1
|
Aiba H, Atherley O'Meally A, Aso A, Tsukamoto S, Kimura H, Murakami H, Saito S, Sakai T, Bordini B, Cosentino M, Zuccheri F, Manfrini M, Donati DM, Errani C. Malawer type I/V proximal humerus reconstruction after tumor resection: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024:S1058-2746(24)00263-5. [PMID: 38642876 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several reconstruction methods exist for Malawer type I/V proximal humerus reconstruction after bone tumor resection; however, no consensus has been reached regarding the preferred methods. METHODS We conducted a literature search on various types of proximal humerus oncologic reconstruction methods. We collected data on postoperative functional outcomes assessed based on Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores, 5-year reconstruction survival rates, and complications. We calculated each reconstruction's weighted mean based on the sample size and standard errors. Complications were categorized based on the Henderson classification. Based on these integrated data, our primary objective is to propose an optimal strategy for proximal humerus reconstruction after bone tumor resection. RESULTS We examined various reconstruction techniques, including modular prosthesis (752 patients in 21 articles), osteoarticular allograft (142 patients in 6 articles), allograft prosthesis composites (APCs) (236 patients in 12 articles), reverse shoulder total arthroplasty (141 patients in 10 articles), composite reverse shoulder total arthroplasty (33 patients in 4 articles), claviculo-pro-humero (CPH) technique (51 patients in 6 articles), and cement spacer (207 patients in 4 articles). Weighted mean MSTS scores were: modular prosthesis (73.8%), osteoarticular allograft (74.4%), APCs (79.2%), reverse shoulder total arthroplasty (77.0%), composite reverse shoulder total arthroplasty (76.1%), CPH technique (75.1%), and cement spacer (69.1%). Weighted 5-year reconstruction survival rates were modular prosthesis (85.4%), osteoarticular allograft (67.6%), APCs (85.2%), reverse shoulder total arthroplasty (84.1%), and cement spacer (88.0%). Reconstruction survival data was unavailable for composite reverse shoulder total arthroplasty and CPH technique. Major complications included shoulder joint instability: modular prosthesis (26.2%), osteoarticular allograft (41.5%), APCs (33.9%), reverse shoulder total arthroplasty (17%), composite reverse shoulder total arthroplasty (6.1%), CPH technique (2.0%), and cement spacer (8.7%). Aseptic loosening of the prosthesis occurred: modular prosthesis (3.9%) and reverse shoulder total arthroplasty (5.7%). Allograft fracture was observed in 54.9% of patients with osteoarticular allograft. CONCLUSION The complication profiles differed among reconstruction methods. Weighted mean MSTS scores exceeded 70% in all methods except cement spacer, and the 5-year reconstruction survival rate surpassed 80% for all methods except osteoarticular allograft. Proximal humerus reconstruction after bone tumor resection should consider potential complications and patients' individual factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisaki Aiba
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III a Prevalente Indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan.
| | - Ahmed Atherley O'Meally
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III a Prevalente Indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Metropolitano CSS, Panama, Panama
| | - Ayano Aso
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III a Prevalente Indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Shinji Tsukamoto
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kimura
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hideki Murakami
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shiro Saito
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takao Sakai
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Barbara Bordini
- Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Monica Cosentino
- Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federica Zuccheri
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III a Prevalente Indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Manfrini
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III a Prevalente Indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Davide Maria Donati
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III a Prevalente Indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Costantino Errani
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III a Prevalente Indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Houdek MT, Sullivan MH, Broida SE, Barlow JD, Morrey ME, Moran SL, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Proximal Humerus Reconstruction for Bone Sarcomas: A Critical Analysis. JBJS Rev 2024; 12:01874474-202403000-00008. [PMID: 38466801 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.23.00217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
» The proximal humerus is a common location for primary bone tumors, and the goal of surgical care is to obtain a negative margin resection and subsequent reconstruction of the proximal humerus to allow for shoulder function.» The current evidence supports the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty over hemiarthroplasty when reconstructing the proximal humerus after resection of a bone sarcoma if the axillary nerve can be preserved.» There is a lack of high-quality data comparing allograft prosthetic composite (APC) with endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus.» Reverse APC should be performed using an allograft with donor rotator cuff to allow for soft-tissue repair of the donor and host rotator cuff, leading to improvements in shoulder motion compared with an endoprosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T Houdek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Samuel E Broida
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Mark E Morrey
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Steven L Moran
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Errani C, Aiba H, Atherley A, Palmas M, Kimura H, Donati DM, Manfrini M. What Is the Revision-free Survival of Resurfaced Allograft-prosthesis Composites for Proximal Humerus Reconstruction in Children With Bone Tumors? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2024; 482:00003086-990000000-01475. [PMID: 38259160 PMCID: PMC11124666 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reconstruction of the proximal humerus in children who undergo bone tumor resection is challenging because of patients' small bone size and possible limb length discrepancy at the end of skeletal growth due to loss of the physis. There are several options for proximal humerus reconstruction in children, such as clavicula pro humero, free vascularized fibula grafting, massive bone osteoarticular allografting, endoprostheses, and allograft-prosthesis composites, but no consensus exists on the best method for reconstruction. Resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites could be an alternative surgical option, but little is known about the results of this surgical technique. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) What are the complications and what is the survivorship free from reconstruction failure associated with resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites in a small, single-center case series? (2) What Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores do patients achieve after reconstructions with resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites? METHODS This study was a retrospective, single-arm case analysis in a single institution. We generally considered resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites in children with malignant bone tumors involving the metaepiphysis of the proximal humerus in whom there was no evidence of joint contamination and in whom axillary nerve preservation was possible. Between 2003 and 2021, we treated 100 children (younger than 15 years) with bone tumors of the humerus. Thirty children (30%) with diaphyseal tumors (21 children) or distal tumors (9 children) were excluded. Among the potentially eligible children, 52 were not analyzed because they were treated with other procedures such as amputation, modular prostheses, cement spacers, free vascularized fibula grafting, and massive bone osteoarticular allografts. We included 18 children (26% of the potentially eligible children) who were treated with resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites. There were 9 boys and 9 girls, with a median age of 10 years (range 4 to 15 years) at the time of diagnosis. A long stem (≥ 6 cm) in the resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composite was used in 9 children and a short stem (< 6 cm) was used in the remaining 9. One of the 18 children had a follow-up of less than 2 years. The median follow-up of the remaining 17 children was 4.7 years (range 2 to 19 years). The children' medical records were reviewed for clinical and functional outcomes. We performed a competing risk analysis to calculate the reconstruction failure-free survival of resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites. Reconstruction failure was defined as removal of the implant or allograft because of implant loosening or breakage and allograft fracture or resorption. We analyzed the children's postoperative complications and functional outcomes at the end of the follow-up period using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional scoring system. RESULTS The competing risk analysis revealed that reconstruction failure was 25% (95% confidence interval 7% to 40%) at 3 years, reaching a plateau. Four of 18 children underwent surgical revision with a new reconstruction. The reasons for reconstruction revision were resorption of the allograft at the proximal part (2 children) and fracture of the allograft (2 children). Reconstruction revision was performed in 3 of 9 children who underwent reconstruction with a short stem and in 1 of 9 children who underwent reconstruction with a long stem. Several children had other complications that did not result in removal of the allograft. Allograft resorption was observed in 4 of 18 children, but no additional surgical treatment was performed. Shoulder instability or subluxation was observed in 4 of 18 children, but only 1 child underwent surgery with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty without removal of the resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composite. Limited elbow motion because of plate impingement was observed in 1 child who underwent surgical cutting of the protruding distal part of the plate. Incomplete radial nerve palsy after surgery occurred in 1 child, with spontaneous resolution after 2 months. Screw loosening occurred in 2 children who underwent surgery with removal of loose screws. Two children had a nonunion at the graft-host bone junction; 1 child underwent surgery with bone grafting and refixation of the graft-host bone junction, and the other child with both nonunion and plate breakage was treated with bone grafting and refixation of the graft-host bone junction with a new plate. Among 17 children who had a follow-up longer than 2 years, the median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score at the last follow-up interval was 23 of 30 (range 20 to 26); 1 child was considered to have an excellent result (functional score ≥ 26), 15 children were considered to have a good result (functional score 21 to 25), and 1 child was considered to have a fair result (functional score ≤ 20). The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score did not change after excluding 4 children who underwent replacement of resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites (24 of 30 [range 20 to 26]). The median angle of flexion of the shoulder was 40° (range 20º to 90°), and the median angle of abduction was 30° (range 20º to 90°). CONCLUSION Resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composites showed a high risk of complications, but not all complications resulted in removal of the reconstructed allograft. We used this technique mainly for very young children with small bones and for older children who underwent axillary nerve preservation. Although its success may be limited owing to a high risk of complications, a resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composite could be an alternative surgical option in order to preserve the bone stock and achieve good functional outcomes in very young children. We recommend using a long-stem resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composite, which may reduce the risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costantino Errani
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III a prevalente indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Hisaki Aiba
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III a prevalente indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ahmed Atherley
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III a prevalente indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Palmas
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III a prevalente indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Hiroaki Kimura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Davide Maria Donati
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III a prevalente indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Manfrini
- Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica III a prevalente indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jamshidi K, Karimi A, Babaei Zarch MA, Mirzaei A. Outcomes of proximal humeral reconstruction with cemented osteoarticular allograft in pediatric patients: a retrospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:e608-e615. [PMID: 37315710 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no agreement on the best choice of proximal humeral reconstruction following tumor resection in pediatric patients. We reviewed the functional outcomes, oncologic outcomes, and surgical complications in pediatric patients after proximal humeral reconstruction with cemented osteoarticular allograft. METHODS Eighteen patients aged 8-13 years who underwent proximal humeral osteoarticular allograft reconstruction following resection of primary bone sarcoma were included. The mean follow-up period was 88 ± 31.7 months. At the last follow-up assessment, limb function was evaluated based on shoulder range of motion, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score, and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score. Tumor recurrence and postoperative complications were extracted from the patients' medical records. RESULTS Mean active forward flexion of the shoulder was 38° ± 18°. Mean active abduction was 48° ± 18°. Mean active external rotation was 23° ± 9°. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 73.4% ± 11.2%. The mean Toronto Extremity Salvage Score was 75.6% ± 12.9%. Local recurrence occurred in 1 patient. Metastasis developed after the operation in 2 additional patients. We recorded 6 postoperative complications in this series, including 1 superficial infection, 1 late-onset deep infection, 1 allograft fracture, 2 cases of nonunion, and 2 cases of shoulder instability. Two complications required allograft removal. CONCLUSION In pediatric patients, reconstruction of the proximal humerus with cemented osteoarticular allograft results in acceptable oncologic and functional outcomes while the postoperative complication rate seems to be lower than that of other available techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khodamorad Jamshidi
- Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amin Karimi
- Research Development Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mohammad Ali Babaei Zarch
- Research Development Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Mirzaei
- Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tsuchiya R, Kobayashi E, Fukushima S, Arikawa M, Ogura K, Iwata S, Akazawa S, Kawai A. Outcomes of Sling Procedure Using a Free Vascularized Fibular Graft After Resection of the Proximal Humerus. JB JS Open Access 2023; 8:e23.00044. [PMID: 37900324 PMCID: PMC10602540 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.oa.23.00044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The proximal humerus is a common site for both primary and metastatic bone tumors. Although various methods have been developed for reconstruction following resection of the proximal humerus, a consensus on which technique is best has not been established. We focused on the sling procedure using a free vascularized fibular graft (FVFG) and conducted what we believe to be the largest retrospective study of patients to undergo this surgery to date. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of 19 patients who underwent the sling procedure with use of an FVFG at our hospital between 1998 and 2022. The median age was 20 years, and the median follow-up duration was 63.1 months. Surgical data, oncological outcomes, the postoperative course, complications, and functional outcomes as measured with use of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score were thoroughly reviewed. Results The median operative duration was 555 minutes, and the median blood loss was 374 mL. The median length of the bone defect was 17.0 cm, and the median length of the graft was 20.0 cm. With respect to oncological outcomes, 9 patients were continuously disease-free, 9 patients had no evidence of disease, and 1 patient was alive with disease. Bone union was present in 13 of the 17 patients for whom it was evaluable. The median time to bone union was 4 months. Graft growth was observed in 2 pediatric patients. Postoperative fracture was a major complication at the recipient site. The incidence of pseudarthrosis significantly increased when the FVFG could not be inserted into the remaining humeral bone or was split in half (p = 0.002). Although a few patients demonstrated peroneal nerve palsy at the donor site, the symptom was temporary. The overall functional outcome was favorable, with an average MSTS score of 66.9%. Conclusions The sling procedure demonstrated a low complication rate and a favorable functional outcome overall. Therefore, we believe that this procedure is a useful reconstruction method for patients in a broad age range who have a wide defect of the proximal humerus. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryuto Tsuchiya
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Eisuke Kobayashi
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Suguru Fukushima
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaki Arikawa
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koichi Ogura
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shintaro Iwata
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Akazawa
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Kawai
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liang H, Guo W, Yang Y, Li D, Yang R, Tang X, Yan T. Efficacy and safety of a 3D-printed arthrodesis prosthesis for reconstruction after resection of the proximal humerus: preliminary outcomes with a minimum 2-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:635. [PMID: 35787280 PMCID: PMC9251937 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05581-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using a three-dimensional (3D)-printed arthrodesis prosthesis for reconstruction of the proximal humeral defect after tumor resection. Methods A novel proximal humeral prosthesis was designed to restore bone continuity and shoulder arthrodesis and was fabricated via 3D printing technology. Ten patients with primary malignancies in the proximal humerus underwent intra-articular resection and replacement with this prosthesis from 2017 to 2019. Baseline and operative data, oncological and prosthetic survival, and functional status were summarized. Results This cohort consisted of 9 males and 1 female with a mean age of 32.1 ± 16.1 years. Diagnoses included 5 cases of osteosarcoma, 3 cases of chondrosarcoma and 1 each case of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and malignant myoepithelioma. The mean operative duration, intraoperative hemorrhage and postoperative length of hospitalization were 151.5 ± 61.0 min, 410.0 ± 353.4 ml and 5.3 ± 1.9 d, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 29.3 ± 6.4 months, with a minimum of 24 months for the surviving patients. Two patients experienced local recurrence, and four patients developed distant metastases. Detachment of the taper occurred in two patients. One was managed conservatively, and the other received amputation due to concurrent tumor recurrence. The mean MSTS-93 and ASES scores and ranges of forwards flexion and abduction were 24.9 ± 3.1, 79.4 ± 8.3, 71.3 ± 19.4°, and 61.3 ± 16.4°, respectively. The functional outcomes were independent of the preservation of the axillary nerve. Histological study of the glenoid component showed evidence of bone ingrowth at the bone-prosthesis porous interface. Conclusion Application of the 3D-printed arthrodesis prosthesis might be a safe and efficacious method for functional reconstruction in patients who underwent resection of the proximal humerus, especially for those without preservation of the axillary nerve. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05581-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haijie Liang
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, People's Hospital, Peking University, Xizhimen Nan 11#, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, People's Hospital, Peking University, Xizhimen Nan 11#, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
| | - Yi Yang
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, People's Hospital, Peking University, Xizhimen Nan 11#, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Dasen Li
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, People's Hospital, Peking University, Xizhimen Nan 11#, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Rongli Yang
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, People's Hospital, Peking University, Xizhimen Nan 11#, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Xiaodong Tang
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, People's Hospital, Peking University, Xizhimen Nan 11#, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Taiqiang Yan
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, People's Hospital, Peking University, Xizhimen Nan 11#, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Free Vascularized Fibula Salvage of Failed CPH in Pediatric Sarcoma Patients. Sarcoma 2022; 2022:6240293. [PMID: 35586727 PMCID: PMC9110248 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6240293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Due to extended life expectancy and recent improvements in surgical techniques, limb salvage has replaced amputation as the gold standard and is now performed in 90–95% of upper extremity malignancies. However, many of these salvage procedures are associated with significant postsurgical complications. In particular, the clavicula pro humero (CPH) procedure is associated with high rates of nonunion. We present our experience with upper extremity salvage using the free vascularized fibular flap (VFF) after failure or nonunion of the original CPH procedure in the pediatric population. Methods Five patients under the age of 18 diagnosed with upper extremity sarcoma who underwent tumor resection with immediate CPH reconstruction complicated with nonunion, and subsequent revision with free VFF were included. Data on patient demographics, oncologic characteristics, surgical procedures, intraoperative details, postoperative complications, and time to graft union were recorded. Results Five patients (average age = 8.4 years; range = 5–10 years at surgery date) underwent secondary limb salvage procedure with free VFF reconstruction following failed CPH reconstruction for proximal humeral osteosarcoma (n = 4) or Ewing sarcoma (n = 1). The mean follow-up was 3.7 years. Complications occurred in five patients (100%), with three patients requiring reoperation (60%). Four patients achieved graft union (average union time = 3.7 months) and successful limb reconstruction. Four patients were alive with no local recurrence of the disease. One patient did not achieve union and was lost to follow-up. Conclusion Primary bone tumors in the pediatric population require wide surgical resection, and reconstruction often has high complication rates that can warrant further procedures. A free VFF is a viable option for upper extremity salvage after previously failed reconstructions because it provides vascularized tissue to a scarred tissue bed and allows for the replacement or augmentation of large bony defects.
Collapse
|
8
|
Han J, Wang W, Yu X, Li X, Wang Z, Zhao R, Xu M, Zheng K. Application and improvement of ipsilateral clavicle turnover during proximal humeral tumorous bone defect repair. Injury 2021; 52:2941-2946. [PMID: 33993988 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the clinical effects and complications that may arise as a result of ipsilateral clavicle turnover during tumorous bone defect repair of the proximal humerus, and to explore the feasibility of performing combined free fibula transplantation and internal fixation in reducing complications METHODS: We treated 13 patients with clavicle turnover or free fibular transplantation from September 1998 to February 2020. There were 7 males and 6 females with the average age of 26.2 years (7-50 years). The histological diagnoses were osteosarcoma in 6 patients (Enneking IIB), giant cell tumors in 3 patients (Campanacci III) and one patient each with Ewing's sarcoma (Enneking IIB), chondrosarcoma (Canceration of multiple osteochondromatosis), fibrosarcoma and metastatic cancer of bone (Bone metastasis of lung cancer). Pathological fractures were found in 7 of the 13 patients. RESULTS The operation was successfully performed for all 13 patients. We followed 12 patients for 18 to 274 months (average 92.7 months). For 6 patients treated with simple clavicle turnover using a short plate, the average healing time was 7 months (4-12 months). Among them, there were 3 cases of clavicle fracture and 3 cases of overturned bone healed well. For the 7 patients treated with clavicle turnover and free fibula using a long plate, the healing time was 6.7 months. However, one patient died of tumor metastasis 19 months after operation, without reversal of clavicle fracture and other complications. CONCLUSION Clavicle turnover is a feasible method for the treatment of tumorous bone defect of the proximal humerus. Flipping clavicle fracture is the most common complication. The application of total clavicle fixation and free fibular transplantation strengthens the flipping clavicle and reduces the risk of clavicle fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Han
- Department of orthopaedics, PLA 960 hospital, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of orthopaedics, Linyi People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, China
| | - Xiuchun Yu
- Department of orthopaedics, PLA 960 hospital, China.
| | - Xiao Li
- Department of orthopaedics, Linyi People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, China.
| | - Zhenxing Wang
- Department of orthopaedics, Linyi People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, China
| | - Rentao Zhao
- Department of orthopaedics, Linyi People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, China
| | - Ming Xu
- Department of orthopaedics, PLA 960 hospital, China
| | - Kai Zheng
- Department of orthopaedics, PLA 960 hospital, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hopyan S. Reconstruction for bone tumours of the shoulder and humerus in children and adolescents. J Child Orthop 2021; 15:358-365. [PMID: 34476025 PMCID: PMC8381401 DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.210131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Reconstructions for paediatric bone tumours of the shoulder girdle and humerus are intended to optimize placement of the hand in space. Given the longevity of paediatric survivors of sarcoma, durability is an important planning consideration. Here, I review a subset of approaches based on anatomical site with an emphasis on function and longevity. Often, biological reconstructions that combine living bone with tendon repairs and transfers best address those goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sevan Hopyan
- Division of Orthopaedics and Program in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto,Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery and Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto,Correspondence should be sent to Sevan Hopyan, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
D'Arienzo A, Ipponi E, Ruinato AD, De Franco S, Colangeli S, Andreani L, Capanna R. Proximal Humerus Reconstruction after Tumor Resection: An Overview of Surgical Management. Adv Orthop 2021; 2021:5559377. [PMID: 33828866 PMCID: PMC8004366 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5559377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Proximal humerus is one of the anatomical sites that are most frequently involved by bone and soft tissue malignant tumors. Alone or in association with adjuvant treatments, surgery represents the main therapeutic option to treat and eradicate these diseases. Once the first-line option, in the last decades, amputation lost its role as treatment of choice for the large majority of cases in favor of the modern limb sparing surgery that promises to preserve anatomy and-as much as possible-upper limb functionality. Currently, the main approaches used to replace proximal humerus after a wide resection in oncologic surgery can be summarized in biological reconstructions (allografts and autografts), prosthetic reconstructions (anatomic endoprostheses, total reverse shoulder prostheses), and graft-prosthetic composite reconstructions. The purpose of this overview is to present nowadays surgical options for proximal humerus reconstruction in oncological patients, with their respective advantages and disadvantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio D'Arienzo
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Ipponi
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Silvia De Franco
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Simone Colangeli
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Andreani
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Capanna
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bernthal NM, Upfill-Brown A, Burke ZD, Greig D, Hwang R, Crawford B, Eckardt JJ. Long term outcomes of total humeral replacement for oncological reconstructions: A single institution experience. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:778-786. [PMID: 32602118 PMCID: PMC11037129 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a paucity of data on long-term survivorship and outcomes for total humerus replacements (THR) with only two series reporting 10-year survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS A review of 769 consecutive, prospectively collected endoprosthetic reconstructions for oncological diagnoses at a single-center between 1980 and 2019 was performed. Patients with THRs were isolated and analyzed for outcomes, complications, and modes of failure. RESULTS Eighteen patients with 20 THR implants were identified. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 148 months (interquartile range [IQR] = 74-194) and 60 months (IQR = 17-155 months) for all patients. Two prostheses required revision for failure, both for symptomatic shoulder dislocation. There were three local recurrences. Revision-free survival at 5, 10, and 15 years was 100%, 86% and 86%, respectively. There were no cases of ulnar component failure, radial nerve palsy, or periprosthetic infection. CONCLUSIONS THR prosthesis survivorship is comparable to the previous series, with a longer follow-up than has previously been reported. Symptomatic shoulder instability was common (25%), and was the only cause of revision. Reverse total shoulder could be an important way to address this in the future. Local recurrence rates were high, as has been reported elsewhere for THR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas M. Bernthal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alexander Upfill-Brown
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Zachary D.C. Burke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Danielle Greig
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Richard Hwang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brooke Crawford
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey J. Eckardt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guder W, Nottrott M, Streitbürger A, Röder J, Podleska LE, Scheidt P, Dudda M, Hardes J. [Complication management following resection and reconstruction of the upper limbs and shoulder girdle]. DER ORTHOPADE 2020; 49:104-113. [PMID: 31974633 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-020-03874-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sarcomas of the upper limbs commonly affect the proximal humerus or scapula. Complications after tumor resection and reconstruction are rare but cannot be neglected, particularly after tumor endoprosthetic reconstructions. MATERIALS AND METHODS The most common complications after resection of sarcomas of the upper limbs and shoulder girdle are described, and current knowledge regarding complication management is presented. Additionally, a selective literature search was performed, incorporating personal experiences. RESULTS Wound healing disorders and infections after tumor resection without specific reconstruction (clavicle resection, scapulectomy) usually respond well to conservative or surgical treatment. However, periprosthetic infections after reconstruction using a megaendoprosthesis constitute a severe and frequent complication, with an incidence of 5-10%. Two-stage implant replacement still represents the gold standard, although in selected cases, one-stage revision with retention of the prosthetic stem appears warranted. Secondary amputation as a result of periprosthetic infection is rare compared to the situation with infections of the lower limb. Mechanical complications necessitating surgical revision are mostly limited to joint dislocation after inverse total shoulder replacement (TSR). (Sub)luxation in anatomic TSR can be tolerated provided there is no tendency toward perforation of the skin in a asymptomatic patient. Biological reconstructions are most often indicated for reconstruction of intercalary defects of the humerus, and revision is necessitated most frequently by mechanical complications. Despite multiple surgical revisions, stable reconstructions and limb salvage can usually be achieved in the upper limb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Guder
- Klinik für Tumororthopädie und Sarkomchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - M Nottrott
- Klinik für Tumororthopädie und Sarkomchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - A Streitbürger
- Klinik für Tumororthopädie und Sarkomchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - J Röder
- Klinik für Tumororthopädie und Sarkomchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland
- Klinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland
| | - L-E Podleska
- Klinik für Tumororthopädie und Sarkomchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - P Scheidt
- Klinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland
| | - M Dudda
- Klinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland
| | - J Hardes
- Klinik für Tumororthopädie und Sarkomchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tsuda Y, Fujiwara T, Evans S, Kaneuchi Y, Abudu A. Extra-articular resection of shoulder joint for bone sarcomas: Oncologic and limb-salvage outcomes of 32 cases compared with shoulder disarticulation and forequarter amputation. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121:612-619. [PMID: 31919856 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We aimed to identify the overall survival (OS), surgical complications, survival of reconstruction, and functional outcome of patients who underwent extra-articular resection of the shoulder joint for primary bone sarcomas. The OS and local recurrence rates in patients who underwent an amputation were also evaluated for comparison. METHODS Thirty-two patients treated between 1988 and 2017 were studied. The tumours were located in the humerus in 22 (69%) and scapula in 10 patients (31%). The resection types were Malawer type IV in 6 (19%), type V in 21 (66%), and type VI in 5 patients (15%). Reconstruction was performed with endoprosthesis in 23 patients (72%) while excision arthroplasty with the suspension of the humerus to the clavicle was performed in 9 patients (28%). Surgical margins were wide in 16, marginal in 8, intralesional in 3, and not available in 5 patients. During the study period, 40 patients underwent a forequarter amputation and 11 patients underwent a shoulder disarticulation. RESULTS The 5-year OS for patients who underwent extra-articular resection of the shoulder joint was 42% which was not statistically different compared with that of patients who underwent amputation (5-year OS = 30%; P = .091). The 5-year survival of the reconstruction was 94%, similar for endoprosthesis and excision arthroplasty. Local recurrence and complications developed in 6 (19%) and 10 patients (31%), respectively. Failures of the reconstruction requiring revision surgery occurred in two patients (6%). Limb salvage was achieved in 30 patients (94%). The median Musculoskeletal Tumour Society functional score was 61% (interquartile range, 57%-70%) and was similar in the endoprosthesis and excision arthroplasty group. CONCLUSIONS Extra-articular resection of the shoulder joint for bone sarcomas is an effective limb-salvage method. However, local recurrence remains a principal concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Tsuda
- Oncology Department, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Scott Evans
- Oncology Department, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Yoichi Kaneuchi
- Oncology Department, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Adesegun Abudu
- Oncology Department, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tsuda Y, Fujiwara T, Stevenson JD, Parry MC, Tillman R, Abudu A. The long-term results of extendable endoprostheses of the humerus in children after the resection of a bone sarcoma. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B:64-71. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.102b12.bjj-2020-0124.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Aims The purpose of this study was to report the long-term results of extendable endoprostheses of the humerus in children after the resection of a bone sarcoma. Methods A total of 35 consecutive patients treated with extendable endoprosthetic replacement of the humerus in children were included. There were 17 boys and 18 girls in the series with a median age at the time of initial surgery of nine years (interquartile range (IQR) 7 to 11). Results The median follow-up time was 10.6 years (IQR 3.9 to 20.4). The overall implant survival at ten years was 75%. Complications occurred in 13 patients (37%). Subluxation at the proximal humerus occurred in 19 patients (54%) but only six (17%) were symptomatic. Subluxation was seen more commonly in children under the age of nine years (86%) than in those aged nine years or more (33%) (p = 0.002). Implant failure occurred in nine patients (26%): the most common cause was aseptic loosening (four patients, 11%). Lengthening of the implant was carried out in 23 patients (66%). At final follow up, three patients had a limb that was shortened by 5 cm or more. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional score was 79% (73% to 90%). Conclusion Extendable endoprosthetic replacement is a reliable method of reconstructing humerus after excision of a bone sarcoma. Children who are less than nine years old have a high risk of subluxation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):64–71
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Tsuda
- Oncology Department, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
What Is the Survival and Function of Modular Reverse Total Shoulder Prostheses in Patients Undergoing Tumor Resections in Whom an Innervated Deltoid Muscle Can Be Preserved? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477:2495-2507. [PMID: 31389894 PMCID: PMC6903840 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After proximal humerus resection for bone tumors, restoring anatomy and shoulder function remains demanding because muscles and bone are removed to obtain tumor-free surgical margins. Current modes of reconstruction such as anatomic modular prostheses, osteoarticular allografts, or allograft-prosthetic composites and arthrodeses are associated with relatively poor shoulder function related to loss of the deltoid and rotator cuff muscles. Newer prosthetic designs like the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are felt to be useful in other reconstructions where rotator cuff function is compromised, so it seemed logical that it might help in tumor reconstructions as well in patients where the deltoid muscle and its innervation can be preserved. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES In patients with a tumor of the proximal humerus that can be resected with preservation of the deltoid muscle, (1) What complications are associated with tumor resection and reconstruction with a modular RTSA? (2) What are the functional results of modular RTSA in these patients? METHODS From January 2011 to January 2018, we treated 52 patients for bone tumors of the proximal humerus. Of these, three patients were treated with forequarter amputation, 14 were treated with standard modular proximal humerus implants, seven were treated with allograft-prosthetic composites (RTSA-APC), and 28 were treated with a modular RTSA. Generally, we used anatomic modular prosthetic reconstruction if during the tumor resection none of the abductor mechanism could be spared. Conversely, we preferred reconstruction with RTSA if an innervated deltoid muscle could be spared, but the rotator cuff and capsule could not, using RTSA-APC or modular RTSA if humeral osteotomy was distal or proximal to deltoid insertion, respectively. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed only patients treated with modular RTSA after proximal humerus resection. We excluded three patients treated with modular RTSA as revision procedures after mechanical failure of previous biological reconstructions and three patients treated after December 2016 to obtain an expected minimum follow-up of 2 years. There were nine men and 13 women, with a mean (range) age of 55 years (18 to 71). Reconstruction was performed in all patients using silver-coated modular RTSA protheses. Patients were clinically checked according to oncologic protocol. Complications and function were evaluated at final follow-up by the treating surgeon (PR) and shoulder surgeon (AC). Complications were evaluated according to Henderson classification. Functional results were assessed with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (range 0 points to 30 points), Constant-Murley score (range 0 to 100), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (range 0 to 100). The statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS Complications occurred in five of 22 patients; there was a shoulder dislocation (Type I) in four patients and aseptic loosening (Type II) in one. Function in these patients on the outcomes scales we used was generally satisfactory; the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 29, the mean Constant score was 61, and the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 81. CONCLUSIONS Although this was a small series of patients with heterogeneous diagnoses and resection types, and we were not able to directly compare the results of this procedure with those of other available reconstructions, we found patients treated with RTSA achieved reasonable shoulder function after resection and reconstruction of a proximal humerus tumor. It may not be valuable in all tumor resections, but in patients in whom the deltoid can be partly spared, this procedure appears to reasonably restore short-term shoulder function. However, future larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic study.
Collapse
|
16
|
Barbier D, De Billy B, Gicquel P, Bourelle S, Journeau P. Is the Clavicula Pro Humero Technique of Value for Reconstruction After Resection of the Proximal Humerus in Children? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475:2550-2561. [PMID: 28699149 PMCID: PMC5599409 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-017-5438-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are several options for reconstruction of proximal humerus resections after wide resection for malignant tumors in children. The clavicula pro humero technique is a biologic option that has been used in the past, but there are only scant case reports and small series that comment on the results of the procedure. Because the longevity of children mandates a reconstruction with potential longevity not likely to be achieved by other techniques, the clavicula pro humero technique may be a potential option in selected patients. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) How successful is the clavicula pro humero procedure in achieving local tumor control? (2) What is the frequency of nonunion? (3) What are the complications of the procedure? (4) What scores do patients achieve (on the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) after this procedure? METHODS Four university hospitals performed the clavicula pro humero technique in eight children aged 8 to 18 years between June 2006 and February 2014. During that period, general indications for this approach included all reconstructions of the proximal humerus for malignant tumors in children older than 8 years. All patients were followed for a mean of 40 months (range, 25-86 months); one patient was lost to followup before 2 years. The tumor resections removed the rotator cuff muscles in all patients, glenohumeral joint in five, and deltoid muscle in three. The median length of the bone defect after resection was 20 cm (range, 7-25 cm). It was reduced to 9 cm (range, 0-17 cm) or 27% (range, 0%-64%) of the total humerus length after clavicular rotation. Direct osteosynthesis (one patient), induced membrane technique (one patient), or vascularized fibular autograft (six patients) was used to complete the defect after rotation of the clavicle if necessary. Presence of union (defined as bone healing before 10 months, as assessed by disappearance of the osteotomy on AP and lateral view radiographs), and complications were determined by chart review performed by a surgeon not involved in patient care. Function assessed by the MSTS and the TESS scores were determined by the patients with their families. RESULTS None of the patients had tumor recurrence. One patient died of pulmonary metastases before the 2-year followup. Proximal and distal bone unions were achieved before 10 months without an additional surgical procedure in two and six of seven patients, respectively. Fourteen local complications occurred resulting in nine revision operations. The main complication was aseptic proximal pseudarthrosis (five patients); other complications included one proximal junction fracture, one clavicle fracture complicated by clavicle osteolysis, one distal junction fracture, one necrosis of the skin paddle of the fibular autograft, one glenoclavicular ossification, and one distal pseudarthrosis complicated by a fracture of this distal junction. Function, as assessed by the MSTS score, was a median of 23 of 30 (range, 11-27). The median TESS score was 82% (range, 75%-92%). Shoulder ROM (median; range) in abduction, front elevation, and external and internal rotations were 70°(30°-90°), 75°(30°-85°), 10°(0°-20°), and 80°(80°-100°), respectively. Three of the seven patients reported dissatisfaction with the cosmetic appearance. CONCLUSIONS The clavicula pro humero technique achieved oncologic local control after resection and reconstruction of proximal humerus tumors in children. Although union times are approximately 2 years and some patients underwent augmentation with other grafts, it eventually provides a solid, painless, biologic, and stable reconstruction and creates a mobile acromioclavicular joint and generally good function. Nonunion of the proximal junction is the main complication of this technique. We cannot directly compare this technique with other reconstruction options, and longer followup is needed, but this may be a useful reconstruction option to consider in select pediatric patients with sarcomas of the proximal humerus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique Barbier
- Pediatric Orthopedics Department, Children’s Hospital, CHU Nancy, Rue du Morvan, 54000 Nancy, France
| | - Benoît De Billy
- Pediatric Orthopedics Department, CHRU, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
| | - Philippe Gicquel
- Pediatric Orthopedics Department, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - Sophie Bourelle
- Pediatric Ortopedics Department, American Memorial Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Pierre Journeau
- Pediatric Orthopedics Department, Children’s Hospital, CHU Nancy, Rue du Morvan, 54000 Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Goulding KA, Schwartz A, Hattrup SJ, Randall RL, Lee D, Rispoli DM, Lerman DM, Beauchamp C. Use of Compressive Osseointegration Endoprostheses for Massive Bone Loss From Tumor and Failed Arthroplasty: A Viable Option in the Upper Extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475:1702-1711. [PMID: 28194713 PMCID: PMC5406340 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-017-5258-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoprostheses using principles of compressive osseointegration have shown good survivorship in several studies involving the lower extremity; however, no series to our knowledge have documented the use of this technology in the management of massive bone loss in the upper limb. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) What proportion of upper extremity implants using compressive osseointegration fixation principles achieved durable short-term fixation, and what were the modes of failure? (2) What surgical complications resulted from reconstruction using this technique? METHODS A multiinstitutional retrospective review identified nine patients (five women; four men) who underwent 13 endoprosthetic replacements between 2003 and 2014 using compressive osseointegration (Compliant® Pre-stress Device [CPS]; Biomet Inc, Warsaw, IN, USA) in the upper extremity, including two proximal humeri, two humeral diaphyses, seven distal humeri, and two proximal ulna. During the early part of that period, the indication for use of a compressive prosthesis in our centers was revision of a previous tumor reconstruction (allograft-prosthetic composite or stemmed endoprosthetic reconstruction) (three patients; five implants), or revision arthroplasty with massive bone loss (three patients, four implants); more recently, indications became somewhat more permissive and included posttraumatic bone loss (one patient, one implant), primary bone sarcoma, and resections with very short remaining end segments after diaphyseal resections (two patients, three implants). Minimum followup was 24 months; one patient (one implant) was lost to followup before that time with the implant intact at 14 months and no patients have died. The mean age of the patients was 45 years (range, 21-62 years). Mean followup was 68 months (range, 24-141 months). Implant revision for any cause and for failure of the CPS mechanism was recorded. Modes of failure were categorized as soft tissue, aseptic loosening, structural, infection, and tumor progression; CPS modes of failure were defined as lack of fixation, with or without bone or implant fracture. RESULTS Of the 12 implants accounted for beyond 2 years, six had undergone revision of any kind. Only two revisions in two patients were attributable to lack of CPS fixation at the bone-implant interface; one of the patients also had periprosthetic and implant fracture develop through the traction bar. Other modes of failure were aseptic loosening of the standard ulnar component (two patients, two implants), bushing wear (one patient; one implant) and infection resulting in two-stage exchange and free soft tissue transfer with retention of the CPS spindle (one patient, one implant). Complications for all nine patients included one transient radial nerve palsy, one ulnar nerve sensory neurapraxia, one superficial infection, and two glenohumeral subluxations, one underwent revision surgery with implantation of a constrained liner. CONCLUSIONS A compressive osseointegration endoprosthesis is an option for very difficult revisions or sarcoma resection in the upper extremity in which the remaining segment of host bone is too short for a conventional prosthesis. However, surgeons must inform patients that these are salvage operations, and revision surgery is common. Long-term followup of more patients is necessary to further document the survivorship of these implants in the upper extremity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista A. Goulding
- McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Avenue Cedar, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4 Canada
| | - Adam Schwartz
- The Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ USA
| | | | | | - Donald Lee
- Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute Medical Center East, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Damian M. Rispoli
- Holy Spirit Hospital, A Gesinger Affiliate Associate, Danville, PA USA
| | - Daniel M. Lerman
- University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dubina A, Shiu B, Gilotra M, Hasan SA, Lerman D, Ng VY. What is the Optimal Reconstruction Option after the Resection of Proximal Humeral Tumors? A Systematic Review. Open Orthop J 2017; 11:203-211. [PMID: 28458733 PMCID: PMC5388785 DOI: 10.2174/1874325001711010203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2016] [Revised: 01/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The proximal humerus is a common location for both primary and metastatic bone tumors. There are numerous reconstruction options after surgical resection. There is no consensus on the ideal method of reconstruction. Methods: A systematic review was performed with a focus on the surgical reconstructive options for lesions involving the proximal humerus. Results: A total of 50 articles and 1227 patients were included for analysis. Reoperation rates were autograft arthrodesis (11%), megaprosthesis (10%), RSA (17%), hemiarthroplasty (26%), and osteoarticular allograft (34%). Mechanical failure rates, including prosthetic loosening, fracture, and dislocation, were highest in allograft-containing constructs (APC, osteoarticular allograft, arthrodesis) followed by arthroplasty (hemiarthroplasty, RSA, megaprosthesis) and lowest for autografts (vascularized fibula, autograft arthrodesis). Infections involving RSA (9%) were higher than hemiarthroplasty (0%) and megaprosthesis (4%). Postoperative function as measured by MSTS score were similar amongst all prosthetic options, ranging from 66% to 74%, and claviculo pro humeri (CPH) was slightly better (83%). Patients were generally limited to active abduction of approximately 45° and no greater than 90°. With resection of the rotator cuff, deltoid muscle or axillary nerve, function and stability were compromised even further. If the rotator cuff was sacrificed but the deltoid and axillary nerve preserved, active forward flexion and abduction were superior with RSA. Discussion: Various reconstruction techniques for the proximal humerus lead to relatively similar functional results. Surgical choice should be tailored to anatomic defect and functional requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Dubina
- University of Maryland - Orthopaedics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brian Shiu
- University of Maryland Medical Center - Orthopaedics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mohit Gilotra
- University of Maryland Medical Center - Orthopaedics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - S Ashfaq Hasan
- University of Maryland Medical Center - Orthopaedics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel Lerman
- University of Maryland Medical Center - Orthopaedics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vincent Y Ng
- University of Maryland Medical Center - Orthopaedics, 110 S. Paca St, 6th Floor, Baltimore, 21201, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Surgery for bone sarcoma of the upper extremity. CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE 2016. [DOI: 10.1097/bco.0000000000000441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|