Clinical and treatment outcomes of planned and unplanned excisions of soft tissue sarcomas

Unplanned Excision of Synovial Sarcoma: Factors Associated with Recurrence and Survival

Background: Synovial sarcoma is rare and may present as a small, slow-growing mass. These tumors are often mistaken as benign and are therefore prone to unplanned and/or non-oncologic excision. We sought to identify the rate of unplanned excision of synovial sarcoma and risk factors for recurrence and survival among this cohort. Methods: The medical records of 246 patients evaluated at a single institution for synovial sarcoma between 1997 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 87 (35%) underwent unplanned, non-oncologic excision. The mean age of the cohort was 49 years. Primary tumors were located in the extremity (n = 63), abdomen (n = 6), thorax (n = 7), head/neck (n = 8), and paraspinal region (n = 3). The median maximum pre-treatment dimension of the primary tumor was 4.8 cm (IQR 7-2.4). Seventy-seven (86%) patients underwent re-excision of the tumor bed, 39 (45%) received chemotherapy, and 63 (72%) received radiation therapy. Results: Among patients who underwent unplanned excision, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 98% at 1 year and 82% at 5 years. Metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 91% at 1 year and 72% at 5 years. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was 98% at 1 year and 72% at 5 years. When adjusting for tumor size, tumors which underwent unplanned excision did not have worse recurrence or survival compared to those which had planned excision (p > 0.10). Size > 5 cm, monophasic subtype, and axial location were associated with increased risk of disease recurrence. Forty-six patients had residual tumor following re-excision, which was associated with worse MFS (HR 8.17, 95% CI [1.89, 35.2], p < 0.01) and DSS (HR 7.66, 95% CI [1.76, 33.4], p < 0.01). Patients who received radiotherapy had improved MFS (HR 6.4, 95% CI [1.42, 29.0], p = 0.02) and DSS (HR 5.86, 95% CI [1.27, 26.9], p = 0.02). Conclusions: One-third of patients presenting with synovial sarcoma were diagnosed after unplanned, non-oncologic excision. Patients with large, axial tumors had worse survival. Approximately half of patients who underwent unplanned excision had no residual tumor after pre-operative radiation. The use of radiation was associated with decreased rates of recurrence and improved disease-specific survival. Our results suggest that margin-negative re-resection and radiotherapy should be considered when feasible following unplanned excision of synovial sarcoma.

Optimizing Morbidity in Unplanned Soft Tissue Sarcoma Excisions: Should We Skip the Reconstructive Ladder?

INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare and diverse primary malignant tumors that comprise approximately 1% of all malignancies. Misdiagnoses and unplanned excisions of STSs are common due to the tumor's rarity, leading to secondary tumor bed excisions (TBEs). Reconstructive outcomes for TBEs remain poorly understood, prompting this study to address the knowledge gap and inform preoperative discussions.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent STS excisions at a quaternary cancer center. Patients were categorized into mass excision (ME) and TBE groups. Reconstructive approaches were divided into simple (primary closure, complex repair, skin grafts, local flaps) and advanced (pedicled or free flaps). The groups were compared for postoperative outcomes, including complications, recurrence, and death.

RESULTS

When simple reconstructive techniques were used, TBEs exhibited higher rates of overall and major complications, whereas MEs had higher rates of overall and minor complications. Intergroup analysis revealed that with simple reconstruction, rates of overall and major complications were higher in TBEs than in MEs, and rates of minor complications were higher in MEs than in TBEs. Regression analyses revealed that simple reconstruction of TBEs had 90% and 180% higher odds of major complications and reoperation compared to simple reconstruction of MEs ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TBEs, despite their smaller size, exhibited a heightened susceptibility to overall and major complications, challenging the notion that simpler techniques suffice in these cases. Our findings encourage the consideration of advanced reconstructive techniques for TBEs that may seem amenable to simple reconstructive techniques.

Early Complications of Planned Resection Versus Unplanned Excision of Sarcomas in the Distal Upper Extremity

Purpose

Unplanned excisions are defined as excisions of malignant tumors performed without preoperative cross-sectional imaging or diagnostic biopsy, frequently resulting in residual disease and re-excision secondary to positive surgical margins. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative morbidity of planned versus unplanned upper-extremity sarcoma excisions.

Methods

A single tertiary referral hospital pathology database was queried from January 2015 through 2022 for primary upper-extremity sarcomas (forearm, wrist, hand, and finger). Demographics, tumor features, survival characteristics, and outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Forty-two upper-extremity sarcoma patients were identified, two-thirds of whom had unplanned excisions. Those with unplanned excisions were more likely to be female (relative risk [RR]: 1.9; P = .002), undergo initial excision at a nonsarcoma center (RR: 14.0; P < .001), have masses distal to the forearm (RR: 1.6; P = .02), and have smaller masses (4.8 vs 7.4 cm, P = .03). 71.4% of tumors were high grade, and 60.7% less than 5 cm in size.Unplanned excisions had positive margins in 96.4% of cases and were more likely to undergo re-excision (odds ratio [OR]: 20.0; P = .001), more total resections (2.7 vs 1.4, P = .009), sacrifice of neurovascular structures (OR: 6.1; P = .04), adjuvant radiation therapy (OR: 4.5; P = .05), adjuvant systemic therapy (OR: 10.9; P = .03), or experience a complication (OR: 17.6; P = .002) at an average of 38.0 months of follow-up.Nearly half of all unplanned excision patients developed a local recurrence or metastatic disease. Six patients required an amputation versus one in the planned cohort (P = .17), and 26.5% of patients died at an average of 32.5 months from presentation.

Conclusions

Distal upper-extremity sarcoma excisions are frequently unplanned, with high rates of morbidity compared with planned excisions. Surgeons should have a low threshold for cross-sectional imaging and core needle biopsy of atypical lesions, irrespective of size, with referral to a sarcoma center.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic IV.

Is Unplanned Excision of Soft Tissue Sarcomas Associated with Worse Oncological Outcomes?-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas are a group of rare neoplasms which can be mistaken for benign masses and be excised in a non-oncologic fashion (unplanned excision). Whether unplanned excision (UE) is associated with worse outcomes is highly debated due to conflicting evidence.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Main outcomes analyzed were five-year overall survival (OS), five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), amputation rate and plastic reconstruction surgery rate. Risk ratios were used to compare outcomes between patients treated with planned and unplanned excision.

RESULTS

We included 16,946 patients with STS, 6017 (35.5%) with UE. UE was associated with worse five-year LRFS (RR 1.35, p = 0.019). Residual tumor on the tumor bed was associated with lower five-year LRFS (RR = 2.59, p < 0.001). Local recurrence was associated with worse five-year OS (RR = 1.82, p < 0.001). UE was not associated with a worse five-year OS (RR = 0.90, p = 0.16), higher amputation rate (RR = 0.77, p = 0.134), or a worse plastic reconstruction surgery rate (RR = 1.25, p = 0.244).

CONCLUSIONS

Unplanned excision of Soft Tissue Sarcomas and the presence of disease in tumor bed after one were associated with worse five-year LRFS. Tumor bed excision should remain the standard approach, with special consideration to the presence of residual disease.

Unplanned Sarcoma Excisions: Understanding How They Happen

BACKGROUND

Soft-tissue sarcomas present as a mass with nonspecific symptoms, and unplanned excisions commonly occur. The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of unplanned excisions performed by orthopaedic surgeons and to conduct a root cause analysis (RCA) of the steps that led to unplanned excisions in all the cases.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted. Two cohorts were identified, one including patients who underwent an unplanned excision of a soft-tissue sarcoma (n = 107) and a second cohort with patients whose entire care was performed at our sarcoma center (n = 102). A RCA was conducted with the whole sample to identify the preventable causes that led to sarcoma unplanned excisions.

RESULTS

Orthopedic surgeons were the second group of physicians to perform the most unplanned excisions, only behind general surgeons. Inadequate imaging was encountered in 76.6% of the patients (n = 82, 95% confidence interval, 67.8 to 83.6). Forty-five patients (42.1%) had no imaging studies before the unplanned procedure. In the RCA, the most notable obstacles found were (1) incorrect assumption of a benign diagnosis, (2) failure to obtain the appropriate imaging study, (3) incorrectly reported imaging studies, (4) failure to order a biopsy, and (5) incorrect reporting of the biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite educational efforts, unplanned excisions and the devastating consequences that sometimes follow continue to occur. Orthopaedic surgeons persist in playing a role in the unplanned procedure burden.

The prognostic significance of surgical resection margins for local recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival in sarcoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgical resection with microscopically negative margins constitutes one of the key elements of a curative therapeutic approach for localized sarcomas. However, the prognostic value of quantitative margin width remains controversial. We sought to determine the prognostic significance of margin status and margin width for local recurrence (LR), distant recurrence (DR), and overall survival.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 210 patients undergoing resection of localized sarcoma between 1997 and 2018 at a national sarcoma reference center.

RESULTS

Logistic regression did not reveal an effect of metric margin width as a prognostic factor for LR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.98, p = 0.574), DR (OR = 1, p = 0.908), or overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval = 0.73-1.20, p = 0.609). Subgroup analysis revealed no differences between complete first resections (R0) and re-resections (re-R0) following unplanned R1-resections for LR (p = 0.727) and overall survival (p = 0.125), but a significantly higher DR-rate in re-R0 cases (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving a negative margin is essential in sarcoma surgery, however, metric margin width was not associated with disease-specific outcomes. Re-resection of unplanned R1-resections should be performed to control for LR and overall survival rates. As re-R0 cases were at significantly higher risk of DR, these patients should be followed up closely in standardized surveillance protocols.

Oncological and functional outcomes of planned and unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcoma: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

In soft tissue sarcomas, the oncological and functional outcomes between planned excision and unplanned excision with additional wide resection remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of unplanned excision on oncological and functional outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study was performed. Patients with soft tissue sarcoma surgically treated in 2005-2019 were included in this study. A total of 120 patients consisting of planned excision (PE) group (n = 88), and unplanned excision (UE) group (n = 32) were included. Overall-survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), disease-free survival (DFS), incidence rate of reconstructive surgery and musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) score were assessed. Propensity score matching method was used in statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate of OS, LRFS, MFS, and DFS did not differ between the PE and UE groups, however, rates of reconstructive surgery were higher in the UE group (PE: 48% vs. UE: 84%, p < 0.001). These results did not differ (PE: 41% vs. UE: 82%, p = 0.012) after propensity score matching was performed to align the backgrounds with difference in tumor size and depth. For MSTS score, the total score and "pain" and "emotional acceptance" scores were higher in the PE group before propensity score matching. The "pain" and "emotional acceptance" scores were higher in the PE group after propensity score matching also.

CONCLUSIONS

Unplanned excision did not deteriorate oncological outcomes, however unplanned excision lead to unnecessary reconstructive surgery. Unplanned excision adversely affected patient-reported outcomes without worsening pure functional outcomes.

Overall survival in patients with re-excision of positive microscopic margins of limb and trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma operated outside of a reference center: a nationwide cohort analysis

Background

This French nationwide NETSARC exhaustive prospective cohort aims to explore the impact of systematic re-excision (RE) as adjuvant care on overall survival (OS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and local and distant control (RFS) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with positive microscopic margins (R1) after initial resection performed outside of a reference center.

Methods

Eligible patients had experienced STS surgery outside a reference center from 2010 to 2017, and had R1 margins after initial surgery. Characteristics and treatment comparisons used chi-square for categorical variables and Kruskall-Wallis test for continuous data. Survival distributions were compared in patients reexcised (RE) or not (No-RE) using a log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for subgroup analysis.

Results

A total of 1,284 patients had experienced initial STS surgery outside NETSARC with R1 margins, including 1,029 patients with second operation documented. Among the latter, 698 patients experienced re-excision, and 331 were not re-excised. Characteristics were significantly different regarding patient age, tumor site, tumor size, tumor depth, and histotype in the population of patients re-excised (RE) or not (No-RE). The study identified RE as an independent favorable factor for OS (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.23–0.56, p<0.0001), for LRFS (HR 0.45, 95%CI 0.36–0.56, p<0.0001), and for RFS (HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.26–0.46, p<0.0001).

Conclusion

This large nationwide series shows that RE improved overall survival in patients with STS of extremities and trunk wall, with prior R1 resection performed outside of a reference center. RE as part of adjuvant care should be systematically considered.

Level of evidence II

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10121-5.

Femoral artery aneurysm developed on intimal sarcoma: Case report

Intimal angiosarcoma is a rare vascular malignancy, and diagnosis is very difficult due to nonspecific symptoms. There are controversial points regarding the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of intimal angiosarcomas. The purpose of this case report was to evaluate the diagnosis and treatment process of a patient diagnosed with femoral artery intimal angiosarcoma. Furthermore, in line with previous studies, it was aimed to illuminate controversial points. A 33-year-old male patient, who had been operated on due to ruptured femoral artery aneurysm, was diagnosed with intimal angiosarcoma with the pathology result. Recurrence was observed during clinical follow-up, and the patient was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Since there was no response to treatment, the patient underwent aggressive surgery including the surrounding tissues. No recurrence or metastasis was observed in the patient's 10^th month follow-up. Although intimal angiosarcoma is rare, it should be considered in differential diagnosis when femoral artery aneurysm is detected. The most important step in treatment is aggressive surgery, but adding chemo-radiotherapy to the treatment should be considered.

Clinical characteristics of patients with undergoing unplanned excisions of malignant soft tissue tumors

INTRODUCTION

Malignant soft tissue tumors are rare tumors representing <1% of all malignancies. As these tumors are rare, it is not uncommon that malignant soft tissue tumor excision is performed without the required preoperative imaging, staging, or wide resection margins for sarcomas. The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of patients with undergoing unplanned excisions. Risk factors for tumor recurrence and mortality in patients treated with unplanned excisions were also analyzed.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients who underwent unplanned excision at other hospitals and additional wide excision at our hospital between January 2002 and December 2018 were identified. Among them, 42 patients with follow-up for more than 1 year were included in this retrospective study. The relationships between sex, age, tumor depth, histological grade, location, size, surgical margin at additional wide excision, residual tumor, reconstruction, kind of hospital where the primary excision was done (sarcoma vs non-sarcoma center), preoperative examination, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and oncological outcomes were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 57.3 years (15-85 years) and the mean observation period was 72.5 months (14-181 months). This analysis showed 53.8% tumors that underwent unplanned excisions were small (<5 cm) and 70.7% tumors were superficial. Multivariate analysis revealed that a positive margin during additional wide excision was significantly associated with a lower 5-year LRFS (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Most of the tumors underwent unplanned excisions were small (<5 cm) and superficial. Surgeons should be aware that a positive margin during additional wide excision is an independent risk factor for local recurrence.

Expert consensus on resection of chest wall tumors and chest wall reconstruction

Chest wall tumors are a relatively uncommon disease in clinical practice. Most of the published studies about chest wall tumors are usually single-center retrospective studies, involving few patients. Therefore, evidences regarding clinical conclusions about chest wall tumors are lacking, and some controversial issues have still to be agreed upon. In January 2019, 73 experts in thoracic surgery, plastic surgery, science, and engineering jointly released the Chinese Expert Consensus on Chest Wall Tumor Resection and Chest Wall Reconstruction (2018 edition). After that, numerous experts put forward new perspectives on some academic issues in this version of the consensus, pointing out the necessity to further discuss the points of contention. Thus, we conducted a survey through the administration of a questionnaire among 85 experts in the world. Consensus has been reached on some major points as follows. (I) Wide excision should be performed for desmoid tumor (DT) of chest wall. After excluding the distant metastasis by multi-disciplinary team, solitary sternal plasmacytoma can be treated with extensive resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. (II) Wide excision with above 2 cm margin distance should be attempted to obtain R0 resection margin for chest wall tumor unless the tumor involves vital organs or structures, including the great vessels, heart, trachea, joints, and spine. (III) For patients with chest wall tumors undergoing unplanned excision (UE) for the first time, it is necessary to carry out wide excision as soon as possible within 1–3 months following the previous surgery. (IV) Current Tumor Node Metastasis staging criteria (American Joint Committee on Cancer) of bone tumor and soft tissue sarcoma are not suitable for chest wall sarcomas. (V) It is necessary to use rigid implants for chest wall reconstruction once the maximum diameter of the chest wall defect exceeds 5 cm in adults and adolescents. (VI) For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) invading the chest wall, wide excision with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy are recommended for patients with stage T_3-4N_0-1M₀. As clear guidelines are lacking, these consensus statements on controversial issues on chest wall tumors and resection could possibly serve as further guidance in clinical practice during the upcoming years.

Risk factors for the development of local recurrence in extremity soft-tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Local recurrence (LR) is one of the main pitfalls in surgery for extremities soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS). Achieving clear histopathological margins is the most important factor to reduce the risk of LR, but the ability to do so depends on not only surgical technique but also the interplay between tumor biology, anatomical location and surgical approach. The balance between postoperative morbidity and oncological benefits in reducing the risk of LR needs to be considered.

AREAS COVERED

This review will cover which etiological factors for the development of eSTS lead to an increased risk of LR and discuss histological subtypes that have a high risk of LR and which surgical and neoadjuvant therapeutic strategies can minimize the risk of LR.

EXPERT OPINION

The traditional view that surgical radicality always results in low rates of LR, while marginality alone always leads to high rates of relapse, is outdated. In the modern era of surgical oncology, limb salvage and high-level function after resectional surgery are the key surgical goals. The best results are achieved by combining effective neoadjuvant treatments with planned bespoke oncological operations that consider the biological and anatomical factors of each individual sarcoma.

A comparison of clinical outcomes between additional excision after unplanned and planned excisions in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma of the limb : a propensity matching cohort study

AIMS

Patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) who undergo unplanned excision (UE) are reported to have worse outcomes than those who undergo planned excision (PE). However, others have reported that patients who undergo UE may have similar or improved outcomes. These discrepancies are likely to be due to differences in characteristics between the two groups of patients. The aim of the study is to compare patients who underwent UE and PE using propensity score matching, by analyzing data from the Japanese Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor (BSTT) registry.

METHODS

Data from 2006 to 2016 was obtained from the BSTT registry. Only patients with STS of the limb were included in the study. Patients with distant metastasis at the initial presentation and patients with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and well-differentiated liposarcoma were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

A total of 4,483 patients with STS of the limb were identified before propensity score matching. There were 355 patients who underwent UE and 4,128 patients who underwent PE. The five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was significantly better in the patients who received additional excision after UE than in those who underwent PE. There was no significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) between the two groups. After propensity score matching, a new cohort of 355 patients was created for both PE and UE groups, in which baseline covariates were appropriately balanced. Reconstruction after tumour excision was frequently performed in patients who underwent additional excision after UE. There were no significant differences in DSS and LRFS between the patients who underwent PE and those who had an additional excision after UE.

CONCLUSION

Using propensity score matching, patients with STS of the limb who underwent additional excision after UE did not experience higher mortality and local failure than those who underwent PE. Reconstruction may be necessary when additional excision is performed. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(12):1809-1814.

Unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcoma: does it impact the accuracy of intra-operative pathologic assessment at time of re-excision?

PURPOSE

An "unplanned excision" refers to soft tissue sarcomas excised without planning imaging studies and a diagnostic biopsy, resulting in the presence of residual disease and usually necessitating a re-excision procedure. We aimed to assess the impact of previous unplanned excisions on the intra-operative pathologic assessment at the time of re-excision, in terms of need to perform repeat assessments and the accuracy to predict margin status of the final pathologic specimen.

METHODS

Data was collected for all patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma who had undergone wide local excision limb salvage surgery or amputation between 2012 and 2017. Intra-operative pathologic assessment with frozen sections was performed in all cases and was classified as negative, negative but close (< 1 mm), and positive.

RESULTS

A total of 173 patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma were included, 54 in the unplanned excision group and 119 in the planned excision group. The accuracy of intra-operative pathologic assessment to predict the margin status on final pathology was similar between groups (87% unplanned vs. 90.7% planned excisions). However, the need for repeat intra-operative pathologic assessment and subsequent resection due to microscopically positive margins was found to be higher within the unplanned excision group ((p = 0.04), OR = 3.2 (95% CI: 1.1-9.1, p = 0.048)).

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-operative pathologic assessment of resection margins had a similar accuracy in planned and unplanned excisions; however, unplanned excisions showed a higher risk of re-resection during the same surgical setting.

Clinical Outcome of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberance. Report From the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor (BSTT) Registry in Japan

BACKGROUND

Owing to its rarity, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberance (DFSP) is often inappropriately excised. After unplanned excision (UE), additional excision is commonly performed. We aimed to elucidate the effect of additional excision after UE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined 306 patients with primary DFSP. We analyzed surgical outcomes in 291 patients who received planned excision (PE) or additional excision after UE.

RESULTS

Of 306 patients, 194 received PE and the remaining 112 received UE. Of 112 patients, 97 received additional excision after UE. Additional surgery due to complications was more frequent in patients with UE than in those with PE. The 5-year local recurrence-free rate in patients without additional excision after UE was significantly worse than that in those with additional excision after UE.

CONCLUSION

If UE is performed, we recommend additional excision for preventing local recurrence; however, the surgical wound should be carefully observed.

Adjuvant high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the foot: a case report

Soft tissue sarcomas of the foot are extremely rare and can therefore be misdiagnosed as benign diseases, and be prematurely removed with an unplanned excision. The standard treatment is a wide local excision with an addition of radiotherapy as an alternative to a radical resection (e.g., below-knee or foot amputation). We report on a patient with primary malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in the foot plantar soft tissue, who had no evidence of the disease and no severe late toxicity higher than grade 2, 40 months after receiving amputation of toes and adjuvant interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). To the best of our knowledge, only a few cases were treated with HDR-BT with this scenario. From our findings, HDR-BT could be a safe and quick treatment option for these types of lesions.

Re-excision after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcoma: A systematic review and metanalysis. The rationale of systematic re-excision

In Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS) referral centre many patients have already had an incomplete tumour resection. In the majority of specimen, tumoral residual is detected and linked to a worsen prognosis. Systematic surgical re-resection of the scar tissue area is often performed. Some authors suggested to postpone re-resections until a clinically evident local recurrence is detected. A searching strategy was applied to Pubmed-Central and Ovid Medline. Odds ratio (OR) for local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (MTS) or overall survival (OS) were calculated comparing patients who had tumour residual to people who hadn't. OR of local recurrences, distant metastasis and OS were calculated in planned vs unplanned-excisions groups. OR to develop a metastasis and OS after a local recurrences were calculated. Residual tumour led to an OR for LR of 3,56, OR of MTS was 3,42; OR of decreased OS was 3,42. Having a LR lead to a OR of 1,55 for MTS and to a OR of decreased OS of 2,32. Patients who underwent a re-excision compared to planned surgery did not have an increased OR of LR and had an OR to develop a MTS of 0,56. Our data confirm that there is a strong correlation between local recurrences, distant relapses and overall survival. Although there is a selection bias; this analysis highlights the optimal oncological outcome in patients who underwent re-resection. The rationale for systematic re-resection after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas is very strong and this treatment remains the gold standard of care in these patients.

Distinction between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors based on an ultrasonographic evaluation of vascularity and elasticity

The initial diagnostic distinction between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors is critical for decisions regarding the appropriate course of treatment. The current study aimed to evaluate the vascularity and elasticity of soft tissue tumors by superb microvascular imaging and shear wave elastography using ultrasonography (US), to determine their usefulness in distinguishing malignant soft tissue tumors, and to further establish the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of a scoring system (SS) based on these evaluations. The present study used 167 lesions of soft tissue tumors examined by US prior to biopsy, surgery and pathological tissue diagnosis. The vascularity index (VI) and the maximal shear velocity (MSV), as indices of vascularity and elasticity respectively, were evaluated using US. The tumor size and depth were also evaluated via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Based on the odds ratio of these parameters determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis, an original SS was established to identify the malignancy of soft tissue tumors. VI and MSV exhibited significantly high values for malignant tumors. Tumor size was also significantly larger for malignant than benign tumors. The areas under the curves (AUCs) of the receiver operating characteristic analysis for VI, MSV and tumor size were 0.75, 0.84 and 0.69, respectively, indicating that these methods were effective for the diagnosis of malignancy. An original SS consisting of VI, MSV and tumor size, excluding tumor depth, was established, and revealed an AUC value of 0.90, with 93.6% sensitivity and 79.2% specificity for malignancy distinction. US evaluation of vascularity and elasticity was an effective technique to distinguish malignant soft tissue tumors, and the current SS based on US evaluations including tumor size via MRI demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy for malignant soft tissue tumors.

Inadvertent Inguinal Sarcoma Excision during Hernia Surgery: Outcomes, Gender Analysis, and Prevention

Introduction

Inadvertent excision of a soft tissue sarcoma during hernia surgery is a preventable clinical scenario that leads to unnecessary patient morbidity. Prior series are few, which only include male patients with little focus on prevention. The purpose of this study is to report the presenting features and outcomes of both male and female patients who underwent inadvertent inguinal sarcoma excision during hernia surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a single sarcoma referral center identified 33 patients who were referred for definitive treatment. Patients were divided into three clinically relevant groups based on intraoperative diagnosis, sex, and location of the mass relative to the inguinal ligament. T-tests and Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Kaplan–Meier modeling was performed to assess sarcoma-specific survival.

Results

Females were younger (47 years vs. 61 years, p=0.003) and had smaller sarcomas (6.7 cm vs. 11 cm, p=0.012) compared to males. Only two sarcomas (2/33, 6%) were <4 cm in size. The majority of sarcomas in females were above the inguinal ligament (12/14, 86%). Twenty-nine (88%) underwent definitive R0 excision. The mean number of surgeries per patient was three (range 1–13), with nineteen (58%) patients requiring flap reconstruction and six (18%) requiring vascular bypass. Five patients locally recurred (15%) at a mean of 38 months after definitive excision (range 5–128 months). Overall sarcoma-specific disease-free survival was 64%, with no difference between males (80 ± 11%) and females (59 ± 17%) (p=0.885). Mean follow-up was 75 months (range 5–212).

Conclusion

This is the second largest study regarding inadvertent inguinal sarcoma excision and the first to include females. When a suspected hernia is >4 cm, irreducible, firm, and is growing, especially in females, consider obtaining preoperative advanced three-dimensional imaging (CT or MRI) that can differentiate a neoplasm from a hernia.

Standard Treatment Remains the Recommended Approach for Patients with Bone Sarcoma Who Underwent Unplanned Surgery: Report from the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group

Background

The outcomes of unplanned surgery for bone sarcomas have not been frequently discussed. However, it is important to recognize patterns, treatment, and clinical outcomes of unplanned surgeries for patients with bone sarcomas. This multicenter study aimed to characterize the clinical outcomes of patients with bone sarcomas who underwent unplanned surgeries.

Patients and Methods

Data of 43 patients with bone sarcomas who underwent unplanned surgery between 2006 and 2017 were obtained from 23 hospitals in Japan. These included 18 cases of osteosarcoma, 9 of Ewing sarcoma, 8 of chondrosarcoma, and 6 of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. The study included 28 men and 15 women, with a mean age of 46 years. The mean follow-up duration was 59 months.

Results

The main primary tumor sites were the femur (n = 19), spine (n = 6), pelvis (n = 5), tibia (n = 3), and humerus (n = 3). The primary diagnoses were benign bone tumor (n = 24), trauma (n = 7), bone metastasis (n = 5), osteomyelitis (n = 4), degeneration (n=2), and unknown (n = 1). As unplanned surgeries, curettage, with or without bone graft, was performed in 26 patients; internal fixation was performed in 7; spinal surgery in 5; arthroplasty in 4; and arthroscopy in one. Thirty-eight patients received additional standard treatments. Thirty-four of these patients underwent surgical tumor resections, including amputation (n = 10), and the remaining 4 received radiotherapy or carbon ion radiotherapy as additional standard treatments. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates in patients with osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma were 65.5%, 58.3%, and 72.9%, respectively. Twelve (27.9%) patients developed local recurrences (LR); among the total 43 patients studied, the 5-year DSS rates were significantly worse for those who developed LR compared to those who did not (p = 0.03). The 5-year DSS rates in patients with and without LR were 44% and 73.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

We recommend that patients who have undergone unplanned surgery be administered standard treatment, including the option of amputation because herein, LR was shown to be a risk factor for decreased DSS.

Does Unplanned Soft Tissue Sarcoma Surgery Have a Negative Effect on Prognosis?

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of patients who underwent re-excision following unplanned surgery and those who underwent planned surgery.

METHODS

Patients who were referred to our hospital after a mass was inappropriately resected and reported to have a malignant pathology with a positive surgical margin, as well as patients diagnosed with malignant soft tissue tumors, and operated on following a multidisciplinary assessment and staging between 2012 and 2018. All patients were followed up at least 6 months.

RESULTS

Our study included a total of 125 patients. Forty percent (n = 50) underwent unplanned excision and sixty percent (n = 75) underwent planned excision.There was no statistically significant difference in the survival curves between the two groups (p = 0.248). Tumor size was larger, and the rate of deep-localized tumors was higher in patients undergoing planned surgery than in the unplanned surgery group (p = 0.001). The rate of tumors localized in the upper extremities was significantly higher in the unplanned surgery group than in the planned surgery (p = 0.033). MRI examinations could detect residual tumors with an accuracy of 80%. Age (>48 years), tumor size (>8 cm), tumor grade (grade 3), and distant organ metastasis at follow-up, which were among risk factors found to have a significant effect on mortality.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing re-excision after an inappropriate resection and undergoing planned resection had a similar prognosis. Superficial, upper extremity-localized, and relatively small-size tumors are more prone to inadequate surgical resection. MRI can be used to detect residual tumors at a high rate in patients who have undergone unplanned surgery. Distant organ metastasis is the most important factor affecting survival.

Effect of unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas on skin defects and reconstructive procedures

Unplanned excision (UE) is defined as a procedure wherein a surgeon operates a tumor resection without appropriate preoperative diagnostic modalities and without the intent to achieve tumor-free margins. Generally, the reconstruction rate after UE is higher than that after planned excision (PE). The present study aimed to investigate how the reconstructive procedure and size of skin defect could be influenced. We reviewed the cases of 442 patients who underwent the resection of soft tissue sarcoma. Patients were stratified into two groups (UE vs. PE). We compared the histologic grade, skin defect, reconstructive procedures, depth of the reconstruction layer. For superficial reconstructions, we also compared procedures involving skin graft-only or flap. 105 cases (23.8%) were UE. Histologic grade in PE was significantly higher (p = .024). The reconstruction rate and size of skin defect in UE was significantly higher (76.2% vs. 27.3%, p < .001) and larger (124.5 cm² vs. 65.7 cm², p < .001). The rate of deep layer reconstruction was significantly higher in PE (7.5% vs. 26.1%, p = .001). In superficial reconstructions, 18 (24.3%) skin graft-only procedures were performed in UE and 15 (22.1%) in PE, all other superficial reconstructive procedures involved flap, and there was no significant difference (p = .45). Skin defects were 1.9 times larger after UE than PE. UE did not affect the superficial reconstructive procedure.

Prediction of Soft Tissue Sarcoma from Clinical Characteristics and Laboratory Data

The accurate diagnosis of soft tissue tumors may be difficult. Simple clinical characteristics or laboratory data that can predict tumor malignancy can be useful tools for diagnosing soft tissue tumors. Between 2003 and 2018, 588 patients with primary soft tissue tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinical characteristics and laboratory data were evaluated to determine their association with the diagnosis of benign, intermediate, or malignant tumor. Multivariable analysis revealed that tumor size ≥ 5.6 cm (odds ratio (OR), 6.15; p < 0.001), white blood cell (WBC) count ≥ 5700/µL (OR, 2.49; p = 0.002), hemoglobin (Hb) count ≤ 12.4 g/dL (OR, 2.56; p = 0.004), C-reactive protein (CRP) level ≥ 0.17 mg/dL (OR, 2.64; p < 0.001), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level ≥ 240 IU/L (OR, 4.94; p < 0.001) were significant predictive factors for sarcoma. The sensitivity and specificity in the presence of three or more predictive factors for detecting malignant tumors were 0.58 and 0.90 respectively, and it was an appropriate threshold with the maximum Youden's index of 0.49. Simple clinical and laboratory data were useful tools for predicting whether the tumor is malignant. Patients with soft tissue tumors that meet any three or more predictive factors should be referred to a specialist.

Sarcoma Surveillance: A Review of Current Evidence and Guidelines

After initial treatment of sarcoma, disease progression may occur in the form of local recurrence, pulmonary metastases, or extrapulmonary metastases. As such, surveillance is an important aspect of management, but no universally accepted practice standards are found. In the absence of strong evidence, and to allow for individualized care, existing guidelines contain flexibility in terms of both the frequency and modality of surveillance. In general, they agree that follow-up should be more intense in the early years after treatment, especially for high-grade sarcomas, and continue for at least 10 years. For local recurrence, data suggest that physical examination is usually sufficient for monitoring; in addition, some guidelines endorse imaging routinely, whereas others only as clinically indicated. For pulmonary metastasis, either radiograph or CT is recommended, with the latter having theoretical advantages but no proven survival benefit to date. Extrapulmonary metastases are rare in most sarcoma types, so the literature only supports extrapulmonary surveillance for certain diagnoses. This topic is complicated by the diversity of sarcomas, the limited evidence, and the indefinite, often conflicting recommendations; therefore, it is critical for providers to understand the existing research and guidelines to determine optimal surveillance strategies for their patients.

Wide resection of soft tissue sarcomas after unplanned primary procedures: A long-term follow-up study

Unplanned resection of soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) predispose the patients to recurrences and metastases, secondary wide resection is usually warranted.To investigate the outcomes of re-excision of STS after unplanned initial resection.The records of 39 patients undergoing re-excision of STS after unplanned initial resection from January 2006 through December 2015 were retrospectively investigated.There were 17 males and 22 females, the mean age was 45.7 years. Most initial unplanned resections were performed in rural hospitals by surgeons from general surgery department, dermatology department, plastic surgery department, and orthopedic department. Thirty-five patients underwent secondary wide resections in our department. Histopathological findings indicated positive margins after primary surgeries in 18 patients. Until the conclusion of 37.2-month follow-up, 7 patients developed metastasis, 3 had local recurrence, and 7 were dead. Positive margins were associated with increased metastases and lower survival rates (P < .05). There was no significant difference in recurrences between the 2 groups.Unplanned initial resection of STS often lead to unfavorable prognosis. Primary wide resections are warranted for this disease entity.

Inadvertent excision of malignant soft tissue tumours

Inadvertent excision of lumps which turn out to be sarcomas is not uncommon.Imaging has a limited role in detecting microscopic residual disease but can show the extent of the previous surgical field.Standard treatment is wide re-excision, usually combined with radiotherapy.Residual tumour is found in an average of 50% of reported cases.The presence of residual disease is an adverse prognostic factor.All lumps bigger than a golf ball should have a diagnosis prior to excision. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180060.

Evaluation of Planned versus Unplanned Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Resection Using PROMIS Measures

Background

The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a tool developed by the National Institutes of Health that allows comparisons across conditions or even the United States (U.S.) general population.

Objectives

Our purpose was to compare PROMIS outcomes between patients who underwent a planned resection to those who underwent an initial unplanned excision of their sarcoma followed by a definitive oncologic resection. We then compared these groups to the U.S. general population.

Methods

Eighty-five patients were included and were divided into those who underwent an initial planned resection (67) and unplanned excision (18). These patients were then further categorized based on the length of follow-up since their last surgery, either early (<12 months) or late (>12 months).

Results

We evaluated seven PROMIS domains and found no differences between patients who underwent planned resection versus those who underwent an initial unplanned excision followed by a wide resection of the previous wound bed. When compared to the U.S. population, both cohorts demonstrated significantly improved scores in several emotional health domains.

Conclusions

Patients who undergo an unplanned excision followed by a definitive oncologic procedure have similar PROMIS scores compared to patients who undergo an initial planned resection.

Diagnostic value of tumor-fascia relationship in superficial soft tissue masses on magnetic resonance imaging

Purpose

Many surgeons participate in the management of superficial soft tissue masses, and a preoperative incorrect diagnosis frequently results in dismal oncological outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify distinguishing magnetic resonance imaging features between malignant and non-malignant lesions.

Methods

The clinicopathological data for 219 patients (men 114; women 105) with superficial soft tissue masses treated from January 2007 to December 2016 in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The median age at the first visit was 55.6 years (range 1–90 years). MRI findings of tumor size, margin, lobulation, intratumoral hemorrhage, peritumoral edema, and tumor-fascia relationship were compared with the final histological diagnosis and tumor grade.

Results

Univariate analysis revealed significant relationships between histologically malignant lesions and tumor size ≥5 cm (p = 0.035), positive peritumoral edema (p = 0.031), and tumor-fascia relationship (p<0.001), but not margin (p = 0.107), lobulation (p = 0.071), and intratumoral hemorrhage (p = 0.17). In addition, using multivariate analysis, the tumor-fascia relationship (p<0.001) and tumor size were significant factors.

A significant correlation between tumor-fascia relationship and malignancy (p<0.001) was observed; such a relationship was, however, not observed for tumor grade (p = 0.43).

Conclusions

Tumors measuring ≥5 cm and the tumor-fascia relationship on magnetic resonance imaging are highly indicative of malignancy. When superficial soft tissue masses cross the superficial fascia and form obtuse angles with the fascia, sarcoma should be considered. The tumor-fascia relationship can offer surgeons useful information regarding the status of superficial soft tissue masses.

Management and outcome of acral soft-tissue sarcomas

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical management and outcome of patients with an acral soft-tissue sarcoma of the hand or foot.

Patients and Methods

We identified 63 patients with an acral soft-tissue sarcoma who presented to our tertiary referral sarcoma service between 2000 and 2016. There were 35 men and 28 women with a mean age of 49 years (sd 21). Of the 63 sarcomas, 27 were in the hands and 36 in the feet. The commonest subtypes were epithelioid sarcoma in the hand (n = 8) and synovial sarcoma in the foot (n = 11).

Results

In 41 patients (65%), the tumour measured less than 5 cm in its largest dimension (median size 3 cm (2 to 6)); 27 patients (43%) were diagnosed after inadvertent excision prior to their referral to the specialist sarcoma unit. After biopsy and staging, primary surgical intervention at the sarcoma unit was excision and limb salvage in 43 (68%), partial (digit or ray) amputation in 14 (22%), and more proximal amputation in six (10%). At final follow up, local recurrence had been treated by one partial amputation and six amputations, resulting in a partial amputation rate of 24% and a proximal amputation rate of 19%. The five-year survival rate was 82%. Patients who underwent inadvertent excision showed no statistically significant difference in survival or local recurrence, but were more likely to undergo amputation (p = 0.008). Large tumour size (> 5 cm) was associated with lower survival (p = 0.04) and a higher risk of local recurrence (p = 0.009;).

Conclusion

Most acral soft-tissue sarcomas measure less than 5 cm at presentation, indicating that while size can be a useful prognostic factor, it should not be used as a diagnostic threshold for referral. Increased tumour size is associated with a higher rate of local recurrence and reduced survival. Sarcoma excision with limb preservation does not result in an increased risk of local recurrence. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1518–23.

Treatment of angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma after unplanned excision: a case report

Background

Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma (AFH) is a relatively uncommon soft tissue tumor of intermediate biologic potential. It occurs in subcutaneous regions of the extremities or the trunk, usually presenting in children or young adults. This is the first reported case of subcutaneous AFH that developed in the iliac region and was treated with an unplanned resection.

Case presentation

An 11-year-old girl noticed a small subcutaneous nodule in the iliac region. As the nodule was asymptomatic, it was observed naturally for a year, after which her parents consulted her doctor due to gradual growth of the nodule. The tumor was resected marginally without biopsy by a non-specialized surgeon. Based on the histology of the resected specimen, the tumor was suspected to be a sarcoma. The patient was referred to our hospital where we reinvestigated the histology of the tumor using immunohistochemistry. After confirming diagnosis of the tumor as an AFH, we undertook additional extensive resection in the iliac region where the tumor had developed. There was no evidence of tumor residue in the resected specimen. It has been 3 years since the operation, and there has been no evidence of recurrence.

Conclusion

We treated a case of AFH after unplanned resection. If subcutaneous tumors in the iliac region are detected, a diagnosis of AFH should be considered and a simple resection avoided.

Management of Unplanned Excision for Soft-Tissue Sarcoma With Preoperative Radiotherapy Followed by Definitive Resection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes after preoperative radiotherapy and definitive surgery for patients who initially had inadvertent excision for sarcoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Treatment records of 44 consecutive patients, who initially underwent unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcoma between January 2004 and January 2012, were reviewed. All patients had clinically localized disease before treatment and received preoperative external-beam radiotherapy followed by definitive oncologic surgery at our institution.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 36 months. Residual tumor after preoperative radiotherapy and wound bed excision was identified in 39% (17/44) of the cases. Kaplan-Meier estimates for 5-year local control, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival are 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80-99), 86% (95% CI, 69-94), and 94% (95% CI, 79-99) respectively. Perioperative morbidity occurred in 25% of patients (11/44.) All patients with perioperative wound complications had lower extremity sarcomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal management for unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcoma is unknown. Our institution has adopted the approach of preoperative radiotherapy, followed by definitive surgery. In our series of 44 patients, local control was excellent at 95%, with perioperative complications seen only in patients with lower extremity sarcomas, suggesting that this is a reasonable approach to manage inadvertently resected sarcoma.

Preoperative Radiation Therapy Followed by Reexcision May Improve Local Control and Progression-Free Survival in Unplanned Excisions of Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremity and Chest-Wall

Background. The management for unplanned excision (UE) of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) has not been established. In this study, we compare outcomes of UE versus planned excision (PE) and determine an optimal treatment for UE in STS. Methods. From 2000 to 2014 a review was performed on all patients treated with localized STS. Clinical outcomes including local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analyses were performed to determine prognostic variables. For MVA, Cox proportional hazards model was used. Results. 245 patients were included in the analysis. 14% underwent UE. Median follow-up was 2.8 years. The LR rate was 8.6%. The LR rate in UE was 35% versus 4.2% in PE patients (p < 0.0001). 2-year PFS in UE versus PE patients was 4.2 years and 9.3 years, respectively (p = 0.08). Preoperative radiation (RT) (p = 0.01) and use of any RT for UE (p = 0.003) led to improved PFS. On MVA, preoperative RT (p = 0.04) and performance status (p = 0.01) led to improved PFS. Conclusions. UEs led to decreased LC and PFS versus PE in patients with STS. The use of preoperative RT followed by reexcision improved LC and PFS in patients who had UE of their STS.

Predictors of residual disease after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is an important quality of care issue given the morbidity related to tumor bed excision. Since not all patients harbor residual disease at the time of reexcision, we sought to determine predictors of residual STS following unplanned excision.

METHODS

We identified 76 patients from a prospective database (January 1, 2008-September 30, 2014) who received a diagnosis of primary STS following unplanned excision on the trunk or extremities. We used univariable and multivariable analyses to evaluate predictors of residual STS as the primary endpoint. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of interval magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict residual sarcoma at reexcision.

RESULTS

Mean age was 52 y, and 63.2% were male. 50% had fragmented unplanned excision. Among patients undergoing reexcision, residual STS was identified in 70%. On univariable analysis, MRI showing gross disease and fragmented excision were significant predictors of residual STS (odds ratio, 10.59; 95% CI, 2.14-52.49; P = 0.004 and odds ratio, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.09-11.94; P = 0.035, respectively). On multivariable analysis, tumor size predicted distant recurrence and overall survival. When we combined equivocal and positive MRI, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI for predicting residual STS were 86.7% (95% CI, 73.2%-95.0%) and 57.9% (95% CI, 33.5%-79.8%), with an overall accuracy of 78.1% (95% CI, 66.0%-87.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

About 70% of patients undergoing repeat excision after unplanned excision of STS harbor residual sarcoma. Although interval MRI and fragmented excision appear to be the most significant predictors of residual STS, the accuracy of MRI remains modest, especially given the incidence of equivocal MRI.

Outcomes of unplanned sarcoma excision: impact of residual disease

This study aimed to compare the oncological results between unplanned excision (UE) and planned excision (PE) of malignant soft tissue tumor and to examine the impact of residual tumor (ReT) after UE. Nonmetastatic soft tissue sarcomas surgically treated in 1996-2012 were included in this study. Disease-specific survival (DSS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and local-recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were stratified according to the tumor location and American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification 7th edition stage. Independent prognostic parameters were identified by Cox proportional hazard models. Two-hundred and ninety PEs and 161 UEs were identified. Significant difference in oncological outcome was observed only for LRFS probability of retroperitoneal sarcomas (5-year LRFS: 33.0% [UE] vs. 71.0% [PE], P = 0.018). Among the 142 UEs of extremity and trunk, ReT in re-excision specimen were found in 75 cases (53%). UEs with ReT had significantly lower survival probabilities and a higher amputation rate than UEs without ReT (5-year DSS: 68.8% vs. 92%, P < 0.001; MFS: 56.1% vs. 90.9%, P < 0.001; LRFS: 75.8% vs. 98.4%, P = <0.001; amputation rate 18.5% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.003). The presence of ReT was an independent poor prognostic predictor for DSS, MFS, and LRFS with hazard ratios of 2.02 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25-3.26), 1.62 (95% CI, 1.05-2.51) and 1.94 (95% CI, 1.05-3.59), respectively. Soft tissue sarcomas should be treated in specialized centers and UE should be avoided because of its detrimental effect especially when ReT remains after UE.

Unplanned Resection of Sarcoma

Unplanned resection is a common problem in the management of sarcoma. Because sarcomas are so rare, they may be misdiagnosed initially as more common benign lesions. When the treating surgeon is unaware of or does not adhere to proper surgical principles of orthopaedic oncology, an intralesional procedure may be performed without the requisite preoperative imaging, staging, or wide resection margins for optimal management of sarcoma. Studies show that oncologic outcomes after unplanned resections are mixed; however, surgical outcomes drastically deteriorate. Failure to adhere to oncologic principles accounts for increased morbidity and amputation rates with re-resection. No diagnostic modality has been proven to accurately predict residual disease in the resection bed following unplanned resection. Thus, repeat surgery with or without adjuvant treatment is usually offered to these patients, thereby adding considerable cost and morbidity. Medical malpractice litigation associated with unplanned sarcoma resection is common, with delayed diagnosis and unnecessary amputation most often cited in cases decided in favor of the plaintiff.

Characteristics of 64 sarcoma patients referred to a sarcoma center after unplanned excision

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Unplanned excision of sarcoma before referral to specialist centers can affect prognosis and surgical outcome. The diagnostic pathway of these patients is uncertain and needs to be reviewed. We aimed to describe patient and tumor characteristics, initial symptoms, initial and final diagnosis, and explore reasons for unplanned excision in this patient group. From a previous study on 258 sarcoma patients, we identified 64 patients referred after surgery. Medical records were reviewed.

RESULTS

The majority were soft tissue sarcomas, most often with thoracic location. Leiomyosarcoma was the most frequent final diagnosis, lipoma, and fibroma/dermatofibroma the most frequent initial diagnoses. Fifty percent were superficial small tumors, and 60.9% had not received diagnostic imaging before surgery. Fifty percent were referred from public surgical departments, and 1/3 from private specialists. Twenty-three patients had initial presence of alarm symptoms registered before surgery, the remaining 2/3 fell outside referral criteria or alarm symptoms were not discovered.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients referred after unplanned excision often have small superficial tumors and the majority fall outside of defined referral criteria. Referral criteria are not a guarantee for detection of all sarcomas and surgeons should always be aware of the possibility of malignancy when removing a tumor.

Staged Soft Tissue Reconstruction Following Sarcoma Excision with Anticipated Large Cutaneous Defects: An Oncologically Safe Alternative

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that select patients undergoing planned soft tissue sarcoma (STS) excision with anticipated skin and soft tissue deficits could be treated with a two stage surgical procedure which would allow some flexibility in coverage options while not significantly increasing local recurrence rate or wound complication rate.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken in a series of consecutive patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up treated by a single orthopedic oncologist and a single reconstructive plastic surgeon who were managed with a staged approach STS excision and reconstruction.

RESULTS

There were 73 patients identified over a ten-year period that underwent staged STS excision and soft tissue reconstruction. There were 12 (16%) initial positive margins resected to negative final margins, and a variety of coverage procedures performed. Wound complication rate was 21%. Local recurrence rate was 11%.

CONCLUSION

Staged STS excision and reconstruction is an acceptable tool in the armamentarium of the orthopedic oncologist for managing major soft tissue deficits without an increase in local recurrence rates.

Outcomes of surgical treatment alone in patients with superficial soft tissue sarcoma regardless of size or grade

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Currently, standard treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is wide local excision and adjuvant radiation, but radiation may be unnecessary in superficial STS. The primary objective is to assess local recurrence rates in patients treated with surgical management alone for superficial STS.

METHODS

A retrospective cancer registry review of patients treated with surgery alone for superficial STS at the Tom Baker Cancer Center (TBCC) was performed. Patient and tumor characteristics as well as recurrence data were collected.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients met study criteria. Local and overall recurrence rates were 7/61 (11.5%) and 12/61 (19.7%), respectively. The proportion with a T2 tumor was 38.8% versus 33.3% (P = 0.69), with Grade 2 or 3 tumors was 59.2% versus 83.3% (P = 0.14), and with resection margins <1 cm was 28.6% versus 75.0% (P = 0.008) for patients without and with recurrence, respectively. Median time to recurrence was 1.7 (0.4-5.2) years.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection alone appears to be a viable option for superficial STS that can save patients from potential side effects of radiation. The association between recurrence and inadequate margins (<1 cm) requires additional treatment be offered to this subset of patients.

Association of short duration from initial symptoms to specialist consultation with poor survival in soft-tissue sarcomas

INTRODUCTION

The association of symptom duration with survival remains controversial in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We determined whether the length from initial symptoms to specialist consultation affects prognosis in STSs. We retrospectively reviewed 152 primary STS patients (with 142 non-small round cell sarcomas) who consulted our specialist hospital. The factors that affected the length of the period from the initial symptoms to specialist consultation and the length of the delay at the clinic before specialist hospital referral were investigated. The relation between the length of the period from symptom onset and overall survival was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Unplanned excision and superficial tumor were significantly associated with increasing duration from the initial symptoms to specialist hospital referral. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumors over 5 cm (P=0.002 and 0.005) and symptoms within 6 months (P=0.017 and 0.016) were independent poor prognostic factors of overall survival among the pretreatment factors when analyzing all and non-small round cell STSs.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a first report to show the independent prognostic role of symptom duration in STSs on multivariate analysis. Considering the impact of symptom duration on survival in these heterogenous tumors, careful follow-up and consideration of treatment are necessary for patients with short symptom duration.

Unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcomas: current concepts for management and prognosis

➤ Biopsy, staging, preoperative imaging and planning, as well as surgical treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas, are best carried out in specialized sarcoma centers, with the support of a multidisciplinary tumor board.➤ Tumor bed excision is recommended after most unplanned excisions, with a goal of obtaining complete tumor removal with an appropriately wide margin of resection.➤ The surgical resection area tends to be more extensive during tumor bed excision than during primary resection because of the need to resect potential areas of contamination, resulting in the need for more reconstructive procedures (flaps and skin grafts) and wider radiation fields.➤ Unplanned excisions are associated with an increased rate of local recurrence related to residual disease and positive margins after tumor bed excision, a deep location, and certain histologic subtypes, such as malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, myxofibrosarcoma, and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.➤ While adjuvant radiation therapy has not been found to mitigate the risk of local recurrence in unplanned excisions, it is generally utilized in the treatment of unplanned excisions as it is in the treatment of primary soft-tissue sarcomas.➤ Given the surgical and oncologic sequelae of unplanned excisions, prevention through the diffusion of concepts by means of provider education on how to approach soft-tissue masses, which can be potential soft-tissue sarcomas, is the best strategy.

Unplanned resection of a soft tissue sarcoma: clinical characteristics and impact on oncological and functional outcomes

BACKGROUND

Over the past three decades, several studies have reported worse outcomes with unplanned resection for malignant soft tissue tumors. However, the impact of these studies on preventing unnecessary unplanned resection remains unknown.

METHODS

In a retrospective survey on the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas, we compared cases of unplanned resection with cases of planned resection in terms of the properties of unplanned resection and the oncological and functional outcomes. For the unplanned resection cases, an additional wide resection was performed.

RESULTS

Of 92 cases, unplanned resection was performed in 24 (26 %). Small or subcutaneous tumors were significantly more frequently subjected to unplanned resection. In 17 of 24 unplanned resection cases, residual tumors (70.8 %) were noted. Plastic surgery was more frequently needed for unplanned resection cases. There was no significant difference between the unplanned resection and control cases with regard to oncological outcome. However, as to local recurrence and overall survival, the events occurred only in the cases with residual tumors in the additional wide resection specimen in the unplanned resection group. There was no significant difference in functional evaluation, except for emotional acceptance, which had a better score in the unplanned resection group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite repeated cautions regarding unplanned resection in terms of its inadequate procedure which contradicts the principles of soft tissue sarcoma treatment, unplanned resections are still frequently performed. Perhaps the small size and subcutaneous location of the sarcomas in the unplanned resection group did not evoke the probability of malignancy for the surgeons who initially managed them. Even though an additional wide resection was performed, a residual tumor would lead to a worse outcome. An effective awareness program to avoid unnecessary unplanned resections for soft tissue sarcoma should be considered.

Diagnosis and Management of Soft-tissue Masses

Soft-tissue masses of the extremities are common entities encountered by nearly all providers of musculoskeletal patient care. Proper management of these lesions requires a specific process of evaluation. A detailed history and physical examination must be performed. Appropriate imaging studies must be obtained based on clinical indications. MRI is the imaging modality of choice for diagnosis of soft-tissue masses, with CT and ultrasonography used as secondary options. These modalities aid the clinician in developing an appropriate differential diagnosis and treatment plan. When the initial evaluation is inconclusive, biopsy must be performed. A diagnosis must be established before definitive treatment with surgical excision or, in rare cases, radiation therapy is performed. Clinicians without significant experience in treating soft-tissue masses should consider referral to a musculoskeletal oncologist for specialized care when a definitive diagnosis of a benign lesion cannot be made. Several studies have shown that multidisciplinary care in specialized referral centers optimizes outcomes and diminishes comorbid complications.