Classifications in brief: the Neer classification for proximal humerus fractures

Head-Shaft Angle Influences Isometric Shoulder Strength Levels after Intramedullary Nailing of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures are common fractures of the elderly population which can lead to long-term compromise of a patient's shoulder function. Closed reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary nailing is a well-established surgical technique yielding good outcomes, as perceived by patients, obtained via Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, and objectified by clinical shoulder testing. Apart from conventional range-of-motion testing and clinical shoulder tests, strength testing of the shoulder is a yet-neglected but meaningful and standardizable outcome parameter. In this study, isometric shoulder strength is evaluated in relation to fracture morphology/postoperative reduction quality as well as with patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

25 patients (mean age 73.2 ± 10.5 years) underwent isometrics strength-testing of the shoulder joint in the scapular plane (abduction) as well as in the sagittal plane (flexion) as well as hand-grip strength-testing at 4.5 ± 1.88 years follow-up. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were analysed. Patients completed ASES and CMS questionnaires.

RESULTS

Patients exhibited a decrease in abduction and flexion force (-24.47% and -25.30%, respectively, p < 0.001) using the contralateral, uninjured arm as reference. Abduction force tended to be decreased in three- and four-part fractures. Patient satisfaction correlated negatively with the relatively reduced force of the affected arm. Varus-angulated humeral heads produced significantly lower abduction force output than valgus- or physiologic angulation (p = 0.014), whereas flexion force was unaffected (p = 0.468). The anatomical reduction had no influence on shoulder strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal humerus fractures may cause a significant reduction in shoulder function, both reported by patients and objectified by shoulder strength testing. Varus head angulation demonstrated the greatest loss of shoulder strength and should be avoided to ensure proper functioning. Further, strength testing seems a valuable outcome parameter for a thorough shoulder examination with easy obtainability.

Mid- to long-term outcomes of proximal humerus fractures treated with open reduction, plate fixation, and iliac bone autograft augmentation

BACKGROUND

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using locking plates is a widely adopted treatment for displaced proximal humerus fractures. Various augmentation techniques have been developed to enhance the stability of plate fixation. Among these, iliac bone autograft is notable for its advantages over allografts, such as ready availability and the elimination of costs and risks associated with disease transmission. Despite its potential benefits, data on the outcomes of iliac bone autograft augmentation (IBAA) are still limited. This study aims to present the mid- to long-term results of treating proximal humerus fractures with ORIF using locking plates and IBAA.

METHODS

The study included 15 patients treated with ORIF and IBAA. We classified fracture patterns using the Neer classification and estimated local bone density via the deltoid tuberosity index. We measured the neck shaft angle (NSA) and humeral head height (HHH) on both immediate postoperative and most recent X-ray images to assess the maintenance of reduction. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) and Constant scores.

RESULTS

The average follow-up duration was 59.56 months, ranging from 24 to 93 months. A majority of fractures were classified as four-part (53%). The average immediate and late postoperative NSAs were 132.6±8.19 and 131.6±7.32 degrees, respectively. The average HHH on the immediate postoperative and latest follow-up images were 16.46±6.07 and 15.10±5.34, respectively. None of the patients exhibited any radiological signs of avascular necrosis or loss of reduction at the latest follow-up. The mean postoperative Constant and DASH scores at the latest follow-up were 79.6 and 11.5, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that ORIF with IBAA is an effective method for managing three- or four-part proximal humerus fractures, yielding excellent outcomes.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty versus Non-Operative Treatment of Three-Part and Four-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly Patient: A Pooled Analysis and Systematic Review

Background: The treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients is not yet fully elucidated. Of all treatment options, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and non-operative treatment (NOT) appear to provide the best results. Evidence to guide the choice between the two is sparse. Therefore, this review provides an overview of the available evidence on RSA versus NOT. Methods: Studies comparing complex proximal humerus fractures in patients aged >65 years treated either with RSA or NOT were included for systematic review and direct comparison via pooled analysis of patient-rated outcome and range of motion. Indirect comparison of case series and non-comparative studies on either treatment was performed separately. Results: Three comparative studies including 77 patients treated with RSA and 81 treated non-operatively were analysed. The RSA group scored better for both the Constant-Murley score (mean difference 6 points) and DASH score (mean difference 8 points). No differences were detected in ASES, PENN score, pain scores, or range of motion between treatment groups. The most common complications for RSA were infection (3%), nerve injury (2%), and dislocation (2%). Reoperation was required in 5%. In the NOT group, common complications included malunion (42%), osteonecrosis (25%), and non-union (3%); no reoperation was required. Patient satisfaction was equal in both groups. Conclusions: The functional outcomes and range of motion after RSA seemed satisfactory and potentially superior to NOT in elderly patients. Patient satisfaction was comparable despite a high malunion and osteonecrosis rate in the non-operative treatment group, which did not require re-interventions.

A Comprehensive Review of Proximal Humerus Fractures: From Epidemiology to Treatment Strategies

This comprehensive review delves into the intricate landscape of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), exploring their epidemiology, historical evolution, contemporary classification systems, treatment strategies, and outcome measures. PHFs present a complex orthopedic challenge, necessitating a nuanced understanding of their multifaceted dimensions. Despite their clinical significance, PHFs remain relatively understudied in population-based epidemiology. This review critically examines existing literature to uncover the incidence, prevalence, and demographic patterns associated with these fractures. A foundational understanding of the epidemiological landscape is crucial for effective preventive strategies and optimized fracture management. Tracing back to historical records, the review explores the evolution of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for PHFs. From ancient treatment modalities documented on the Edwin Smith papyrus to contemporary X-ray-based classifications such as Neer and AO/OTA, a historical context is provided to understand the journey of managing these fractures. Navigating through a spectrum of treatment strategies, the review contrasts nonoperative approaches with various surgical interventions. The challenges and outcomes associated with conservative management are juxtaposed against methods like open reduction internal fixation and tension band osteosynthesis. Evidence synthesis guides clinicians in making informed decisions based on patient characteristics and fracture complexities. Central to assessing PHF management are patient-reported outcome measures. The review explores the significance of instruments such as the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Constant-Murley score in evaluating treatment success. The shift toward subjective measures is discussed, considering their correlation with patient experiences and the concept of minimal clinically important difference. The impact of demographic factors, including age and gender, on PHFs is scrutinized. The association between these fractures and osteoporosis is highlighted, emphasizing the crucial role of bone health in fracture prevention and management. Through this comprehensive exploration, the review provides a robust foundation for understanding, evaluating, and advancing the management strategies for PHFs. The synthesis of historical perspectives, contemporary classifications, and treatment modalities serves as a valuable resource for the orthopedic community, fostering improved clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

Great tuberosity fixation does not affect healing and clinical outcomes in RSA performed in proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients

PURPOSE

Aims of our study were to define whether the great tuberosity (GT) positioning fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) after proximal humeral fracture (PHF) could predict tuberosity healing and its impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We enrolled 59 patients treated with cementless reverse shoulder arthroplasty after PHF in our institute between 2012 and 2018. The mean follow-up was 57 months (± 23.4). We divided patients into two groups according to GT positioning after fixation: Group 1 GT in contact and Group 2 GT detached at least 1 mm from humeral diaphysis. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were conducted at last follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall GT healing rate was 64.4%, (Group 1 70.7%-Group 2 50%). A statistically significant difference (P = 0.047) was found in cortical thickness narrowing at one-third of stem length. We found a correlation between lateral cortical narrowing and GT fixation in non-anatomical position, but we observed no statistically significant differences about GT healing according to GT anatomical or non-anatomical fixation. No differences were found in shoulder function in patients whose tuberosity was healed or failed to heal.

CONCLUSION

GT reduction is not a predictive factor for GT healing; external stress shielding, instead, seems to be decreased in patients with postoperative anatomically reduced GT. In our study, GT healing did not affect clinical outcomes or patient's satisfaction in elderly low-demanding patients.

Three-dimensional printed models can reduce costs and surgical time for complex proximal humeral fractures: preoperative planning, patient satisfaction, and improved resident skills

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are still controversial with regards to treatment and are difficult to classify. The study's objective is to show that preoperative planning performed while handling a three-dimensional (3D) printed anatomical model of the fracture can ensure a better understanding of trauma for both surgeons and patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients (group A, cases) with complex PHF were evaluated preoperatively by reproducing life-size, full-touch 3D anatomical models. Intraoperative blood loss, radiographic controls, duration of surgery, and clinical outcomes of patients in group A were compared with 20 patients (group B, controls) who underwent standard preoperative evaluation. Additionally, senior surgeons and residents, as well as group A patients, answered a questionnaire to evaluate innovative preoperative planning and patient compliance. Cost analysis was evaluated.

RESULTS

Intraoperative radiography controls and length of operation were significantly shorter in group A. There were no differences in clinical outcomes or blood loss. Patients claim a better understanding of the trauma suffered and the proposed treatment. Surgeons assert that the planning of the definitive operation with 3D models has had a good impact. The development of this tool has been well received by the residents. The surgery was reduced in length by 15%, resulting in savings of about EUR 400 for each intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer intraoperative radiography checks, shorter surgeries, and better patient compliance reduce radiation exposure for patients and healthcare staff, enhance surgical outcomes while reducing expenses, and lower the risk of medicolegal claims.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, prospective randomized case-control study.

Advanced Preoperative Planning Techniques in the Management of Complex Proximal Humerus Fractures

This review evaluates the current literature on the recent advances of preoperative planning in the management of complex proximal humerus fractures (PHF). PHFs can pose a considerable challenge for orthopaedic surgeons due to their diversity in presentation and complexity. Poor preoperative planning can lead to prolonged operations, increased blood loss, higher risk of complications, and increased stress on the surgical team. Recent advances have seen the evolution of preoperative planning from conventional methods to computer-assisted virtual surgical technology (CAVST) and three-dimensional (3D) printing, which have been highlighted as transformative tools for improving preoperative planning and postoperative outcomes. CAVST allows the creation of 3D renderings of patient-specific anatomy, clearly demonstrating fracture patterns and facilitating detailed planning for arthroplasty or surgical fixation. The early studies show promising outcomes however the literature calls for more high-quality randomised controlled trials. Using 3D printing for high-fidelity simulation involving patient-specific physical models offers an immersive experience for surgical planning. Preoperative planning with 3D printing reduces operative time, blood loss and use of fluoroscopy. The technology's potential to produce customisable surgical implants further improves its versatility. There is a need for a cost analysis for the use of these technologies within the orthopaedic field, particularly considering the high expense of 3D printing materials and extended hospital stays until the printed models are available. CAVST and 3D printing also show promising applications within high-fidelity simulation surgical training, with CAVST offering possibilities in virtual reality and haptic-enhanced simulations and 3D printing providing physical models for trainee surgeons to hone their skills. Moving forward, a reduction in the cost of 3D printing and the advancement of CAVST using artificial intelligence would lead to future improvement. In conclusion, preoperative planning supported by these innovative technologies will play a pivotal role in improving surgical outcomes and training for complex PHF cases.

Does a hip fracture mean we should we operate on a concomitant proximal humerus fracture?

BACKGROUND

Concomitant upper extremity and hip fractures present a challenge in postoperative mobilization in the geriatric population. Operative fixation of proximal humerus fractures allows for upper extremity weight bearing. This retrospective study compared outcomes between operative and non-operative proximal humerus fracture patients with concomitant hip fractures.

METHODS

A trauma database of 13,396 patients age > 55 years old was queried for concomitant hip and proximal humerus fracture patients between 2014-2021. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, hospital quality measures, Neer classification, morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and outcomes. All hip fractures were treated operatively. Patients were grouped based on operative vs. non-operative treatment of their proximal humerus fracture. Primary outcomes included comparing postoperative ambulatory status, pain, length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) need, discharge disposition, and readmission rates.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (0.4%) met inclusion criteria. Twelve patients (25%) underwent operative treatment for their proximal humerus fracture and 36 (75%) received non-operative treatment. Patients with operative fixations were younger (p < 0.01), had more complex Neer classifications (p = 0.031), more likely to be community ambulators (p < 0.01), and required more inpatient MMEs (p < 0.01). There were no differences in LOS (p = 0.415), need for ICU (p = 0.718), discharge location (p = 0.497), 30-day readmission (p = 0.228), or 90-day readmission (p = 0.135) between cohorts. At 6 months postoperatively, among community or household ambulators, a higher percentage of operative patients returned to their baseline ambulatory functional status, however, this was not significant (70% vs. 52%, p = 0.342). There were three deaths in the non-operative cohort and no deaths in the operative cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patients with hip fractures and concomitant proximal humerus fractures treated operatively required more inpatient MMEs and trended toward maintaining baseline ambulatory function. There were no differences in inpatient LOS, ICU need, discharge location, or readmissions. Future larger, multicenter studies are needed to further delineate if operative repair of concomitant proximal humerus fractures provides a benefit in the geriatric population.

Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes after Antegrade Intramedullary Nailing in Proximal Humeral Fractures: Insights and Implications for Patient Satisfaction

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are common injuries that can lead to significant functional impairment. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications associated with the use of the Targon PH+ (Fa. Aesculap, Germany) intramedullary nail for the treatment of PHFs.

METHODS

A subgroup consisting of 70 patients with a mean follow-up of 4.91 years out of 479 patients who underwent treatment with the Targon PH+ intramedullary nail for PHFs at a single center between 2014 and 2021 were included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed using validated German versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L). Radiographic assessment was performed using pre- and postoperative imaging.

RESULTS

Among the 70 patients of the subgroup who completed follow-up, 21.4% experienced complications, including major complications in 15.7% of cases, all of which were revised (revision rate of 15.7%). Anatomical reduction was achieved in 48,5% of cases. The mean DASH, ASES, and OSS scores were 25.4 ± 22.0, 76.2 ± 21.1, and 38.8 ± 10.3, respectively. Significant correlations were observed among the PROMs, indicating their convergent validity. Additionally, a significant correlation of all used PROMs and patient well-being (HRQoL) was observed. Severe complications and revisions were associated with significantly lower ASES scores (-11.1%, p = 0.013). There was a tendency for PROM scores to slightly decline with increasing fracture complexity, although this trend did not reach statistical significance. Our findings indicate that patients over the age of 65 years tend to exhibit lower scores in PROMs and HRQoL measures.

CONCLUSION

The use of the Targon PH+ intramedullary nail for the treatment of PHFs resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes and acceptable complication and revision rates. The PROMs and HRQoL measures indicated varying levels of disability and symptoms, with major complications, revision surgery, and age negatively impacting shoulder function after midterm follow-up.

Displaced varus proximal humerus fracture with conservative treatment: a case report

The authors report a case of an elderly female with a displaced varus misalignment of a proximal humerus fracture which met the indications for surgery, but the patient was treated conservatively with an arm sling due to the wishes of the patient and her relatives. The clinical outcome was nearly full function compared with the right shoulder.

Presentation of case

A 65-year-old Thai female presented with right shoulder pain 1 h after a fall during which her right shoulder hit the floor. Radiographs of the right shoulder in anteroposterior and lateral transcapular views showed a proximal humerus fracture with varus misalignment. The patient and her relatives decided on conservative treatment with an arm sling. At 12 weeks following the fall she was able to move her right shoulder nearly equally to the left shoulder.

Intervention and outcome

The authors discussed the treatment options with the patient and her relatives and recommended open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate and screw, but they decided on conservative treatment with an arm sling. At 12 weeks following the fall she was able to move her right shoulder nearly equally to the left shoulder. She had no pain and could do normal life activities with the right shoulder.

Relevance and impact

Patients with severe varus deformity are usually treated with surgery. If there are contraindications for surgery, the stability of the fracture should first be evaluated through radiographs of the fracture in various arm positions.

Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures and for fracture sequelae: did not differ in their outcomes

Background

The role of hemiarthroplasty (HA) in the management of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) and their sequalae has evolved with the development of contemporary internal fixation techniques and the widespread use of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. However, HA may still have a role in certain acute PHFs as well as select fracture sequalae. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the outcomes of HA when used in acute fractures and fracture sequelae.

Methods

Over a 16-year period (2000 - 2016), 122 primary HA performed for either acute PHFs or fracture sequelae were identified. Of these, 70 (57.4%) HA were performed within 4 weeks of the injury, whereas 52 (42.6%) underwent HA for fracture nonunion, malunion, or avascular necrosis. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years. Outcomes included the visual analog scale for pain, range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, complications, and reoperations inclusive of revision surgery. Cumulative incidence analysis was used to report implant survivorship with death as a competing risk.

Results

The mean follow-up time after HA was 4.8 years (range, 2-15 years) with no differences between groups (P = .102). Cohort comparisons demonstrated an older age (67.8 vs. 60.1; P = .004), lower rate of previous procedure (4.3% vs. 51.9%; P < .001), lower bone graft use (28.6% vs. 59.6%; P < .001), and a longer length of stay (5.9 vs. 3.0 days; P < .001) in the acute HA group. Additionally, no differences were observed between the acute and sequalae cohort in pain (2.0 vs. 2.5; P = .523), forward elevation (98° vs. 93°; P = .627), external rotation (30° vs. 23°; P = .215), internal rotation score (4.0 vs. 4.5; P = .589), satisfaction (P = .592), ASES scores (64.4 vs. 57.1; P = .168), complications (27.1% vs. 28.8%; P = .836), or reoperations (11.4% vs. 19.2%; P = .229). When comparing acute fractures and sequalae, the 15-year complication rates were 32.4% and 43.3%, respectively (P = .172), with 15-year reoperation rates of 13.7% and 24%, respectively (P = .098).

Conclusions

HA, whether performed acutely for a PHF or in a delayed fashion for fracture sequalae, demonstrated no statistically significant differences in outcomes for all examined parameters. HA in this setting may provide reasonable pain relief. However, limited motion, marginal ASES scores, and elevated rates of complications and reoperations can be expected up to 15 years postoperatively.

6-Pin Technique Joshi External Stabilization System Fixation for Proximal Humerus Fractures - A Case Series

Introduction

Proximal humerus fractures account for 4-5% of the fractures in long bones with a bimodal distribution. A wide spectrum of options are available in its management ranging from conservative to total shoulder replacement. We aim to demonstrate a minimally invasive simple 6-pin technique in the management of proximal humerus fracture using Joshi external stabilization system (JESS).

Case Report

We report the results of ten patients (M: F = 4:6) with proximal humerus fractures of age range between 19 and 88 years managed with the 6-pin technique JESS under regional anesthesia. Of the included patients, 4, 3, and 3 cases belonged to Neer Type II, III, and IV, respectively. On analysis of outcomes based on the Constant-Murley score, we noted excellent outcomes and good outcomes in 6 (60%), and 4 (40%) patients, respectively, at 12 months. Fixator was removed after the radiological union between 8 and 12 weeks. Complications noted include pin tract infection in 1 (10%) and malunion in 1 (10%) case.

Conclusion

JESS fixation by 6-pin technique remains a viable minimally invasive cost-effective treatment option in the management of proximal humerus fractures.

Mapping of Orthopaedic Fractures for Optimal Surgical Guidance

Orthopaedic fractures may be difficult to treat surgically if accurate information on the fracture propagation and its exit points are not known. Even with two-dimensional (2D) radiographic images, it is difficult to be completely certain of the exact location of the fracture site, the fracture propagation pattern and the exit points of the fracture. Three-dimensional (3D) computerised tomographic models are better in providing surgeons with the extent of bone fractures, but they may still not be sufficient to allow surgeons to plan open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) surgery.Fracture patterns and fracture maps are developed to be visual tools in 2D and 3D. These tools can be developed using fractured bones either before or after fracture reduction. Aside from being beneficial to surgeons during pre-surgical planning, these maps aid bioengineers who design fracture fixation plates and implants for these fractures, as well as represent fracture classifications.Fracture maps can be either created ex silico or in silico. Ex silico models are created using 3D printed bone models, onto which fracture patterns are marked. In silico fracture models are created by tracing the fracture lines from a fractured bone to a healthy bone template on a computer. The points of interest in both of these representations are the path of fracture propagation on the bone's surface and exit zones, which eventually determine the surgeon's choice of plate and fracture reduction. Both ex silico and in silico fracture maps are used for pre-surgical planning by the surgeons where they can plan the best way to reduce the fracture as well as template various implants in a low-risk environment before performing the surgery.Recently, fracture maps have been further digitised into heat maps. These heat maps provide visual representations of critical regions of fractures propagating through the bone and identify the weaker zones in the bone structure. These heat maps can allow engineers to develop optimal surgical plates to fix an array of fracture patterns propagating through the bone. Correlation of fractured regions with the mechanisms of injury, age, gender, etc. may improve fracture predictability in the future and optimise the intervention, along with making sure that surgeons do not miss fractures of the bone that may otherwise be hidden from plain sight.

Patient obesity is associated with severity of proximal humerus fractures, not outcomes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of obesity on the outcome of operatively treated proximal humerus fractures.

METHODS

Between December 2003 and October 2020, 240 patients with proximal humerus fractures requiring surgery were prospectively followed and classified according to the international AO/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) and Neer classifications. Patients' body mass indexes (BMI) were calculated and used to identify two groups, BMI ≥ 30 kg/cm (obese) and < 30 kg/cm (non-obese). Independent t tests were used for statistical analysis of continuous variables and χ² tests for categorical variables. Regression analysis was performed to determine if BMI was a predictor of fracture pattern severity as determined by the AO/OTA classification.

RESULTS

Overall, 223 patients who sustained proximal humerus fractures were analyzed. Patient age at time of injury was 60.5 ± 13.7 years. There were 67 AO/OTA 11A, 79 AO/OTA 11B, and 77 AO/OTA 11C fracture types. Seventy-two patients (32.3%) were obese. No significant differences were seen between groups in regard to demographic variables, Neer classification, or functional and clinical outcomes as determined by DASH scores and shoulder ROM, respectively. Statistical analyses confirmed that obesity is associated with more severe fracture patterns of the proximal humerus as categorized by the AO/OTA classification. An independent t test confirmed that BMI was significantly higher in the complex fracture group based on the AO/OTA classification (p = 0.047). Regression analysis also demonstrated that age (p = 0.005) and CCI (p = 0.021) were predictors of more severe fractures, while BMI approached significance (p = 0.055) based on the AO/OTA classification.

CONCLUSION

A significantly higher incidence of complex proximal humerus fracture patterns is observed in patients with higher body mass indexes based on the AO/OTA classification. Age and CCI are also associated with more severe fracture patterns of the proximal humerus as determined by the AO/OTA classification. No differences were seen in outcomes or complication rates between obese patients and non-obese patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The automized fracture edge detection and generation of three-dimensional fracture probability heat maps

With proven impact of statistical fracture analysis on fracture classifications, it is desirable to minimize the manual work and to maximize repeatability of this approach. We address this with an algorithm that reduces the manual effort to segmentation, fragment identification and reduction. The fracture edge detection and heat map generation are performed automatically. With the same input, the algorithm always delivers the same output. The tool transforms one intact template consecutively onto each fractured specimen by linear least square optimization, detects the fragment edges in the template and then superimposes them to generate a fracture probability heat map. We hypothesized that the algorithm runs faster than the manual evaluation and with low (< 5 mm) deviation. We tested the hypothesis in 10 fractured proximal humeri and found that it performs with good accuracy (2.5 mm ± 2.4 mm averaged Euclidean distance) and speed (23 times faster). When applied to a distal humerus, a tibia plateau, and a scaphoid fracture, the run times were low (1-2 min), and the detected edges correct by visual judgement. In the geometrically complex acetabulum, at a run time of 78 min some outliers were considered acceptable. An automatically generated fracture probability heat map based on 50 proximal humerus fractures matches the areas of high risk of fracture reported in medical literature. Such automation of the fracture analysis method is advantageous and could be extended to reduce the manual effort even further.

Proximal humeral fractures treated with a low-profile plate with enhanced fixation properties

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of proximal humeral fractures treated with a new generation plating system and compare results with a meta-analysis of recent literature.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2017, 93 patients (18 males, 75 females) with proximal humerus fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using a Pantera® Plate. These low-profile plates are anatomically shaped and include "cross-elements" that form a three-dimensional scaffold in bone to enhance fixation stability. According to Neer classification, there were 24 two-part fractures, 49 three-part fractures and 20 four-part fractures (4 with dislocated heads). X-rays and Constant Shoulder Scores (CSS) were used to evaluate healing, complications, and clinical outcomes. Results were compared with a meta-analysis of similar studies reported in literature over the last 10 years.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years had a mean CSS of 72 (53-90) graded as excellent for 23 patients (28%), good for 35 (42%), fair for 14 (17%), and poor for 11 (13%). Fractures healed without complication in 75 (91%) patients. Eight (9%) complications were observed, i.e., three avascular necrosis of the humeral head, one case of implant loosening, two cases of subacromial impingement and two superficial infections. There was no significant correlation between Neer fracture stage and patient outcome (p = 0.257). Compared to the literature, this method had a lower complication grade (p = 0.03), though it did not significantly differ in its clinical outcomes (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

The investigated plating system includes design features that can potentially increase utility for ORIF of proximal humeral fractures. While the complication profile was signficantly less than reported in the literature for standard proximal humerus plates, clinical outcomes were similar. Further studies will be required to better understand the role of plate design on treatment of these challenging fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, therapeutic study.

Fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus treated with open reduction and internal fixation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The treatment of proximal humerus fracture dislocations can be challenging given the extensive injury to the proximal humeral anatomy and increased risk of devascularization of the humeral head often seen in these injuries. The purpose of this study is to undertake a systematic review of the literature on the functional outcomes, rate of revision, and short- and long-term complications for proximal humerus fracture dislocations treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

The PubMed and OVID Embase databases were queried for literature reporting on proximal humerus fracture dislocations treated with ORIF. Data including study design, patient demographics, functional outcomes, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Twelve studies including 294 patients with Neer type 2-, 3-, or 4-part proximal humerus fracture dislocations met the criteria for inclusion. The mean patient age was 53.4 years (19-89 years) with an average follow-up of 2.9 years (1.15-4.9 years). At the final follow-up, the mean Constant score was 73.2 (52-87.3) and the mean Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score was 26.6 (17.5-32). Avascular necrosis was observed in 20.0% (0%-82.3%) and nonunion was observed in 3.0% (0%-7.7%) of patients. Conversion to arthroplasty was observed in 10.7% (5%-20%) and a total reoperation was observed in 35.6% (11.8%-89.1%) of patients in studies explicitly reporting these outcomes. In addition to conversion to arthroplasty, common causes of reoperation were revision ORIF (5.2%) and hardware removal (22.2%).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing ORIF for proximal humerus fracture dislocations have reasonable functional outcomes but relatively high avascular necrosis and reoperation rates. This information can be used to counsel patients and set expectations about the potential for further surgeries.

Comparison of the Neer classification to the 2018 update of the Orthopedic Trauma Association/AO fracture classification for classifying proximal humerus fractures

Background

The classification of fractures is necessary to ensure a reliable means of communication for clinical interaction, education and research. The Neer classification is the most commonly used classification for proximal humerus fractures. In 2018 the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) and the AO Foundation provided an update to the OTA/AO Fracture Classification Scheme addressing many of the concerns about the previous versions of the classification. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the rater reliability of the 2 classifications and if the classifications subjectively better characterized the fracture patterns.

Methods

X-rays and CT scans of 24 proximal humerus fractures were given to 7 independent raters for classification according to the Neer and 2018 OTA/AO classification. Both full-forms and short-forms of the classifications were tested. The Fleiss Kappa statistic was used to assess inter-rater agreement and intra-rater consistency for the 2 classifications. For each case the raters subjectively commented on how well each classification was able to characterize the fracture pattern.

Results

All raters graded the 2018 OTA/AO classification as good as or better than the Neer classification for an adequate description of the fracture patterns. The short-form 2018 OTA/AO classification had the most 4 rater and 5 rater agreement cases and the second most 6 rater agreement cases. The short-form Neer classification had the second most 4 rater and 5 rater agreement cases and the most 6 rater agreement cases. The full 2018 OTA/AO had the least 4, 5, or 6 rater agreement cases of all the classification systems. Inter-rater agreement was fair for the full and short form of both the Neer and 2018 OTA/AO classification. The full and short Neer classifications together with the short 2018 OTA/AO classification had moderate intra-rater consistency, while the full 2018 OTA/AO classification only had slight intra-rater consistency.

Conclusions

The 2018 OTA/AO classification is equivalent in its short-form to the Neer classification in inter-rater reliability and intra-rater consistency; and is superior in its full form for characterizing specific fracture types. The low inter-rater reliability of the full 2018 OTA/AO classification is a concern that may need to be addressed in the future.

Specific Radiologic Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head after Interlocking Nailing with the Targon PH+ of Proximal Humeral Fractures in a Middle to Old Population

Background: Operative management of proximal humeral fractures is still challenging. While antegrade nailing has become a valid option in fracture fixation, risk factors for adverse events, and failure have not been sufficiently clarified. Methods: All patients of a single trauma center undergoing surgery for proximal humeral fractures with the Targon PH+ nail between 2014 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. This included complications, revisions, and failures. Pre- and postoperative radiographic imaging were assessed regarding fracture’s complexity, anatomic reduction, reconstruction of the medial hinge, metaphyseal head extension, and fixation of the implant in the calcar region. Follow-up was at a minimum of 12 months. Results: A total number of 130 patients with a mean age of 74.5 years (range 63−94, SD ± 8.2) are included in this study. Two- and three-part fractures were found in 58 patients, while 14 patients showed four-part fractures. Overall, a complication rate of 34.2% and an implant failure rate of 15.4% was found. Four-part fractures showed a significantly higher complication rate than two- and three-part fractures. Four-part fractures also showed significantly higher revisions (p = 0.005) and implant failures (p = 0.008). The nonsufficient anatomical reduction was found to be a risk factor for complications (p < 0.0001), implant failures (p < 0.0001), and later humeral head osteonecrosis (p < 0.0001). Insufficiently reconstructed medial hinges (p = 0.002) and a metaphyseal head extension of under 8 mm (p = 0.005) were also demonstrated as risk factors for osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Conclusions: Four-part fractures in an elderly population show high complication, revision, and implant-failure rates. Therefore, demonstrated radiologic risk factors should be evaluated for improvements. Anatomical reduction and fixation near the calcar proved to be vital for successful antegrade nailing of complex fractures. To prevent osteonecrosis of the humeral head, reconstruction of the medial hinge and metaphyseal head extension should be evaluated.

PHILOS Synthesis for Proximal Humerus Fractures Has High Complications and Reintervention Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: The aim of this study was to quantify the rate of complications and reinterventions in patients treated with PHILOS plate for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) synthesis. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed on the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to 7 October 2021. Studies describing medium and long-term complications in PHF synthesis using the PHILOS plate were included. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on complications and causes of reinterventions. Assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence was performed with the Downs and Black’s “Checklist for Measuring Quality”. Results: Seventy-six studies including 4200 patients met the inclusion criteria. The complication rate was 23.8%, and the main cause was screw cut-out (4.1%), followed by avascular necrosis (AVN) (3.1%) and subacromial impingement (1.5%). In patients over 55 years, the complication rate was 29.5%. In the deltopectoral (DP) approach the complication rate was 23.8%, and in the delto-split (DS) it was 17.5%, but no difference between the two approaches was seen when considering the type of fracture. The overall reintervention rate was 10.5% in the overall population and 19.0% in older patients. Conclusions: Proximal humerus synthesis with a PHILOS plate has high complications and reintervention rates. The most frequent complication was screw cut-out, followed by humeral head AVN and subacromial impingement. These results need to be further investigated to better understand both the type of patient and fracture that is more at risk of complications and reintervention and to compare pros and cons of the PHILOS plate with respect to the other solutions to manage PHFs.

Altered Glenohumeral Biomechanics in Proximal Humeral Fracture Malunion

INTRODUCTION

There is little biomechanical evidence to support the traditional guideline that 45° represents acceptable proximal humerus deformity. We evaluated glenohumeral contact pressure (GP) and area, subacromial contact pressure, and joint abduction to assess biomechanical changes with different proximal humerus deformities.

METHODS

Fifteen fresh-frozen cadaver shoulders were used. Intact specimens were tested on a custom dynamic shoulder frame. Subsequently, a surgical neck fracture was made in each specimen and fixed using a custom dual hinge plate for fixation of 15°, 30°, and 45° deformities in varus, valgus, antecurvatum, retrocurvatum, and combined varus-antecurvatum and valgus-retrocurvatum. Specimens were then retested.

RESULTS

Compared with the intact state, GP was markedly lower with all levels of varus and varus-antecurvatum deformity. Valgus and combined valgus-retrocurvatum deformity of 45° led to notable increases in GP compared with the intact state. Varus deformities of 30° and 45° caused significant increases in subacromial pressures and limited abduction markedly from 60° to 54.2° and 44.6° (P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Varus and antecurvatum proximal humerus deformities as small as 15° were associated with notable alterations in glenohumeral joint mechanics. With valgus and retrocurvatum deformity, statistically significant joint alterations occurred only at higher deformity levels.

Management of Posttraumatic Avascular Necrosis of the Proximal Humerus

The etiology of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the proximal humerus can be classified as idiopathic or posttraumatic, the latter being mainly due to proximal humerus fractures. Evidence suggests that posttraumatic AVN may require surgical intervention more often than idiopathic AVN of the proximal humerus. This article provides a comprehensive review of the management of posttraumatic AVN of the proximal humerus. Early stage AVN (stages 1 to 3) is commonly treated with nonoperative intervention or core decompression of the humeral head, whereas later stage disease (stages 4 and 5) may require hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty to restore function. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(6):367-375.].

Incidence of avascular necrosis following biceps tenodesis during proximal humerus open reduction and internal fixation

Avascular necrosis (AVN) may occur in up to 77% of proximal humeral fractures and can cause fixation failure. Risk factors include fracture position, calcar length and medial hinge integrity. We routinely perform intra-articular biceps tenotomy with tenodesis at the level of pectoralis major to facilitate fragment identification and potentially ameliorate post-operative pain relief. Concern exists that tenotomising the biceps damages the adjacent arcuate artery, potentially increasing the rate of AVN. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether biceps tenodesis is associated with an increased risk of radiographically evident humeral head AVN. 61 fractures surgically treated over a 52-month period were retrospectively reviewed and radiographically assessed in accordance with Neer’s classification, calcar-length and medial hinge integrity. 40, 20 and 1 were four-, three- and two-part fractures respectively. 37 had a calcar-length less than 8mm and 26 suffered loss of the medial hinge. The median radiographic follow-up was 23 months. There was radiographic evidence of humeral head AVN in only one case, comparing favourably to rates quoted in current literature. In our experience, intra-articular biceps tenotomy with the deltopectoral approach was thus not associated with a significantly increased risk of humeral head AVN, even in complex four-part fractures.

Outcomes of plate osteosynthesis for displaced 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures with deltopectoral vs. deltoid split approach

PURPOSE

Three part and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus offer challenges in reduction and plate fixation, with considerable debate about use of Deltoid splitting (DS) and Delto-pectoral (DP) approaches, especially when they involving the greater tuberosity. We prospectively compared the results using DS approach and DP approach in these cases, with special focus on functional outcomes, complications, and ease of tuberosity reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

84 patients with three- and four-part proximal humerus fracture were alternately allocated the DP approach or DS approach for proximal humerus locking plate fixation. The outcome analysis was done by evaluating relative Constant score and ease of surgical reduction of greater tuberosity; radiological malunion was evaluated using Beredjiklian classification and complications were noted.

RESULTS

At mean follow-up of 23 months (19-48 months), the mean 'relative Constant score was 74.27 ± 8.19 in the DP group and 73.26 ± 8.02 in the DS group and the difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.988). There was no significant difference with respect to shoulder ROM, abductor strength, radiological malunion or complications. However, the mean surgical time was significantly less (p value = 0.042) in DS group (65 ± 5 min) in comparison to DP group (92 ± 4.3 min); significantly less difficulties were documented by the surgeon in reducing the greater tuberosity in DS group(p value = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Although surgical time was reduced and greater tuberosity reduction was easier in DS group, the other outcomes were similar; either surgical approach can be used based, and can be based on the experience and comfort level of the surgeon.

Implant Selection for Proximal Humerus Fractures

Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are a common orthopedic injury; however, their treatment remains largely controversial with evidence supporting a wide array of treatments. Although many injuries can be treated nonoperatively, there has been much debate about surgical management of PHF. A detailed review of the literature was performed relative to operative management options specifically related to implant choices. Although no definitive answers are available regarding best practice, there is literature to guide operative decision-making and implant selection based on both patient- and surgeon-specific factors.

DIPHOS® nail for proximal humeral fractures: our experience with more than 190 procedures and surgical tips

AIM

evaluate the outcome of proximal  humeral nailing over 5 years follow-up, focusing  on possible complications. Secondary endpoint is the description and analysis of some technical notes to simplify surgical procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

the cohort is composed by 194 fractures fixed with short nail. Neer Classification was used to assess the type of fracture; Deltoid Tuberosity Index (DTI) was applied to verify local bone quality. Follow-up with X-rays and orthopaedic evaluation was conducted on every operated subject.

RESULTS

mean follow up of the study was 25.4 months. We registered an average CMS score of 84.66 points for 2-parts fractures, 79.05 points for 3-part fractures and 68.62 points for 4-parts fractures. We obtained radiographical healing in 95.9% of patients (186/194) after 2.7 months on average. We recorded "very good" / "good" results in 90.3% of 2-parts fractures, 88.5% of 3-parts fractures and 46.2% of 4-part fractures. Overall complication rate was 10.3% (20/194 nails).  Second surgery was performed in 8.2% (16/194) of cases.

CONCLUSION

intramedullary nailing is an effective treatment for 2 and 3-part fractures with relatively low incidence of complications, small surgical accesses and short surgical time. Future researches are necessary to analyze the results related to nailing in 4-fragment fractures, still uncertain and influenced by multiple factors. The presence of the intramedullary nail reduces the lever arm of the screws making the osteosynthesis more reliable. Modern nails guarantee angular stability for proximal cancellous screws and allows 1 or 2 screws at calcar level to get a valid medial support.

Pre-operative Hypoalbuminemia Is Associated with Complications Following Proximal Humerus Fracture Surgery: An Analysis of 919 Patients

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures are among the most common presenting fractures to orthopedic surgeons in the USA. Hypoalbuminemia is accepted as a nutrition marker associated with post-operative complications following common orthopedic interventions.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Thus, the authors sought to (1) describe the national demographic trends of patients undergoing surgical fixation for proximal humerus fracture and (2) investigate the association between pre-operative hypoalbuminemia, a malnutrition marker, and post-operative complications within 1 year of surgical intervention.

METHODS

The PearlDiver Humana Claims Database was queried to identify a nationally representative cohort of patients who underwent surgical intervention for proximal humerus fractures from 2008 to 2015. Demographic and comorbid characteristics were collected. Pearson's χ-squared analysis was used to compare rates of 90-day and 1-year outcomes between hypoalbuminemia (albumin ≤ 3.5 mg/dL) and control groups. Multivariate logistic regression was then used to determine the isolated effect that hypoalbuminemia had on post-operative outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 3337 patients identified, 919 (27.5%) had available serum albumin data. Seventy (7.6%) patients had hypoalbuminemia. Hypoalbuminemia was more likely to be associated with post-operative sepsis (7.1% vs. 1.5%, respectively) and pneumonia (15.7% vs. 4.6) compared with controls. Additionally, hypoalbuminemia was associated with increased 90-day rates of discharge to extended care (4.3% vs. 0.8), emergency room visits (38.6% vs. 21.7), and total cost ($24,051.96 ± 24,972.74 vs. $15,429.74 ± 24,492.30).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests hypoalbuminemia is associated with an increased risk of complications, specifically pneumonia and sepsis, and total health care costs in patients undergoing surgery for proximal humerus fractures. These findings provide insight for individualized patient care that will aid in evaluating the potential risk of surgical complications in an effort to improve outcomes and reduce costs.

Three-dimensional models increase the interobserver agreement for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures

Background

The agreement for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures is low. Interpretation of exams used for diagnosis can be directly associated with this limitation. This study proposes to compare the agreement between experts and residents in orthopedics for treatment indication of proximal humerus fractures, utilizing 3D-models, holography (augmented reality), x-rays, and tomography as diagnostic methods.

Methods

Twenty orthopedists (ten experts in shoulder and elbow surgery and ten experts in traumatology) and thirty resident physicians in orthopedics evaluated nine fractures of the proximal humerus, randomly distributed as x-rays, tomography, 3D-models and holography, using the Neer and AO / OTA Classifications. After, we evaluated the interobserver agreement between treatment options (conservative, osteosynthesis and arthroplasty) and whether the experience of the evaluators interfered with the results.

Results

The interobserver agreement analysis showed the following kappa-values: κ = 0.362 and κ = 0.306 for experts and residents (3D-models); κ = 0.240 and κ = 0.221 (X-ray); κ = 0.233 and κ = 0.123 (Tomography) and κ = 0.321 and κ = 0.160 (Holography), for experts and residents respectively. Moreover, residents and specialists were discordant in the treatment indication using Tomography as a diagnostic method (p = 0.003). The same was not seen for the other diagnostic methods (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Three-dimensional models showed, overall, the highest interobserver agreement (experts versus residents in orthopedics) for the choice of treatment of proximal humerus fractures compared to X-ray, Tomography, and Holography. Agreement in the choice of treatment among experts that used Tomography and Holography as diagnostic methods were two times higher compared to residents.

Trial registration

Registered in Brazil Platform under no. CAAE 12273519.7.0000.5505.

Acute surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: ORIF vs. hemiarthroplasty vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fracture treatment varies by surgeon preference and patient factors. This study compares patient and fracture characteristics, with outcomes between current surgical treatment options.

METHODS

Between 1999 and 2018, 425 proximal humerus fractures underwent acute surgical management: open reduction internal fixation (ORIF, n = 211), hemiarthroplasty (HA, n = 108), or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA, n = 106). Patient and fracture characteristics included age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA), and fracture classification. Postoperative motion at 3, 6, and minimum 12 months (avg 20 ± 21 months), radiographic outcomes, and postoperative falls were analyzed.

RESULTS

Average age for treatment groups was 65 ± 13 years (range: 18-93 years). Fractures were classified as 2- (11%), 3- (41%), or 4-part (48%). Age, ASA, and fracture classification were associated with selected surgical management (P < .0001, =.001, <.0001, respectively). Outcomes showed a significant improvement in forward flexion from 3 months to 6 months in all groups (P < .0001). No difference in final motion was seen between groups. Radiographic union was higher in ORIF (89%), and similar between HA (79%) and RSA (77%, P = .005). Rate of reoperation was RSA 6.6%, ORIF 17.5%, and hemiarthroplasty 15.7% (P = .029). Postoperatively, 23% patients had at least 1 fall, of which 73% resulted in fractures.

CONCLUSION

Older patients with high ASA were treated with arthroplasty, and younger patients with lower ASA were treated with ORIF. All groups showed improvements in motion. At minimum 1 year of follow-up, there was no difference in motion between groups. ORIF and HA showed significantly more reoperations compared with RSA. Patients should be counseled about reoperation, fall risk, and prevention.

Proximal Humerus Fractures: Reliability of Neer Versus AO Classification on Plain Radiographs and Computed Tomography

Introduction: Several classifications for proximal humeral fractures exist, with excellent reliability and reproducibility of such classifications being a desirable feature. Despite their widespread use, these systems are variable in both reliability and accuracy. We aimed to, a) assess and compare the reliability of the Neer (complete and abbreviated versions) and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragenbeing (AO) classifications, and b) identify if computed tomography (CT) made any difference to the reliability of Neer and AO classifications when compared to plain radiographs alone. 

Materials and methods: This is a single-centre retrospective study identifying all proximal humeral fractures presenting between February 2016 and February 2017 as a result of trauma that subsequently proceeded to CT. Two specialty orthopaedic trainees analysed the plain radiographs as well as CT images over two rounds, spaced two weeks apart. The Neer 16-grade, abbreviated Neer 6-grade and AO classifications were used. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of each classification system was assessed using the Kappa coefficient. 

Results: Twenty-two patients were included. The mean age was 62 years (SD 14.5). Management changed in 9/22 patients based on CT. Computed tomography changed Neer-16 type in 16% observations, Neer-6 in 10%, and AO in 23%. This was significant when comparing Neer-6 and AO classifications (p = 0.04). Neer-6 had the best inter-observer reliability (0.737) with the management of one patient changing after CT. On X-ray and CT, intra-observer agreement was substantial, >0.7, using Neer-16 and Neer-6 (p<0.005). Inter-observer agreement for Neer-16 and Neer-6 was substantial, >0.7 (p<0.005). In comparison, intra- and inter-observer agreements for AO were lower on X-ray and CT, 0.4-0.6, (p<0.005).

Conclusion: Our study shows that simplicity is key with a high degree of reliability in the abbreviated Neer classification. Computed tomography allowed greater reliability than radiographs in classifying fractures, affecting management decisions in 41% of patients. The comprehensive Neer classification showed similar intra- and inter-observer reliabilities to AO.

Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems

BACKGROUND

The classification systems for proximal humeral fractures routinely used in clinical practice include the Neer and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 2007 systems. Currently used systems have low inter- and intraobserver reliability. In 2018, AO/OTA introduced a new classification system with the aim of simplifying the coding process, in which the Neer four-part classification was integrated into the fracture description. The aim of the present work is to assess the inter- and intraobserver agreement of the new AO/OTA 2018 compared with the Neer and AO/OTA 2007 classifications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 116 radiographs of consecutive patients with proximal humeral fracture were selected and classified by three observers with different levels of experience. All three observers independently reviewed and classified the images according to the Neer, AO/OTA 2007, and new AO/OTA 2018 systems. To determine the intraobserver agreement, the observers reviewed the same set of radiographs after an interval of 8 weeks. The inter- and intraobserver agreement were determined through Cohen's kappa coefficient analysis.

RESULTS

The new AO/OTA 2018 classification showed substantial mean inter- (k = 0.67) and intraobserver (k = 0.75) agreement. These results are similar to the reliability observed for the Neer classification (interobserver, k = 0.67; intraobserver, k = 0.85) but better than those found for the AO/OTA 2007 system, which showed only moderate inter- (k = 0.57) and intraobserver (k = 0.58) agreement. The two more experienced observers showed better overall agreement, but no statistically significant difference was found. No differences were found between surgical experience and agreement regarding specific fracture types or groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that the Neer system still represents the more reliable and reproducible classification. However, the new AO/OTA 2018 classification improved the agreement among observers compared with the AO/OTA 2007 system, while still maintaining substantial descriptive power and simplifying the coding process. The universal modifiers and qualifications, despite their possible complexity, allowed a more comprehensive fracture definition without negatively affecting the reliability or reproducibility of the classification system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic studies.

Imaging to improve agreement for proximal humeral fracture classification in adult patient: A systematic review of quantitative studies

Proximal humeral fracture classification has low reproducibility. Many studies have tried to increase inter- and intra-observer agreement with more sophisticated imaging. The aim of this review was to determine which imaging modality produces the best inter- and intra-observer agreement for proximal humeral fracture classification in adults and to determine if this varies with observer experience or fracture complexity. OvidMEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EBSCO CINAHL and Elsevier Scopus were searched on July 22nd, 2018. Quantitative studies comparing at least two imaging modalities for inter- or intra-observer agreement of proximal humeral fracture classification in adults were eligible for inclusion in this systematic literature review. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Study quality was appraised using a modified Downs and Black checklist. The search strategy identified 1987 studies, of which 15 met the eligibility criteria. All included studies addressed inter-observer agreement and 8 provided results for intra-observer agreement. A narrative synthesis was performed. Trends were compared between studies as clinical heterogeneity and the statistical measures used by included studies prevented meta-analysis. Inter- and intra-observer agreement was found to increase from radiographs (x-ray) to two-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) to three-dimensional (3D) CT. 2D and 3D CT may improve inter-observer agreement to a greater extent in less experienced observers and in more complex fractures. Future studies should compare 2D and 3D CT with subgroups categorising surgeon experience and fracture complexity. X-ray should be used for initial assessment; however doctors should have a low threshold for ordering CT. PROSPERO number: CRD42018094307.

INTER/INTRA-OBSERVER EVALUATION BETWEEN RADIOGRAPHS AND TOMOGRAPHIES FOR PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURE

OBJECTIVE

The use of images in 3D reconstruction is an instrument that facilitates the interpretation of the fracture, observations of deviations, rotations and articular surface.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the Neer x AO proximal humerus fracture classification on radiographs versus computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstruction (3D).

METHODS

We evaluated the digital radiographs (anteroposterior and profile) and computerized tomography with 3D reconstruction of patients presenting with a proximal humerus fracture, surgically treated at an Orthopedics and Traumatology Service. All radiographs and computed tomography were classified (Neer and AO) by eight (8) orthopedic surgeons, specialists in the upper limb and sent, following the pre-established numeration by the author, in a spreadsheet to the author of the study.

RESULTS

The Neer and AO scores were more reproducible when determined by computed tomography with 3D reconstruction, mainly in fractures of greater complexity (Neer 4 parts and AO group C). However, in absolute values, inter and intra-observer reproducibility and concordance still remain low.

CONCLUSION

Computed tomography with 3D reconstruction allows a better analysis of fractures of group C and Neer 4 parts. However, the inter and intra-observer agreement does not increase significantly in comparison to the radiographs. Level of evidence III, Study of non-consecutive patients, without gold standard, applied uniformly.

What Are the Applications and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence for Fracture Detection and Classification in Orthopaedic Trauma Imaging? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Artificial-intelligence algorithms derive rules and patterns from large amounts of data to calculate the probabilities of various outcomes using new sets of similar data. In medicine, artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied primarily to image-recognition diagnostic tasks and evaluating the probabilities of particular outcomes after treatment. However, the performance and limitations of AI in the automated detection and classification of fractures has not been examined comprehensively.

QUESTION/PURPOSES

In this systematic review, we asked (1) What is the proportion of correctly detected or classified fractures and the area under the receiving operating characteristic (AUC) curve of AI fracture detection and classification models? (2) What is the performance of AI in this setting compared with the performance of human examiners?

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from the start of each respective database until September 6, 2018, using terms related to "fracture", "artificial intelligence", and "detection, prediction, or evaluation." Of 1221 identified studies, we retained 10 studies: eight studies involved fracture detection (ankle, hand, hip, spine, wrist, and ulna), one addressed fracture classification (diaphyseal femur), and one addressed both fracture detection and classification (proximal humerus). We registered the review before data collection (PROSPERO: CRD42018110167) and used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). We reported the range of the accuracy and AUC for the performance of the predicted fracture detection and/or classification task. An AUC of 1.0 would indicate perfect prediction, whereas 0.5 would indicate a prediction is no better than a flip-of-a-coin. We conducted quality assessment using a seven-item checklist based on a modified methodologic index for nonrandomized studies instrument (MINORS).

RESULTS

For fracture detection, the AUC in five studies reflected near perfect prediction (range, 0.95-1.0), and the accuracy in seven studies ranged from 83% to 98%. For fracture classification, the AUC was 0.94 in one study, and the accuracy in two studies ranged from 77% to 90%. In two studies AI outperformed human examiners for detecting and classifying hip and proximal humerus fractures, and one study showed equivalent performance for detecting wrist, hand and ankle fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary experience with fracture detection and classification using AI shows promising performance. AI may enhance processing and communicating probabilistic tasks in medicine, including orthopaedic surgery. At present, inadequate reference standard assignments to train and test AI is the biggest hurdle before integration into clinical workflow. The next step will be to apply AI to more challenging diagnostic and therapeutic scenarios when there is absence of certitude. Future studies should also seek to address legal regulation and better determine feasibility of implementation in clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study.

Can patient and fracture factors predict opioid dependence following upper extremity fractures?: a retrospective review

BACKGROUND

Since the early 1990s, opioids have been used as a mainstay for pain management surrounding fracture injuries. As opioid dependence has become a major public health issue, it is important to understand what factors can leave patients vulnerable. The purpose of this study was to examine what risk factors, patient or injury severity, contribute most to postoperative opioid dependence following surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs).

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent an open reduction and internal fixation of PHF was performed within a large multisite hospital system. Recorded variables included age, gender, ASA class, BMI, fracture type, time to surgery, pre- and postoperative opioid prescriptions, physical and psychological comorbidities, smoking status, and complications. Pre- and postoperative opioid dependence was defined as prescription opioid use in the 3 months leading up to or following surgery. Odds ratio calculations were performed for each variable, and a multivariate logistic regression was used to compare all predictors.

RESULTS

A total of 198 surgically treated PHFs were included in the cohort with an average age of 59.9 years. Thirty-nine cases were determined to be preoperatively opioid dependent while 159 cases were preoperatively opioid naïve. Preoperative opioid dependence was found to be a significant risk factor for postoperative narcotic dependence, carrying a 2.42 times increased risk. (CI 1.07-5.48, p = 0.034). Fracture type was also found to be a risk factor for postoperative dependence, with complex 3- and 4-part fracture patients being 1.93 times more likely to be opioid dependent postoperatively compared to 2 part fractures (CI 1.010-3.764, p = 0.049). All other factors were not found to have any significant influence on postoperative opioid dependence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that the most important risk factors of postoperative opioid dependence following proximal humerus fractures are preoperative dependence and fracture complexity. It is important for orthopedic surgeons to ensure that patients who have more complex fractures or are preoperatively opioid dependent receive adequate education on their increased risk and support to wean off of opioids following surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The impact of surgeon and patient treatment preferences in an orthopaedic trauma surgery trial

Background

Surgeon and patient treatment preferences are important threats to the internal and external validity of surgical trials such as PROFHER, which compared surgical versus non-surgical treatment for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus in adults. We explored the treatment preferences expressed by surgeons and patients in the trial and how these impacted on patient selection, trial conduct and patient outcome.

Methods

A series of exploratory secondary analyses of the PROFHER trial data were undertaken. We reviewed the extent of surgeon and patient treatment preferences (surgery or not surgery) at screening (n = 1250) as well as prior preference (including no preference) of randomised patients (n = 250), and assessed their impact on recruitment and adherence to follow-up and rehabilitation. Changes in treatment after 2 years’ follow-up were explored. Patient preference and characteristics associated with trial inclusion or treatment preference (t test, chi-squared test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) were included as treatment interaction terms in the primary trial analysis of shoulder functioning (Oxford Shoulder Score, OSS).

Results

Surgeons excluded 17% of otherwise eligible patients based on lack of equipoise; these patients had less complex fractures (p < 0.001) and tended to be older (p = 0.062). Surgeons were more likely to recommend surgery for patients under 65 years of age (p = 0.059) and who had injured their right shoulder (p = 0.052). Over half of eligible patients (56%) did not consent to take part in the trial; these patients tended to be older (p = 0.022), with a preference for not surgery (74%; which was associated with older age, p = 0.039). There were no differential treatment effects (p value of interaction) for shoulder functioning (OSS) based on subgroups of patient preference (p = 0.751), age group (p = 0.264), fracture type (p = 0.954) and shoulder dominance (p = 0.850). Patients who were randomised to their preferred treatment had better follow-up rates (94 vs 84% at 2 years) and treatment adherence (90 vs 83% reported completing home exercises). Patients who were not randomised to their preferred treatment were more likely to change their treatment preference at 24 months (60 vs 26%).

Conclusions

The robustness of the PROFHER trial findings was confirmed against possible bias introduced by surgeon and patient preferences. The importance of collecting preference data is highlighted.

Trial registration

ISRCTN50850043. Registered on 25 March 2008.

Inter-observer reliability of alternative diagnostic methods for proximal humerus fractures: a comparison between attending surgeons and orthopedic residents in training

Background

Proximal humerus fractures are frequent, and several studies show low diagnostic agreement among the observers, as well as an inaccurate classification of these lesions. The divergences are generally correlated with the experience of the surgeons as well as the diagnostic methods used. This paper challenges these problems including alternative diagnostic methods such as 3D models and augmented reality (holography) and including the observers’ period of medical experience as a factor.

Methods

Twenty orthopedists (ten experts in shoulder surgery and ten experts in traumatology) and thirty resident physicians in orthopedics classified nine proximal humerus fractures randomly distributed as x-ray, tomographies, 3D models and holography, using AO/ASIF and Neer’s classification. In the end, we evaluated the intra- and inter-observer agreement between diagnostic methods and whether the experience of the observers interfered in the evaluations and the classifications used.

Results

We found overall kappa coefficients ranging from 0.241 (fair) to 0.624 (substantial) between the two classifications (AO / ASIF and Neer), concerning the diagnostic methods used. We identified image modality differences (p = 0.017), where 3D models presented an average kappa coefficient value superior to that of tomographies. There were no differences between kappa scores for x-ray and holography compared to the others. The kappa scores for AO / ASIF classification and Neer classification and subdivided by observer period of experience showed no differences concerning the diagnostic method used.

Conclusions

3D models can substantially improve diagnostic agreement for proximal humerus fractures evaluation among experts or resident physicians. The holography showed good agreement between the experts and can be a similar option to x-ray and tomography in the evaluation and classification of these fractures. The observers’ period of experience did not improve the diagnostic agreement between the image modalities studied.

Trial registration

Registered in the Brazil Platform under no. CAAE 88912318.1.0000.5487.

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of recategorized Neer classification in differentiating 2-part surgical neck fractures from multi-fragmented proximal humeral fractures in 116 patients

BACKGROUND

Optimal fracture classification should be simple and reproducible and should guide treatment. For proximal humeral fractures, the Neer classification is commonly used. However, intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Neer classification has been shown to be poor. In clinical practice, it is essential to differentiate 2-part surgical neck fractures from multi-fragmented fractures. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether surgeons can differentiate 2-part surgical neck fractures from multi-fragmented fractures using plain radiographs and/or computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Three experienced upper limb specialists and trauma surgeons (B.O.S., A.P.L., and V.L.) independently reviewed and classified blinded plain radiographs and CT scans of 116 patients as showing 2-part surgical neck fractures or multi-fragmented fractures. Each imaging modality was reviewed and classified separately by each surgeon, after which each surgeon reviewed both modalities at the same time. This process was repeated by all surgeons after 24 weeks. Intraobserver and interobserver analyses were conducted using Cohen and Fleiss κ values, respectively.

RESULTS

The κ coefficient for interobserver reliability showed substantial correlation (0.61-0.73) and was as follows: 0.73 for radiographs alone, 0.61 for CT scans alone, and 0.72 for radiographs and CT scans viewed together. After 24 weeks, the process was repeated and intraobserver reliability was calculated.The κ coefficient for intraobserver reliability showed substantial correlation (0.62-0.75) and was as follows: 0.62 for radiographs alone, 0.64 for CT scans alone, and 0.75 for radiographs and CT scans viewed together.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians were able to differentiate 2-part surgical neck fractures from multi-fragmented fractures based on plain radiographs reliably.

Standing Tall on Their Shoulders: Essential Eponyms in Shoulder Surgery

There has been enormous advancement in the field of shoulder surgery since its initial establishment as a subspecialty. This is due in large part to the numerous contributions made by clinicians who came before us. This review of eponyms in shoulder surgery provides the opportunity to honor our predecessors and their contributions as well as promote the correct use of eponyms going forward.

Operative versus nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and comparison of observational studies and randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the choice of treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures in older patients (aged > 65 years). The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were (1) to compare operative with nonoperative management of displaced proximal humeral fractures and (2) to compare effect estimates obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.

METHODS

The databases of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched on September 5, 2017, for studies comparing operative versus nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures; both RCTs and observational studies were included. The criteria of the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies, a validated instrument for methodologic quality assessment, were used to assess study quality. The primary outcome measure was physical function as measured by the absolute Constant-Murley score after operative or nonoperative treatment. Secondary outcome measures were major reinterventions, nonunion, and avascular necrosis.

RESULTS

We included 22 studies, comprising 7 RCTs and 15 observational studies, resulting in 1743 patients in total: 910 treated operatively and 833 nonoperatively. The average age was 68.3 years, and 75% of patients were women. There was no difference in functional outcome between operative and nonoperative treatment, with a mean difference of -0.87 (95% confidence interval, -5.13 to 3.38; P = .69; I² = 69%). Major reinterventions occurred more often in the operative group. Pooled effects of RCTs were similar to pooled effects of observational studies for all outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend nonoperative treatment for the average elderly patient (aged > 65 years) with a displaced proximal humeral fracture. Pooled effects of observational studies were similar to those of RCTs, and including observational studies led to more generalizable conclusions.

Titanium mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures for the treatment of humeral greater tuberosity fracture osteosynthesis versus PHILOS: a retrospective view

PURPOSE

Greater tuberosity fractures (GTFs) account for 17 to 21% of proximal humerus fractures, most of these fractures are treated conservatively, but treatment for displaced fractures is still controversial. The aim of this study is to compare intra-operative clinical conditions and post-operative outcomes when displaced GTFs are treated with either proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) or mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study conducted in Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital. A total of 60 patients (22 males and 38 females) with displaced humeral GTF between May 2013 and March 2017 were included, of whom 43 underwent PHILOS implant treatment and 17 underwent titanium mini plate implant with trans-osseous suture treatment. Intra-operative (incision size, intra-operative blood loss, operative duration) and postoperative (Constant-Murley score (CMS) and implant cost) variables were recorded for the comparison.

RESULTS

Mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures shows better results. Operative duration (PHILOS mean 77.0 minutes vs mean 63.7 minutes, p value < 0.05), blood loss during surgery (PHILOS mean 111.5 vs 66.5 ml, p value < 0.05), incision size (PHILOS mean 7.2 vs 4.6 cm, p value < 0.05), CMS (PHILOS mean 81.0 vs 87.3, p value < 0.05), and implant costs (PHILOS mean 26,192.6 renminbi (RMB) vs mean 21,358.8 RMB, p value < 0.05). On the other hand, 9.30% of impingement in the PHILOS group was observed to have no complications compared to the mini locking plate group.

CONCLUSIONS

Mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures shows better efficacy in reducing the incision size, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and implant cost and in improving CMS. No complication was found with its use. Our data can provide rationale and inform sample- size calculations for such studies. Larger, control studies are needed for better understanding.

Proximal Humerus Fractures: Evaluation and Management in the Elderly Patient

Introduction:

Proximal humerus fractures are common in the elderly. The evaluation and management of these injuries is often controversial. The purpose of this study is to review recent evidence and provide updated recommendations for treating proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.

Methods:

A literature review of peer-reviewed publications related to the evaluation and management of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly was performed. There was a focus on randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews published within the last 5 years.

Results:

The incidence of proximal humerus fractures is increasing. It is a common osteoporotic fracture. Bone density is a predictor of reduction quality and can be readily assessed with anteroposterior views of the shoulder. Social independence is a predictor of outcome, whereas age is not. Many fractures are minimally displaced and respond acceptably to nonoperative management. Displaced and severe fractures are most frequently treated operatively with intramedullary nails, locking plates, percutaneous techniques, or arthroplasty.

Discussion:

Evidence from randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews is insufficient to recommend a treatment; however, most techniques have acceptable or good outcomes. Evaluation should include an assessment of the patient’s bone quality, social independence, and surgical risk factors. With internal fixation, special attention should be paid to medial comminution, varus angulation, and restoration of the calcar. With arthroplasty, attention should be paid to anatomic restoration of the tuberosities and proper placement of the prosthesis.

Conclusion:

A majority of minimally displaced fractures can be treated conservatively with early physical therapy. Treatment for displaced fractures should consider the patient’s level of independence, bone quality, and surgical risk factors. Fixation with percutaneous techniques, intramedullary nails, locking plates, and arthroplasty are all acceptable treatment options. There is no clear evidence-based treatment of choice, and the surgeon should consider their comfort level with various procedures during the decision-making process.

Functional outcome after Mason II-III radial head and neck fractures: study protocol for a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA statement

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the radial head and neck are the most common fractures of the elbow, and account for approximately one-third of all elbow fractures. Depending on the fracture type the treatment is either conservative or surgical. There is no absolute consensus regarding optimal treatment for different fracture types. The aim of this protocol is to present the method that will be used to collect, describe and analyse the current evidence regarding the treatment of Mason II-III radial head and neck fractures.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines statement. We will search a number of databases with a predefined search strategy to collect both randomised and non-randomised studies. The articles will be summarised with descriptive statistics. If applicable a meta-analysis will be conducted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required since this is a protocol for a systematic review and no primary data will be collected. The authors will publish findings from this review in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42016037627.

The Effect of Two Factors on Interobserver Reliability for Proximal Humeral Fractures

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to assess whether training observers and simplifying proximal humeral fracture classifications improve interobserver reliability among a large number of orthopaedic surgeons.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-five observers were randomized to receive training or no training in a simple classification for proximal humeral fractures before evaluating preoperative radiographs of a consecutive series of 30 patients who were treated with open reduction and internal fixation.

RESULTS

The overall interobserver reliability of the simple proximal humeral fracture classification system was low and not significantly different between the training and the no training group (κ = 0.20 and κ = 0.18, respectively; P = 0.10). Subgroup analyses showed that training improved the agreement among surgeons who have been in independent practice ≤5 years (κ = 0.23 versus κ = 0.14; P < 0.001), surgeons from the United States (κ = 0.23 versus κ = 0.16; P = 0.002), and general orthopaedic surgeons (κ = 0.42 versus κ = 0.15; P = 0.021).

DISCUSSION

Simplifying classifications and training observers did not improve the interobserver reliability for the diagnosis of proximal humeral fractures. However, training observers improved interobserver reliability of a simple proximal humeral fracture classification system among surgeons from the United States and, in particular, younger and less specialized surgeons. This finding may suggest that our interpretations of radiographic information might become more fixed and immutable with experience.

Defining the fracture population in a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROFHER and the Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures

OBJECTIVES

Accurate characterisation of fractures is essential in fracture management trials. However, this is often hampered by poor inter-observer agreement. This article describes the practicalities of defining the fracture population, based on the Neer classification, within a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial in which surgical treatment was compared with non-surgical treatment in adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus involving the surgical neck.

METHODS

The trial manual illustrated the Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures. However, in addition to surgical neck displacement, surgeons assessing patient eligibility reported on whether either or both of the tuberosities were involved. Anonymised electronic versions of baseline radiographs were sought for all 250 trial participants. A protocol, data collection tool and training presentation were developed and tested in a pilot study. These were then used in a formal assessment and classification of the trial fractures by two independent senior orthopaedic shoulder trauma surgeons.

RESULTS

Two or more baseline radiographic views were obtained for each participant. The independent raters confirmed that all fractures would have been considered for surgery in contemporaneous practice. A full description of the fracture population based on the Neer classification was obtained. The agreement between the categorisation at baseline (tuberosity involvement) and Neer classification as assessed by the two raters was only fair (kappa 0.29). However, this disparity did not appear to affect trial findings, specifically in terms of influencing the effect of treatment on the primary outcome of the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

A key reporting requirement, namely the description of the fracture population, was achieved within the context of a pragmatic multicentre randomised clinical trial. This article provides important guidance for researchers designing similar trials on fracture management.Cite this article: H. H. G. Handoll, S. D. Brealey, L. Jefferson, A. Keding, A. J. Brooksbank, A. J. Johnstone, J. J. Candal-Couto, A. Rangan. Defining the fracture population in a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROFHER and the Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures.Bone Joint Res 2016;5:481-489. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0132.R1.

Surgical Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures: The Emerging Role of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Acute proximal humeral fractures are common injuries in elderly patients. These fractures can lead to significant pain and functional loss. Nonoperative treatment offers high rates of satisfactory function and pain relief in the majority of fractures, particularly in elderly patients. Open reduction and internal fixation, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and hemiarthroplasty are used for treating displaced proximal humeral fractures, depending on patient and fracture characteristics. Recently, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has gained popularity for treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures due to a rapid recovery of active elevation and activities of daily living function. Although complications remain a concern, early results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures have been promising. Future comparative outcome studies are needed to define the indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty instead of nonoperative and other operative options. Optimal treatment of proximal humeral fractures requires clinical judgment based on fracture characteristics, bone quality, patient factors, and surgeon experience with the array of available techniques. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(3):e465-e473.].

Shoulder replacements: a review

Shoulder replacement surgery is a common elective surgical procedure for those with progressive osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. This review explores the history of shoulder replacements, the different types of replacements and their advantages or disadvantages.