Direct anterior approach for hip resurfacing: surgical technique and complications

Protection of the innervation of the tensor fasciae latae in hip direct anterior and anterolateral approaches: a cadaver study

PURPOSE

This study aims to reveal the exact course of the superior gluteal nerve (SGN) branch innervating the tensor fascia lata (TFL) and show how it can be protected in the direct anterior approach (DAA) and anterolateral approach (ALA).

METHODS

The anterolateral regions of 22 thighs from formalin-fixed cadavers were dissected. 3 anatomical points were determined. Point A, B, C indicates where the SGN enters the gluteus minimus (GMin) fibres, the SGN leaves the gluteal muscles, the SGN enters the TFL, respectively. Measurements were made on 3 separate lines.

RESULTS

On the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the head of the fibula line (Line 1), the horizontal-vertical distances from point B and C to the ASIS were 7.99 ± 3.65 mm-40.40 ± 11.50 mm and 11.74 ± 6.61 mm-70.35 ± 14.11 mm respectively. The horizontal-vertical distances from point A, B, C to the greater trochanter (GT) were 32.41 ± 9.97 mm-55.28 ± 12.25 mm; 67.70 ± 8.54 mm-17.76 ± 13.57 mm; 63.92 ± 9.96 mm-13.00 ± 7.92 mm on the GT and the head of the fibula line (Line 2), respectively. The horizontal-vertical distances from point A, B, C to the GT were 24.58 ± 9.83 mm-42.54 ± 12.86 mm; 9.45 ± 7.92 mm-36.25 ± 9.06 mm; 26.18 ± 11.12 mm-64.05 ± 11.67 mm on the ASIS and the GT line (Line 3).

CONCLUSIONS

In the DAA, the increased risk of damaging the branch of the SGN that innervates the TFL must be kept in mind. The protection of this branch can be ensured with easy and applicable rules.

SuperPath® vs. direct anterior approach : A retrospective comparison between two minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive approaches are subject to controversy in orthopedic surgery. The aim of the current study was to compare the radiographic parameters between two minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 2018 and February 2019, the radiographic parameters of 80 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty via minimally invasive approaches (DAA: n = 40; SuperPath® SP: n = 40) have been measured. The radiographic analysis was performed with digital software tool mediCad® (HECTEC™ GmbH, Landshut, Germany).

RESULTS

Patients treated with DAA showed significantly higher inclination (SP: 39.7° ± 7.3° vs. DAA: 44.7° ± 5.3°) and significantly lower cup anteversion values (SP: 31.2° ± 7.9° vs. DAA: 27. 5° ± 5.3°, p < 0.001) than patients undergoing THA via SP postoperatively. The horizontal femoral offset was neither preoperatively nor postoperatively higher in DAA than in SP cohort (preoperative: p = 0.71, postoperative: p = 0.25) (preoperative: SP:37.2 mm ± 7.3 vs. DAA 38.2 mm ± 7.5; postoperative: SP: 38.0 mm ± 7.2 vs. DAA: 40.5 mm ± 7.0). At both times, the acetabular offset was significantly higher in DAA cohort than in SP cohort (preoperative: SP: 32.9 mm ± 5.9 vs. DAA: 36.8 mm ± 4.9; postoperative: SP: 28.9 mm ± 4.2 vs. DAA: 33.4 mm ± 3.8) (preoperative: 0.001; postoperative: p < 0.001). The vertical height was preoperatively and postoperatively not significantly higher in SP cohort than in DAA cohort (preoperative: SP: 16.1 mm ± 4.1 vs. DAA: 15.5 mm ± 4.9; postoperative: SP: 16.6 mm ± 4.6 vs. DAA: 16.1 mm ± 4.6) (preoperative: p = 0.77; postoperative: p = 0.58). The preoperatively existing leg length discrepancy of the affected leg could be compensated via surgery without showing significant differences between the two cohorts (preoperative: SP: -3.2 mm ± 5.4 vs. DAA: 1.9 mm ± 4.9; postoperative: SP: 1.5 mm ± 5.4 vs. DAA: 4.8 mm ± 5.6) (preoperative: p = 0.34; postoperative: p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrates suitable cup positioning and stem alignment in the coronal plane using minimal-invasive approaches DAA and Superpath®.

Total hip arthroplasty through an anterior approach: The pros and cons

Total hip arthroplasty through an anterior approach has been increasing in popularity amongst surgeons and patients.

Anterior approach hip arthroplasty seems to offer improved early outcomes in terms of pain, rehabilitation and length of stay.

No difference in long-term outcomes has been shown between anterior and posterior or lateral approaches.

Proper formal training, utilization of fluoroscopy and adequate experience can mitigate risks of complications and improve early and medium-term outcomes.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:574-583. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180023.

The Direct Anterior Approach for Hip Revision: Accessing the Entire Femoral Diaphysis Without Endangering the Nerve Supply

BACKGROUND

The direct anterior approach (DAA) to the hip has been criticized as an approach that is limited to primary arthroplasty only. Our study objective was to demonstrate, in a cadaveric setting, that an alternate extension of the DAA can be used to reach the femur at the posterior border of the lateral vastus muscle without endangering the nerve supply.

METHODS

The iliotibial tract is split anteriorly and pulled laterally, thereby opening the interval to the lateral-posterior aspect of the vastus muscle. The muscle fascia is incised at the posterior border to access the femoral diaphysis. The vastus mobilization is started distally and laterally to the greater trochanter, leaving a muscular bridge between the vastus and the medial gluteal muscle intact. If it is necessary to open the femoral cavity for implant retrieval, we perform an anterior wall osteotomy instead of an extended trochanteric osteotomy.

RESULTS

It was possible to split the iliotibial band and pull it laterally, thereby exposing the entire vastus lateralis muscle. The junction of the vastus lateralis and vastus intermedius was not encountered in all cases, nor was the nerve supply with all nerve fibers in that interval.

CONCLUSION

The alternate technique described here for accessing the femoral diaphysis allows for easy access to the lateral aspect of the vastus lateralis and the femoral diaphysis. Using this technique, it should also be possible to access the femur and perform all necessary reconstructive procedures on it without damaging the surrounding nerve structures.

Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Lateral Decubitus Position: Our Experiences and Early Results

BACKGROUND

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is typically performed in the supine position using a specially designed operating room table, which makes this approach more accessible to orthopedic surgeons. We attempted to perform this procedure in the lateral decubitus position on an ordinary operation table to avoid dependence on a special operating room table. There is an obvious absence of literature regarding this subject.

METHODS

A total of 248 patients (295 hips) were recruited for primary THAs from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. In total, 126 hips (42.7%) underwent THAs using the DAA in the lateral decubitus position. The technical feasibility and early results were evaluated.

RESULTS

The orientation of the acetabular component was 16.5° ± 4.9° anteversion and 43.3° ± 3.5° abduction. Intraoperative proximal femoral fracture occurred in one hip. The superficial wound complications occurred in 2 hips and the hematoma in one hip while in hospital. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury was noted in 43 hips. The early dislocation occurred in 2 hips. Heterotopic ossification was Brooker class I in 5 hips and class II in 1 hip. No aseptic loosening, postoperative periprosthetic fracture, and deep infection occurred in our series.

CONCLUSION

The DAA for THA in the lateral decubitus position may be a valuable alternative if the DAA in the supine position is difficult to implement owing to absence of a special operating room table. This technique also seems to provide satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes with an acceptable complication in our early follow-up.

Closed Suction Drainage Has No Benefits in Anterior Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Many studies have challenged routine drain placement in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Some studies suggest increased transfusion rate with the use of closed suction drains. The use of tranexamic acid to control surgical bleeding and aspirin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis has gained popularity. No study has evaluated the use of drains in patients undergoing direct anterior total hip arthroplasty under these conditions.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, randomized study in patients undergoing direct anterior total hip arthroplasty to evaluate whether closed suction drain placement provides any clinical benefit. Patients randomly assigned to the control group had closed suctions drains placed; patients randomly assigned to the treatment group had no drains placed. The primary outcome measures were hematoma formation, wound complications, and transfusion rates. The secondary outcome measures were estimated blood loss, decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, total hemoglobin loss, calculated blood loss, hidden blood loss, and total length of hospital stay. Differences in outcomes between groups were considered to be significant at P ≤ .05.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups in transfusion rate (P = .49), postoperative decrease in hemoglobin levels (P = .95), average calculated blood loss (P = .65), complications (P = .49), or length of hospital stay (P = .14). There was no hematoma formation observed in either group.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed no clinical benefit or disadvantage to closed suction drainage in anterior hip arthroplasty with the concomitant use of tranexamic acid for surgical hemostasis and aspirin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Does surgical approach or prosthesis type affect hip joint loading one year after surgery?

Several approaches may be used for hip replacement surgery either in combination with conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) or resurfacing hip arthroplasty (RHA). This study investigates the differences in hip loading during gait one year or more after surgery in three cohorts presenting different surgical procedures, more specific RHA placed using the direct lateral (RHA-DLA, n=8) and posterolateral (RHA-PLA, n=14) approach as well as THA placed using the direct anterior (THA-DAA, n=12) approach. For the DAA and control subjects, hip loading was also evaluated during stair ascent and descent to evaluate whether these motions can better discriminate between patients and controls compared to gait. Musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim was used to calculate in vivo joint loading. Results showed that for all operated patients, regardless the surgical procedure, hip loading was decreased compared to control subjects, while no differences were found between patient groups. This indicates that THA via DAA results in similar hip loading as a RHA via DLA or PLA. Stair climbing did not result in more distinct differences in hip contact force magnitude between patients and controls, although differences in orientation were more distinct. However, patients after hip surgery did adjust their motion pattern to decrease the magnitude of loading on the hip joint compared to control subjects.

Osseointegrated total hip replacement connected to a lower limb prosthesis: a proof-of-concept study with three cases

Background

Osseointegrated implants are a suitable alternative for prosthetic attachment in individuals with a transfemoral amputation, who are unable to wear a socket. However, the small bone-implant contact area, reduced muscular leverage, and osteoporosis contraindicate osseointegrated implant use in transfemoral amputees with osteoporosis and a short residuum. We report on the feasibility of combining total hip replacement (THR) with an osseointegrated implant for prosthetic attachment.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of three transfemoral amputees who underwent osseointegration with THR between 2013 and 2014. In a two-stage procedure, a custom-made femoral prosthesis was connected to a THR with a modular revision stem and a stoma was created. Clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline and 1.5–2.5-year follow-up using standard measures of health-related quality of life, ambulation, and activity levels including the Short Form-36 (SF-36), Questionnaire for Transfemoral Amputees (Q-TFA), Timed Up and Go test, and 6-min walk test.

Results

Patient age ranged from 35 to 65 years. There were no major adverse events, but there was one case of superficial infection. All patients showed improved Q-TFA and SF-36 scores. Two patients who were wheelchair-bound at baseline became community ambulators, and the third patient exhibited improved ambulation.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the feasibility of combining a THR with an osseointegrated implant in transfemoral amputees.

Adverse effects associated with the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The direct anterior approach (DAA) is an increasingly popular technique for performing total hip arthroplasty (THA). This muscle-sparing approach may yield functional benefits. However, DAA has been associated with an increased risk incidence (RI) of intra- and postoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the published literature was conducted to document the cumulative RI of intra- and postoperative complications, as well as the presence of a learning curve in subjects undergoing THA with a DAA. Study selection and data extraction were carried out independently in duplicate. A Bayesian zero-inflated random-effect model was used to calculate pooled estimates for the different endpoints.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies (6485 patients) were analysed. RIs of 0.8 % [95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.4-1.6 %] and 0.5 % (95 % CI: 0.3-0.9 %) were found for intra-operative trochanter and femoral fractures, respectively, and of 0.9 % (95 CI: 0.3-2.6 %) for postoperative transient lateral cutaneous femoral nerve (LCFN) impairment. A clear RI for early revisions (2.1 %; 95 % CI: 1.4-2.8 %) and other surgical re-interventions (1.3 %; 95 % CI: 0.7-1.9 %) was present, but these values do not differ from reported RIs for THA overall. The RI for dislocation was low (0.6 %; 95 % CI: 0.4-0.9 %) compared with the reported literature.

CONCLUSIONS

DAA is a technically demanding procedure, with outcomes possibly indicative of surgeon learning curve. A risk for intra-operative fractures and LCFN is evident, although the risk for other adverse effects is comparable to those with other approaches.

Large ossification mass causing groin pain and limited hip function

Acute avulsion fractures to the anterior inferior iliac spine are unusual, yet well documented injuries, especially in the adolescent skeleton. To our knowledge, chronic avulsion fracture to the anterior inferior iliac spine has not been reported. This report presents a case of chronic avulsion fracture to the anterior inferior iliac spine leading to a large ossification mass resulting in a late presentation of hip with limited function. Surgical excision followed by physiotherapy led to satisfactory resolution of pain and significantly improved the range of flexion.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome from Neck-Preserving, Short-Stem Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Younger Osteoarthritis Patients

Hip resurfacing has been considered a good treatment option for younger, active osteoarthritis patients. However, there are several identified issues concerning risk for neck fractures and issues related to current metal-on-metal implant designs. Neck-preserving short-stem implants have been discussed as a potential alternative, but it is yet unclear which method is better suited for younger adults. We compared hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome scores (HOOS) from a young group of patients (n = 52, age 48.9 ± 6.1 years) who had received hip resurfacing (HR) with a cohort of patients (n = 73, age 48.2 ± 6.6 years) who had received neck-preserving, short-stem implant total hip arthroplasty (THA). Additionally, durations for both types of surgery were compared. HOOS improved significantly preoperatively to last followup (>1 year) in both groups (p < 0.0001, η (2) = 0.69); there were no group effects or interactions. Surgery duration was significantly longer for resurfacing (104.4 min ± 17.8) than MiniHip surgery (62.5 min ± 14.8), U = 85.0, p < 0.0001, η (2) = 0.56. The neck-preserving short-stem approach may be preferable to resurfacing due to the less challenging surgery, similar outcome, and controversy regarding resurfacing implant designs.

The direct anterior approach in hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures

PURPOSE

Hip replacement is the most common treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly, and minimally invasive surgery is popular in the field of orthopaedic surgery. This study evaluated the outcome of monopolar hemiarthroplasty by the direct anterior approach over a postoperative period up to 2.5 years.

METHODS

A total of 86 patients with displaced femoral neck fractures were included (mean age of 86.5 years). Surviving patients were reviewed three months (retrospectively) and one to 2.5 years (prospectively) after surgery. One-year mortality was 36 %.

RESULTS

For all stems, implant positioning with respect to stem alignment, restoration of leg length and femoral offset was correct. Acetabular protrusion was observed in 55 % of the patients one to 2.5 years postoperatively. Subsidence and intraoperative periprosthetic fractures occurred in three patients (3 %) each. All revision stems for postoperative periprosthetic fractures could be implanted using the initial surgical technique without extension of the previous approach. The mean Harris hip score was 85 points at the one to 2.5-year follow-up; 85 % of the patients were satisfied with their hip and 57 % returned to their preoperative level of mobility.

CONCLUSION

Based on these findings, hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures can be performed safely and effectively via the direct anterior approach with good functional outcome and high patient satisfaction.