Revision total knee arthroplasty for aseptic and septic causes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Increased Rate of Complications Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Marfan Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are poorly documented in the literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate MFS as a potential risk factor for complications after TKA.

METHODS

Using a national private payer insurance database from 2010 to 2022, MFS patients undergoing primary TKA were identified and compared to 10:1 matched controls based on age, sex, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and a comorbidity index. A total of 4,092 patients undergoing primary TKA were analyzed, of which 372 had MFS. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were done for medical complications up to 90 days and surgical complications up to 2 years. 90-day emergency department-visits and inpatient readmissions were also documented.

RESULTS

Compared to the matched controls, patients who have MFS displayed elevated rates of surgical complications, including prosthetic instability (1-year, odds ratio (OR) 3.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.58 to 8.66]; 2-year, OR 4.39, 95% CI [2.16 to 8.44]), and revision surgery (2 year, OR 1.79, 95% CI [1.05 to 2.91]). Additionally, patients who have MFS demonstrated significant higher rates of medical complications, including aortic dissection (2.15 versus 0%) and transfusion (OR 2.63, 95% CI [1.31 to 4.90]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who have MFS are at higher risks of postoperative complications after TKA, encompassing both medical and surgical complications. Specifically, patients who have MFS have a significantly higher likelihood of experiencing prosthetic instability and requiring revision surgery. Given these results, it is crucial for orthopedic surgeons and patients alike to consider these risks when determining a course of TKA for patients who have MFS.

Ninety-day postoperative mortality and complications in continuous and unselected single-stage revisions for chronic periprosthetic joint infection

PURPOSE

Single-stage revision has gained significant attention as a major surgical approach for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, the 90-day mortality and complication profile of single-stage revision is poorly characterized. The purposes of this study were to determine the incidence rates of and identify the risk factors for 90-day postoperative mortality and complications of single-stage revision for chronic PJI.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent single-stage revision for PJI between August 2000 and May 2022. Patient demographics, 90-day mortality, and postoperative complications were recorded. Complications were categorized into systemic and local complications. Patients in this study were further categorized into knee and hip revision groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify significant independent predictors of the outcome measures.

RESULTS

348 patients (144 knees and 204 hips) were included in this study. The 90-day mortality rate was 0.9%. The incidence rates of postoperative complications in knee and hip surgeries were 31.3% and 19.6%, respectively. The most common complication was deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was the independent predictor of mortality. In the knee revision group, fungal infection was identified as the independent predictor of recurrent PJI; regular alcohol use was predictive of wound dehiscence. Among hip PJI patients, age ≥ 80 years was independently associated with DVT; RA was found to be a predictor of dislocation and wound dehiscence.

CONCLUSION

For continuous and unselected patients with chronic PJI, single-stage revision demonstrated a satisfactory 90-day mortality. Nevertheless, the 90-day postoperative complication rates after single-stage revision in both knee and hip groups were relatively high.

Discrepant histological diagnoses: A cause of early low FJS-12 score and if untreated, unhappy Total Knee Arthroplasty patient

PURPOSE

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most successful operations in orthopedics. Still, a sizable percentage of patients (20%) remain dissatisfied after a well-executed TKA. The study aims to examine the excised synovium from the suprapatellar region in osteoarthritic knees during TKA and evaluate the histopathology (HP) report to know whether discrepant diagnoses affect the Forgotten Joint Score-12 at various time intervals.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study. Two hundred (160 female; 40 male) end-stage osteoarthritis patients who underwent primary TKA were studied. An inclusion criterion was patient with end-stage osteoarthritis. Clinically and serologically proven rheumatoid arthritis patients were excluded from the study. The synovium excised during the TKA procedure was sent for the HP examination. The statistical significance was measured with the Chi-square test and two-sample t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 184 out of the 200 patients (92%) knee synovium showed HP features of osteoarthritis. The discordant diagnoses and discrepant diagnosis rate was 8% and 7%, respectively, which is statistically significant by Chi-square test (p value < 0.0001 and p value = 0.0001). 14 of the patients (12 F:2 M) showed histological features of inflammatory/rheumatoid arthritis who were treated, two patients (all female) showed HP features of villonodular synovitis. The mean (SD) improvement in FJS-12 at six weeks in the concordant group (25.3 [17.6]) is significantly more than the discrepant group (15.3 [12.5]), p-value 0.0385.

CONCLUSION

8% of our patients exhibited unexpected results. The study showed a 7% rate of discrepant diagnosis. This discrepant diagnosis if missed and untreated, would have affected the function and long-term survival of the implanted TKA.

Contemporary Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty is Durable in Patients Diagnosed With Ankylosing Spondylitis

INTRODUCTION

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a seronegative spondyloarthropathy affecting the axial spine and peripheral joints. Despite innovations in medical management, patients with AS experience two-fold the lifetime risk of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to the general population. Moreover, recent data have indicated a correlation between spinal pathology and outcomes of TKAs.

METHODS

Our institutional total joint registry identified 19 patients (28 knees) with a diagnosis of AS treated with primary TKA from 2000 to 2016. The mean age at TKA was 68 years, and 84% of patients were men. The mean follow-up period was 6 years. Outcomes included implant survivorship, clinical outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

Survivorship free from any revision was 88% at 10 years. A single patient required revision at 8 years for aseptic loosening. Survivorship free from any reoperation was 77% at 10 years. Reoperations included 2 manipulations under anesthesia and 1 superficial wound irrigation and debridement. Mean Knee Society score improved from 46 preoperatively to 89 postoperatively (P < .0001). The mean arc of motion improved from 108^o preoperatively to 116° postoperatively (P = .01). There were 6 complications that did not require reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Primary TKAs in patients with AS resulted in significant improvement in clinical outcomes with excellent 10-year implant survivorship. Although 2 manipulations under anesthesia were required, the range of motion was restored postoperatively. These data suggest that the contemporary primary TKA can achieve durable and reliable outcomes in patients with axial skeletal disease resulting from AS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Diagnosis of peripheral bone and prosthetic joint infections: overview on the consensus documents by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement)

OBJECTIVES

Peripheral bone infection (PBI) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) are two different infectious conditions of the musculoskeletal system. They have in common to be quite challenging to be diagnosed and no clear diagnostic flowchart has been established. Thus, a conjoined initiative on these two topics has been initiated by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). The purpose of this work is to provide an overview on the two consensus documents on PBI and PJI that originated by the conjoined work of the ESR, EANM, and EBJIS (with ESCMID endorsement).

METHODS AND RESULTS

After literature search, a list of 18 statements for PBI and 25 statements for PJI were drafted in consensus on the most debated diagnostic challenges on these two topics, with emphasis on imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, white blood cell scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging have individually demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance over other imaging modalities for the diagnosis of PBI and PJI. However, the choice of which advanced diagnostic modality to use first depends on several factors, such as the benefit for the patient, local experience of imaging specialists, costs, and availability. Since robust, comparative studies among most tests do not exist, the proposed flowcharts are based not only on existing literature but also on the opinion of multiple experts involved on these topics.

KEY POINTS

• For peripheral bone infection and prosthetic joint infection, white blood cell and magnetic resonance imaging have individually demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance over other imaging modalities. • Two evidence- and expert-based diagnostic flowcharts involving variable combination of laboratory tests, biopsy methods, and radiological and nuclear medicine imaging modalities are proposed by a multi-society expert panel. • Clinical application of these flowcharts depends on several factors, such as the benefit for the patient, local experience, costs, and availability.

Consensus document for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a joint paper by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement)

Background

For the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection, real evidence-based guidelines to aid clinicians in choosing the most accurate diagnostic strategy are lacking.

Aim and Methods

To address this need, we performed a multidisciplinary systematic review of relevant nuclear medicine, radiological, orthopaedic, infectious, and microbiological literature to define the diagnostic accuracy of each diagnostic technique and to address and provide evidence-based answers on uniform statements for each topic that was found to be important to develop a commonly agreed upon diagnostic flowchart.

Results and Conclusion

The approach used to prepare this set of multidisciplinary guidelines was to define statements of interest and follow the procedure indicated by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (OCEBM).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-4263-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Rationale of Cruciate Retaining Design in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Review of Clinical Analysis and its Role in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background:

Over the years, proponents of total knee designs (cruciate retaining and posterior stabilised) have conducted several long-term studies to claim the potential of these designs in several subsets of patients. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis has also been one such domain where numerous studies were conducted in the past. A general perception among majority of arthroplasty surgeons is that, posterior stabilised (PS) is the implanted design of choice among patients with Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, with the available literature there is a significant disparity related to the selection of implants in patients with rheumatoid RA. In this review of literature, an attempt is made to identify the clinical performance and role of one such implant design, the cruciate retaining (CR) prosthesis in rheumatoid arthritis.

Method:

The review was conducted after a series of advanced search in the following medical databases; Pub med, Biomed central, Cochrane and Google scholar for articles related to long term follow up studies of cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis using the keywords cruciate retaining prosthesis, total knee arthroplasty, rheumatoid arthritis.

Results:

The available data demonstrate that the CR design is attributed with an excellent long term survivorship and functional outcome even in follow up studies up to twenty-five years.

Conclusion:

The advantages of using a CR design are long term survivorship, controlled femoral roll back and preservation of bone stock. Thus, the data gathered in this review lead to a consideration that the CR design is an implant design on par with PS design in patients with RA.

A study of pre-operative presence of micro-organisms in affected knee joints of rheumatoid arthritis patients who need total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

To evaluate, by way of intraoperative tissue culture and pathological study, the pre-operative presence of micro-organisms in knee joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who need total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

From November 2012 to January 2014, 47 patients with RA (53 knees) who needed TKA were included in this study. Patients received routine pre-operative examination and joint fluid routine and culture. Each RA patient was match-paired with one osteoarthritis (OA) patient. During arthrotomy, synovial tissue was reserved and portioned for culture, frozen section, and routine pathologic examination.

RESULTS

Pre-operative infection in all knees was ruled out. There were 12 RA patients (13 knees) with positive culture results: two Escherichia coli, two Staphylococcus epidermidis, two Staphylococcus aureus, one Proteus mirabilis, one Staphylococcus warneri, one Enterococcus faecalis, one Acinetobacter baumannii, one Candida albicans, one Ochrobactrum anthropi, and one Candida glabrata. Except for microabscess found in one RA patient, all pathological sections showed mild chronic inflammation but no infection. All patients with positive culture results were administered sensitive antibiotics for six weeks after surgery. Two patients had deep infection: one had a fused knee after a failed debridement, and the second was previously treated with an amphotericin injection.

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative presence of micro-organism in knee joints of RA patients is common (24.5%). This finding of a high incidence of pre-operative presence of micro-organism in joints of RA patients before arthroplasty may suggest a role of micro-organism in the pathogenesis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Intraoperative synovial tissue culture is valuable for diagnosis of this condition and in instruction of antibacterial treatment.

Burden of Surgical Site Infections Associated with Arthroplasty and the Contribution of Staphylococcus aureus

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing arthroplasty are at considerable risk of experiencing post-operative complications, including surgical site infections (SSIs). In addition to potential economic consequences, SSIs can have a negative impact on patient outcomes and may potentially be life-threatening. Staphylococcus aureus has been consistently shown as the leading cause of SSIs associated with orthopedic surgery, with an important contribution from methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). This study evaluated the global burden of SSIs among patients undergoing orthopedic surgical procedures, and specifically those undergoing knee and hip arthroplasties.

METHODS

An extensive search of PubMed and recent conference proceedings was conducted. English articles published between 2003 and 2013 pertaining to SSI epidemiology, patient outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization and costs were reviewed.

RESULTS

Overall, 81 studies were included, mainly from North America and Europe. Median SSI and S. aureus SSI rates, calculated as percentage of all arthroplasty procedures, were 1.7% (range: 0.25%-4.4%; 15 studies) and 0.6% (range: 0.1%-23%), respectively. Median SSI rates were 1.3% (range: 0.05%-19%; 22 studies) after knee arthroplasty, and 2.1% (range: 0.05%-28%; 24 studies) after hip arthroplasty. S. aureus SSI rates ranged from 0.2%-2.4% and 0.18%-3.8% for patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty, respectively. The percentage of S. aureus SSIs because of MRSA varied widely within each patient category. SSI-related mortality data (14 studies) showed that in-hospital mortality rates were low (1.2%-2.5%), but increased with time after index arthroplasty procedure (up to 56% over 1 y). Studies assessing healthcare resource utilization (n = 21) revealed that developing post-orthopedic SSIs resulted in a two- to three-fold increase in length of hospital stay (LOS) compared with non-infected patients (median LOS: 18.9 d vs. 6 d for non-SSI patients). Patients with SSIs because of methicillin-resistant staphylococci incurred greater mean LOS compared with SSIs because of methicillin-sensitive organisms. Readmission rates reported in 11 studies indicate a greater likelihood in the presence of SSIs; comparison across studies was not feasible because of differences in data reporting. Consistent with increased healthcare resource utilization (LOS and readmission) associated with SSIs, cost studies (n = 23) revealed that the presence of SSIs was associated with up to three-fold cost increase compared with the absence of SSI across all orthopedic patient categories assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

SSIs are associated with increased morbidity, mortality rates, healthcare resource utilization, and costs. Despite the relatively low SSI incidence following orthopedic surgery and specifically arthroplasty, preventive methods, specifically those targeting S. aureus, would serve to minimize costs and improve patient outcomes.

[Periprosthetic infections in systemic inflammatory rheumatic disease. Review article on diagnostics and therapy]

BACKGROUND

Patients with an inflammatory disease have an elevated risk for periprosthetic joint infections due to impairment of the immune system caused by the disease itself in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). These infections can cause life-threatening sepsis. Unfortunately recommendations on the diagnostics and treatment are mostly based on studies with a level of evidence grade IV or V.

OBJECTIVES

This article gives an overview of recent publications evaluating the level of evidence of recommendations on diagnostics and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections in patients with inflammatory diseases.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the Medline database in January and February 2014. The search included all articles on diagnostic and/or treatment of periprosthetic joint infections in patients with inflammatory diseases. Articles in languages other than English or German were excluded, as well as case reports, studies with less than 20 patients and articles only referring to patients with inflammatory diseases without periprosthetic infections.

RESULTS

Nearly all recommendations are based on retrospective studies or expert opinions (level of evidence IV or V). Conflicting results are common but there is good evidence on preoperative aspiration of joint fluid (level of evidence I) and a doubled risk of joint infections under treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (level of evidence II). An increased mortality has been reported in multiple studies. Two-stage revision seems to have a slightly better outcome than retention of prosthesis or one-stage revision. Generally, therapeutic recommendations for periprosthetic joint infections lack a good level of evidence. Future studies are urgently needed.

Comparison of clinical and histologic diagnoses in 16,587 total joint arthroplasties: implications for orthopedic and pathologic practices

OBJECTIVES

To confirm how often histologic diagnoses correspond to reported clinical diagnoses in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasties.

METHODS

We compared the submitting operative diagnosis with the pathologic diagnosis in 16,587 total joint arthroplasties for the seven most common diagnoses.

RESULTS

The discrepancy rates between the submitted operative and histologic diagnosis were 18.8% for 7,968 total hip replacements and 9.4% for 8,619 total knee replacements. In addition, 5.4% of hip joints and 1.4% of knee joints demonstrated discordant histologic findings that had not been suspected clinically and should have affected clinical management and patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrated significantly more diagnostic discrepancies and discordance than has been suggested by the previously published literature. A large part of the difference may be due to more careful diagnostic analyses of orthopedic specimens than in other institutions. These analyses include some diagnoses that are not often made elsewhere but may have important future implications for patients.

Long-term survival rate of implants and modes of failure after revision total knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon

The purpose of the present study was to analyze the survival rate of implants and mode of failure after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using one type of modular prosthesis by a single surgeon. From September 1990 to June 2009, 224 revision TKAs were performed in 194 patients. The 5-, 8-, and 10-year survival rates were 97.2%, 91.6%, and 86.1%, respectively. Re-revision TKAs were performed in 20 knees because of infection (seven knees), loosening (six knees), polyethylene wear (six knees), and periprosthetic fractures (one knee). The long-term survival rate of revision TKA was satisfactory, but careful attention is necessary to detect the late failure. The prevention of infection and the stable fixation of components are required at the time of revision TKA.

Periprosthetic joint infection in patients with inflammatory joint disease: a review of risk factors and current approaches to diagnosis and management

BACKGROUND

Prevention, early identification, and effective management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with inflammatory joint disease (IJD) present unique challenges for physicians. Discontinuing disease-modifying anti-rheumatoid drugs (DMARDs) perioperatively may reduce immunosuppression and infection risk at the expense of increasing disease flares. Interpreting traditional diagnostic markers of PJI can be difficult due to disease-related inflammation.

PURPOSES

This review is designed to answer how to (1) manage immunosuppressive/DMARD therapy perioperatively, (2) diagnose PJI in patients with IJD, and (3) treat PJI in this population.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for relevant articles with subsequent review by independent authors.

RESULTS

While there is evidence to support the use of methotrexate perioperatively in RA patients, it remains unclear whether using anti-tumor necrosis factor medications perioperatively increases the risk of surgical site infections. Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein can be useful for diagnosis of PJI in this population, but only as part of comprehensive workup that ultimately relies upon sampling of joint fluid. Management of PJI depends on several clinical factors including duration of infection and the likelihood of biofilm presence, the infecting organism, sensitivity to antibiotic therapy, and host immune status. The evidence suggests that two-stage revision or resection arthroplasty is more likely to eradicate infection, particularly when MRSA is the pathogen.

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppression and baseline inflammatory changes in the IJD population can complicate the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of PJI. Understanding the increase in risk associated with IJD and its treatment is essential for proper management when patients undergo lower extremity arthroplasty.

Risk factors for deep infection after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Estimated the risk factors for postoperative infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to prevent its occurrence.

DESIGN

The meta-analysis collected twelve cohorts or case-control studies which included 548 infected persons in 57,223 general cases. Review Manager 5.0 was operated to assess the heterogeneity and to give an overall estimate of the association of factors with postoperative infection after TKA.

RESULTS

The main factors distinctly associated with infection after TKA were BMI (BMI >30: OR = 2.53, 95 % CI 1.25, 5.13; BMI >40: OR = 4.00, 95 % CI 1.23, 12.98), diabetes mellitus (OR = 3.72, 95 % CI 2.30, 6.01), hypertension (OR = 2.53, 95 % CI 1.07, 5.99), steroid therapy (OR = 2.04, 95 % CI 1.11, 3.74), and rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 1.83; 95 % CI 1.42, 2.36). It had no sufficient evidences to reveal that gender could lead to infection after TKA. Osteoarthritis appeared to have a moderately protective effect. Statistical analysis revealed no correlation between urinary tract infection, fixation method, ASA, bilateral operation, age, transfusion, antibiotics, bone graft, and infection.

CONCLUSION

There were positive evidences for some certain factors which could be targeted for prevention of the onset of infection, but more studies are needed to define the association of some other controversial factors in infection, like osteoarthritis, gender and so on. The quality of studies also needs to be improved.

Lower limb joint replacement in rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction

There is limited literature regarding the peri-operative and surgical management of patients with rheumatoid disease undergoing lower limb arthroplasty. This review article summarises factors involved in the peri-operative management of major lower limb arthroplasty surgery for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods

We performed a search of the medical literature, using the PubMed search engine (http://www.pubmed.gov). We used the following terms: ‘rheumatoid’ ‘replacement’ ‘arthroplasty’ and ‘outcome’.

Findings

The patient should be optimised pre-operatively using a multidisciplinary approach. The continued use of methotrexate does not increase infection risk, and aids recovery. Biologic agents should be stopped pre-operatively due the increased infection rate. Patients should be made aware of the increased risk of infection and periprosthetic fracture rates associated with their disease. The surgical sequence is commonly hip, knee and then ankle. Cemented total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) have superior survival rates over uncemented components. The evidence is not clear regarding a cruciate sacrificing versus retaining in TKR, but a cruciate sacrificing component limits the risk early instability and potential revision. Patella resurfacing as part of a TKR is associated with improved outcomes. The results of total ankle replacement remain inferior to THR and TKR. RA patients achieve equivalent pain relief, but their rehabilitation is slower and their functional outcome is not as good. However, the key to managing these complicated patients is to work as part of a multidisciplinary team to optimise their outcome.

Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature

PURPOSE

Early aseptic loosening is a major complication in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is well accepted that intramedullary stems improve the anchoring of the prosthetic components; however, controversy still exists about the optimal fixation technique of the stems (cementless, hybrid, cemented).

METHODS

A literature review was carried out in the main medical databases from 1980 to 04/2010 to evaluate the available literature by evidence-based criteria and to analyse the results of the single studies regarding fixation technique in knee revision arthroplasty.

RESULTS

There are four studies regarding the cementless fixation. Eight studies reported the hybrid technique and five studies the cemented technique. Hybrid and cemented techniques are comparable regarding the survival of arthroplasties, the rate of aseptic loosening and the clinical outcome. However, most studies just show a low level of evidence (LoE III and IV), a small to medium number of cases and a short follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Based on the current literature, no final statement can be drawn regarding the optimal fixation technique in revision TKA. Future RCTs are needed to enable conclusive statements about the possible advantages and disadvantages of the single fixation techniques, although the clinical implementation often is critical.