Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty in young patients: diagnosis is more important than age

What is the Level of Evidence Substantiating Commercial Payers' Coverage Policies for Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in the United States has drawn the attention of health care stakeholders. The payers have also used a variety of strategies to regulate the medical necessity of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to examine the level of evidence of the coverage policies being used by commercial payers in the United States.

METHODS

The references of the coverage policies of four commercial insurance companies were reviewed for type of document, level of evidence, applicability to a TJA population, and success of nonoperative treatment in patients with severe degenerative joint disease.

RESULTS

282 documents were reviewed. 45.8% were primary journal articles, 14.2% were level I or II, 41.2% were applicable to patients who were candidates for TJA, and 9.9% discussed the success of nonoperative treatment in patients who would be candidates for TJA.

CONCLUSION

Most of the references cited by commercial payers are of a lower level of scientific evidence and not applicable to patients considered to be candidates for TJA. This is relatively uniform across the reviewed payers. The dearth of high-quality literature cited by commercial payers reflects the lack of evidence and difficulty in conducting high level studies on the outcomes of nonoperative versus operative treatment for patients with severe, symptomatic osteoarthritis. Patients, surgeons, and payers would all benefit from such studies and we encourage professional societies to strive toward that end through multicenter collaboration.

Ceramic-on-ceramic cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients aged 40 years or under: Do preoperative conditions affect long-term results?

INTRODUCTION

Underlying diseases, bone deformities and polyethylene wear affect outcome in young patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). These issues are not widely confirmed for ceramic - on-ceramic THA, particularly regarding cup fixation. Therefore, we did a retrospective long-term investigation on a large population of cementless ceramic-on-ceramic THA in patients aged 40 years or younger aiming to analyze: 1) the complication rate; 2) clinical results; and 3) survival for cup loosening with regard to their preoperative conditions.

HYPOTHESIS

Cup loosening could be related to preoperative diagnosis in young patients with a cementless ceramic-on-ceramic THA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and seven hips in 171 patients (97 men and 74 women) underwent a cementless ceramic-on-ceramic THA at a mean age of 31.6±6.8 years. The most frequent diagnoses were avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head (74 hips), pediatric hip diseases (35 hips), severe congenital hip dysplasia (CHD) (31 hips), juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (30 hips) and mild CHD (26 hips). The prosthesis included a press-fit metal backed cup with a hydroxyapatite coating and a macrotexture surface on either the equatorial region (93 cups) or the entire surface of the shell (114 cups). Ceramics were made of pure alumina and had a femoral head size of 28 (60 hips) or 32mm (147 hips). In all cases same the straight cementless tapered stem was inserted.

RESULTS

There were three early dislocations, one requiring cup revision No hip was revised due to infection, ceramic fracture, or femoral component loosening. Eight cups were revised for aseptic loosening (3,8%). The mean preoperative Harris Hip score was 52.8±6.2 and 93.4±6.9 at the end of follow-up. It was better in AVN (95.7±2.3) and worst in severe CHD (88.8±11.8) (p=0.001). If the end-point was cup aseptic loosening, the survival rate at 17 years was 95.1% (95% CI: 91.3-98.9), 100% for AVN and post-traumatic arthritis, and 86.8% (95% CI: 74.9-98.7) for severe CHD.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite diagnoses frequently causing technical difficulties at the surgery, outcome of cementless ceramic-on-ceramic THA in patients under the age of 40 years is satisfactory over ten years of follow up. Cup aseptic loosening was the main cause of failure and appears more related to the initial hip diseases than the age of the patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective comparative study.

Early to medium-term outcomes of uncemented ceramic-bearing total hip arthroplasty in teenagers for paediatric hip conditions

AIMS

Despite advances in the treatment of paediatric hip disease, adolescent and young adult patients can develop early onset end-stage osteoarthritis. The aims of this study were to address the indications and medium-term outcomes for total hip arthroplasty (THA) with ceramic bearings for teenage patients.

METHODS

Surgery was performed by a single surgeon working in the paediatric orthopaedic unit of a tertiary referral hospital. Databases were interrogated from 2003 to 2017 for all teenage patients undergoing THA with a minimum 2.3 year follow-up. Data capture included patient demographics, the underlying hip pathology, number of previous surgeries, and THA prostheses used. Institutional ethical approval was granted to contact patients for prospective clinical outcomes and obtain up-to-date radiographs. In total, 60 primary hips were implanted in 51 patients (35 female, 16 male) with nine bilateral cases. The mean age was 16.7 years (12 to 19) and mean follow-up was 9.3 years (2.3 to 16.8).

RESULTS

The most common indication for teenage hip arthroplasty was avascular necrosis secondary to slipped upper femoral epiphysis (31%; n = 16). Overall, 64% of patients (n = 33) had undergone multiple previous operations. The survival at follow-up was 97%; two patients required revision for aseptic loosening (one femoral stem, one acetabular component). Both patients had fused hips noted at the time of arthroplasty. A further two patients had radiolucent lines but were asymptomatic. At latest follow-up the mean Oxford Hip Score was 44 (31 to 48) and a Visual Analogue Scale measurement of 1.5, indicating satisfactory function.

CONCLUSION

Operating on this cohort can be complicated by multiple previous surgeries and distorted anatomy, which in some cases require custom-made prostheses. We have demonstrated a good outcome with low revision rate in this complex group of patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1491-1496.

Incidence of Ceramic Fracture in Contemporary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Proportions

BACKGROUND

We performed a proportion meta-analysis of currently available data to determine the prevalence of ceramic fracture for each generation.

METHODS

A total of 10,571 total hip arthroplasties from 45 studies were included. Proportion meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed to estimate the prevalence of ceramic fracture. To determine whether the ceramic fractures have a fatigue nature and a risk or latent period for the development, postoperative time lapse, patient age, and body mass index were related with ceramic fracture by metaregression analysis.

RESULTS

As of postoperative 2.0 to 18.8 years, the rate of ceramic fracture was 0.5% (95% CI, 0.3%-0.8%) in the forte group and 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.4%) in the delta group (P = .059). The ceramic fracture rate for each component was 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.3%) for the forte head, 0.1% (95% CI, 0.0%-0.2%) for the delta head (P = .210), 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.3%) for the forte liner, and 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.4%) for the delta liner (P = .305). The rate of ceramic fracture per 1000 patient-years was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-0.13) in the forte group and 0.5 (95% CI, 0.2-0.8) in the delta group (P = .072). In metaregression analysis, no significant associations were found between prevalence of ceramic fracture and postoperative time lapse, patient age, or body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of ceramic fracture was 0.9/1000 patient-year in the forte group and 0.5/1000 patient-year in the delta group. The results of this study provide baseline data for further studies validating ceramic bearings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, meta-analysis.

Eighteen-Year Follow-Up Study of 2 Alternative Bearing Surfaces Used in Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Same Young Patients

BACKGROUND

This study compares the long-term functional, radiographic, and computed tomography scan outcomes and implant survivorship of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (C-O-C THA) and ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (C-O-HXLPE THA) in the same patients.

METHODS

In this randomized, prospective trial conducted between January 1999 and April 2003, 133 patients (266 hips) younger than 55 years were enrolled. Each patient received C-O-C THA in 1 hip and a C-O-HXLPE THA in the other. The mean follow-up was 17.1 years (range, 15-18 years); there were 84 men and 49 women with a mean age of 53 ± 7 years (range, 25-55 years).

RESULTS

At the latest follow-up, mean Harris hip scores (94 vs 93 points; P = .861), pain scores (43 vs 42 points; P = .651), and patient satisfaction scores (7.8 vs 7.6 points; P = .379) were not different between the 2 groups. Eight hips (3%) in the C-O-C THA had an audible squeaking sound. The mean annual penetration rate of HXLPE was 0.0162 ± 0.032 mm per year. No osteolysis was recorded on radiographs or computed tomography scans in either group. At 17.1 years, the survival rate of the acetabular component was 97% in the C-O-C bearing group and 98% in the C-O-HXLPE bearing group (P = .923). The survival rate of the femoral component was 99% in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Both C-O-C THA and C-O-HXLPE THA functioned well, with no osteolysis at mean of 17.1-year follow-up.

A Comparison Study of the Outcomes of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young vs Older Patients: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up Prospective Matched Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to analyze the outcome and prosthesis survival in patients aged between 20 and 40 years who received a cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a minimum follow-up of 10 years compared to older patients.

METHODS

Prospective matched comparative study was conducted between 94 young patients with mean age of 37.2 (range 22-40) years and 90 older patients with mean age of 64.7 (range 60-70) years treated with ceramic-on-ceramic THA. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the Harris Hip Score, reduced Western Ontario and MacMaster University (WOMAC), and Short-Form-12 (SF12) questionnaires. Radiological evaluation was also performed. The primary outcome was the THA survival rate.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up of 13.6 (range, 10-15) years. At the final follow-up, there was no significant difference between groups in Harris Hip Score (P = .356), WOMAC-pain (P = .461), SF12-physical (P = .305), or SF12-mental (P = .511), but younger group had significantly higher WOMAC-function score (P = .013). There were 7 revisions in the younger group and 4 in the older group (P = .197). The 14-year prosthesis survival for any reason was 93.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.7-99.7) in the younger group and 98.3% (95% CI 95.1-100) in the older group (P = .189). For aseptic reason, the 14-year survival was 94.7% (95% CI 88.9-100) in the younger group and 98.3% (95% CI 95.1-100) in the older group (P = .332).

CONCLUSION

At minimum follow-up of 10 years, THA with cementless stem and ceramic-on-ceramic bearing provides successful survival and functional outcomes in young patients between 20 and 40 years old.

Implant Survival and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients

BACKGROUND

Younger patients are undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for various conditions that affect the hip joint. This study evaluates the implant survival and long-term patient-reported outcomes of THA in patients aged 35 years or younger.

METHODS

Data were collected through a retrospective chart review, and follow-up surveys were conducted to determine implant survival and patient-reported outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate implant survival, and the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) was used to describe patient-reported outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline and follow-up data, and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare implant survival and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

This study included 400 patients (548 THAs). The average age at the time of surgery was 27 (range: 8-35) years, and the mean time to follow-up was 14 (range: 2-29.7) years. The 10- and 20-year implant survival was 87% and 61%, respectively. Implant survival differed based on primary diagnosis (P = .05), and it was significantly better in patients aged 25 years or older at the time of surgery, male patients, and patients with ceramic-on-ceramic or ceramic-on-plastic implants (P < .05). Mean HOOS scores at follow-up were 86 for pain, 84 for symptoms, 86 for ADLs, and 77 for sports. All HOOS scores were significantly worse after revision THA (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Young patients have good implant survival and favorable long-term outcomes after THA. There are several predictors of implant survival and patient-reported outcomes after THA in young patients.

The evolution of an uncemented acetabular component in alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty has improved clinical outcome

Aims

To determine the effect of a change in design of a cementless ceramic acetabular component in fixation and clinical outcome after total hip arthroplasty

Patients and Methods

We compared 342 hips (302 patients) operated between 1999 and 2005 with a relatively smooth hydroxyapatite coated acetabular component (group 1), and 337 hips (310 patients) operated between 2006 and 2011 using a similar acetabular component with a macrotexture on the entire outer surface of the component (group 2). The mean age of the patients was 53.5 (14 to 70) in group 1 and 53.0 (15 to 70) in group 2. The mean follow-up was 12.7 years (10 to 17) for group 1 and 7.2 years (4 to 10) for group 2.

Results

No hips were revised due to complications related to bearing fracture or to stem loosening. A total of 15 acetabular components were revised for aseptic loosening in group 1 and two in group 2. The survival rate for acetabular component aseptic loosening at eight years was 96.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.8 to 98.7) for group 1 and 99.2% (95% CI 98.0 to 100) for group 2. The risk for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component was higher in group 1 (p = 0.04, Hazard Ratio (HR) 4.99), dysplastic acetabula (p = 0.01, HR 4.12), components outside Lewinnek´s zone (p < 0.001, HR 6.13) and in those with a hip rotation centre distance greater than 5 mm (p = 0.005, HR 4.09).

Conclusion

Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic THA is an excellent option for young patients. Although newer components appeared to improve fixation, acetabular reconstruction is essential to obtain a satisfactory outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:749–58.

Metal on Metal or Ceramic on Ceramic for Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Hard bearings, metal on metal (MOM) and ceramic on ceramic (COC), have been developed to overcome polyethylene wear-related osteolysis, but comparisons between these 2 hard bearings are limited. We performed a meta-analysis to determine revision rates for (1) any reason, (2) aseptic loosening, (3) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and (4) recurrent dislocation between MOM and COC bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

This analysis included 3 studies comparing COC and MOM bearings and 56 studies reporting outcomes of MOM or COC bearings. We conducted a comparison meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the 3 comparative studies and a proportional meta-analysis on the data from the 59 articles to determine a consensus.

RESULTS

In the comparison meta-analysis, MOM showed higher revision rate than COC for any reason (odds ratio = 2.39, P = .046) and PJI (odds ratio = 6.21, P = .015). In the proportion meta-analysis, the MOM group showed significantly higher revision rate than COC group for any reason, aseptic loosening, and PJI.

CONCLUSION

MOM bearings were associated with a higher risk of revision for any reason and PJI than COC bearings after cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings total hip arthroplasty in young patients

Background

The results of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) in younger patients were not univocal. This study aims to evaluate the results of CoC bearing THA in patients younger than 50 years.

Methods

A total of 90 younger patients performed CoC THAs during March 2003 and May 2008 were included in this study. Hip function and activity were evaluated with Harris hip score and University of California Los Angeles activity score. We had discussed survival rates, radiological findings of component loosening or osteolysis, and ceramic-related complications in these patients.

Results

The mean Harris hip score increased from 46.3 ± 12.0 points (range, 28-70 points) before surgery to 92.5 ± 5.6 points (range, 78-100 points) at the final follow-up. The mean preoperative University of California Los Angeles activity score was 4.2 ± 1.1 points (range, 2-6 points), which improved to a mean of 7.2 ± 1.3 points (range, 4-10 points). At the time of the last follow-up, there was found to be 1 occurrence of hip dislocation, 1 squeaking, and 2 “sandwich” ceramic liners fractured during normal activity of daily living. No hips showed osteolysis or required revision for aseptic loosening. Kaplan-Meier survivorship with revision due to loosening or osteolysis was 100% and with revision due to ceramic fracture was 97.3% (95% confidence interval, 93.7%-100%) at a mean of 9.4 years.

Conclusions

This study with the use of CoC bearings THAs in younger patients have shown promising results and higher rate of survivorship without evidence of osteolysis.

Implant survival and patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty in young patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common cause of hip pain in young patients, and may require treatment with total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study evaluates implant survival and describes patient-reported outcomes after primary THA in DDH patients aged 35 or younger.

METHODS

A retrospective study with prospective follow-up was conducted at a major academic medical centre. Patient charts were reviewed to identify young THA patients with DDH, and follow-up surveys were conducted to determine implant survival and patient-reported outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate implant survival, and the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) was used to describe patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

This study included 61 patients (75 THAs, 75% follow-up), and the mean time to follow-up was 13 years (range 3-25 years). The 10-year and 20-year implant survival was 87% (95% CI, 78%-94%) and 55% (95% CI, 37%-72%), respectively, and implant survival was significantly better in patients over the age of 25 at the time of surgery (p value &lt;0.01). The mean HOOS patient scores were 83 for pain (SD 20.29), 78 for symptoms (SD 19.72), 83 for ADLs (SD 20.89), and 74 for sports (SD 25.92). Patients that were younger at the time of surgery or required custom implants reported worse HOOS-Symptom scores at follow-up (p value = 0.02).

DISCUSSIONS

Young patients with DDH have good outcomes after surgery. Patient factors and implant characteristics should be considered when predicting implant survival and outcomes after THA in young patients with DDH.

Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years

BACKGROUND

Poor survival of THA implants in very young patients has been attributed to use of cemented implants, wear of conventional polyethylene, and the presence of morphologic deformities in the proximal femur or in the acetabulum. Few studies have reported the long-term results of ceramic-on-ceramic implants in THAs in patients younger than 20 years.

QUESTION/PURPOSES

We determined: (1) the proportion of patients who experienced complications related to the ceramic bearing (squeaking, fracture); (2) the survivorship free from loosening and free from revision for any reason; (3) whether patients with osteonecrosis had inferior survivorship compared with patients whose surgical indication was all other diagnoses including sequelae of pediatric hip disorders (developmental dysplasia of the hip, Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, slipped capital femoral epiphysis); and (4) clinical function.

METHODS

Between 1979 and 2013, we performed 113 primary THAs in 91 patients younger than 20 years at the time of surgery. Of those, 105 THAs (83 patients) were done with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings (91% of the 91 patients); during that period, a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing couple was indicated in all patients younger than 20 years. In eight patients (eight hips), a cemented polyethylene cup was implanted because the diameter of the acetabulum was smaller than the smallest available ceramic cup (46 mm), or because adequate fixation of a ceramic press-fit cup could not be achieved despite careful reaming of the acetabulum. The most common diagnosis indicating THA was avascular necrosis of the femoral head (56.2%; 59 hips). Thirty-five patients (40 hips) had undergone previous operations before the replacement. Three patients (4%; four hips) died from unrelated causes, nine patients (11%; 13 hips) were lost to followup, and four patients (five hips) had a followup greater than 8.5 years but have not been seen in the last 5 years. Patients were assessed clinically (using the Merle d'Aubigne-Postel score, Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (HOOS), and the SF-12(®) Health Survey, and radiographically for signs of radiolucencies, subsidence, or osteolysis on plain films. The mean followup was 8.8 ± 6.1 years (range, 2-34.4 years).

RESULTS

Five patients experienced transient noise generation, defined as a snap in four patients and squeaking in one. Seventeen hips underwent revision surgery-16 for aseptic loosening and one for septic loosening. The implant survival rate at 10 years with aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 90.3% (95% CI, 82.4%-98.9%). No hip had acetabular or femoral osteolysis. Survivorship in patients with osteonecrosis did not differ from survivorship in patients with other diagnoses. The Merle d'Aubigne-Postel score increased from 10.1 ± 4.0 to 17.6 ± 1.1 (p < 0.01); the mean HOOS score was 79.3 ± 13.8 (range, 50.6-100); the mean SF-12(®) physical and mental component scores were 48.1 ± 7.9 (range, 21.4-57.6), and 47.4 ± 12.2 (range, 24.5-99.4), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that patient-reported outcomes scores improved in most patients undergoing THA in this very young study group. Underlying diagnosis did not affect long-term survivorship. However, the revision-free survival rate at 10 years is lower than published estimates in older patients, and with 11% of patients lost to followup, our estimates may represent a best-case scenario. Therefore, we believe THA should be performed as a last resort in this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

What Host Factors Affect Aseptic Loosening After THA and TKA?

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening is the most common cause for revisions after lower-extremity total joint arthroplasties, however studies differ regarding the degree to which host factors influence loosening.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSE

We performed a systematic review to determine which host factors play a role in the development of clinical and/or radiographic failure from aseptic loosening after (1) THA and (2) TKA.

METHODS

Two searches on THA and TKA, respectively, using four electronic databases (EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, PubMed, and Scopus) were conducted. We identified a total of 209 reports that encompassed nine potential host factors affecting aseptic loosening. Inclusion criteria for consideration of scientific clinical reports were that 20 or more patients were involved, with more than 1-year followup, with at least three studies pertaining to each factor, and at least six of the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies criteria met, and with raw data for odds ratio (OR) calculations. Twenty-one studies (16 THA studies with 45,779 hips and five TKA studies with 288 knees, respectively) were used to calculate weighted OR and CIs (using the random effects theory) and study heterogeneity for four different host factors in THAs (male sex, high activity level, obesity defined as BMI≥30 kg/m2, and current or former tobacco use) and one factor in TKA (BMI≥30 kg/m2), which were placed in a forest plot.

RESULTS

For THA, male sex (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.22-1.58; p=0.001) and high activity level (University of California Los Angeles [UCLA] activity score≥8 points; OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 2.46-7.31; p=0.001) were associated with aseptic loosening. However, obesity (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.73-1.40; p=0.96), and tobacco use (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.43-8.97; p=0.39) were not associated with an increased risk of aseptic loosening after THA with the numbers available. For TKA, we found no host factors associated with loosening. In particular, obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) was not associated with aseptic loosening with the numbers available (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 0.60-8.62; p=0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing a lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty who engage in impact sports should be counseled regarding their potential increased risk of aseptic loosening; however, given the weak evidence available, we believe that higher-level studies are necessary to clearly define the risk factors, particularly with newer-generation constructs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings were introduced in total hip arthroplasty (THA) to reduce problems related to polyethylene wear. We compared the 9-year revision risk for cementless CoC THA and for cementless metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, population-based study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry, we identified all the primary cementless THAs that had been performed from 2002 through 2009 (n = 25,656). Of these, 1,773 THAs with CoC bearings and 9,323 THAs with MoP bearings were included in the study. To estimate the relative risk (RR) of revision, we used regression with the pseudo-value approach and treated death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

444 revisions were identified: 4.0% for CoC THA (71 of 1,773) and 4.0% for MoP THA (373 of 9,323). No statistically significant difference in the risk of revision for any reason was found for CoC and MoP bearings after 9 years of follow-up (adjusted RR = 1.3, 95% CI: 0.72-2.4). Revision rates due to component failure were 0.5% (n = 8) for CoC bearings and 0.1% (n = 6) for MoP bearings (p < 0.001). 6 patients with CoC bearings (0.34%) underwent revision due to ceramic fracture.

INTERPRETATION

When compared to the "standard" MoP bearings, CoC THA had a 33% higher (though not statistically significantly higher) risk of revision for any reason at 9 years.

Eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia and osteoarthritis: follow-up at a mean duration of twenty years

BACKGROUND

The aim of the eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy is to correct the deficient acetabular coverage in the dysplastic hip in order to limit the development of secondary osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the results in patients managed with an eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy after a mean of twenty years.

METHODS

The clinical and radiographic outcomes for the first 126 consecutive patients (132 hips) who underwent an eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy at our institution were retrospectively evaluated. One hundred and twenty-four patients (130 hips) were evaluated; 117 were women (123 hips). The mean patient age was thirty-seven years (range, fifteen to fifty-nine years) at the time of surgery, and the average duration of follow-up was twenty years. Twenty-three hips in twenty-two patients were also treated with intertrochanteric valgus osteotomy at the time of the eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy to further improve joint congruency.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative Harris hip score of 70 points (range, 51 to 90 points) improved to a mean of 88 points (range, 35 to 100 points) at the final follow-up. Thirty hips had a fair clinical outcome (Harris hip score, <80 points). In seventeen hips, the eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy was converted to a total hip arthroplasty. The cumulative survivorship at fifteen years and at the final follow-up at twenty-three years was 97% and 80%, respectively. Four factors led to a poor outcome: a small (≤2.0-mm) preoperative minimum joint space, joint incongruence, simultaneous intertrochanteric valgus osteotomy, and lateral subluxation of the femoral head postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy is an effective surgical procedure for treating symptomatic dysplastic hips before, and in the early stages of, osteoarthritis. The majority of patients maintained excellent or good native hip function at a mean of twenty years after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years

PURPOSE

To review the outcomes of 65 patients younger than 55 years who underwent uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) using third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic prostheses.

METHODS

Medical records of 30 men and 35 women (80 hips) aged 18 to 55 (mean, 39) years who underwent uncemented THA using third-generation ceramic-onceramic prostheses by a single surgeon were reviewed. 61 THAs used the Reflection cup with the Synergy stem (n=49), Spectron stem (n=7), or Anthology stem (n=5), and 19 THAs used the Trident cup with the Secur-Fit stem. Outcomes were assessed based on the UCLA Activity Score and Harris Hip Score, as well as radiolucency around the implants, malposition, and subsidence on radiographs. Patients were asked about their satisfaction with current activity level (yes/no), activity limitation (no limitation, musculoskeletal limitation, psychological impediments and lack of motivation, and pain or disability of the operative hip), and change in occupational activity level (same or similar, more active, and less active or disability).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 54 (range, 24-110) months. Six patients were excluded from the analysis owing to prosthetic failure secondary to ceramic liner fracture after falling (n=2), acetabular component loosening (n=1), intolerable squeak (n=1), periprosthetic fracture (n=1), and instability (n=1). The mean UCLA Activity Score improved from 4.0 (range, 1-10) to 7.7 (range, 2-10) [p<0.001], and the mean Harris Hip Score improved from 52.8 (range, 25-69) to 91.0 (range, 38-100) [p<0.001]. No hip had evidence of subsidence, loosening, or osteolysis. 52 (80%) patients were satisfied with their activity level; 28 (43%) patients reported no activity limitation; and 57 (88%) patients kept the same or similar occupation.

CONCLUSION

Ceramic-on-ceramic THA achieved acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Systematic review of total hip arthroplasty in patients under 30 years old

We performed a systematic review to assess whether joint replacement in this very 
young patient group provides significant functional improvement and whether these procedures are associated with good implant survivorship. The studies included presented the results of 
450 THA procedures. All patients showed an improvement in functional score and symptom relief. Uncemented stems showed good integration with no signs of loosening. Cemented implants showed high rates of loosening. This study shows that THA in the very young patient can provide good functional improvement and relief of symptoms and that the more modern uncemented implant designs used with hard-on-hard bearings can be associated with improved implant survival. Long-term studies are necessary to confirm the superiority and improved survivorship of these newer 
implants.

Alumina-on-alumina hip replacement in developmental dysplasia of the hip

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) requires complex reconstructive techniques and presents an increased risk of complications. Because of these patients' young age, alternative bearing surfaces such as alumina-on-alumina couples could be an option. We asked whether moderate or severe congenital dysplasia of the hip would influence the clinical outcome and rates of cup loosening in our patients. We prospectively compared 50 hips in patients with dysplastic hip (group 1) and 22 hips in patients with a low or high dislocation (group 2) using an alumina-on-alumina THA. The minimum follow-up was 5 years (range 5-10 years). Age, activity level, and implant size were greater in group 1. Preoperative function and range of mobility were worse in group 2. The survival rate for cup loosening at 5 years was 89.8% (95% confidence interval, 78.7%-100%) for group 1 and 81.7% (95% confidence interval, 57.6%-100%) for group 2. An alumina-on-alumina THA provides a high level of pain relief and functional improvement in hip dysplasia. Continued follow-up will be required to determine if the alumina-on-alumina bearings in these patients result in less osteolysis and loosening.

A randomised prospective evaluation of ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in the same patients with primary cementless total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Very few studies have compared alumina-on-alumina ceramic and alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in the same patient. The purpose of this prospective randomised study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results and the prevalence of osteolysis in cementless total hip arthroplasty using an alumina-on-alumina and alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in young active patients.

METHODS

We prospectively compared the results of 100 patients (200 hips) who had undergone a cementless total hip arthroplasty with an alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearing in one hip and an alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene in the other. There were 66 men and 34 women with a mean age of 45.3 years (range, 21-49 years) at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up was 12.4 years (range, 11-13 years). The patients were assessed clinically and radiographically at three months, one year, and annually thereafter.

RESULTS

Harris hip, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and University of California, Los Angeles activity scores did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups of bearings preoperatively or at the time of final follow-up. Radiographic findings of the component were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean polyethylene linear penetration was 0.031 ± 0.004 mm per year. No hips in either group displayed osteolysis. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship with revision as the end point at 12.4 years was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94-100%) for the femoral component in both groups and 99% (95%CI, 93-100%) for the acetabular component.

CONCLUSION

The clinical and radiographic results of using an alumina-on-alumina ceramic and alumina-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings were similar.

Total hip arthroplasty in teenagers: an alternative to hip arthrodesis

Debilitating arthritis in teenage patients is a complex problem with limited surgical options. Hip arthrodesis is unpopular amongst patients, and contemporary total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be a promising alternative. We report on the outcomes of THA in patients less than 20 years of age. All consecutive teenage patients undergoing THA at a tertiary referral centre were reviewed. Mean follow-up was 3.4 years (range 0.6-6.8) and 9 patients had at least 5 years follow-up. There were 51 THAs in 43 patients with a mean age of 17 years (range 12-19). The commonest indication was osteonecrosis (35 cases), mostly secondary to slipped upper femoral epiphysis (15 cases). Forty-six were uncemented and 5 were reverse hybrid THAs of which 7 were computer assisted design/manufacture (CADCAM) components. The commonest bearing surface used was ceramic on ceramic (40 cases). The survival rate was 96% and there were 2 complications. At latest follow-up, the mean Harris hip score was 90 (range 68-99) and UCLA activity score was 6 (range 4-9). Radiological analysis showed 2 patients with lucent lines around the acetabular component, but no signs of osteolysis or wear. We report good short to intermediate term survivorship and outcomes, and feel THA represents a valid alternative option to hip arthrodesis.

Alumina-on-alumina THA performed in patients younger than 30 years: a 10-year minimum followup study

BACKGROUND

THA in patients younger than 30 years presents challenges because of uncertainties regarding the long-term survivorship of prostheses. Alumina-on-alumina bearings, which exhibit little long-term wear, may be a reasonable option but the long-term survivorship is unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined (1) the survival rate of alumina-on-alumina bearings in patients younger than 30 years after a 10-year followup, (2) the incidence of audible hip clicking and squeaking, (3) radiographic evidence of osteolysis, and (4) the effects on pregnancy, childbirth, and career choice.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients who had 75 THAs with alumina-on-alumina bearings followed more than 10 years (average, 11.5; range, 10-13.5 years). Mean patient age at the time of surgery was 24 years (range, 18-30 years). All operations were performed using the same cementless implant at a single center. We determined survival, presence of osteolysis, and function (Harris hip score, WOMAC).

RESULTS

The 10-year survival rate of alumina-on-alumina bearings in THAs, with revision for any reason as the end point, was 98.9%. Audible hip clicking and squeaking were identified in 10 hips and two hips, respectively. No osteolysis was detected. None of the 11 patients who became pregnant had been affected by their THA during pregnancy or childbirth. Seven of the 14 patients who were unemployed at the time of index surgery stated that their THA affected their job choice.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a high 10-year survival of cementless alumina-on-alumina bearings in THAs in patients younger than 30 years. Lifetime events such as job choice, pregnancy, and childbirth should be considered when choosing THA for patients younger than 30 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cup press fit in uncemented THA depends on sex, acetabular shape, and surgical technique

BACKGROUND

Uncemented press-fit cups provide bone fixation in primary THA, but the use of screws is sometimes necessary to achieve primary stability of the socket. However, it is unclear whether and when screws should be used.

QUESTION/PURPOSES

We analyzed the factors related to screw use with a press-fit uncemented cup and assessed whether screw use is associated with the same rates of loosening and revision as a press-fit technique.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 248 patients who underwent THA using the same prosthetic design. Eighty-eight hips had screws to achieve primary cup fixation (Group 1), and 189 did not (Group 2). Mean age was 50 years (range, 14-73 years). We analyzed factors related to the patient, acetabular type, and reconstruction of the rotation center of the hip. Minimum followup was 5 years (mean, 8.9 years; range, 5-12 years).

RESULTS

We found higher screw use in women, patients with less physical activity, Acetabular Types A or C, and a distance from the center of the prosthetic femoral head to the normal center of rotation of more than 3 mm. There were four revisions in Group 1 and five in Group 2. Eight hips had radiographic loosening in Group 1 and nine in Group 2. Cups with a postoperative abduction angle of more than 50° had a higher risk for loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

Press fit was achieved less frequently in women and patients with Acetabular Types A or C and less physical activity; a closer distance to the normal center of rotation decreased screw use. Screw use to augment fixation achieved survival similar to that of a press-fit cup.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prognostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years with osteonecrosis of femoral head

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiographic results of patients younger than 30 years who underwent cementless third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Forty-one patients (56 hips) with a minimum follow-up of 6 years were included. In all cases, third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic articulation was used. Average Harris Hip Scores improved from 52.9 preoperatively to 98.2, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, from 95.2 to 25.2. Thirty-nine patients returned to their normal occupations. No aseptic loosening or osteolysis was observed. Total hip arthroplasty performed using third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearings for osteonecrosis of femoral head was found to provide satisfactory clinical and radiologic results, especially in active, young patients.

Alumina-on-alumina THA in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a 5-year followup study

BACKGROUND

THA is a concern in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) owing to patients' youth, poor bone stock, and small physical size.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether (1) uncemented alumina-on-alumina THAs have good clinical and radiographic results at midterm followup in young patients with inflammatory arthritis and end-stage hip disease secondary to JIA, and (2) the anatomic center of rotation of the hip could be reconstructed in patients with acetabular protrusion. We also assessed the rate of surgical complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 31 alumina-on-alumina THAs in 21 patients with a mean age of 30.9 years (range, 14-48 years). Minimum followup until the time of revision of any component or the latest evaluation was 16 months. For nonrevised cases, the minimum followup was 60 months (range, 60-108 months). Acetabular protrusion was mild in 17 hips (Group 1) and moderate-severe in 14 (Group 2). Bone autograft was used to reconstruct the acetabulum in Group 2. Acetabular reconstruction was evaluated according to Ranawat et al.

RESULTS

One cup was revised owing to aseptic loosening at 16 months; the remaining hips showed good clinical and radiographic results. The mean postoperative horizontal distance and the distance between the center of the head of the prosthesis and the true center of the femoral head improved in Group 2. There were no complications related to alumina.

CONCLUSIONS

Although THA is a technically demanding procedure in patients with JIA, uncemented alumina-on-alumina THA provides pain relief and improves quality of life. In patients with acetabular protrusion, bone grafts enable anatomic cup positioning. Continued followup will be required to determine whether the alumina-on-alumina bearings in patients with JIA result in less osteolysis and loosening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing three alternative bearing surfaces in primary total hip replacement

The ideal bearing surface for young patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) remains controversial. We report the five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of 102 THRs in 91 patients who were <  65 years of age. These patients were randomised to receive a cobalt–chrome on ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene, cobalt–chrome on highly cross-linked polyethylene, or a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing. In all, 97 hip replacements in 87 patients were available for review at five years. Two hips had been revised, one for infection and one for peri-prosthetic fracture.

At the final follow-up there were no significant differences between the groups for the mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (pain, p = 0.543; function, p = 0.10; stiffness, p = 0.99), Short Form-12 (physical component, p = 0.878; mental component, p = 0.818) or Harris hip scores (p = 0.22). Radiological outcomes revealed no significant wear in the ceramic group.

Comparison of standard and highly cross-linked polyethylene, however, revealed an almost threefold difference in the mean annual linear wear rates (0.151 mm/year versus 0.059 mm/year, respectively) (p < 0.001).

Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 20 years

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the adolescent patient has historically shown relatively poor survivorship. This study reports the results of THA in young patients using contemporary ceramic bearings. Twenty-four THAs were performed using ceramic bearing surfaces in patients 20 years old or younger (mean, 16.4; range, 12-20). Average follow-up was 52 months (range, 25-123 months). The survival rate was 96%, with 1 revision for a loose acetabular component. Other complications included a peroneal nerve palsy that resolved and 2 dislocations in 1 patient. Postoperatively, the Modified Harris Hip Score mean was 93.4 (range, 66-100). This study shows promising results at short-term to midterm follow-up in very young patients who undergo THA using ceramic-on-ceramic components.

Total joint replacement in adolescents: literature review and case examples

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review summarizes the recent studies of total knee and hip replacement outcomes in adolescent patients, as well as highlights current replacement strategies and bearing options.

RECENT FINDINGS

The survival rates of total knee and hip replacements in adolescents are lower compared with those in the elderly adults. Adolescent patients almost inevitably require revision surgery in their lifetime. Cementless arthroplasty is a promising replacement strategy in adolescents because, theoretically, if bone ingrowth occurs, then implant survival should improve; further, if revision is required, the surgeon does not have the burden of removing cement. However, recent data suggest no difference in survival rates between cementless and cemented implants in the short-term. The advantages and disadvantages between various bearing surfaces in this population also remain controversial and survival data are limited.

SUMMARY

Total knee and hip replacement, although rare in the adolescent population, is successful at alleviating pain and restoring mobility in end-stage arthritic disease in the short-term. Numerous replacement strategies and bearing options are currently available; however, there is currently no standard of care or implants specifically designed for the adolescent population. Long-term studies looking at the survival of the various prostheses is essential to determine the efficacy and safety in the adolescent population with different causes of end-stage arthritic disease.

Thirty years of experience with alumina-on-alumina bearings in total hip arthroplasty

Alumina-on-alumina bearings in total hip arthroplasty have been developed in an attempt to minimise debris and the occurrence of osteolytic lesions. The outstanding tribological properties of this bearing system are explained by low surface roughness, high hardness for major scratch resistance, and high wettability. Since the 1970s, technological improvements in the manufacturing process of alumina components together with a better understanding of Morse taper technology have provided a surgical grade material with high density, high purity and small grains. Published studies on the outcome of total hip arthroplasty performed with this new generation of implants showed high survivorship especially in young and active patients, with survival rates free of revision of 90.8% to 97.4% at ten years. However, concern remains over ceramic liner fracture and squeaking, which has been noted recently with increasing prevalence. This review will discuss the current knowledge on the use of alumina-on-alumina bearings.