Femoral anteversion in THA and its lack of correlation with native acetabular anteversion

Unveiling the Hidden Links: Anatomical and Radiological Insights into Primary Hip Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Hip osteoarthritis (HOA) is a disease with globally rising incidence that leads to disability and morbidity, overall, in older populations, and might be primary or secondary to numerous risk factors. The most common idiopathic HOA is generally a diagnosis of exclusion, with pathogenetic mechanisms largely still misunderstood. We aimed to investigate the correlation between femoral-acetabular and spinopelvic anatomical and computed tomography (CT) characteristics, and the presence of primary OA.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed CT scans from 2019 to 2021, excluding patients under 45 years or with conditions affecting the pelvis, sacrum, or lower limbs. Femoral, acetabular, and spinopelvic parameters were measured; signs of OA were analyzed in the hip and knee joints. Patients were categorized into two groups: A (isolated hip OA) and B (no OA); patients with hip OA, also presenting knee OA, were excluded from this study.

RESULTS

In total, 232 cases were examined; statistical analyses compared CT parameters between 129 subjects from Group A and 103 patients of Group B. Group A showed a mean femoral version of 16 ± 4.53 degrees, significantly higher than Group B's 13.16 ± 4.37 degrees (p = 0.0001). Other parameters showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights an association between femoral version and primary hip OA.

Understanding the variability of the proximal femoral canal: A computational modeling study

Statistical shape modeling (SSM) offers the potential to describe the morphological differences in similar shapes using a compact number of variables. Its application in orthopedics is rapidly growing. In this study, an SSM of the intramedullary canal of the proximal femur was built, with the aim to better understanding the complexity of its shape which may, in turn, enhance the preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This includes the prediction of the prosthetic femoral version (PFV) which is known to be highly variable amongst patients who have undergone THA. The model was built on three dimensional (3D) models of 64 femoral canals which were generated from pelvic computed tomography images including the proximal femur in the field of view. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the mean shape derived from the model and each segmented canal. Five prominent modes of variations representing approximately 84% of the total 3D variations in the population of shapes were found to capture variability in size, proximal torsion, intramedullary femoral anteversion, varus/valgus orientation, and distal femoral shaft twist/torsion, respectively. It was established that the intramedullary femoral canal is highly variable in its size, shape, and orientation between different subjects. PCA-driven SSM is beneficial for identifying patterns and extracting valuable features of the femoral canal.

Femoral Neck Anteversion: Which Distal Femur Landmark Matters?

Background

Femoral neck anteversion has traditionally been measured by the angle between the distal femur posterior condylar axis (PCA) and a line drawn through the center of the femoral head and neck. While less common, the transepicondylar axis (TEA) has also been used to reference femoral neck anteversion. The purpose of this study was to compare femoral neck version of the PCA vs the TEA using computerized tomography (CT).

Methods

A total of 1507 femoral CTs were included. Precise bony landmarks were established: lateral epicondyle, medial epicondyle, posteromedial condyle, posterolateral condyle, center of the femoral neck, and center of the femoral head. Femoral version was calculated between the head and neck axis and either the PCA or TEA. Differences between sex and ethnicity were evaluated.

Results

The mean femoral anteversion was 12.7° ± 9.1° based on the PCA and 11.5° ± 7.9° based on the TEA (mean difference 1.2° ± 1.9°, P < .001). Males were less anteverted than females (9.8° ± 7.6° vs 13.5° ± 7.8°, P < .001). African Americans had less anteversion than other groups (8.1° ± 9.2° vs 11.5° ± 7.8°, P = .04), while Asians were more anteverted than other groups (12.1° ± 9.0° vs 11.2° ± 7.3°, P = .04). These values were referenced on the TEA.

Conclusions

In this series of over 1500 femoral CT scans, the mean difference between anteversion measurements referencing the PCA and TEA was 1.2°. Native femoral version varied widely between gender and ethnic groups. Extreme femoral version, defined as <0° or >30°, was present in 11.8% of patients referencing the PCA.

Effect of longer femoral head on leg length, offset, and range of motion in total hip arthroplasty: a simulation study

In this study, we investigated the relationship between head length, leg length, offset, and dislocation resistance using range of motion (ROM) simulations based on computed tomography data to examine if a longer femoral head reduces the risk of dislocation. The femoral components were set to eliminate leg length differences with a + 0 mm head, and variations for + 4-, + 7-, and + 8-mm heads were analyzed. Offset and ROM were assessed when longer heads were used, with the leg length adjusted to be similar to that of the contralateral side. While internal rotation at flexion and external rotation at extension increased with + 4-mm longer heads, the + 7- and + 8-mm heads did not increase dislocation resistance. When adjusting for leg length, the longer heads showed no significant differences in offset and ROM. Enhancing dislocation resistance by solely increasing the offset with a longer head, while simultaneously adjusting the depth of stem insertion, may be a beneficial intraoperative technique. Although a + 4-mm longer head possibly increases ROM without impingement, heads extended by + 7 or + 8 mm may not exhibit the same advantage. Therefore, surgeons should consider this technique based on the implant design.

Evaluation of the native femoral neck and stem version reproducibility using robotic-arm assisted direct-anterior total hip arthroplasty

The intraoperative measurement of the femoral version (FV) has gained attention in wake of an optimised combined version (CV) philosophy. Whereas some data is available utilising different approaches, to our belief this study provides the first in vivo FV data in DA-THA using the MAKO™ robot. To improve the accuracy of the femoral stem version in DA-THA, we want to ask the following question: How effectively can we reproduce the native femoral version in DA- THA using the MAKO™ robot? The first 125 total hip cases through DAA with the use of the combined anteversion concept and the help of the MAKO™ robot from a single institution, single surgeon from January 2020 to July 2021 were retrospectively analysed. The native version (NV) and broach version (BV) were determined with the use of the MAKO™ preoperative computed tomography planning software. The data of the NV and BV of 115 withheld patients was normally distributed. The native femoral version ranged from -12° till 33° (mean 7,8° +/- 8,1) and the broach version ranged from -18° till 43° (mean 8,2° +/- 9,9). The Pearson correlation coefficient between the NV and BV was 0,78. The native femoral version can be reproduced by broaching the proximal femur, in a robotically implanted direct anterior cementless THA, with 78% effectiveness. Stem placement seemed to be more precise with growing experience, however this appeared not to be significant.

The walls of the femoral neck as an auxiliary tool for femoral stem positioning

BACKGROUND

Femoral anteversion is a major contributor to functionality of the hip joint and is implicated in many joint pathologies. Accurate determination of component version intraoperatively is a technically challenging process that relies on the visual estimation of the surgeon. The following study aimed to examine whether the walls of the femoral neck can be used as appropriate landmarks to ensure appropriate femoral prosthesis version intraoperatively.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study based on 32 patients (64 hips) admitted to our centre between July and September 2020 who had undergone a CT scan of their lower limbs. Through radiological imaging analysis, the following measurements were performed bilaterally for each patient: anterior wall version, posterior wall version, and mid-neck femoral version. Anterior and posterior wall version were compared and evaluated relative to mid-neck version, which represented the true version value.

RESULTS

Mean anterior wall anteversion was 20° (95% CI, 17.6-22.8°) and mean posterior wall anteversion was -12° (95% CI, -15 to -9.7°). The anterior walls of the femoral neck had a constant of -7 and a coefficient of 0.9 (95% CI, -9.8 to -4.2; p < 0.0001; R² 0.77).The posterior walls of the femoral neck had a constant of 20 and a coefficient of 0.7 (95% CI, 17.8-22.5; p < 0.0001; R² 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons can accurately obtain femoral anteversion by subtracting 7° from the angle taken between the anterior wall and the posterior femoral condyles or by adding 20° to the angle taken between the posterior wall and the posterior femoral condyles.

A comparison of accuracy and safety between stem-first and cup-first total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The combined anteversion theory to prevent impingement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been proposed. However, because stem-anteversion is influenced by the native femoral anteversion and the stem flexion/extension angle, it is often difficult to adjust stem anteversion during surgery. Therefore, the stem-first (combined anteversion) technique may be useful to adjust and achieve appropriate cup anteversion during surgery with respect to the implanted stem anteversion angle. However, the technique may adversely affect cup or stem angle accuracy and result in intra-operative bleeding, post-operative adverse events, and prolonged operative time. It is inconclusive whether either the stem-first or cup-first technique is safe or accurate. Therefore, this study assessed the accuracy and safety of stem-first THA compared to those of cup-first THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective randomised controlled trial analysed 114 patients who were randomly divided into 2 groups (stem-first group: n = 57, cup-first group (control group): n = 57). Primary outcomes included cup and stem angle, the discrepancies from the targeted angle and combined anteversion (evaluated via CT at 3 months postoperatively). Secondary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, operative time, WOMAC, and adverse events.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, gender, BMI or in the primary and secondary outcomes between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing stem-first in THA did not adversely affect cup and stem angle accuracy, or result in intraoperative bleeding, prolongation of operative time, or postoperative adverse events. Thus, performing stem-first may be advantageous for achieving combined anteversion theory.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) registration number UMIN000025189.

Functional Femoral Anteversion: Axial Rotation of the Femur and its Implications for Stem Version Targets in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Acetabular and femoral component positioning are important considerations in reducing adverse outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Previous assessments of femoral anteversion examined anatomic femoral anteversion (AFA) referenced to anatomic landmarks. However, this does not provide a functional understanding of the femur's relationship to the hip. We investigate a new measurement, functional femoral anteversion (FFA), and sought to measure its variability across a large sample of patients undergoing THA.

Methods

A total of 1008 consecutive patients underwent THA surgery between September 2019 and July 2021. All patients were measured for supine and standing functional femoral rotation (FFR), AFA, and FFA.

Results

The mean standing FFA was 13.2° ± 12.2° (-27.8° to 52.3°). The mean change in FFR from supine to standing was -2.2° ± 11.8° (-43.0° to 41.9°). Of all, 161 (16%) patients had standing FFA version greater than 25°. Four hundred sixty (46%) patients had standing FFR (internal or external) greater than 10°. One hundred twenty-three (12%) patients exhibited an increase in external rotation from supine to standing of greater than 10°. A moderate, negative linear relationship was observed between AFA and standing external femoral rotation (P <<.001, R = -0.46), indicating people may externally rotate their femur as AFA decreases with age.

Conclusions

Functional alignment of the femur in patients requiring THA is understudied. It is now understood that the femur, like the pelvis, can rotate substantially between functional positions. Enhancing our understanding of FFA and FFR may improve both acetabular and femoral component positioning.

Abnormal Spinopelvic Motion and Spine Deformity are Associated With Native Femoral Retroversion in the Setting of Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

The effect of spinopelvic pathology on femoral version is unclear. This study investigated variability in native femoral anteversion in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and its relationship to the patient’s underlying spinopelvic pattern.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed to include in the study all patients undergoing robot-assisted THA over a 3-year period. Native femoral version was measured for each patient using a preoperative computed tomography scan and categorized as excessive, normal, or retroverted. Additionally, a subset analysis was performed for all patients with sit-to-stand dynamic pelvic radiographs available, and cases were classified by spinopelvic pattern.

Results

A total of 119 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 68.6 years; 61 (51%) were female. The median femoral anteversion for the entire study group was 6.0° (−32° to 40°, interquartile range 13.5°). Eleven patients (9.2%) had excessive femoral anteversion, 54 of the 119 (45.4%) had normal femoral version, and 54 of the 119 (45.4%) had native retroversion. Forty-two patients (35.3%) had sit-to-stand radiographs available and were subclassified by femoral version type and spinopelvic parameters. Welch’s analysis of variance demonstrated a significant difference in femoral version among spinopelvic patterns (F = 7.826, P = .003), with Games-Howell post hoc analysis showing increased retroversion in deformity-stiff patients compared to deformity-normal mobility patients (P = .003).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that native femoral retroversion is present in a significant number of patients undergoing THA and is more common in patients with stiff spine deformities. Based on this observation, currently available spinopelvic classification systems should be modified to account for native femoral version.

Positive Correlation Between the Femur Neck Shaft and Anteversion Angles: A Retrospective Computed Tomography Analysis in Patients With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the anatomical correlation between the femoral neck shaft angle (NSA) and femoral anteversion angle (AA) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip based on the Crowe classification and provide a novel method to estimate the femoral AA on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs.

METHODS

A total of 208 patients with dysplastic hips who underwent total hip arthroplasty at our institution were retrospectively included. Preoperative physiological AA and NSA were determined via 3-dimensional computed tomography. Linear regressions and Pearson's coefficients were calculated to assess the correlation between the femoral NSA and femoral AA.

RESULTS

A total of 416 hips were divided into 5 subgroups: 99 normal, 143 type I, 71 type II, 63 type III, and 40 type IV hips following the Crowe classification. Dysplastic femurs had significantly higher AAs than normal hips (25.2° vs 31.4° vs 33.3° vs 35.5° vs 41.7°). Significant positive correlations between the AA and NSA were observed in normal (r = 0.635), type I (r = 0.700), type II (r = 0.612), and type III (r = 0.638) hips (P < .001); however, no meaningful correlation was observed in type IV hips (r = 0.218, P = .176).

CONCLUSION

The NSA and AA correlated positively and significantly in the normal and dysplastic Crowe type I-III hips. The relationship between the NSA and AA indicates torsion of the proximal femur and offers an opportunity for straightforward estimation of AA based on NSA.

Abnormal Femoral Anteversion Is Associated With the Development of Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature and to evaluate the relationship between abnormal femoral version and the development of hip osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, evaluating Level I and II studies. Included studies had to provide granular femoral version (FV) information. The severity of OA was ranked on the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) scale. Excel version 1808 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) was used to perform a student t test statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Our review identified 19 qualifying studies-5 Level I and 14 Level II with 1,756 patients. Patients with FV above normal range (>14°) had greater KL scores than patients with normal range FV (mean ± standard deviation; 3.37 ± 1.44 vs 2.05 ± 1.72, P < .05). Analysis of KL scores in patients with FV >24° (>1 standard deviation) versus patients with FV >14° but <24° also demonstrated a positive correlation between increasing FV and KL (4.00 ± 1.96 vs 2.34 ± 0). This was significant independent of the presence or absence of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Retroverted hips (FV<10°) in the present study showed variable OA results upon analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The present review suggests that elevated FV may be a risk factor for more severe hip OA with or without the presence of concurrent dysplasia of the hip. The relative amount of increased anteversion appears positively correlated with severity of OA. Although femoral retroversion may impact hip mechanics, in this review it does not appear to strongly correlate with the development of OA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II: systematic review of Level I and II studies.

Proximal Femoral Rotational Osteotomy for Symptomatic Femoral Retroversion : A Case Report

The Rotational osteotomy for femoral retroversion has been extremely rare despite the known association between femoral neck retroversion, hip pain, and osteoarthritis. Here, we describe a case of femoral neck retroversion for which proximal femoral rotation osteotomy. A 16-year-old boy with a past history of developmental dysplasia of the both hip treated conservatively presented with a complaint of pain in left hips. On physical examination, flexion of the left hip was limited to 90° with terminal pain. Internal rotation was also limited to 10°. Computed tomography (CT) showed -7.1° anteversion of the left femur. We performed rotational osteotomy to increase femoral anteversion because conservative treatment was not effective. The postoperative course was uneventful. At 12 postoperative months, his left hip pain was completely disappeared and femoral anteversion was 34° on CT scans. Retroversion of the femur is a distinct dynamic factor that should be considered in the evaluation of mechanical causes of hip pain. Restoring the normal rotational alignment of the hip resulted in cure of the impingement due to femoral retroversion. J. Med. Invest. 67 : 214-216, February, 2020.

Lewinnek Safe Zone References are Frequently Misquoted

BACKGROUND

Optimal acetabular component orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a necessity in achieving a stable implant. Although there has been considerable debate in the literature concerning the safe zone, to date, there has not been any review to determine if these references are consistent with the definition applied by Lewinnek et al. in 1978. Therefore, this article aims to examine the available literature in the PubMed database to determine how often a correct reference to the safe zone as defined by Lewinnek was applied to discussions regarding THA.

METHODS

A search for literature in the PubMed database was performed for articles from 1978 to 2019. Search criteria included terms 'Lewinnek,' 'safe zone,' and 'total hip arthroplasty.' Exclusions included abstract-only articles, non-English articles, articles unrelated to THA, and those lacking full content.

RESULTS

A review of literature yielded 147 articles for inclusion. Overall, only 11% (17) cited the Lewinnek article correctly. Forty-five percent (66) of articles referenced measurements in the supine position, 18% (26) referenced other positions, and 37% (55) did not specify. Nineteen percent (28) reported measurements of the acetabular cup orthogonal to the anterior pelvic plane, while 73% (108) did not, and 7% (11) did not specify. Twenty-three percent (34) measured from computed tomography scans instead of other methods.

CONCLUSIONS

In the discussion of the safe zone regarding THA, only 11% of articles listed are consistent with the definition established by Lewinnek. This warrants further investigation into a consistent application of the term and its implications for THA implant stability and dislocation rates.

A Specific Anteversion of Cup and Combined Anteversion for Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Lateral Approach

OBJECTIVE

To determine the implant orientation, especially the combined anteversion measurements in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using lateral approach, and to compare with implant orientation using posterior-lateral (P-L) approach. The secondary goal was to identify the factors associated with implant orientation.

METHODS

Five hundred and one patients (545 hips) who underwent primary THA with the modified Hardinge approach between January 2016 and November 2019 by one senior surgeon in our department in a retrospective study were followed up. A survey to inquire about the history of dislocation of the hip after THA was designed and responses were gathered by telephone, WeChat software, and outpatient follow-up. The mean age of the patients was 61.97 ± 11.72 years, and there were 254 males and 247 females. The average follow-up time was 25.2 ± 13.7 months (range, 3.2-49.7 months). Among the patients who were followed up, 97 patients (104 hips) underwent computed tomography (CT) scans from L₄ to the tuberosity of the tibia. The implant orientation, including the anteversion and inclination of the cup, anteversion of the stem, combined anteversion, and pelvic tilt were measured based on CT scans of these patients. The results were compared with the implant orientation reported in previous reports measured by CT. Factors that may be associated with implant orientation were investigated, including the patient's age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis; size of the cup; diameter of the femoral head component; and pelvic tilt. Data and statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0.

RESULTS

No cases of dislocation were found in the 501 patients (545 hips) who underwent primary THA during this period. The mean inclination and anteversion of the cups were 38.83° ± 5.04° (24.5°-53.1°) and 9.26° ± 11.19° (-15°-48°), respectively. The mean anteversion of the stem was 13.83° ± 10.7° (-10.2°-42.3°). The combined anteversion was 23.1° ± 13.4° (-7.4°-54.6°). Compared with the reported combined anteversion and anteversion of the cup, the mean anteversion of the cup and combined anteversion using the lateral approach were much lower than the reported values in the literature using the P-L approach. Pelvic tilt was found to be the only independent factor for cup anteversion. Factors including age, sex, BMI, diagnosis, cup size, and diameter of the femoral head component were not associated with implant orientation.

CONCLUSION

THA using the lateral approach yields smaller cup anteversion and combined anteversion values than using the P-L approach. Pelvic tilt is the only predictor for cup anteversion.

The Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Reliably Achieves "Safe Zones" for Combined Anteversion

Background

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), component position is critical to avoid instability and improve longevity. Appropriate combined femoral and acetabular component anteversion is important for improved THA stability and increased impingement-free range of motion. In direct anterior THA (DA-THA), concern has been expressed regarding the accuracy of femoral component positioning. This study seeks to quantify acetabular, femoral, and combined component orientation relative to the accepted “safe zones” in patients who have undergone DA-THA.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients who had THA performed via direct anterior approach had postoperative computerized tomography scans done to assess femoral anteversion. Stem rotational alignment was measured relative to the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and the posterior condylar axis (PCA) of the femur at the knee. Acetabular abduction and version were recorded on anteroposterior pelvis radiographs.

Results

The mean stem anteversion was 17.5° (standard deviation = 10.8°) from the TEA and 21.7° (standard deviation = 11.3°) from the PCA. Ten of 30 cups were appropriately anteverted; however, all the cups had appropriate abduction. Combined version when using the TEA resulted in 79% (23/29) of patients within the “safe zone” of 25°-50°. Pearson correlation coefficients were high for both stem anteversion from the TEA (R = 0.96) and PCA (R = 0.98); however, interobserver reliability for combined component anteversion was greater for the TEA (kappa, 0.83 vs 0.65).

Conclusions

Combined anteversion within the “safe zone” was achieved 79% of the time with DA-THA. Interestingly, most of the “excessive” combined anteversion appears to be related to increased anteversion of the acetabular component with only 10 patients within the acetabular cup “safe zone” of 5°-25°.

Uncemented femoral stem orientation and position in total hip arthroplasty: A CT study

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), accurate positioning of components is important for the functionality and long life of the implant. Femoral component version has been underinvestigated when compared with the acetabular cup. Accurate prediction of the femoral version on the preoperative plan is particularly important because a well-fitting uncemented stem will, by definition, press-fit into a version that is dictated by the anatomy of the proximal femur. A better understanding of this has recently become an unmet need because of the increased use of uncemented stems and of preoperative image-based planning. We present the first, three-dimensional (3D) comparison between the planned and achieved orientation and position of the femoral components in THA. We propose a comparison method that uses the 3D models of a, computed tomography-generated (CT-generated), preoperative plan and a postoperative CT to obtain the discrepancy in the six possible degrees of freedom. We ran a prospective study (level 2 evidence) of 30 patients undergoing uncemented THA to quantify the discrepancy between planned and achieved femoral stem orientation and position. The discrepancy was low for femoral stem vertical position and leg length, and varus-valgus and anterior-posterior orientation. The discrepancy was higher for femoral version with a mean (±SD) of -1.5 ± 7.8 deg. Surgeons should be aware of the variability of the eventual position of uncemented stems in THA and acknowledge the risk of achieving a less-than-optimal femoral version, different from the preoperative 3D CT plan.

The Mako ™ robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach: surgical technique, skills and pitfals

In the last decades many innovations have improved the hip replacement and the hip reconstruction surgery such as the introduction of the robotic-arm assisted surgery associated with the direct anterior approach (DAA). This surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is growing in popularity and its effectiveness has been demonstrated to improve patients’ outcomes, especially regarding more accurate implant placement, less post operative pain, faster recovery and lower of prosthesis dislocation risk. The robotic-arm assisted surgery is another really great innovation for the orthopedic surgeons. It allows to create a patient-specific THA pre-operative planning and to perform a much more accurate surgical procedure. This article outlines authors’ surgical technique of performing accurate pre-operative planning and robotic-assisted THA using direct anterior approach based on the experience of 534 patients and to discuss details of this technique. (www.actabiomedica.it)

In vivo kinematics, component alignment and hardware variables influence on the liner-to-neck clearance during chair-rising after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is an interest in quantifying dynamic hip kinematics before and after total hip arthroplasty (THA) during chair-rising: one of daily life activities.

METHODS

The study consisted of 21 patients who underwent unilateral total hip arthroplasty for symptomatic osteoarthritis. We obtained continuous radiographs using a flat-panel X-ray detector while the participants rose from chair. We assessed the pre and postoperative hip joint's movements using three-dimensional-to-two-dimensional model-to-image registration techniques. We also measured minimum liner-to-neck distances at maximum hip flexion and extension as anterior and posterior liner-to-neck distances, respectively. Multivariate analyses were applied to determine which factors were associated with liner-to-neck distances.

RESULTS

The cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem anteversion averaged 37.4°, 23.1°, and 30.1°, respectively. Significantly larger maximum hip flexion angle (72°) was found during chair-rising after THA compared to that before THA (63°, P < 0.01). The anterior pelvic tilt at the maximum hip flexion after THA (3° of anterior tilt) was significantly (P < 0.05) anterior compared to that before THA (1° of posterior tilt). The anterior and posterior liner-to-neck distances averaged 12.3 mm and 8.1 mm, respectively, with a significant difference (P < 0.01). No liner-to-neck contact was found in any hips. In multivariate analysis, the hip flexion angle, cup inclination, stem anteversion and head diameter were significantly associated with the anterior liner-to-neck distance (P < 0.05), the hip extension angle, cup anteversion, neck length and with or without elevated rim were significantly associated with the posterior liner-to-neck distance (P < 0.05, 0.01, 0.05, 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that well-positioned THA provide increased range of hip flexion with sufficient anterior liner-to-neck clearance during chair-rising. Dynamic hip kinematics, component position, and hardware variables significantly influenced on the liner-to-neck clearance under weight-bearing conditions.

Variation in femoral anteversion in patients requiring total hip replacement

BACKGROUND

Optimal implant alignment is important for total hip replacement (THR) longevity. Femoral stem anteversion is influenced by the native femoral anteversion. Knowing a patient's femoral morphology is therefore important when planning optimal THR alignment. We investigated variation in femoral anteversion across a patient population requiring THR.

METHODS

Preoperatively, native femoral neck anteversion was measured from 3-dimensional CT reconstructions in 1215 patients.

RESULTS

The median femoral anteversion was 14.4° (-27.1-54.5°, IQR 7.4-20.9°). There were significant gender differences (males 12.7°, females 16.0°; p < 0.0001). Femoral anteversion in males decreased significantly with increasing age. 14% of patients had extreme anteversion (<0° or >30°).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest series investigating native femoral anteversion in a THR population. Patient variation was large and was similar to published findings of a non-THR population. Gender and age-related differences were observed. Native femoral anteversion is patient-specific and should be considered when planning THR.

An increase in the risk of excessive femoral anteversion for relatively younger age and types of femoral morphology in total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach

BACKGROUND

Direct anterior approach (DAA) is known to diminish a dislocation risk and widely used for total hip arthroplasty (THA). On the other hand, anterior dislocation due to increasing stem anteversion and cup anteversion is an important complication.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 140 (male/female: 10/130) consecutive patients with 149 hips who had undergone primary THA in the period between 2011 and 2015 was conducted. Factors including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and primary diagnosis were examined. Radiographic parameters including the Dorr proximal femoral types, cortical thickness index (CTI), canal flare index (CFI), and canal to calcar index were measured. To investigate relationships of combined anteversion (CA) with other factors, a stepwise regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The mean age, BMI, and the follow-up period were 69.5 ± 10.3 years old, 23.4 ± 3.4 kg/m², and 48.2 ± 13.6 months, respectively. The proximal femurs of the 149 hips were categorized as Dorr type A ( n = 33), type B ( n = 110), and type C ( n = 6). The mean CTI, CFI, and canal to calcar index were 0.56 ± 0.08, 4.15 ± 0.83, and 0.46 ± 0.09, respectively. The mean stem varus angle, radiographic inclination, and radiographic anteversion of the cup were 0.19 ± 1.63, 40.9 ± 6.0°, and 12.7 ± 3.5°, respectively. Stem anteversion measured by computed tomography (CT) axial image was 17.7 ± 12.0°. The mean radiographic inclination, radiographic anteversion (CTRA), and anatomical anteversion analyzed by Kyocera 3-D template were 40.8 ± 7.2°, 19.8 ± 6.6°, and 28.8 ± 10.0°, respectively. Mean CA defined as the sum of stem anteversion and CTRA was 37.5 ± 14.5°. To investigate relationships of CA with other factors, a stepwise regression analysis was performed and resulted in a model with age ( p < 0.001). In the same way, stem anteversion and CTRA were analyzed; only for the stem anteversion, the stepwise selection process resulted in a model with age ( p < 0.001) and the Dorr types ( p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

The risk of excessive femoral anteversion increases for relatively younger age and for types of femoral morphology according to the Dorr classification, moreover with an increase of CA in DAA-THA with cementless tapered-wedge stem.

Comparison of Supine and Lateral Decubitus Positions for Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Direct Lateral Approach in Overweight and Obese Patients

Background

The purpose of our study is to compare the results of supine and lateral decubitus positions for total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the direct lateral (DL) approach in overweight and obese patients.

Methods

Patients who had a THA with the DL approach using the lateral decubitus position (LD group) (n = 54) or supine position (S group) (n = 54) or supine position (S group) (

Results

Both groups did not differ from each other by means of age, gender, BMI, and affected side (p = 0.814, p = 0.814, p = 0.814, p = 0.814, p = 0.814, p = 0.814, p = 0.814, p = 0.814,

Conclusions

The LD and S groups had comparable functional outcomes one year postoperatively. However, the S group was associated with worse intraoperative outcomes than the LD group.

Prediction of Postoperative Stem Anteversion in Crowe Type II/III Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip on Preoperative Two-Dimensional Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND

Preoperative planning is fundamental for total hip arthroplasty. This study investigated the optimal femoral neck level for measuring femoral anteversion to predict postoperative stem anteversion in developmental dysplasia of the hip and determined the predictive role of average anteversion based on the sagittal 3-point fixation.

METHODS

Sixty-two Crowe type II/III dysplastic hips that underwent total hip arthroplasty were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative anteversion was measured via 2-dimensional computed tomography. Anterior and posterior cortex anteversions were measured at 6 levels of the proximal femur. Femoral anteversion at each level was calculated. Average anterior (lesser trochanter) and posterior cortex anteversions (femoral neck) were calculated based on the sagittal 3-point fixation.

RESULTS

From the lesser trochanter to head-neck junction, femoral anteversion decreased gradually from more to less than stem anteversion. For hips with femoral neck height ≥10 mm, femoral anteversion at the 10-mm level above the lesser trochanter proximal base showed no significant difference with stem anteversion, with a good correlation for the single-wedge and an excellent correlation for the double-wedge stem. Average anterior (lesser trochanter proximal base) and posterior cortex anteversions (femoral neck at 10 mm above the lesser trochanter proximal base) showed no significant difference from stem anteversion, with excellent correlations.

CONCLUSION

For Crowe type II/III hips with femoral neck height ≥10 mm, the 10-mm level above the lesser trochanter proximal base is an optimal choice for measuring femoral anteversion to predict postoperative stem anteversion. The average of anterior cortex anteversion at the lesser trochanter and posterior cortex anteversion at the femoral neck has a predictive role.

Comparison of G-guide and Image-free Navigation System in Accuracy of Stem Anteversion Assessment During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Introduction:

We have developed and utilized the Gravity-guide (G-guide) as a simple manual instrument for intraoperative assessment and adjustment of stem anteversion (AV). Since 2013, we simultaneously measured stem AV using the G-guide and image-free navigation during THA procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare the measurement accuracy of the G-guide and navigation system using the postoperative CT results as a reference.

Methods:

In total, 59 hips in 56 patients who underwent primary THA using both the G-guide and image-free navigation system were included in the study. All patients underwent postoperative CT examination, and the femoral stem AV was assessed using a 3D image analysis system (Zed hip, LEXI, Japan). The AV angle derived from the postoperative CT image analysis was used as the reference value to assess the accuracy of the two intraoperative measurement systems.

Results:

The discrepancy between the G-guide and the postoperative CT-measured values averaged 5.0° ± 3.9°, while the corresponding value for the navigation system was 5.2° ± 4.1°. Acceptable accuracy with a measurement error of less than 10° was achieved in 86% and 90% of the cases for the G-guide and navigation measurements respectively.

Conclusion:

Consequently, it was shown that both navigation and G-guide measurements can achieve comparative accuracy and are clinically useful.

Relationship between muscular and bony anatomy in native hips: a theoretical background for approach-specific implant positioning

INTRODUCTION:

The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between bony joint orientation and the distribution of hip musculature.

METHODS:

The bone anatomy of the hip (femoral antetorsion (AT), acetabular anteversion (AV), and combined anteversion (AV/AT)) and the muscle volume of the gluteal muscles and the tensor fasciae latae were analysed bilaterally using computed tomography data of 49 patients. Muscle force direction (MFD) was determined for each muscle. The total MFD of the hip musculature was calculated and then correlated with the bony anatomy.

RESULTS:

The mean AV, AT, and AV/AT were 21.9° ± 5.9°, 7.22° ± 7.4°, and 29.2° ± 9°, respectively. We found the following mean muscle volumes: gluteus maximus: 780 ± 227 cm3, gluteus medius: 322 ± 82 cm3, gluteus minimus: 85 ± 20 cm3, and tensor fasciae latae: 68 ± 22 cm3. The mean MFD was 18.92° ± 1.29°. We found a uniform distribution of the musculature that was not correlated with the bone anatomy.

CONCLUSION:

This study highlights the variability in native acetabular and femoral anatomy and that bone hip anatomy does not correlate with the distribution of hip musculature. Although native acetabular anteversion matches the suggested targets for cup insertion, native combined anteversion is not related to current implant insertion targets. Understanding native muscular anatomy and the alterations that occur with different surgical approaches can serve as an explanatory model for THAs that has become unstable despite the components being implanted within the safe zone.

Efficacy of Computed Tomography-Based Navigation for Cup Placement in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Navigation systems are an effective tool to improve the installation accuracy of the cup in primary total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a computed tomography-based navigation system in achieving optimal installation accuracy of implants in revision total hip arthroplasty and to clarify the usefulness of the navigation system.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 23 hips in 23 patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system; the control group comprised 33 hips in 33 patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty without a navigation system.

Results

The average cup position with the navigation system was 40.0° ± 3.7° in radiographic abduction angle, 18.8° ± 4.8° in radiographic anteversion, and 41.2° ± 8.9° in combined anteversion; without the navigation system, the average cup position was 38.7° ± 6.1°, 19.0° ± 9.1°, and 33.6° ± 20.5°, respectively. The achievement rate of cup positioning within the Lewinnek safe zone was not significantly different between the navigation group (82.6%) and control group (63.6%). In contrast, the achievement rate of cup positioning within the Widmer combined anteversion guidelines was significantly greater in the navigation group (78.3%) than in the control group (48.0%, p = 0.029). Furthermore, outlier cases in the navigation group had a smaller variance of deviation from the optimal cup position than those in the control group did.

Conclusions

The results show that the use of navigation for revision total hip arthroplasty improved cup positioning and reduced the range of outliers. Improvement of cup placement accuracy influenced the installation of the stem and also improved the achievement rate of combined anteversion. Thus, a computed tomography-based navigation system is very useful for surgeons when placing the cup within the target angle in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Evaluation of Native Femoral Neck Version and Final Stem Version Variability in Patients With Osteoarthritis Undergoing Robotically Implanted Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Combined anteversion in total hip arthroplasty influences both dislocation risk and range of motion. One of its components, stem version (SV), could be dictated by many factors, from native femoral anatomy to stem geometry and surgeon's choice. In the present multicenter study, robotic technology was used to assess the influence of native femoral version on final SV and combined anteversion using a straight, uncemented stem.

METHODS

Three hundred sixty-two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were enrolled from 3 different orthopedic centers from 2012 and 2016. All patients underwent computed tomography planning with measurement of femoral neck version (FNV) and intraoperative measurement of stem version (SV), acetabular component version (AV), and combined version (CV) with robotic instrumentation.

RESULTS

Mean FNV was 5.0° ± 9.6°, and SV was 6.4° ± 9.7°. The average difference between FNV and SV was 1.6° ± 9.8°. A moderate correlation was found between FNV and SV (R = 0.48, P < .001). SV was between 5° and 20° in 174 patients (48%). Mean CV was 28.2° ± 7.9°. A strong correlation was found between SV and CV (R = 0.89, P < .001). A significant difference in SV was found between the 3 centers (P < .001). CV was <25° in 109 patients (30.1%). Relative risk of CV < 25° was 8.6 times greater with SV < 5° (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

With the use of an uncemented, single-wedge, straight stem, SV is highly variable. Despite being moderately correlated with native FNV, SV can be partially influenced by the surgeon. A low SV could be hardly corrected, bringing high risk of low CV.

The final implant position of a commonly used collarless straight tapered stem design (Corail®) does not correlate with femoral neck resection height in cement-free total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective computed tomography analysis

Background

In total hip arthroplasty, inadequate femoral component positioning can be associated with instability, impingement and component wear and subsequently with patient dissatisfaction. In this study, we investigated the influence of femoral neck resection height on the final three-dimensional position of a collarless straight tapered stem (Corail^®). We asked two questions—(1) is neck resection height correlated with version, tilt, and varus/valgus alignment of the femoral component, and (2) dependent on the resection height of the femoral neck, which area of the stem comes into contact with the femoral cortical bone?

Materials and methods

Three-dimensional computed tomography scans of 40 patients who underwent minimally invasive, cementless total hip arthroplasty were analyzed retrospectively. We analyzed the relationship between femoral neck resection height and three-dimensional alignment of the femoral implant, as well as the contact points of the implant with the femoral cortical bone. This investigation was approved by the local Ethics Commission (No.10-121-0263) and is a secondary analysis of a larger project (DRKS00000739, German Clinical Trials Register May-02-2011).

Results

Mean femoral neck resection height was 10.4 mm (± 4.8) (range 0–20.1 mm). Mean stem version was 8.7° (± 7.4) (range − 2° to 27.9°). Most patients had a varus alignment of the implant. The mean varus/valgus alignment was 1.5° (± 1.8). All 40 patients (100%) had anterior tilt of the implant with a mean tilt of 2.2° (± 1.6). Femoral neck resection height did not correlate with stem version, varus/valgus alignment, or tilt. Independent from femoral neck resection height, in most patients the implant had contact with the ventral and ventromedial cortical bone in the upper third (77.5%) and the middle third (52.5%). In the lower third, the majority of the implants had contact with the lateral and dorsolateral cortical bone (92.5%).

Conclusion

Femoral neck resection height ranging between 0 and 20.1 mm does not correlate with the final position of a collarless straight tapered stem design (Corail^®).

Level of evidence

Level 3.

CT-based Navigation System Using a Patient-Specific Instrument for Femoral Component Positioning: An Experimental in vitro Study with a Sawbone Model

PURPOSE

The intraoperative version of the femoral component is usually determined by visual appraisal of the stem position relative to the distal femoral condylar axis. However, several studies have suggested that a surgeon's visual assessment of the stem position has a high probability of misinterpretation. We developed a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system with a patient-specific instrument (PSI) capable of three-dimensional (3D) printing and investigated its accuracy and consistency in comparison to the conventional technique of visual assessment of the stem position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A CT scan of a femur sawbone model was performed, and pre-experimental planning was completed. We conducted 30 femoral neck osteotomies using the conventional technique and another 30 femoral neck osteotomies using the proposed technique. The femoral medullary canals were identified in both groups using a box chisel.

RESULTS

For the absolute deviation between the measured and planned values, the mean two-dimensional anteversions of the proposed and conventional techniques were 1.41° and 4.78°, while their mean 3D anteversions were 1.15° and 3.31°. The mean θ₁, θ₂, θ₃, and d, all of which are parameters for evaluating femoral neck osteotomy, were 2.93°, 1.96°, 5.29°, and 0.48 mm for the proposed technique and 4.26°, 3.17°, 4.43°, and 3.15 mm for the conventional technique, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The CT-based navigation system with PSI was more accurate and consistent than the conventional technique for assessment of stem position. Therefore, it can be used to reduce the frequency of incorrect assessments of the stem position among surgeons and to help with accurate determination of stem anteversion.

Posterior lesser trochanter line should not be used as reference for assessing femoral version in CT scans: a retrospective reliability and agreement study

Background The estimation of femoral version in preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty and to assess complications after total hip arthroplasty is crucial. Recent studies have recommended the posterior lesser trochanter line as an intraoperative reference for estimating femoral version. We hypothesized, that if there is a correlation, the posterior lesser trochanter line could be used to assess femoral version in computed tomography (CT) scans. Purpose To evaluate the correlation between the posterior lesser trochanter line and the posterior femoral condyle axis. Material and Methods CT scans of 126 patients after unilateral total hip arthroplasty were analyzed by means of a newly developed digital planning software for CT scans. Both hips were measured, the angle between the posterior lesser trochanter line and the posterior femoral condyle axis was determined, and the relationship between both lines was evaluated. Results We found significant differences between male and female patients ( P < 0.001) and between left and right femora ( P = 0.001). There was no significant difference between healthy hips and hips with osteoarthritis after total hip arthroplasty ( P = 0.901). Conclusion There is no reliable correlation between posterior lesser trochanter line and posterior femoral condyle axis. Therefore, posterior lesser trochanter line should not be used to assess femoral version in CT scans. As a consequence, the gold standard for measuring femoral version should still be a three-dimensional CT scan of the whole femur.

Novel potential marker for native anteversion of the proximal femur

Identifying native femoral version from proximal femoral landmarks would be of benefit both for preoperative assessment as well as intraoperatively. To identify potential markers for femoral anteversion, an empirical framework was developed for orientation-independent analysis of the proximal femur from pelvic CT to allow for segmentation of the proximal femur into five constituent regions: Femoral head, femoral neck, greater trochanter, lesser trochanter and femoral shaft. The framework is based on the identification of differences in the radius of curvature at anatomic zones of transition between regions of the proximal femur, followed by non-linear geometric shape fitting. The framework is applied to 86 proximal femurs segmented from pelvic CTs, with at least 2 cm of proximal femur remaining below the lesser trochanter, obtained for non-musculoskeletal pathology to investigate potential proximal femoral markers for native femoral version. The analysis of the proximal femur suggests a fixed relationship between the maximal femoral canal diameter 1 cm proximal to the base of the lesser trochanter from the center of the greater trochanter and the femoral neck axis of 4.13° +/- 4.99°. Further full-length femoral studies are needed to confirm the relationship of the maximal canal diameter as a proxy for native femoral anteversion. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1724-1731, 2017.

A Validated Single-View Radiographic Alternative to Computed Tomography for the Measurement of Femoral Anteversion: A Method-Comparison Study

BACKGROUND

Although preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty is helpful to ensure appropriate component position, there is no single-view radiographic method to determine femoral anteversion (FA) preoperatively. The aim of the present study was to validate the use of radiographic measurement of FA using a modified Budin view.

METHODS

This prospective study reports on 105 limbs from 65 patients. Computed tomography (CT) scans and radiographs were obtained to measure native FA. Radiographs were obtained using the modified Budin protocol with 90° flexion at the knee and 90° flexion and 30° abduction at the hip. Pearson correlation analyses, paired-samples t-test, and Bland-Altman plots were performed to assess correlation and agreement between methods. Data were grouped into subsets based on CT-derived FA in 5° intervals. Groups included all limbs, FA < 35°, FA < 30°, and FA < 25°.

RESULTS

For all limbs, Bland-Altman analysis revealed a fixed bias (mean bias, -0.8°; 95% confidence interval, -1.4° to -0.2°) and showed that radiographic methods underestimated FA. Subset analyses were performed and revealed excellent correlation between CT and radiographic measurements for all subgroups (r = 0.97, P < .001). Paired-samples t-tests revealed no significant difference between methodologies for any of the subgroups. Radiographic and CT methods showed excellent agreement, and the bias between methods was within 0.5° for all subgroups. There was no fixed bias and thus no systematic difference in methods within any of the subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION

Radiographic measurement of FA using a modified Budin view is a valid and reliable technique.

Use of the G-guide for Measuring Stem Antetorsion During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Implant positioning is one of the critical factors influencing postoperative outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Several studies have reported that the postoperative antetorsion (AT) measurement for the femoral stem inserted without navigation showed wide variability. The current authors developed a simple instrument, the Gravity-guide (G-guide), for intraoperative assessment of stem AT and adjustment. They evaluated the effectiveness of the G-guide with postoperative computed tomography (CT) examination. Ninety patients (96 hips) who underwent primary THA using the G-guide for stem adjustment were evaluated. The G-guide consists of 2 parts: one attached to the lower leg and the other attached to the handle of the rasp. The G-guide was used to evaluate the AT at the time of inserting the final rasp. In addition, the AT value in the G-guide evaluation system required correction by the angle obtained in the preoperative epicondylar view. Intraoperative stem AT was defined as the sum of the intraoperative G-guide value and the correction angle. Postoperative AT was evaluated by CT examination. The discrepancy between the intra- and postoperative measurements was 4.6°±4.1°. Acceptable accuracy with discrepancy of less than 5° and 10° was achieved in 66 (69%) hips and 85 (89%) hips, respectively. The use of the G-guide could effectively reduce the variability of stem anteversion compared with manual adjustment. This study proved the effectiveness of the newly developed G-guide system in intraoperative stem AT adjustment.

Novel measurement method on plain radiographs to predict postoperative stem anteversion in cementless THA

Preoperative knowledge of femoral stem anteversion can reduce instability and impingement especially using the standard "cup first" technique in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study, we asked whether stems at risk of retroversion or high anteversion (>20°) can be detected preoperatively using hip radiographs in two planes (anteroposterior and Lauenstein). In 123 patients undergoing cementless THA using a non-anatomic, non-modular, straight stem, low centered hip radiographs in two planes were obtained preoperatively and three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) 6 week postoperatively. The novel developed Isthmus Ratio (iRatio) as the relation between canal isthmus and calcar isthmus in the anteroposterior and Lauenstein view was calculated by two observers twice in a 6-week interval. iRatio was compared to postoperative 3D-CT stem version measured by an independent and blinded, external institute. We found a correlation between mean radiographic iRatio and 3D-CT stem torsion of r = 0.578 (p < 0.0001). The observers had excellent agreements within (ICC ≥0.918) and between (mean CCC = 0.967) radiographic iRatio measurements. Eighty-one percent (21/26) of the retroverted cementless stems had a preoperative iRatio below 0.35 and 91% (10/11) of stems with an anteversion exceeding 20° an iRatio above 0.55, respectively. The novel iRatio represents a feasible and reliable method for analyzing anteversion of the final stem on plain radiographs before cementless THA with a straight, tapered stem. iRatios below 0.35 and above 0.55 represent a warning of retroversion and anteversion more than 20° of the final stem, respectively. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:2025-2030, 2016.

Native femoral anteversion should not be used as reference in cementless total hip arthroplasty with a straight, tapered stem: a retrospective clinical study

Backround

Improper femoral and acetabular component positioning can be associated with instability, impingement, component wear and finally patient dissatisfaction in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The concept of “femur first”/“combined anteversion”, incorporates various aspects of performing a functional optimization of the prosthetic stem and cup position of the stem relative to the cup intraoperatively.

In the present study we asked two questions: (1) Do native femoral anteversion and anteversion of the implant correlate? (2) Do anteversion of the final broach and implant anteversion correlate?

Methods

In a secondary analysis of a prospective controlled trial, a subgroup of 55 patients, who underwent computer-assisted, cementless THA with a straight, tapered stem through an anterolateral, minimally invasive (MIS) approach in a lateral decubitus position were examined retrospectivly. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to verify a “best-fit” position of the final broach. An image-free navigation system was used for measurement of the native femoral version, version of the final broach and the final implant. Femoral neck resection height was measured in postoperative CT-scans. This investigation was approved by the local Ethics Commission (No.10-121-0263) and is a secondary analysis of a larger project (DRKS00000739, German Clinical Trials Register May-02–2011).

Results

The mean difference between native femoral version and final implant was 1.9° (+/− 9.5), with a range from −20.7° to 21.5° and a Spearman’s correlation coefficient of 0.39 (p < 0.003). In contrast, we observed a mean difference between final broach and implant version of −1.9° (+/− 3.5), with a range from −12.7° to 8.7° and a Spearman’s correlation coefficient of 0.89 (p < 0.001). In 83.6 % (46/55) final stem version was outside the normal range as defined by Tönnis (15-20°). The mean femoral neck resection height was 7.3 mm (+/− 5.6). There was no correlation between resection height and version of the implant (Spearman’s correlation coefficient 0.14).

Conclusion

Native femoral version significantly differs from the final anteversion of a cementless, straight, tapered stem and therefore is not a reliable reference in cementless THA. Measuring anteversion of the final “fit and fill” broach is a feasible assistance in order to predict final stem anteversion intraoperatively. There is no correlation between femoral neck resection height and version of the implant.

Dynamic Hip Kinematics During the Golf Swing After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although most surgeons allow their patients to play golf after total hip arthroplasty (THA), the effect on the implant during the golf swing is still unclear.

PURPOSE

To evaluate hip kinematics during the golf swing after THA.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Eleven hips in 9 patients who underwent primary THA were analyzed. All patients were right-handed recreational golfers, and these 11 hips included 6 right hips and 5 left hips. Periodic radiographic images of the golf swing were taken using a flat-panel x-ray detector. Movements of the hip joint and components were assessed using 3-dimensional-to-2-dimensional model-to-image registration techniques. Liner-to-neck contact and translation of the femoral head with respect to the acetabular cup (cup-head translation) were examined. Hip kinematics, orientation of components, and maximum cup-head translation were compared between patients with and without liner-to-neck contact.

RESULTS

On average, the golf swing produced approximately 50° of axial rotation in both lead and trail hips. Liner-to-neck contact was observed in 4 hips with elevated rim liners (2 lead hips and 2 trail hips) at maximum external rotation. Neither bone-to-bone nor bone-to-implant contact was observed at any phases of the golf swing in any of the hips. Four hips with liner-to-neck contact had significantly larger maximum external rotation (37.9° ± 7.0° vs 20.6° ± 9.9°, respectively; P = .01) and more cup anteversion (26.5° ± 6.1° vs 10.8° ± 8.9°, respectively; P = .01) than hips without liner-to-neck contact. No significant differences between hips with and without contact were found for cup inclination (42.0° ± 2.5° vs 38.1° ± 5.5°, respectively; P = .22), combined anteversion (45.3° ± 8.9° vs 51.4° ± 7.9°, respectively; P = .26), or maximum cup-head translation (1.3 ± 0.3 mm vs 1.5 ± 0.4 mm, respectively; P = .61).

CONCLUSION

In this analysis, the golf swing did not produce excessive hip rotation or cup-head translation in any hips. However, liner-to-neck contact during the golf swing was observed in 36% of the hips, with unknown effects on the long-term results.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Golf is an admissible sport after THA because dynamic hip stability was observed. However, the implant position, especially cup anteversion and the use of elevated rim liners, promoted liner-to-neck contact.

Visual intraoperative estimation of cup and stem position is not reliable in minimally invasive hip arthroplasty

Background and purpose - In hip arthroplasty, acetabular inclination and anteversion-and also femoral stem torsion-are generally assessed by eye intraoperatively. We assessed whether visual estimation of cup and stem position is reliable. Patients and methods - In the course of a subgroup analysis of a prospective clinical trial, 65 patients underwent cementless hip arthroplasty using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach in lateral decubitus position. Altogether, 4 experienced surgeons assessed cup position intraoperatively according to the operative definition by Murray in the anterior pelvic plane and stem torsion in relation to the femoral condylar plane. Inclination, anteversion, and stem torsion were measured blind postoperatively on 3D-CT and compared to intraoperative results. Results - The mean difference between the 3D-CT results and intraoperative estimations by eye was -4.9° (-18 to 8.7) for inclination, 9.7° (-16 to 41) for anteversion, and -7.3° (-34 to 15) for stem torsion. We found an overestimation of > 5° for cup inclination in 32 hips, an overestimation of > 5° for stem torsion in 40 hips, and an underestimation < 5° for cup anteversion in 42 hips. The level of professional experience and patient characteristics had no clinically relevant effect on the accuracy of estimation by eye. Altogether, 46 stems were located outside the native norm of 10-20° as defined by Tönnis, measured on 3D-CT. Interpretation - Even an experienced surgeon's intraoperative estimation of cup and stem position by eye is not reliable compared to 3D-CT in minimally invasive THA. The use of mechanical insertion jigs, intraoperative fluoroscopy, or imageless navigation is recommended for correct implant insertion.

Is a Stem Version on the Crosstable Lateral Radiograph Accurate in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

In contrast to the acetabular cup version (CV), stem version (SV) measurement on the crosstable lateral radiograph has not been validated. We, therefore, investigated: (1) the difference of SV on the crosstable lateral radiograph from that measured using computed tomography data and (2) the reliability of SV measurement on the crosstable lateral radiograph.

METHODS

We examined the correlations of the crosstable-CV and crosstable-SV with true-CV (operative cup anteversion) and true-SV (neck version relative to the posterior condylar line) obtained using computed tomography data from 103 patients. We also produced the digital reconstructed crosstable lateral radiograph with adjusted hip flexion and rotation and defined SV on this image as the true-crosstable SV.

RESULTS

Significant positive correlations were noted between the crosstable-CV and true-CV, with a correlation coefficient of 0.79. In contrast, the correlation between the crosstable-SV and true-SV was very low (r = 0.30), with significantly higher deviation from the true-SV values when compared with the crosstable-CV (standard deviation, 11.6° vs 6.5°, P  < .001). The true-crosstable SV was correlated with true-SV (r = 0.81); however, the average difference was 23.5° ± 8.9°.

CONCLUSION

Crosstable-SV differed from true-SV in the measurement plane and did not correlate well with the true-SV, suggesting the unreliability of its measurements. Therefore, the crosstable-SV is not recommended for clinical use.

Preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation of total hip arthroplasty that takes combined anteversion

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether postoperative combined anteversion (CA) can be kept within the safe zone while using cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the operative technique which prepares the socket first for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), by estimating the anteversion of the metaphyseal fit stem using preoperative three-dimensional (3D) computerized planning and by adjusting the anteversion of the socket using a navigation system that considers CA. Our subjects were 65 patients (65 hips) that had undergone cementless THA for DDH that could be observed for 1 year or more. Clinical assessments were made using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association’s (JOA) hip score. For a radiological evaluation, we investigated 3D-planned stem versions, postoperative stem versions, preoperative and postoperative CA, and the relationship between CA and dislocation tendencies with temporary intraoperative reductions. JOA hip scores improved from 52.3 ± 11.4 points to 88.9 ± 8.6 points. CT evaluations revealed that 3D-planned stem versions were strongly correlated with postoperative stem versions (r = 0.80; p < 0.01). Preoperative CA was 50.5° ± 7.2°, and postoperative CA was 41.3° ± 8.6°. Postoperative CA was kept within the safe zone in 61 hips. No intraoperative dislocation tendencies were observed in any hips. By estimating the anteversion of the cementless metaphyseal fit stem using 3D planning preoperatively and adjusting the angle of anteversion of the socket using a navigation system that considers CA intraoperatively, postoperative CA can very frequently be kept within the safe zone, even with cementless THA using the operative technique which prepares the socket first for DDH.

Acetabular Dysplasia and Surgical Approaches Other Than Direct Anterior Increases Risk for Malpositioning of the Acetabular Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Persistent acetabular dysplasia (AD) after periacetabular osteotomy has been hypothesized to increase the risk for malpositioning of the acetabular component. In this study, we investigate whether AD is an independent risk factor for cup malpositioning during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Patient demographics, surgical approach, presence of AD assessed using the lateral center-edge angle, and acetabular cup positioning determined using Martell Hip Analysis Suite were investigated in 836 primary THA patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter study.

RESULTS

We found that presence of AD, defined as the lateral center-edge angle of <25°, is an independent risk factor for malpositioning of the acetabular component during primary THA. Surgical approach other than direct anterior was also independently associated with malpositioned cups.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons should therefore take special care during placement of the acetabular component in patients with AD.

Femoral version, neck-shaft angle, and acetabular anteversion in Chinese Han population: a retrospective analysis of 466 healthy adults

Anatomic data regarding femoral version, neck-shaft angle, and acetabular anteversion are still limited in Chinese Han adult population. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of age, sex, and body laterality on the 3 important anatomic indicators in Chinese Han healthy adults. Measurements were performed independently by 3 experienced observers using the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) in healthy adults who had received imaging tests of the femur and acetabulum between January 2009 and October 2014. Relevant data were measured and analyzed. A total of 466 adults (353 males and 113 females) were included. The mean femoral version, neck-shaft angle, and acetabular anteversion for all were 10.62, 133.02, and18.79, respectively. Age-based analysis showed that adults younger than 60 years had a significantly higher neck-shaft angle (P < 0.001) but a significantly lower acetabular anteversion (P < 0.001) than those older than 60 years. Sex-based analysis revealed that females had significantly higher values of femoral version (P < 0.001) and acetabular anteversion (P < 0.001) than males. Laterality-based analysis found the left side had a significantly lower acetabular anteversion (P < 0.001) than the right side. Outcomes of multiple linear regression analysis indicated that femoral version may be associated with sex (P < 0.001) but not age (P = 0.076) or laterality (P = 0.430), neck-shaft angle may be associated with age (P < 0.001) but not sex (P = 0.378) or laterality (P = 0.233), and acetabular anteversion may be associated with age (P < 0.001) and sex (P < 0.001) but not laterality (P = 0.060). In this representative Chinese cohort, neck-shaft angle may decrease, whereas acetabular anteversion may increase with age, females may have higher values of femoral version and acetabular anteversion than males, and the right body side may have a higher value of acetabular anteversion than the left side.

Total Hip Prostheses in Standing, Sitting and Squatting Positions: An Overview of Our 8 Years Practice Using the EOS Imaging Technology

More total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed worldwide and especially in younger and more active patients compared to earlier decades. One of the focuses of THA research in the future will be on optimizing the radiological follow-up of these patients using 2D and 3D measurements of implants position while reducing the radiation dose delivered.

Low-dose EOS^® imaging is an innovative slot-scanning radiograph system providing valuable information in patient functional positions (standing, sitting and even squatting positions). EOS has been proven accurate and reliable without significant inconvenience caused by the metallic artifacts of implants. The ability to obtain precise data on implant orientation according to the patient posture opens new perspectives for a comprehensive analysis of the pelvic frontal and sagittal balance and its potential impact on implants function and failures.

We report our 8 years experience on our first 300 THA patients using this technology routinely for pre and post op evaluation. Our results will be compared and confronted with the actual literature about this innovative technology. We shall especially emphasize our experience about patients with abnormal posture and the evolution of the subject over time, because the phenomenon of an aging spine is frequently associated with the process of aging hips.

Strong correlation between the morphology of the proximal femur and the geometry of the distal femoral trochlea

PURPOSE

Previous investigations suggested that the geometry of the proximal femur may be related to osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral joint and various patellofemoral joint conditions. This study aims to investigate the correlation between proximal and distal femoral geometry. Such a correlation could aid our understanding of patient complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and be of benefit for further development of kinematic approaches in TKA.

METHODS

CT scans of 60 subjects (30 males, 30 females) were used to identify anatomical landmarks to calculate anatomical parameters of the femur, including the femoral neck anteversion angle, neck-shaft angle (NSA), mediolateral offset (ML-offset), condylar twist angle (CTA), trochlear sulcus angle (TSA) and medial/lateral trochlear inclination angles (MTIA/LTIA). Correlation analyses were carried out to assess the relationship between these parameters, and the effect of gender was investigated.

RESULTS

The CTA, TSA and LTIA showed no correlation with any proximal parameter. The MTIA was correlated with all three proximal parameters, mostly with the NSA and ML-offset. Per 5° increase in NSA, the MTIA was 2.1° lower (p < 0.01), and for every 5 mm increase in ML-offset, there was a 2.6° increase in MTIA (p < 0.01). These results were strongest and statistically significant in females and not in males and were independent of length and weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal femoral geometry is distinctively linked with trochlear morphology. In order to improve knowledge on the physiological kinematics of the knee joint and to improve the concept of kinematic knee replacement, the proximal femur seems to be a factor of clinical importance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Prevalence and characteristics of cam-type femoroacetabular deformity in 100 hips with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia: a case control study

Background

Cam-type femoroacetabular deformity in acetabular dysplasia (AD) has not been well clarified. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of femoroacetabular deformity in symptomatic AD patients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 86 women (92 hips) and eight men (eight hips) with symptomatic AD. The mean patient age was 37.9 (range, 14–60) years. All participants underwent lateral cross-table and lateral whole-spine radiographic examinations to measure the alpha angle and pelvic tilt. Pelvic computed tomography scans were used to measure femoral anteversion. The patients were classified into two groups: AD only group, containing hips with an alpha angle less than 55°; and AD with cam-type femoroacetabular deformity (AD + cam-type deformity) group, containing hips with an alpha angle greater than or equal to 55°.

Results

Of the patients with AD, 40 hips displayed additional radiographic evidence of cam-type morphology, while 60 hips had exclusive AD morphology. The patients in the AD + cam-type deformity group had significantly increased forward pelvic tilt in the standing position (p =0.023) and decreased femoral anteversion (p =0.047) compared with the AD only group.

Conclusions

Our data revealed that 40% of patients with AD also had radiographic evidence of cam-type femoroacetabular deformity. Greater forward pelvic tilt in the standing position and decreased femoral anteversion seemed to be associated with the cam-type deformity in these patients. These results indicate the morphological features that are most likely to induce secondary symptoms to developmental hip dysplasia. It is suggested that the symptoms in the AD + cam-type deformity group could arise through femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) after periacetabular osteotomy, because a predisposition was present preoperatively.

Optimal anterior femoral offset for functional range of motion in total hip arthroplasty--a computer simulation study

PURPOSE

Compared to medial femoral offset (MFO), the role of anterior femoral offset (AFO) on range of motion (ROM) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been fully examined. We therefore defined AFO as the anterior distance from the centre of the femoral head to the proximal femoral axis in the sagittal plane and determined the optimal AFO required for ROM needed for activities of daily living using a computer-simulated THA model.

METHODS

Various AFOs were obtained by changing stem anteversion (stem-AV) and stem tilt in the sagittal plane (stem-tilt) using a CT-based simulation software. The required ROM was defined as: flexion ≥ 110°, internal rotation at 90° flexion (IR) ≥ 30°, external rotation (ER) ≥ 30°, and extension ≥ 30°, and we determined AFO and MFO to satisfy required ROM.

RESULTS

AFO was positively correlated with stem-AV and anterior stem-tilt. MFO was negatively correlated with stem-AV and not influenced by stem-tilt. Flexion and IR increased with both increased AFO and MFO, whereas extension and ER decreased with increased AFO. A smoothing spline curve showed the optimal AFO and MFO for required ROM to be from 15 mm to 25 mm on average and more than 32.1 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to show that AFO directly influenced ROM in THA. Optimal AFO as well as MFO should be reconstructed to achieve sufficient ROM.

The use of combined anteversion in total hip arthroplasty for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip

The combined anteversion technique has been proposed recently and proved to be an applicable technique in general THA. The corresponding author routinely applied this approach to DDH patients in clinical practice. The current study aimed to provide clinical evidence for this approach. We studied 35 DDH patients (47 hips). Every patient underwent pelvic CT scans before and after surgery and the HHs was recorded. The data indicate a high accuracy of controlling components orientation and satisfactory clinical outcomes. Using this approach, we reduced dislocation risk and got better impingement free range of motion. Therefore, we conclude that combined anteversion is effective for DDH patients who receive a THA. This approach could guarantee stable and functioning joints for DDH patients receiving THA.

How many different types of femora are there in primary hip osteoarthritis? An active shape modeling study

We assessed the variation in proximal femoral canal shape and its association with geometric and demographic parameters in primary hip OA. In a retrospective cohort study, the joint geometry of the proximal femur was evaluated on radiographs and corresponding CT scans of 345 consecutive patients with end-stage hip OA. Active shape modeling (ASM) was performed to assess the variation in endosteal shape of the proximal femur. To identify natural groupings of patients, hierarchical cluster analysis of the shape modes was used. ASM identified 10 independent shape modes accounting for >96% of the variation in proximal femoral canal shape within the dataset. Cluster analysis revealed 10 specific shape clusters. Significant differences in geometric and demographic parameters between the clusters were observed. ASM and subsequent cluster analysis have the potential to identify specific morphological patterns of the proximal femur despite the variability in proximal femoral anatomy. The study identified patterns of proximal femoral canal shape in hip OA that allow a comprehensive classification of variation in shape and its association with joint geometry. Our data may improve future stem designs that will optimize stem fit and simultaneously allow individual restoration of hip biomechanics.

Influencing factors for the increased stem version compared to the native femur in cementless total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Stem version is not always equivalent to femoral neck version (native version) in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). We therefore examined the discrepancy of version between the native femoral neck and stem using pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT), the level of the femur where the canal version most closely fit the stem version, and the factors influencing version discrepancy between the native femoral neck and stem.

METHODS

A total of 122 hips in 122 patients who underwent primary THA using a metaphyseal-fit stem through the postero-lateral approach were included. Pre- and postoperative CT images were utilized to measure native and stem version, and the version of the femoral canal at four levels relative to the lesser trochanter.

RESULTS

The mean native and stem versions were 28.1 ± 11.0° and 38.0 ± 11.2°, respectively, revealing increased stem version with a mean difference of 9.8° (p < 0.0001). A total of 84 hips (68.9 %) revealed an increase in version greater than 5°. Femoral canal version at the level of the lesser trochanter most closely approximated that of stem version. Among the factors analysed, both univariate and multivariate analysis showed that greater degrees of native version and anterior stem tilt significantly reduced the version discrepancy between the native femoral neck and stem version.

CONCLUSIONS

Since a cementless stem has little version adjustability in the femoral canal, these findings are useful for surgeons in preoperative planning and to achieve proper component placement in THA.

A validation study for estimation of femoral anteversion using the posterior lesser trochanter line: an analysis of computed tomography measurement

The aim of this study was to introduce a simple and reliable intraoperative reference guide to reproduce the normal femoral anteversion during total hip arthroplasty (THA). We hypothesized that the posterior lesser trochanter line (PLTL) could be a useful guide for estimating femoral anteversion during THA. We conducted a study of 56 men (112 hips) to evaluate the relationship between the PLTL and the femoral anteversion using computed tomography scans. The mean femoral anteversion was 9.0° ± 8.1° (range, -16.2° to 32.9°). The PLTL angle correlated (r(2) = 0.12, P < 0.05) with the femoral anteversion. We found a constant relationship between the PLTL and femoral anteversion, and the PLTL may be used as a guide for estimating the femoral stem anteversion during femoral stem fixation.