Vascular and nerve injury after knee dislocation: a systematic review

Modern multiligament knee injury surgical reconstruction techniques can achieve excellent knee function and patient satisfaction, with low complication rates

PURPOSE

To report on the recovery of strength and functional capacity symmetry following multiligament knee surgical reconstruction (MLKR), as well as the capacity of athletes to return to sport.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study recruited 47 patients undergoing MLKR between February 2018 and July 2021. Forty patients had full outcome assessment postoperatively at 6, 12 and 24 months and were included in the analysis, 75% were knee dislocation one injuries and 60% were injured playing sport. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessed included the International Knee Documentation Committee score, the Knee Outcome Survey, the Lysholm Knee Score and the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS). Patient satisfaction was also assessed. Objective assessment included assessment of active knee flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), the single (single horizontal hop for distance [SHD]) and triple (triple horizontal hop for distance [THD]) hop tests for distance and peak isokinetic knee flexor/extensor torque.

RESULTS

All PROMs significantly improved (p < 0.001) from presurgery to 24 months postsurgery. At 24 months, 70% of patients were satisfied with their sports participation. Active knee flexion (p < 0.0001) and extension (p < 0.0001) ROM significantly improved over time, as did the limb symmetry indices (LSIs) for the SHD (p < 0.0001), THD (p < 0.0001), peak knee extensor (p < 0.0001) and flexor (p = 0.012) torque. While LSIs for the SHD, THD and knee flexor strength tended to plateau by 12 months, knee extensor strength continued to improve from 12 to 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients undergoing modern MLKR surgical techniques and rehabilitation can achieve excellent knee function, with low complication rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Knee Dislocation as a Result of a Ski Injury

Visible knee deformity as a result of a sporting activity is rare; however, it can be caused by a serious injury and have catastrophic consequences. Differential diagnosis includes patellofemoral or knee dislocations, fractures, and tendon or ligament ruptures. Immediate diagnosis and appropriate management are key. Diagnosis can be made using available tools such as plain radiography, ultrasound, CT scan, and MRI. Depending on the type and severity of the diagnosis, urgent transportation to a higher level of care facility may be indicated. We present a gentleman in his 20s with knee dislocation as a result of a ski injury. His knee was reduced and he was transported to a hospital with surgical capability. He underwent surgery to stabilize his injury and then staged reconstruction for rupture of multiple ligaments.

Tibiofemoral Dislocation Management in a Rural High School Football Scenario: Development of a Popliteal Artery Injury Suspicion Index

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the knowledge and preparedness of athletic trainers (ATs) for diagnosing and managing an anterior tibiofemoral knee dislocation in a rural or limited-resource high school football setting scenario. The study hypothesis was that more experienced ATs would display greater preparedness than less experienced ATs. A secondary objective was to develop evidence-based guidelines to help the AT provide better emergency triage care.

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study distributed a rural high school football game scenario survey electronically to a random sample of 2000 certified ATs to determine their perceptions of readiness to diagnose and manage an anterior tibiofemoral knee dislocation with signs or symptoms of possible popliteal artery injury.

RESULTS

A total of 249 surveys (12.5%) were completed. Years of athletic training experience were ≤5 years (n = 82, group 1) and ≥6 years (n = 167, group 2). Both groups perceived that they could not "rule out" an arterial injury and had similar "red flag" sign and symptom rankings. Group 2 perceived a more serious situation than group 1 (77.5 ± 15 vs 70.8 ± 14, P < 0.0001) and were more likely to activate the emergency action plan (74.5 ± 25 vs 64.4 ± 26, P = 0.005). Both groups were "neutral" about their ability to diagnose the condition or manage the case, had poor ankle-brachial index test familiarity, and agreed that evidence-based guidance was needed.

CONCLUSIONS

More experienced ATs perceived a more serious situation than less experienced ATs and were more likely to activate the emergency action plan. Both groups were neutral about their ability to diagnose the condition or manage the case, had poor ankle-brachial index test familiarity, and agreed that they would benefit from evidence-based guidance. Proposed guidelines provide the AT with a more measured, evidence-based index of suspicion for potential popliteal artery injury in anterior tibiofemoral dislocation cases. This will complement existing hospital emergency department-based management algorithms, decreasing the likelihood of this condition progressing to limb loss or death.

No effect of dislocation status at arrival in emergency department on outcome of knee joint dislocations

PURPOSE

Knee dislocation is a rare but severe injury of the lower extremities. The aim of this study was to report on the epidemiology, diagnostics and treatment of such injuries and to identify negative predictors of clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included all knee dislocations treated at a Level I Trauma Centre in Germany between 2009 and 2021. Medical records were categorised, collected and analysed in a standardised manner. A follow-up visit 1 year after the injury focused on limitations in knee mobility.

RESULTS

A total of 120 knee dislocations were included in the study. 29.3% of patients presented to the emergency department with a dislocated joint, and 17.5% (n = 21) had a neurovascular lesion. At follow-up 12 months after the injury, 65.8% of the patients reported limitations in the range of motion, and 11.7% (n = 14) reported severe limitations in daily activities. Site infections due to surgery occurred in 3.3% of patients. Increased body weight (r = 0.294; p < 0.001 and r = 0.259; p = 0.004), an increased body mass index above 25 kg/m2 (body mass index, r = 0.296; p < 0.001 and r = 0.264; p = 0.004) and deficits in peripheral perfusion as well as sensory and motor function (r = 0.231; p = 0.040 and r = -0.192; p = 0.036) were found to be negative predictive factors for clinical outcome. For posttraumatic neurovascular injury, lack of peripheral perfusion, insufficient sensory and motor function (r = -0.683; p < 0.0001), as well as a higher Schenck grade (r = 0.320; p = 0.037), were identified as independent risk factors. The status of dislocation at the site of the accident and on arrival at the emergency department had no impact on the outcome or neurovascular injury.

CONCLUSION

Knee dislocation is a rare injury with a high rate of severe complications such as neurovascular lesions. In particular, the initial status of neurovascular structures and injury classification showed a relevant negative correlation with the posttraumatic status of nerves and vessels. In particular, patients with these characteristics need close monitoring to prevent negative long-term consequences.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Perioperative outcomes in isolated versus multiligamentous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort analysis

PURPOSE

The outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the setting of multiligamentous knee injury (M-ACLR) have not been well characterized compared to isolated ACLR (I-ACLR). This study aims to characterize and compare short-term outcomes between I-ACLR and M-ACLR.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2017. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify and compare elective I- and M-ACLR patients, excluding patients undergoing concomitant meniscal or chondral procedures. Patient demographics and outcomes after I- and M-ACLR were compared using bivariate analysis. Multiple logistic regression analyzed if multiligamentous ACLR was an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

There was a total of 13,131 ACLR cases, of which 341 were multiligamentous cases. The modified fragility index-5 was higher in multiligamentous ACLR (p < 0.001). Multiligamentous ACLR had worse perioperative outcomes, with higher rate of all complications (3.8%, p = 0.013), operative time > 1.5 h (p < 0.001), length of stay (LOS) ≥ 1 day (p < 0.001), wound complication (2.1%, p = 0.001), and intra- or post-op transfusions (p < 0.001). In multiple logistic regression, multiligamentous ACLR was an independent risk factor for LOS ≥ 1 (odds ratio [OR] 5.8), and intra-/post-op transfusion (OR 215.1) and wound complications (OR 2.4). M-ACLR was not an independent risk factor for any complication, reoperation at 30 days, readmission, urinary tract infection (UTI), or venous thromboembolism (VTE).

CONCLUSION

M-ACLR generally had worse outcomes than I-ACLR, including longer LOS, need for perioperative transfusions, and wound complications.

Multiligament knee injuries. Ten years' experience at a public university, level I Trauma Center

PURPOSE

To describe our institutional experience and results in the surgical management of multiligament knee injuries (MLKI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective series of MLKI consecutively operated on at a single, level I Trauma Center. Data on patients' baseline characteristics, injuries, treatments, and outcomes were recorded up to one-year follow-up. Recorded outcomes included the Tegner-Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (TLKSS), return to work, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

MLKI incidence was 0.03% among 9897 orthopedic trauma admissions. Twenty-four patients of mean age 43.6 years were included in analysis. The mean Injury Severity Score was 12.6. Five patients presented with knee dislocations and six had fracture-dislocations, two of them open fractures. There was one popliteal artery injury requiring a bypass and four common peroneal nerve palsies. Staged ligamental reconstruction was performed in all cases. There were seven postoperative complications. The median TLKSS was 80 and, though patient satisfaction was high, and dissatisfaction was largely restricted to recreational activities (only 58.3% satisfied). Seventeen patients returned to their previous employment.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a high aggregation of fracture-dislocations secondary to road traffic accidents. One in four patients experienced complications, particularly stiffness. Complications were more common in cases involving knee dislocation. Most patients had good functional results, but 25% were unable to return to their previous work, which demonstrates the long-lasting sequelae of this injury.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Documented Knee Dislocation Versus Multiligamentous Knee Injury: A Comparison of KD3 Injuries at Mean 6.5 Years Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Previous research has found that the incidence of neurovascular injury is greatest among multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) with documented knee dislocation (KD). However, it is unknown whether there is a comparative difference in functional recovery based on evidence of a true dislocation.

PURPOSE

To determine whether the knee dislocation-3 (KD3) injury pattern of MLKI with documented tibiofemoral dislocation represents a more severe injury than KD3 MLKI without documented dislocation, as manifested by poorer clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed of patients who underwent surgical treatment for KD3 MLKI between May 2012 and February 2021. Outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Documented dislocation was defined as a radiographically confirmed tibiofemoral disarticulation, the equivalent radiology report from outside transfer, or emergency department documentation of a knee reduction maneuver. Subgroup analysis was performed comparing lateral (KD3-L) versus medial (KD3-M) injuries. Multivariable linear regression was conducted to determine whether documented dislocation was predictive of outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients (25 male, 17 female) were assessed at a mean 6.5-year follow-up (range, 2.1-10.7 years). Twenty patients (47.6%) were found to have a documented KD; they reported significantly lower IKDC (49.9 vs 63.0; P = .043), Lysholm (59.8 vs 74.5; P = .023), and Tegner activity level (2.9 vs 4.7; P = .027) scores than the patients without documented dislocation. VAS pain was not significantly different between groups (36.4 vs 33.5; P = .269). The incidence of neurovascular injury was greater among those with documented dislocation (45.0% vs 13.6%; P = .040). Subgroup analysis found that patients with KD3-L injuries experienced a greater deficit in Tegner activity level than patients with KD3-M injuries (Δ: -3.4 vs -1.2; P = .006) and had an increased incidence of neurovascular injury (41.7% vs 11.1%; P = .042). Documented dislocation status was predictive of poorer IKDC (β = -2.15; P = .038) and Lysholm (β = -2.85; P = .007) scores.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing surgical management of KD3 injuries with true, documented KD had significantly worse clinical and functional outcomes than those with nondislocated joints at a mean 6.5-year follow-up. The current MLKI classification based solely on ligament involvement may be obscuring outcome research by not accounting for true dislocation.

German S2e-Guideline "Knee Dislocation"

Knee dislocation is a devastating form of multiligament injury of the knee. Due to its high complexity, there is a large number of different diagnostic and treatment strategies. With the aim of providing evidence-based treatment recommendations, the S2e guideline on knee dislocation is aimed at all professional groups involved in diagnostics and therapy (orthopaedic and trauma surgeons, physiotherapists, outpatient/inpatient surgeons, sports physicians, etc.) as well as those affected (patients with knee dislocation) and service providers (health insurance companies, pension insurance companies). In addition to the presentation of conceptual differences between the injury entities, this includes the special features of diagnostic testing, options for conservative and surgical therapy as well as aspects of follow-up treatment - against the background of the interdisciplinary treatment approach to a severe knee injury.

Open injuries and obesity as emerging risk factors for vascular injury in knee dislocations: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

Knee dislocations (KDs) are rare in orthopaedic trauma but can have devastating effects. Failing to diagnose a concomitant vascular injury can lead to amputation. Different methods are used for the diagnosis of a vascular injury and the best approach is under debate. This study aims to examine the risk factor(s) of vascular injury in patients with KDs, examine variables that differ between obese patients and non-obese patients with KDs, and analyse the modalities used to identify vascular injuries in the KD population.

METHODS

The electronic patient medical record system at a major trauma centre was retrospectively reviewed to identify knee dislocations from 2015 to 2022. These were stratified based on age, gender, BMI, mechanism of injury, vascular injury, non-vascular complications, and laterality. Co-variates were inputted into a univariable regression analysis, followed by a multivariable regression analysis to identify risk factors of vascular injury in patients with knee dislocations. Co-variates were also compared between obese and non-obese patients using two-tailed t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

Forty patients were identified with a KD, with twenty-eight males and twelve females. The average age was 42.9 years, seventeen patients had a BMI of thirty or over, and eleven patients (27.5%) had a vascular injury. Open injuries (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.19-11.30; p = 0.038) and obesity (OR: 2.66; 95% CI: 1.45-18.69; p = 0.027) are risk factors for vascular injury in patients with knee dislocation. Compared to non-obese patients, obese patients had a higher rate of open injury (p = 0.028), vascular injury (p = 0.017), low-energy injuries (p = 0.014), non-vascular complications (p = 0.017), and amputation (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Open injuries and obesity are risk factors for vascular injury in patients with KD. Compared to non-obese patients, obese patients have low-energy injuries and an increased rate of non-vascular complications, meaning that clinicians could err on the side of caution when investigating vascular injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Patient-reported outcomes and return to pre-injury activities after surgical treatment of multi-ligamentous knee injuries in patients over 40-years-old: Average 5-years follow-up

BACKGROUND

Multi-ligamentous knee injuries (MLKI) are potentially devastating injuries, though existing prognostic research among older patients who sustain MLKI is limited. The purpose was to investigate clinical outcomes and rates of return to pre-injury activities following surgical treatment of MLKI in patients at least 40 years old.

METHODS

This study was a multi-center retrospective case series of patients who underwent surgical treatment for MLKI from 2013-2020 and were ≥ 40 years old at time of injury. Outcomes were assessed via e-mail and telephone using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, a satisfaction rating, and return to pre-injury sport and work surveys. Stepwise linear regression was used to assess the impact of preoperative characteristics on IKDC and Lysholm scores.

RESULTS

Of 45 patients eligible for inclusion, 33 patients (mean age: 48.6 years [range: 40-72]) were assessed at a mean follow-up of 59.1 months (range 24-133). The cohort reported a mean IKDC of 63.4 ± 23.5, Lysholm of 72.6 ± 23.6, and Tegner of 3.8 ± 2.0. There was a 41.2% rate of return to sports, and 82.1% returned to work. Documented knee dislocation was predictive of poorer IKDC (β:-20.05, p = 0.025) and Lysholm (β:-19.99, p = 0.030). Patients aged > 50 were more satisfied compared to those 40-50 years old (96.2 ± 4.9 vs 75.6 ± 23.3, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who sustained MLKI aged at least 40 at injury demonstrated fair clinical outcomes at a mean 5-year follow-up. Older patients who sustained MLKI reported a relatively high rate of return to work but were less likely to return to sports.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Case series.

[Multiligament instabilities of the knee in sports injuries : An update of the Hamburg concept]

BACKGROUND

Knee dislocation (KD) is a rare but severe injury of the knee joint, with a high rate of concomitant neurovascular injuries. The severity of the ligamentous injury, which is classified according to the Schenck classification, the mechanism of injury, concomitant injuries and individual factors determine the treatment strategy in KD.

TREATMENT STRATEGY

Furthermore, a clear differentiation between high-velocity (HV) and low-velocity (LV) injuries is necessary. Generally, surgical treatment within 7-10 days should be aspired. Herein, the one-stage hybrid treatment using augmented ligament sutures (ligament bracing) in combination with primary ligament reconstruction (posterolateral and ACL) leads to very good functional results in the mid-term. Ultra-low-velocity (ULV) dislocations and those with concomitant peroneal lesions require a modified approach, due to a limited prognosis. During rehabilitation, the individual progress must be closely monitored and follow an early functional approach. In approximately 20% of all cases, early arthroscopic arthrolysis shows a high success rate.

Therapeutic management and amputation options in a long time delayed blunt popliteal artery injury

PURPOSE

To report the experience of treatment on blunt traumatic popliteal artery injury (PAI) combined orthopedic injuries and determine the amputation-associated factors.

METHODS

From January 2008 to December 2019, 55 patients in level I trauma center with traumatic blunt PAI were retrospectively reviewed. Variables were retrospectively collected and statistically analyzed. Patients with PAI with limb selvage, primary amputation, and secondary amputation were retrospectively grouped and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients with a median age of 41.4 years (range 18-70), of which 45 were males (81.8%) and 10 were females (18.2%), were enrolled. The overall amputation rate was 36.4% because 88.6% of patients faced more than 6 h of delay before treatment. The average injury severe score (ISS) and abbreviated injury score (AIS) were 10.4 (range 9-34) and 8.2 (range 5-16), respectively. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the number of hospitalization days was a significantly related factor to amputation. After a median follow-up of 56 months (range 12-132), no death, another limb loss, or claudication was found in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PAI are commonly accompanied by multiple injuries that increase the risk of amputation; therefore, timely treatments are urgently required. Reducing the severity of ischemia by fasciotomy, not losing time by performing preoperative imaging or diagnostic tests, and repairing the associated venous injury can help to optimize the rates of limb salvage. However, impact factors, such as the gender and age of the patient, injured mechanisms, concomitant injuries, AIS, ISS, and surgical times, are not associated with the outcomes of amputation. Nonetheless, endeavors to salvage the limbs as far as possible should be made.

Characteristics of multi-ligament knee injuries accompanied with patellar tendon disruption

PURPOSE

Patella tendon rupture with multi-ligament injury is a rare injury. We observed patients with patella tendon rupture (or patella inferior pole fracture) with multi-ligament injury. This study intends to inspect the mechanism of the injury and classify them.

METHODS

This is a case series involving patients from two hospitals. Twelve patients who had patella tendon rupture (PTR) with multi-ligament injury were studied.

RESULTS

The incidence of multi-ligament injury in patella tendon rupture patients found to be 13% in retrospective search. Two types of injury were observed. First type is relatively low energy injury involving ACL and patella tendon which does not involve rupture of PCL. Second type is high energy injury involving PCL and patella tendon. Treatment differed among the patients, due to severity of trauma. Two-staged operation was the basis of treatment. Patella tendon was repaired in first stage. Reconstruction of ligaments was done in second stage. The patients who had infection or stiffness did not have a second surgery.

CONCLUSION

Patella tendon rupture with multi-ligament injury can be classified into low energy rotational injury and high energy dashboard injury. Two-staged surgery is the basis of treatment.

Team Approach: Treatment of Traumatic Dislocations of the Knee

»

Traumatic knee dislocations are complex injuries that can be associated with compromise of the neurovascular structures about the knee.

»

Various classification systems for knee dislocations exist in the literature but should be used with caution as a prognostic tool because many knee dislocations fit into more than 1 category.

»

Special populations of knee dislocations, such as obese patients and high-velocity mechanism injuries, require additional caution during the initial evaluation for possible vascular injuries.

MR Imaging of Acute Knee Injuries: Systematic Evaluation and Reporting

Acute knee injury ranges among the most common joint injuries in professional and recreational athletes. Radiographs can detect joint effusion, fractures, deformities, and malalignment; however, MR imaging is most accurate for radiographically occult fractures, chondral injury, and soft tissue injuries. Using a structured checklist approach for systematic MR imaging evaluation and reporting, this article reviews the MR imaging appearances of the spectrum of traumatic knee injuries, including osteochondral injuries, cruciate ligament tears, meniscus tears and ramp lesions, anterolateral complex and collateral ligament injuries, patellofemoral translation, extensor mechanism tears, and nerve and vascular injuries.

Diagnosis and treatment strategies of the multiligament injured knee: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To map the current literature evaluating the diagnosis and treatment of multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs).

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O'Malley frameworks were followed. A three-step search strategy identified relevant published literature comprising studies reporting on at least one aspect in the diagnosis or treatment of MLKI in adults. Data were synthesised to form a descriptive analysis and thematic summary.

RESULTS

Overall, 417 studies were included. There was a substantial chronological increase in the number of studies published per year, with 70% published in the last 12 years. Of included studies, 128 (31%) were narrative reviews, editorials or technical notes with no original data. The majority of studies (n=239, 57%) originated from the USA; only 4 studies (1%) were of level I evidence. Consistent themes of contention included clinical assessment, imaging, operative strategy, timing of surgery and rehabilitation. There was a lack of gender and ethnic diversity reported within patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There remains insufficient high-level evidence to support definitive management strategies for MLKI. There is considerable heterogeneity in outcome reporting in current MLKI literature, precluding robust comparison, interpretation and pooling of data. Further research priorities include the development of expert consensus relating to the investigation, surgical management and rehabilitation of MLKI. There is a need for minimum reporting standards for clinical studies evaluating MLKI.

Vascular Injury After Knee Dislocation: A Meta-Analysis Update

INTRODUCTION

Multisystem injuries affecting vasculature and nerves can be detrimental sequelae of knee dislocations (KDs). The purpose of this study was to provide an update of the current literature since the conducted search used in the publication of Medina et al on May 3, 2013, to evaluate (1) the frequency of vascular and neurologic injury after KD, (2) the frequency with which surgical intervention was conducted for vascular injury in this setting, and (3) the frequency with which each imaging modality was used to detect vascular injury.

METHODS

A two-author screening process was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the MEDLINE database. Frequency of vascular injury, surgical intervention, and amputation after KD were analyzed. Diagnostic modalities used in the acute-care setting were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles were analyzed for a total of 37,087 KDs. Of these, 10.7% sustained vascular injuries and 19.6% sustained nerve injuries. Overall, 62.2% of patients with vascular injury underwent surgical repair and 2.2% limbs resulted in amputation. Angiography was the most frequently used diagnostic modality (91.7%).

DISCUSSION

This review updates our understanding on the clinical implications of KDs including frequency of vascular injury (10.7%), amputation (2.2%), and nerve injuries (19.6%). Compared with prior literature, there was an increased prevalence of KD1 (32.4%) and lateral KDs (80.4%). Most vascular injuries after KD undergo surgical repair (62.2%).

Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries: A Multicenter Study of 178 Patients

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown limited diagnostic accuracy for multiple ligament knee injuries (MLKIs), especially posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries.

HYPOTHESIS

The diagnostic accuracy of MRI for MLKIs will only be moderate for some knee structures. Patient-related factors and injury patterns could modify the diagnostic accuracy of MRI.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

All patients with MLKIs surgically treated between January 2014 and December 2020 in the centers participating in the study were reviewed. We recorded sex, age, mechanism of injury, time from injury to MRI, and vascular and neurological associated lesions. Lesions to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, lateral collateral ligament (LCL), popliteus tendon, popliteofibular ligament, iliotibial band, biceps tendon, medial and lateral meniscus, and articular cartilage from MRI reports and surgical records were also collected. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and intraclass correlation coefficient of MRI were calculated for each knee structure. With logistic regression, associations between patient and injury characteristics and MRI accuracy were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients (127 male; mean age, 33.1 years) were included. High-energy trauma was the most common mechanism of injury (50.6%), followed by sports trauma (38.8%) and low-energy trauma (8.4%). The ACL was the structure with the best diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio, and positive predictive value (94.4%, 113.2, and 96.8%, respectively). PLC structures displayed the worst diagnostic accuracy among knee ligaments (popliteus tendon: 76.2%; LCL: 80.3%) and diagnostic odds ratio (popliteus tendon: 9.9; LCL: 17.0; popliteofibular ligament: 17.5). MRI was more reliable in detecting the absence of meniscal and chondral lesions than in identifying them. Logistic regression found that the diagnostic accuracy was affected by the Schenck classification, with higher Schenck grades having worse diagnostic accuracy for peripheral structures (iliotibial band, popliteus tendon, and biceps tendon) and improved diagnostic accuracy for the ACL and posterior cruciate ligament.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of MRI for MLKIs largely varied among knee structures, with many of them at risk of a misdiagnosis, especially PLC, meniscal, and chondral lesions. The severity of MLKIs lowered the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for peripheral structures.

Mid-Term Results following Traumatic Knee Joint Dislocation

PURPOSE

Although treatment strategies of knee joint dislocations have evolved, there is still no consensus on the best method and timing. New therapeutic concepts suggest that early one-stage treatment, including suturing and bracing of the cruciate ligaments in acute knee joint dislocation, are leading to improved functional results. This study aimed to evaluate the midterm functional outcome following traumatic knee joint dislocation and to determine whether the outcome is influenced by the surgical management, patient habitus or concomitant injuries.

METHODS

In this retrospective single center study, 38 patients with acute Schenck type II to IV knee dislocations were treated over an eight-year period in a level I trauma center. At follow-up, various clinical scores, such as the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score, Lysholm Score, and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), and individual questions about rehabilitation and activity levels of 38 patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 5.5 ± 2.7 years. The mean IKDC Score was 65.6 ± 15.7 points, the average Lysholm Score was 70.5 ± 16.4 points and the median TAS was 4 (0-7), resulting in a loss of activity of 2 (range 0-6) points. There was no significant difference between a one-stage treatment compared to a two-stage approach. Ligament reconstruction of the ACL in a two-stage approach was required in only 33.3%. Further operations (early and late) were performed in 37% of cases. Being overweight was associated with more complications and worse outcomes, and external fixation with arthrofibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Knee dislocation is a severe trauma that often leads to a prolonged loss of function and increased knee pain over years, affecting the patient's activity. Clinical outcome is influenced significantly by concomitant injuries. Severe cases with initial external fixation are associated with a higher risk of knee stiffness and should be considered during rehabilitation. Obese patients present a challenge due to higher complication rates and lower postoperative knee function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective single center study, level III.

Failure in Medical Practice: Human Error, System Failure, or Case Severity?

The success rate in medical practice will probably never reach 100%. Success rates depend on many factors. Defining the success rate is both a technical and a philosophical issue. In opposition to the concept of success, medical failure should also be discussed. Its causality is multifactorial and extremely complex. Its actual rate and its real impact are unknown. In medical practice, failure depends not only on the human factor but also on the medical system and has at its center a very important variable-the patient. To combat errors, capturing, tracking, and analyzing them at an institutional level are important. Barriers such as the fear of consequences or a specific work climate or culture can affect this process. Although important data regarding medical errors and their consequences can be extracted by analyzing patient outcomes or using quality indicators, patient stories (clinical cases) seem to have the greatest impact on our subconscious as medical doctors and nurses and these may generate the corresponding and necessary reactions. Every clinical case has its own story. In this study, three different cases are presented to illustrate how human error, the limits of the system, and the particularities of the patient's condition (severity of the disease), alone or in combination, may lead to tragic outcomes There is a need to talk openly and in a balanced way about failure, regardless of its cause, to look at things as they are, without hiding the inconvenient truth. The common goal is not to find culprits but to find solutions and create a culture of safety.

Multiligamentous Knee Injuries: Acute Management, Associated Injuries, and Anticipated Return to Activity

Multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) are devastating injuries. The energy and severity of these injuries encompass a wide range from low-energy single-joint mechanisms to high-energy polytrauma settings. Currently, there is no consensus on surgical treatment approach, surgical timing, or the return to preinjury activity levels after injury. There does appear to be a difference in the rate of return to activity and level of activity based on whether the injury was sustained during sport, in a trauma setting, or while on active military duty. The purpose of this descriptive review was to summarize current concepts related to (1) the acute management of MLKIs; (2) the effect of concomitant neurovascular, meniscal, and chondral injury on MLKI outcomes; (3) the effect of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of MLKI on outcomes; and (4) rates and predictors of return to sport, work, and active military service after an MLKI.

A systematic review on management and outcome of irreducible knee dislocations

BACKGROUND

Irreducible knee dislocations (IKD) are rare and can often be missed or misdiagnosed. The incidence of knee dislocation is quoted between 0.01% and 0.2% of all orthopaedic injuries, with up to 4% of these dislocations sub-classified as irreducible. The primary aim of this systematic review was to analyse cases of IKD described in the literature, with a secondary aim of producing a streamlined approach for managing these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 1st September 2021 in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines using the online databases Medline and EMBASE. The review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database. Case reports or clinical studies or reporting on IKD were included. The studies were appraised using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool and Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 60 studies eligible for inclusion, giving a total of 114 cases of IKD. Posterolateral dislocation was most common, seen in 85% of cases. The dimple sign was present in 70%. All cases required surgical intervention to achieve joint reduction. The most commonly involved structure blocking reduction was the medial collateral ligament (MCL)±medial structures, seen in 52.4%. MCL reconstruction or repair was carried out in 32.3% cases. The overall incidence of neurovascular injury was 9% and the overall complication rate was 14.4%.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of this SR we conclude that: the most common type of IKDs are PL dislocations, and the MCL, medial retinaculum and capsule and vastus medialis oblique form the most common structures involved in block to reduction and often will require open reduction and repair in acute setting if arthroscopic reduction fails. The most common pattern of injury to ligament is likely to be ACL, PCL, MCL±other structures but the MCL will be the most commonly repaired ligament. The dimple sign is often present and is highly pathognomonic of IKD. The incidence of neurovascular injury is uncommon. The most common post-operative complications likely to be encountered is medial skin necrosis and postoperative knee stiffness. Therefore, patients should be mobilised as early as possible with ROM in hinge brace.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Relationship Between Peroneal Nerve and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Involvement in Multiligamentous Knee Injury: A Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

Peroneal nerve injuries are rare injuries and usually associated with multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) involving one or both cruciate ligaments. The purpose of our study was to perform a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis to examine the rates of peroneal nerve injuries and to see whether a peroneal nerve injury was suggestive of a particular injury pattern.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted in patients who were diagnosed with MLKI at two level I trauma centers from January 2001 to March 2021. MLKIs were defined as complete injuries to two or more knee ligaments that required surgical reconstruction or repair. Peroneal nerve injury was clinically diagnosed in these patients by the attending orthopaedic surgeon. Radiographs, advanced imaging, and surgical characteristics were obtained through a chart review.

RESULTS

Overall, 221 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 35.9 years, and 72.9% of the population was male. Overall, the incidence of clinical peroneal nerve injury was 19.5% (43 patients). One hundred percent of the patients with peroneal nerve injury had a posterolateral corner injury. Among patients with peroneal nerve injury, 95.3% had a complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture as compared with 4.7% of the patients who presented with an intact ACL. There was 4.4 times of greater relative risk of peroneal nerve injury in the MLKI with ACL tear group compared with the MLKI without an ACL tear group. No statistical difference was observed in age, sex, or body mass index between patients experiencing peroneal nerve injuries and those who did not.

CONCLUSION

The rate of ACL involvement in patients presenting with a traumatic peroneal nerve palsy is exceptionally high, whereas the chance of having a spared ACL is exceptionally low. More than 90% of the patients presenting with a nerve palsy will have sustained, at the least, an ACL and posterolateral corner injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Case Series.

Predictors of Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Experiencing a Knee Dislocation: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies

Knee dislocations (KDs) are devastating injuries for patients and present complex challenges for orthopaedic surgeons. Although short-term outcomes have been studied, there are few long-term outcomes of these injuries available in the literature. The purpose of this study is to determine factors that influence mid- to long-term clinical outcomes following surgical treatment of KD. A review of the current literature was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify clinical studies published from 2010 to 2019 with a minimum 2-year follow-up that reported outcomes following surgical treatment of KDs. Ten studies (6 level III, 4 level IV) were included. At mid- (2-10 y) to long-term (>10 y) follow-up, concomitant arterial, cartilage, and combined meniscus damage were predictive factors for inferior Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores when compared with patients without these associated injuries. Although concomitant neurological damage may influence short-term outcomes due to decreased mobility, at longer follow-up periods it does not appear to predict worse clinical outcomes when compared with patients without concomitant neurological injury. Frank and polytrauma KDs have been associated with worse mid- to long-term outcomes when compared with transient and isolated KDs. Patients who underwent surgery within 6 weeks of trauma experienced better long-term outcomes than those who underwent surgery longer than 6 weeks after the initial injury. However, the small sample size of this study makes it difficult to make valid recommendations. Lastly, female sex, patients older than 30 years at the time of injury and a body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 kg/m² are factors that have been associated with worse mid- to long-term Lysholm and IKDC scores. The results of this review suggest that female sex, age >30 years, BMI >35 kg/m², concomitant cartilage damage, combined medial and lateral meniscal damage, KDs that do not spontaneously relocate, and KDs associated with polytrauma may predict worse results at mid- to long-term follow-up.

Inclusion of open injuries in an updated Schenck classification of knee dislocations based on a global Delphi consensus study

OBJECTIVES

Knee dislocations (KDs) are complex injuries defined as incongruity of the tibiofemoral joint, which leads to tears of two or more of the main stabilising knee ligaments, and they are often associated with damage to surrounding soft tissue or neurovascular structures. A classification system for these injuries should be simple and reproducible and allow communication among surgeons for surgical planning and outcome prediction. The aim of this study was to formulate a list of factors, prioritised by high-volume knee surgeons, that should be included in a KD classification system.

METHODS

A global panel of orthopaedic knee surgery specialists participated in a Delphi process. The first survey employed 91 orthopaedic surgeons to generate a list of patient- and system-specific factors that should be included in a KD classification system that may affect surgical planning and outcomes. This list was subsequently prioritised by 27 identified experts (mean 15.3 years of experience) from Brazil (n = 9), USA (n = 6), South Africa (n = 4), India (n = 4), China (n = 2), and the United Kingdom (n = 2). The items were analysed to find factors that had at least 70% consensus for inclusion in a classification system.

RESULTS

Of the 12 factors identified, four (33%) achieved at least 70% consensus for inclusion in a classification system. The factors deemed critical for inclusion in a classification system included vascular injuries (89%), common peroneal nerve injuries (78%), number of torn ligaments (78%), and open injuries (70%).

CONCLUSION

Consensus for inclusion of various factors in a KD classification system was not easily achieved. The wide geographic distribution of participants provides diverse insight and makes the results of the study globally applicable. The most important factors to include in a classification system as determined by the Delphi technique were vascular injuries, common peroneal nerve injuries, number of torn ligaments, and open injuries. To date, the Schenck anatomic classification system most accurately identifies these patient variables with the addition of open injury classification. The authors propose to update the Schenck classification system with the inclusion of open injuries as an additional modifier, although this is only a small step in updating the classification, and further studies should evaluate the inclusion of more advanced imaging modalities. Future research should focus on integrating these factors into useful existing classification systems that are predictive of surgical treatment and patient outcomes.

No Difference in Knee Kinematics Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament-First and Posterior Cruciate Ligament-First Fixation During Single-Stage Multiligament Knee Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study

Background:

For combined reconstruction of both the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), there is no consensus regarding which graft should be tensioned and fixed first.

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to determine which sequence of graft tensioning and fixation better restores normal knee kinematics. The hypothesis was that ACL-first fixation would more closely restore normal knee kinematics, graft force, and the tibiofemoral orientation in the neutral (resting) position compared with PCL-first fixation.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

A total of 15 unpaired human cadaveric knees were examined using a robotic testing system under the following 4 conditions: (1) 89.0-N anterior tibial load at different knee angles; (2) 89.0-N posterior tibial load at different knee angles; (3) combined rotational 7.0-N·m valgus and 5.0-N·m internal rotation load (simulated pivot shift) at 0°, 15°, and 30° of flexion; and (4) 5.0-N·m external rotation load at 0°, 15°, and 30° of flexion. The 4 evaluated knee states were (1) intact ACL and PCL (intact), (2) ACL and PCL deficient (deficient), (3) combined anatomic ACL-PCL reconstruction fixing the ACL first (ACL-first), and (4) combined anatomic ACL-PCL reconstruction fixing the PCL first (PCL-first). A 9.0 mm–diameter quadriceps tendon autograft was used for the ACL graft, tensioned with 40.0 N at 30° of flexion. A 9.5 mm–diameter hamstring tendon autograft (gracilis and semitendinosus, quadrupled loop, and augmented with an additional allograft strand if needed), tensioned with 40.0 N at 90° of flexion, was used for the PCL graft.

Results:

There were no statistically significant differences between ACL-first and PCL-first fixation regarding knee kinematics. ACL-first fixation restored anterior tibial translation to the intact state at all tested knee angles, while PCL-first fixation showed higher anterior tibial translation than the intact state at 90° of flexion (9.05 ± 3.05 and 5.87 ± 2.40 mm, respectively; P = .018). Neither sequence restored posterior tibial translation to the intact state at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. At 15° of flexion, PCL-first fixation restored posterior tibial translation to the intact state, whereas ACL-first fixation did not.

Conclusion:

There were no differences in knee laxity between ACL-first and PCL-first fixation with the ACL graft fixed at 30° and the PCL graft fixed at 90°.

Clinical Relevance:

This study showed that there was no evidence to support the use of one tensioning sequence over the other in single-stage multiligament knee reconstruction.

Single-Stage Surgical Treatment of Multi-ligament Knee Injuries Results in Lower Cost and Fewer Complications and Unplanned Reoperations Compared With Staged Treatment

Purpose

To compare complications, unplanned reoperations, and costs between single-stage and 2-stage treatment of multi-ligament knee injuries.

Methods

The MarketScan database was queried (2007-2016), identifying patients undergoing surgery for a multi-ligament knee injury. The single-stage cohort was defined as having at least 2 Current Procedural Terminology codes for ligament reconstruction at the index procedure without a Current Procedural Terminology code for ligament reconstruction appearing in the database for the following 12 months. The 2-stage cohort was defined as undergoing multiple ligament reconstruction procedures within a 12-month period with subsequent ligament procedure codes that differed from the index ligament reconstruction codes. Propensity score matching was performed using a greedy nearest-neighbor algorithm to match specific injury patterns between the 2 cohorts. Baseline demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index were recorded. Complications, unplanned reoperations, and total health care expenditures were recorded for up to 5-year follow-up. Two-sample t tests, χ² tests, and Fisher exact tests were used with an α level of .05 set as significant.

Results

We identified 1,150 patients who underwent surgery for multi-ligament knee injuries (1,080 with single-stage approach and 270 with 2-stage approach). No significant differences in baseline characteristics or medical comorbidities were found between the cohorts. After propensity score matching, the single-stage group had fewer complications at 30, 90, 180, and 365 days (P < .05). Two-stage treatment increased the risk of reoperation at 1 year (5.5 times) and 2 years (4.9 times) after the index procedure. Health care expenditures were lower in the first 9 months for the staged cohort, but from 9 months ($31,210 vs $22,252, P < .0001) through 5 years, total costs were higher in this group.

Conclusions

Single-stage surgical treatment of multi-ligament knee injuries results in fewer complications and reoperations and lower total costs compared with 2-stage treatment, even after controlling for the number and combination of ligaments injured.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcome of traumatic knee dislocations: a retrospective cohort study of 75 patients with 6.5-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

At present, limited knowledge regarding clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes at mid- and long-terms after surgical treatment of traumatic knee dislocations is available. This study aimed to investigate the mid-term recovery regarding clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes in patients following knee dislocation with associated multi-ligament injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study design was a cross-sectional cohort study. Data were collected by retrospective chart review, clinical examination, and interview of patients. All patients treated surgically following a knee dislocation between January 2000 and December 2011 were included. The surgical technique was up to the decision of the individual surgeon. The main outcome was the Lysholm knee score. Secondary outcomes consist of clinical knee examination, functional performance test, pain, and patient-reported outcome across several domains in function, sport, pain, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients (66.3%) accepted the invitation to participate. The mean age at the time of knee dislocation was 33.5 years, with a range of 16-65 years of age. The mean follow-up time was 78 months (R: 17-147). 75% of patient a Schenck's type 1 lesion and 23% a type 3. The median Lysholm knee score was 83 (R: 18-100). The mean KOOS for the five subscales were pain 84.5 (95% CI 80.5-88.5), symptoms 75.1 (95% CI 70.7-79.4), ADL 87.0 (95% CI 83.1-90.9), sport 59.9 (95% CI 53.3-66.4), and QOL 71.3 (95% CI 67.0-75.6). The mean Tegner activity level was 5.1 (95% CI 4.5-5.7). The median single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) was 93 (R: 0-100). The pain intensity score for pain (VAS) during activity was reported with a mean of 2.7 (95% CI 2.1-3.3). The objective IKDC examination showed 76% of patients grouped by Grade A (normal knee function) or Grade B (nearly normal).

CONCLUSION

With a mean follow-up of 6.5 years, combined repair and reconstruction surgery following a knee dislocation shows good to excellent patient-reported outcome and more than 75% of patients experiencing normal knee functioned evaluated by the IKDC score.

Total Knee Arthroplasty as the Primary Surgical Treatment After Knee Dislocation

Traumatic knee dislocation (KD) is a rare but serious injury, and a missed diagnosis or incorrect treatment can be limb-threatening due to a significant risk of neurovascular injury. The mechanism of injury is often high-energy trauma, but there is a rising tendency of KD after low-energy trauma in the obese patient. KD often results in multiligament injury which can be a complicated surgical task with long recovery time, especially in older patients. This report presents 4 cases where patients older than 50 years with traumatic KD have been treated with a total knee arthroplasty of revision type as an alternative to multiligament reconstruction.

The Functional Outcomes of Delayed Surgical Reconstruction in Nonsport-Induced Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are among the most detrimental injuries, which can cause significant compromise of joint stability and function. Our aim was to investigate the functional outcomes of nonsport-induced MLKIs who presented late after injury and underwent delayed arthroscopic reconstruction. In a retrospective cohort of 18 MLKI patients (19 knees, January 2012-2018) who had undergone arthroscopic reconstruction, we assessed the knee range of motion, return to work/sport, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Lysholm, and Tegner scores. The preoperative scores were retrieved from the patients' registry database. We reviewed their surgical notes and extracted the operation data, including the damaged ligaments, stages of the surgery, and associated meniscal injury. There were 14 males and 4 females with a mean age of 30.57 ± 10.31 years. The mean time from injury to surgery was 17.31 ± 11.98 months. The most common injury was anterior cruciate ligament/posterior cruciate ligament (31.6%). The mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle accidents (72.2%), falls (22.2%), and sports (5.6%). The reconstruction was either single (61.2%) or multiple stage (38.8%). The pre- and postoperative scores were 45.31 ± 7.30 versus 79.16 ± 11.86 IKDC, 3.84 ± 1.26 versus 8.37 ± 1.16 Tegner, and 60.42 ± 7.68 versus 89.42 ± 8.81 Lysholm, respectively. All the scores showed significant improvement at mean follow-up of 24.05 ± 9.55 months (p < 0.001). In conclusion, delayed arthroscopic reconstruction of MLKIs significantly improved the functional outcomes and return to work in patients presenting late to the orthopaedic clinic. There was no relationship between the demographic variables, mechanism of injury, number of injured ligaments, and the stages of surgery and the functional outcomes in this group of patients.

High Incidence of Osteoarthritis Observed in Patients at Short- to Midterm Follow-Up after Delayed Multiligament Knee Reconstruction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of knee osteoarthritis, failure rate of reconstruction, and clinical outcomes of patients with chronic multiligament knee injuries subjected to surgical treatment. Sixty-two patients with chronic knee dislocation subjected to multiligament reconstruction between April 2008 and July 2016 were evaluated, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were performed in the pre- and last postoperative evaluation; the progression of degenerative changes according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification (KL) was assessed. The Schenck classification, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), time between injury and surgery, type of postoperative rehabilitation protocol (brace vs. external fixator), and physical examination for ligament instability were also evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed, p <0.05 was considered significant. Fifty-two (83.9%) patients were men and 16.1% (n = 10) were women, with a mean age of 38.8 ± 1.3 years. The time from injury to surgery was 31.1 ± 6.1 months, and the follow-up time was 6.1 ± 0.5 years. The mean final KOOS was 79.3 ± 10.4 and the overall reconstruction failure occurred in 25.8%. Of all patients, 64.5% (n = 40) presented a KL classification of ≥2 and were defined as having radiographic osteoarthritis (OA). As 11.7% (n = 7) also presented arthritis in the contralateral knee, in 53.2% (n = 33) the progression was most likely due to the initial injury. The failure of ligament reconstruction or residual instability was present in 15 (35.7%) of patients with OA, and only one patient (4.5%) without OA. In the multivariate analysis, only reconstruction failure was an independent predictor of OA (odds ratio = 13.2 [p = 0.028]). There is a high incidence of knee OA following ligament reconstruction for chronic multiligament knee injuries. Ligament reconstruction failure was the only independent predictor for the development of OA in our study.

An Evidence-Based Approach to Multi-Ligamentous Knee Injuries

Multi ligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are highly complex injuries with associated complications and often present with difficult management strategies. MLKIs may affect the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), medial collateral ligament (or posteromedial corner (PMC)), and lateral collateral ligament (or posterolateral corner (PLC)) in addition to other structures including the menisci, common peroneal nerve, and popliteal artery. MLKIs are highly associated with the male sex and are commonly seen in high-velocity motor vehicle accidents and low-velocity sports injuries. Given the multiple planes of movement in the knee and various primary and secondary stabilizers throughout those planes, there is great heterogeneity in an injury pattern and most involve the ACL and PCL. Initial evaluation of this injury includes assessment of lower extremity sensation, distal pulses, and ankle-brachial index (ABI). If vascular compromise is suspected, computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are indicated to evaluate the vasculature. As opposed to CTA, MRA offers visualization of the soft-tissue structures that are commonly damaged in MLKIs. Initial management typically includes closed reduction of the knee with subsequent external fixation. Classification systems guide initial assessments; however, further management is unclear and leads the surgical team to decide the best, individualized management option for each patient. As a result, optimal surgical and postoperative treatment options remain complicated, and clinical outcomes remain difficult to predict. The purpose of this review is to consolidate the most up-to-date practices of the diagnostic workup, management, and treatment of MLKIs.

The accuracy of routine knee MR imaging in detection of acute neurovascular injury following multiligamentous knee injury

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of routine knee MRI in detecting acute popliteal artery and/or common peroneal nerve (CPN) dysfunction following multiligamentous knee injury (MLKI), with correlation of MRI findings to clinical outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Routine MRI knee examinations in 115 MLKI patients (54/115 with acute neurovascular injury, 61/115 without neurovascular injury) were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were classified by injury mechanism and ligamentous injuries sustained. MRI examinations were reviewed by two readers for vascular (arterial flow void, arterial calibre, intimal flap, perivascular hematoma) and CPN (intraneural T2-hyperintensity, calibre, discontinuity, perineural hematoma) injuries. Accuracy of routine knee MRI in the diagnosis of acute neurovascular injury and correlation of MRI findings to clinical outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients included 86/115 males, mean age 33 years. The accuracy of MRI in diagnosis of acute CPN injury was 80.6%, 83.6% (readers 1 and 2): sensitivity (78%, 79.7%), specificity (80%, 86.7%), PPV (78%, 82.5%), and NPV (82.7%, 84.4%). Increased intraneural T2 signal showed a significant correlation to acute CPN dysfunction (p < 0.05). MRI was 75%, 69.8% (readers 1 and 2) accurate in detecting acute vascular injury: sensitivity (73.3%, 86.7%), specificity (75.2%, 67.3%), PPV (30.5%, 36.1%), and NPV (95%, 97.1%). No MRI features of vascular injury showed a statistical correlation with clinical outcome. Neurovascular complications were more common in ultra-low-energy injuries and KD-V3L pattern of ligament disruption.

CONCLUSION

Routine MRI is of limited accuracy in assessing vascular complication, but higher accuracy in assessing CPN injury following MLKI. Increased intraneural T2 signal on conventional knee MR imaging shows statistically significant association with clinically documented acute CPN dysfunction following MLKI.

Demographic analysis of knee dislocation: A rare mechanism of injury

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to present to the literature a rare injury mechanism that causes knee dislocation (KD) and describe its characteristics.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with KD who were treated between January 2014 and December 2019 at our hospital was performed. Patients with KD due to rotavator machine injury were included in Group 1 and all patients with KD due to other etiological reasons were included in Group 2. Patients' age, gender, side, injury mechanism, time to surgery, length of stay (LOS), operation time, follow-up time, neurological injury status, vascular injury status, open injury status, and surgical interventions were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients were evaluated in the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, side, or follow-up time (p = .915, p = 1.000, p = .682, p = .374, respectively). However, LOS and time to surgery were statistically significantly longer in Group 1 (p = .037, p = .010, respectively). Moreover, neurovascular damage was statistically significantly more common in Group 1.

CONCLUSION

As a rare injury mechanism for KD, rotavator machine injuries cause more neurovascular injuries in patients compared to other injury mechanisms and increase the time to surgery and LOS due to preoperative soft tissue damage.

Estudo epidemiológico das lesões multiligamentares do joelho

Objective  The present paper aims to describe multiligament knee injuries and to associate their features with the profile of the patients and trauma mechanisms.

Methods  This is a cross-sectional study evaluating 82 patients with multiligament knee injuries from September 2016 to September 2018. Evaluated parameters included age, gender, mechanical axis, affected side, range of motion, trauma mechanism, associated injuries, affected ligaments, and absence from work.

Results  The sample included patients aged between 16 and 58 years old, with an average age of 29.7 years old; most subjects were males, with 92.7% of cases. The most common trauma mechanism was motorcycle accident (45.1%). The most injured ligament was the anterior cruciate ligament (80.5%), followed by the posterior cruciate ligament (77.1%), the posterolateral corner (61.0%), and the tibial collateral ligament (26.8%). The most frequent type of dislocation was KD IIIL (30.4%). Only 1 patient had a vascular injury, and 13 (15.9%) presented with neurological injuries. Most subjects took medical leave from work (52.4%).

Conclusion  There is a big difference between patients with multiligament lesions in Brazil compared with international studies. Thus, it is advisable to carry out more specific studies on the topic with our population to improve the treatment of these patients.

Popliteal Artery Injury After Fracture and/or Dislocation of the Knee: Risk Stratification for Revascularization Outcome

BACKGROUND

Managing complex knee trauma involving both vascular and osseous injuries is challenging, yet the available guidelines for efficient popliteal artery injury management after high-velocity blunt knee trauma remain conflicting and inconsistent. In this study, the authors aim to identify the risk factors associated with delayed limb amputation and ischemic muscular sequela postrevascularization. Furthermore, we propose a treatment algorithm to improve the limb salvage rate.

METHODS

Patients who presented with traumatic popliteal artery injury resulting in vessel occlusion or rupture, followed by fracture and/or dislocation of the knee from January 2008 to December 2013, were included for retrospective review.

RESULTS

Overall delayed amputation rate was 24% (7/29) and 16% (4/25) after successful revascularization. Mangled Extremity Severity Score is higher in the delayed amputation group than the limb-salvaged group (P = 0.02). Higher-impact force (P = 0.03), ischemic limb on presentation (P = 0.03), prolonged ischemia time (P = 0.04), unstable hemodynamics (P = 0.01), longer operation time (P = 0.04), and prolonged intensive care unit stay (P = 0.03) are risk factors of delayed amputation. Longer ischemia time (P = 0.04) and length of popliteal artery injury (P = 0.02) are associated with ischemic muscular sequela.

CONCLUSIONS

Mangled Extremity Severity Score is a reliable predictor of limb salvage. An algorithmic approach may improve the outcome of popliteal artery injury after high-velocity blunt knee trauma.

Anterior prosthetic knee dislocation with acute vascular injury: A case report

Introduction

and Importance: Anterior dislocation of a prosthetic knee is rarely encountered. Acute vascular injury following anterior prosthetic dislocation has only been reported once in the literature with extremely poor outcomes.

Case presentation

The authors report the case of a 70-year-old woman who presented with anterior prosthetic knee dislocation after a fall from slipping. After closed reduction, CT angiography found transection and active extravasation of the left popliteal artery. An emergent fasciotomy and popliteal bypass were performed with concurrent external fixation of the joint. Recovery was complicated by bacteremia requiring eventual explant of total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Clinical discussion

We report the only case of successful vascular repair after acute vascular injury from traumatic anterior prosthetic dislocation. External fixation of the knee allowed for better stabilization of the joint and preservation of the repaired vascular injury; however, it carries a risk for infection, as seen in this case.

Conclusions

While there are no clear guidelines for management, we highlight the importance of rapid diagnosis with CT angiography and shared decision making with the vascular surgery team to repair the injury and stabilize the joint.

•

70-year-old woman with acute popliteal injury following anterior prosthetic knee dislocation.

•

First case of successful vascular repair following such injury.

•

Rapid CT angiography, vascular repair, and stabilization of the joint essential in management.

Acute Femoropopliteal Bypass Graft Occlusion After Knee Manipulation Under Anesthesia: A Case Report and Review of Current Literature

Bilateral tibiofemoral knee dislocations are a relatively rare injury, and there is a scarcity of literature on its appropriate evaluation and treatment. Even less knee dislocations with concomitant popliteal artery injury have been described. Postoperative graft occlusion accounts for approximately half of the overall complication rate, occurring in up to 18% of the patients undergoing femoropopliteal bypass grafting. Furthermore, anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy after graft placement is a point of contention. Here, we describe a case of a knee dislocation with associated popliteal artery transection treated initially with successful knee-spanning external fixation and arterial grafting, respectively. At 6 weeks after injury, the patient underwent external fixation removal and closed manipulation of the knee for arthrofibrosis. After manipulation, yet still under anesthesia, distal pulses were acutely diminished and subsequent CTA demonstrated femoropopliteal graft thrombosis. This case demonstrates successful recognition, thrombectomy, and restoration of arterial blood flow, which has since been maintained. Written consent by the patient involved in this case report was obtained.

Management of acute knee dislocation with vascular injury: the use of the external fixator. A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Vascular injuries after traumatic knee dislocation pose a potential limb threat for the patient. The benefits of external fixation have been described by many authors. However, the usefulness of the external fixator during acute management of knee dislocations with vascular injuries is a controversial aspect that has no consensus in the literature. The purpose of the present study was to provide data from the current literature on the utility of the external fixator and to investigate the percentage of knee dislocations with vascular injuries treated with an external fixator, the timing between external fixator and vascular repair, and the total time of external fixator.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist. MEDLINE (Pubmed), Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases were searched for articles from 1 January 2000 to 6 February 2019. Studies reporting outcomes of treatment of knee dislocations with vascular injuries were included. Exclusion criteria included studies investigating chronic knee dislocations, knee arthroplasties, editorials, case reports, and expert opinions. Two authors independently extracted data and appraised the quality of evidence and risk of bias using the Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports.

RESULTS

Descriptive statistics were used to report the outcome of our findings. Seven studies related to the usefulness of the external fixator during acute management of knee dislocations with vascular injuries were included. The external fixator had been used in the majority of knee dislocations with vascular lesions (72%). Timing between external fixator and vascular repair was reported on four studies (57%), two studies performed external fixation before vascular repair, and two studies performed external fixation after vascular repair. Total time of external fixator was only reported on three studies, ranging from 3 weeks to 3 months. These studies reported acute management, without referring to long-term results and without comparative groups.

CONCLUSIONS

External fixator was used in the majority of knee dislocations with vascular injuries but the justification for its use remained unclear. Larger studies are needed to fully understand the merit of the external fixator in knee dislocations with vascular injuries. Joint protocols between vascular surgeons and trauma surgeons are necessary to agree on the aspects related to the management of knee dislocations with vascular injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Knee Dislocation With Vascular and Nerve Injury in a Professional Football Player: Return to Play

Traumatic knee dislocations are serious and complex injuries, defined as clinical and/or radiological loss of tibiofemoral congruence, which may represent real emergencies to the integrity of the affected limb. This lesion is responsible for multi-ligament tears but the most serious possible complications are related to vascular and peripheral nerve injuries.

Recent studies show that surgical treatment has better functional results and higher return rates to sports practice compared to conservative treatment. However, there is still no consensus on the ideal surgical technique and the timing of surgery. After conservative management or surgical treatment, rehabilitation treatment plays a key role in the recovery process. There are few studies evaluating the return to competition after traumatic knee dislocation and those athletes who return have difficulty reaching the pre-injury level.

Here, we report the case of a professional football player who suffered a traumatic knee dislocation, with multiple ligament tears associated with vascular and neurological damage. Three hours after the initial lesion a double interposition bypass was done with the great saphenous vein, returning flow distally. It was decided not to perform ligament surgery. Two years after a long and intense rehabilitation program the athlete successfully returned to competition.

[Effectiveness of knee dislocation and multiple ligament injury based on Hua Xi-knee dislocation and multiple ligament injury diagnosis and treatment system]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of personalized treatment based on Hua Xi-knee dislocation and multiple ligament injury (HX-KDMLI) diagnosis and treatment system.

METHODS

A clinical data of 36 patients (36 knees) with KDMLI met the selective criteria between February 2019 and September 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 24 males and 12 females with an average age of 45.7 years (range, 21-62 years). The KDMLI was caused by traffic accident in 15 cases, heavy pound in 8 cases, sports sprain in 7 cases, falling from height in 4 cases, and machine cutting in 2 cases. The interval between injury and operation was 1-9 weeks (mean, 3.6 weeks). All patients were categorized according to HX-KDMLI diagnosis and treatment system. Twenty patients were categorized as acute period and 16 patients as chronic period. Three patients were type HX-Ⅰ-A, 1 type HX-Ⅰ-P, 10 type HX-Ⅲ-L, 13 type HX-Ⅲ-M, 4 type HX-Ⅳ-S, 3 type HX-Ⅴ-F, and 2 type HX-Ⅴ-T. Thirty-five patients were positive in both the anterior drawer test and Lachman test, 31 were positive in the posterior drawer test; 19 patients were positive in varus stress test, 23 were positive in valgus stress test. According to the Internation Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grading, there was 1 case of grade A, 5 cases of grade B, 8 cases of grade C, and 2 cases of grade D. Surgical interventions included arthroscopic surgery, open surgery, or arthroscopy combined with open surgery, ligament suture or reconstruction, and internal fixation after anatomical reduction of the fracture. Different rehabilitation protocols were assigned to patients during different postoperative period, according to patient's individualized classification.

RESULTS

All incisions healed by first intention with no obvious complications. All patients were followed up 12-19 months (mean, 15 months). At 12 months after operation, all patients retained muscle strength of grade Ⅴ, and range of motion of the knee joint could reach 0° extension and over 120° flexion. Radiographic examination showed no sign of knee instability, healed fractures, ideal joint alignment, good continuity and tension, and clear image of repaired or reconstructed ligaments. The anterior and posterior drawer tests were all negative. Lachman test was degreeⅠpositive in 5 cases, valgus stress test was degreeⅠpositive in 2 cases, varus stress test was degreeⅠpositive in 2 cases; the other patients were all negative. At 12 months after operation, according to the IKDC grading, there were 9 cases of grade A, 19 cases of grade B, 5 cases of grade C, and 3 cases of grade D, showing significant differences when compared with the preoperative ones ( Z=-5.328, P=0.000). There were significant differences in the IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores between pre- and post-operation (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The promising effectiveness of KDMLI can obtain under the guidance of HX-KDMLI.

Primary repair of multiligament knee injury with InternalBrace ligament augmentation

Multiligament injury of the knee usually occurs as a result of high-energy trauma causing tibiofemoral dislocation. These are rare but potentially limb-threatening injuries, frequently involving nerve or arterial damage and often leading to severe complex instability. Management generally favours surgical reconstruction of the affected ligaments, with controversy regarding optimal treatment. We present a severe multiligament knee injury (Schenk classification KD-IV involving both cruciate and both collateral ligaments) in a competitive showjumper. A combined arthroscopic/open technique of single-stage surgical repair and suture augmentation was used, repairing all affected ligaments. The patient made an excellent recovery, returning to work after 12 weeks and riding after 22 weeks. After 5-year follow-up, she has regained her previous level of competition without subsequent injury. Multiligament repair with suture augmentation is a viable approach to the management of knee dislocation injuries. We propose that this could provide superior outcomes to traditional reconstruction techniques using autograft or synthetic reconstruction.

Distal posterolateral corner injury in the setting of multiligament knee injury increases risk of common peroneal palsy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify if the location of posterolateral corner (PLC) injury was predictive of clinical common peroneal nerve (CPN) palsy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients presenting to our institution with operative PLC injuries. Assessment of concomitant injuries and presence of neurologic injury was completed via chart review and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) review. A fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist reviewed the PLC injury and categorized it into distal, middle and proximal injuries with or without a biceps femoral avulsion. The CPN was evaluated for signs of displacement or neuritis.

RESULTS

Forty-seven operatively managed patients between 2014 and 2019 (mean age-at-injury 29.5 ± 10.7 years) were included in this study. Eleven (23.4%) total patients presented with a clinical CPN palsy. Distal PLC injuries were significantly associated with CPN palsy [9 (81.8%) patients, (P = 0.041)]. Nine of 11 (81.8%) patients with CPN palsy had biceps femoral avulsion (P = 0.041). Of the patients presenting with CPN palsy, only four (36.4%) patients experienced complete neurologic recovery. Three of 7 patients (43%) with an intact CPN had full resolution of their clinically complete CPN palsy at the time of follow-up (482 ± 357 days). All patients presenting with a CPN palsy also had a complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture in addition to a PLC injury (P = 0.009), with or without a posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury. No patient presenting with an isolated pattern of PCL-PLC injury (those without ACL tears) had a clinical CPN palsy.

CONCLUSION

Distal PLC injuries have a strong association with clinical CPN palsy, with suboptimal resolution in the initial post-operative period. Specifically, the presence of a biceps femoris avulsion injury was highly associated with a clinical CPN palsy. Additionally, CPN palsy in the context of PLC injury has a strong association with concomitant ACL injury. Furthermore, the relative rates of involvement of the ACL vs. PCL suggest that specific injury mechanism may have an important role in CPN palsy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Postoperative Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Following Multiligament Knee Reconstruction

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are debilitating injuries that increasingly occur in young athletes. Return to sport (RTS) has historically been considered unlikely due to the severity of these injuries. Reporting in the literature regarding objective outcomes following MLKI, including RTS, is lacking, as are clear protocols for both rehabilitation progressions and RTS testing. RTS following MLKI is a complex process that requires an extended recovery duration compared to other surgery types. Progressions through postoperative rehabilitation and RTS should be thoughtful, gradual, and criterion based. After effective anatomic reconstruction to restore joint stability, objective measures of recovery including range of motion, strength, movement quality, power, and overall conditioning guide decision-making throughout the recovery process. It is important to frame the recovery process of the athlete in the context of the severity of their injury, as it is typically slower and less linear. Improved reporting on objective outcomes will enhance our understanding of recovery expectations within this population by highlighting persistent deficits that may interfere with a full recovery, including RTS.

Current concepts in the assessment and management of multiligament injuries of the knee

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs), though rare, pose significant challenges to the patient and surgeon. They often occur in the setting of high-velocity trauma and are frequently associated with concomitant intra- and extra-articular injuries, the most immediately devastating of which is vascular compromise. A detailed evaluation is required when acute or chronic MLKIs are suspected, and stress radiography, MRI and angiography are valuable adjuncts to a thorough clinical examination. Surgical treatment is widely regarded as superior to non-surgical management and has been demonstrated to improve functional outcome scores, return to work, and return to sport rates, though the incidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis remains high in affected knees. However, acceptable results have been obtained with conservative management in populations where surgical intervention is not feasible. Early arthroscopic single-stage reconstruction is currently the mainstay of treatment for these injuries, but some recent comparative studies have found no significant differences in outcomes. Recent trends in the literature on MLKIs seem to favour early surgery over delayed surgery, though both methods have distinct advantages and disadvantages. Due to the heterogeneity of the injury and the diversity of patient factors, treatment needs to be individualised, and a single best approach with regards to the timing of surgery, repair versus reconstruction, surgical technique and surgical principles cannot be advocated. There is much controversy in the literature surrounding these topics. Early post-operative rehabilitation remains one of the most important positive prognostic factors in surgical management and requires a dedicated team-based approach. Though outcomes of MLKIs are generally favourable, complications are abundant and precautionary measures should be implemented where possible. Low resource settings are faced with unique challenges, necessitating adaptability and pragmatism in tailoring a management strategy capable of achieving comparable outcomes.

Traumatic Simultaneous Bilateral Knee Dislocation: A Case Report

Bilateral knee dislocation is an extremely rare and devastating injury to the knee joint. This injury is a true emergency as concomitant injuries may threaten life and limb. Here, we report the case of a 26-year-old male patient who sustained bilateral knee dislocation due to a high-velocity motor vehicle accident. In this case, the patient suffered a feared complication associated with knee dislocation, popliteal artery disruption with peroneal nerve damage. Abdominal and skeletal injuries were also discovered and treated appropriately by a multidisciplinary team. A staged surgical approach to ligament reconstruction was used without any postoperative complication. Postoperatively, the patient successfully returned to his preoperative activity level.

Knee joint dislocation: overview and current concepts

Knee joint dislocation is a relatively uncommon injury but its management is important because of the associated high risk of vascular, neurological and multi-ligamentous knee injuries. Clinicians must be aware that not all knee dislocations are diagnosed on plain X-rays; a high index of suspicion is required based on clinical evaluation. Multidisciplinary specialist care is required in all cases to achieve best outcomes. Early one-stage or multiple staged ligament repair and reconstruction offer better outcomes, but most patients have some long-term functional limitation. This article provides insights into the epidemiology and management of this injury and its devastating effects.