institution, were analyzed in a retrospective study. Two hundred patients underwent curettage of the lesion and in 64 of these cases, three local adjuvants, such as phenol, alcohol and cement, were employed. The hypothesis is that an "aggressive curettage" with phenol, alcohol and cement provides better local control and functional results. The correlation between tumor in the proximal femur and higher recurrence rate has not been recorded before. The results of the present study suggest that an "aggressive curettage" reduces the recurrence rate in a disease whose aggressiveness is not easy to predict. Special attention must be given to giant cell tumors not only in the distal radius, but also in the proximal femur, where the treatment is more difficult and associated with a higher rate of local recurrence.