What Is the Outcome of Allograft and Intramedullary Free Fibula (Capanna Technique) in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients With Bone Tumors?

Parallel Reconstruction of Vascularized Fibula Autograft for Treatment of Complications after Resection of Malignant Tumor from the Thigh

SUMMARY

The authors herein introduce a modification of parallel reconstruction with a vascularized fibula autograft (VFA) for cases of femur allograft complications. Conventional parallel reconstruction, in which the fibula with its vascular pedicle is placed on the medial side of the femur and allogeneic bone, may be an effective means to solve the allograft complications. However, the limited contact area between the fibula and femur/allogeneic bone can affect the bone healing ability. Furthermore, the rigid internal fixation method for the VFA may cause stress shielding and result in bone resorption. The authors propose the use of modified parallel reconstruction of the VFA with fibula expansion and titanium cable fixation for patients with allograft-host junction nonunion, allogeneic bone fracture, and femoral shaft fracture after surgical removal of a malignant tumor from the thigh. The modified parallel reconstruction has been performed on 5 patients (2 patients underwent fibular expansion). All 5 patients with 7 nonunions of the allograft-host junction or fracture were followed up for 33.2 months. The length of fibular graft was 10 to 20 cm, with an average of 15.0 cm. The union rate of allograft-host junction and fracture was 100% (7 of 7), and the union time was 15.9 months. This modified parallel reconstruction technique can achieve satisfactory union in treatment of the above complications.

Distraction Osteogenesis Reconstruction Following Resection of Bone Sarcomas: Surgical, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes from a Prospective Trial Analysis

BACKGROUND

While sustainable long-term function has been established for biological reconstruction with distraction osteogenesis (DO) following osseous resections, there is a paucity of published data informing surgeons and patients on important milestones in the reconstructive process. The objectives of this study were to determine when to expect complete bone healing and full weight-bearing as well as to quantify the influence of chemotherapy on the osseous regeneration process.

METHODS

Prospectively, pathological and clinical data were collected for 30 consecutive patients who underwent primary or secondary DO-based reconstruction following osseous resection from 2018 to 2021. Serial radiographs indicated the times to cortex formation and full union. An unpaired t test was used to compare the time required for full bone remodeling of segments transported with and without concurrent chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The average resection length was 13.6 cm (range, 4 to 22 cm). Patients underwent an average of 6.1 procedures (range, 1 to 14 procedures). Half (50%) of all procedures were planned, while half were unplanned procedures. All patients achieved full, independent weight-bearing at a median of 12 months (interquartile range [IQR], 9 to 16 months). For the 34 segments transported concurrently with chemotherapy, the mean bone healing index (BHI) was 2.3 ± 0.7, and the mean BHI was 1.2 ± 0.4 for the 25 segments without chemotherapy at any point during their transport (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

All 30 patients achieved full bone healing and independent weight-bearing at a median of 1 year postoperatively and continued to show functional improvement afterward. Surgeons and patients can expect bone healing to be nearly twice as fast for segments transported after completion of systemic chemotherapy compared with segments transported concurrently with adjuvant chemotherapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparing Fibula Flap Insetting Techniques for Pediatric Oncologic Extremity Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Extremity reconstruction in skeletally immature patients presents unique challenges in terms of operative technique, bone healing, and limb function. A variety of insetting techniques have been described, with no clearly superior option. The authors hypothesized that vascularized fibula flaps placed in the intramedullary space are associated with shorter union times and better functionality compared with onlay flaps.

METHODS

In a cohort study, the authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all pediatric patients who underwent fibula flap extremity reconstruction at a single center from 2001 through 2018. Comorbidities, complications, and outcomes were analyzed. Complete fibula union was based on radiographic evidence of significant cortical bridging.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (mean age, 13.6 years; range, 2 to 18 years) underwent pedicled ( n = 7) or free ( n = 26) fibula flap reconstructions in 12 upper extremities and 21 lower extremities. Median follow-up was 69.5 months (interquartile range, 16.3 to 114.6 months). Onlay and intramedullary fibula position compared with intercalary placement (median, 13.5 and 14.6 months versus 3.4 months; P = 0.002) were associated with longer time to complete bone union. Complications including allograft fracture ( P = 0.02) and hardware removal ( P = 0.018) were also associated with longer time to complete union and eventual conversion to megaprosthesis ( P = 0.02, P = 0.038). Thirty-two patients (97%) achieved full union and a functional reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Fibula flap reconstruction is safe and effective for pediatric long-bone reconstruction. Longer fibula union times were associated with onlay and intramedullary fibula placement, allograft fracture, and hardware removal.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Limb salvage surgery reconstructive techniques following long-bone lower limb oncological resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage surgery (LSS) is now considered the gold standard surgical treatment for lower limb bone sarcomas. However, there is a paucity of literature comparing the various LSS reconstructive options. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare functional outcomes and complications of LSS reconstructive techniques.

METHODS

The primary aim of the meta-analysis was to determine functional outcomes from the pooled data utilizing the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score (MSTS). Comparisons could then made for this outcome between biological and prosthetic, vascularised and non-vascularised, and prosthetic and composite reconstructions. The secondary aim was to compare complication outcomes of each reconstruction. Standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) and odds ratios were estimated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with a total of 785 patients were included. We found structural failure was 75% less likely to occur in prosthetic reconstruction compared to biological (OR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.07-0.79; P = 0.02). We did not find any evidence of difference in function (MSTS score) between vascularised verses non-vascularised reconstructions (Cohen's d = -1.14; 95% CI = -3.06 to 0.78; I2  = 87%). Other analyses comparing complications found no difference between the reconstructive groups.

CONCLUSION

The study found no correlation between functional outcomes and the type of LSS reconstruction. Structural failure was more likely to occur in biological when compared with prosthetic reconstruction. There was no correlation between the incidence of other complications and the type of LSS technique. This suggests a role for improved approaches to reconstruction methods including bioprinting and bioresorbable devices.

Outcomes of Humeral Allograft-Prosthetic Composites with Plate Fixation in Revision Total Elbow Arthroplasty

Background

Traditionally, the reconstruction of severe distal humeral bone loss at the time of revision total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has used allograft-prosthetic composites (APCs) stabilized with cerclage wires or cables. We have migrated to plate fixation when revision TEA using a humeral APC is performed. This study shows the outcomes of patients treated with a humeral APC with plate fixation during revision TEA.

Methods

Between 2009 and 2019, 41 humeral APCs with plate fixation of distal humeral allograft to the native humerus were performed in the setting of revision TEA. There were 12 male patients (29%) and 29 female patients (71%), with a mean age of 63 years (range, 41 to 87 years). The mean allograft length was 12 cm. All elbows had a minimum follow-up of 2 years (mean follow-up, 3.3 years). Patients were evaluated for visual analog scale pain scores, range of motion, the ability to perform select activities of daily living, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Outcomes including reoperations, complications, and revisions were noted. The most recent radiographs were evaluated for union at the allograft-host interface, failure of the plate-and-screw construct, or component loosening.

Results

The mean postoperative flexion was 124° (range, 60° to 150°) and the mean postoperative extension was 26° (range, 0° to 90°); the mean arc of motion was 99° (range, 30° to 150°). The mean MEPS was 58 points (range, 10 to 100 points). Two surgical procedures were complicated by neurologic deficits. The overall reoperation rate was 14 (34%) of 41. Of the 33 patients with complete radiographic follow-up, 12 (36%) had evidence of nonunion at the allograft-host interface with humeral component loosening, 1 (3%) had evidence of partial union, and 1 (3%) had ulnar stem loosening.

Conclusions

Revision TEA with a humeral APC using compression plating was successful in approximately two-thirds of the elbows. Further refinement of surgical techniques is needed to improve union rates in these complex cases.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Treatment of a case of septic tibial nonunion by the Capanna technique

This report presents the case of a 25-year-old male with an infected tibial diaphyseal nonunion caused by a bone transport procedure carried out to treat an open fracture the patient had sustained 10 years before referral to our hospital. After an initial radical debridement, a bone defect was created, which was subsequently obliterated by placement of an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer and Stimulan beads and covered by an anterolateral thigh flap. As the patient refused to wear an external fixator and his osseous biology was not amenable to a Masquelet procedure, a decision was made to apply the Capanna technique as soon as the infection healed. The second debridement resulted in a 12-cm-long bone defect that was filled with a tibial allograft and a vascularized fibular graft. At six months, the patient had regained full knee function and was able to bear his full weight, without pain or the need of support equipment. At one year, the bone had healed completely, the infection had subsided and the patient was able to resume his everyday activities. Although the Capanna technique was initially developed to reinforce reconstructions at risk of fracture or nonunion as a result of chemotherapy, its use in post-traumatic cases has been shown to be successful in a selected group of patents. Our study demonstrated that increasing the stability of a reconstruction with an allograft can accelerate the time to heal, and that using a vascularized fibular graft can enhance incorporation of the whole construct. It can be concluded that the Capanna technique is a valid treatment option for managing infected segmental bone defects in selected patients.

Is liquid nitrogen recycled bone and vascular fibula combination the biological reconstruction of choice in lower extremity long bone tumor-related defects?

INTRODUCTION

Combination techniques, which encompass the combined use of vascularized bone grafts with massive allografts or autografts (recycled bone grafts), are especially important in the biological reconstruction of tumor-related lower extremity long bone defects. Liquid nitrogen recycled bone (frozen autograft) and free vascular fibula graft (FVFG) combination, which was coined as the "frozen hotdog (FH)" method by the authors, has not been as widely used nor its outcomes reported for significantly sized patient groups. This study aims to provide an answer to whether FH is a safe and effective reconstructive tool for limb salvage in malignant tumors of the lower extremity regarding radiological, functional, and oncological outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-six (male/female: 33/33) patients, who underwent FH reconstruction for tumor-related massive defects of lower extremity long bones between 2006 and 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age was 15.8 (3.8-46.7) years. The most common tumor localizations were distal femur (42.4%) and proximal tibia (21.2%) while classic osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma were the most common pathologies (60.6% and 22.7%, respectively). Mean resection and FVFG lengths were 160 (90-320) mm and 192 (125-350) mm, respectively. The mean follow-up was 73.9 (24-192) months.

RESULTS

The mean MSTS score was 25.4 (15-30) and the mean ISOLS radiographic score was 22.6 (13-24). Mean time to full weight bearing without any assistive devices was 15.4 (6-40) months and the median time was 12 months. MSTS score negatively correlated with resected segment length and vascular fibula length (p < 0.001; p = 0.006). Although full contact apposition of the FH segment correlated with earlier full weight bearing compared to partial apposition (mean 13.7 vs. 17.9 months) (p = 0.042), the quality of reduction did not affect the ISOLS radiographic score at LFU. Overall limb survival rate was 96.3% at 5 and 10 years while FH survival rate was 91.0% and 88.1% at 5 and 10 years. Local recurrence-free survival rates were 88.8% and 85.9%, and overall survival was 89.9% and 86.1% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Limb length discrepancy was the most common complication with 34 (51.5%) patients while shell nonunion was seen in 21 (31.8%) patients and graft fracture in 6 (9.1%).

CONCLUSION

The "FH" method is a safe, effective, and extremely cost-efficient reconstructive tool for tumor-related lower extremity long bone defects. Patient compliance to protracted weight-bearing, ensuring the vitality of the FVFG, and achieving an oncologically safe resection are key factors for a successful outcome.

Operative Treatment and Outcomes of Pediatric Patients with an Extremity Bone Tumor: A Secondary Analysis of the PARITY Trial Data

BACKGROUND

Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are the 2 most common primary bone sarcomas, occurring predominantly in pediatric patients, with the incidence of osteosarcoma correlating with periods of peak bone-growth velocity. Although survival outcomes have plateaued over the past several decades, ongoing treatment advances have improved function, decreased infection rates, and improved other clinical outcomes in patients with bone tumors. Recently, the Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) trial addressed the serious problem of surgical site infection (SSI) and the lack of consensus regarding the appropriate prophylactic postoperative antibiotic regimen. The objective of the present secondary analysis of the PARITY trial was to characterize the modern treatment and surgical and oncologic outcomes of pediatric patients with bone tumors at 1 year postoperatively.

METHODS

The PARITY trial included patients ≥12 years old with a bone tumor or soft-tissue sarcoma that was invading the femur or tibia, necessitating osseous resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction. This pediatric subanalysis of the PARITY trial data included all PARITY patients ≤18 years old. As in the main PARITY study, patients were randomized to either a 5-day or 1-day course of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome measure was the development of an SSI within 1 year, and secondary outcomes included antibiotic-related adverse events, unplanned additional operations, local recurrence, metastasis, and death.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were included. An adjudicated SSI occurred in 27 patients (17.9%). There was no difference in the rate of any SSI between the 5-day and 1-day antibiotic groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 to 1.9; p = 0.82). Antibiotic-related complications occurred in 13 patients (8.6%), with no difference noted between groups (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.4; p = 0.18). A total of 45 patients (29.8%) required a return to the operating room within the first postoperative year, which corresponded with a 68.8% reoperation-free rate of survival at 1 year when accounting for competing risks. The most common reason for reoperation was infection (29 of 45; 64.4%). A total of 7 patients (4.6%) required subsequent amputation of the operative extremity, and an additional 6 patients (4.0%) required implant revision within 12 months. A total of 36 patients (23.8%) developed metastases, and 6 patients (4.0%) developed a local recurrence during the first postoperative year. A total of 11 patients (7.3%) died during the study period. There were no significant differences in oncologic outcomes between the 5-day and 1-day antibiotic groups (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.5-1.8; p = 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in surgical or oncologic outcomes between pediatric patients who underwent a 1-day versus 5-day antibiotic regimen following endoprosthetic reconstruction in the PARITY trial. Surgeons should be aware of and counsel patients and caregivers regarding the 30% rate of reoperation and the risks of infection (17.9%), death (7.3%), amputation (4.6%), and implant revision (4%) within the first postoperative year.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Allografts: expanding the surgeon's armamentarium

In Germany, bone allografts are widely used and their application in clinics has increased over the years. Successful use of allografts depends on many factors such as the procurement, processing, sterilization and the surgeon's surgical experience. Tissue banks have provided safe and sterile allografts for decades ranging from hard to soft tissue. Allografts are obtained from various tissues such as bone, tendon, amniotic membrane, meniscus and skin. An advantage of allografts is their wide applicability that has never been limited by indication restrictions thus providing a huge benefit for surgeon's. The use of the correct allograft in different indications is extremely important. Thereby surgeons have access to various allograft forms such as mineralized, demineralized, freeze-dried, paste, powder, chips strips and putty. The vast options of allografts allow surgeon's to use allografts in indications they deem fit. Currently, the application of allografts is at the discretion of the expert surgeon. However, regulations are often changed locally or internationally and may impact/limit allograft use to certain indications. Here, we report the different indications where our peracetic acid (PAA) sterilised bone allografts were used as well as general literature on bone allograft use in other indications.

A classification system of joint-salvage tumor resection in osteosarcoma of the knee: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Joint-preserving surgery is possible for patients with juxta-articular osteosarcoma of the knee, even when the tumor invades the epiphysis. Oncologic and functional outcomes may vary due to the extent of tumor invasion, the amount of epiphysis preservation, and reconstruction methods. We aimed to introduce a novel classification facilitating clinical evaluation of different surgical treatments.

METHODS

We identified 52 patients with osteosarcoma of the knee undergoing joint-preserving tumor resection and intercalary reconstruction. We classified procedures into two types and six subtypes based on the tumor location and adjuvant treatment employed. Oncologic outcomes, limb function and complications were compared among different types.

RESULTS

None of the patients had a local recurrence in the preserved epiphysis apart from three (5.7 %) who had local recurrence in soft tissue. Overall survival rate of the patients was 82.7 % at 5 and 10 years. There was no difference in survival rate (P = 0.909), local recurrence (P = 0.642) between type I (tumor not invading epiphysis) and type II (tumor invading epiphysis). In addition to one skin necrosis in the 3D-printed prosthesis reconstruction and one infection in Capanna reconstruction, all complications necessitating additional surgery occurred in allograft. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores ranged from 21 to 30 with a median of 26. There were differences in the MSTS scores among six subgroups (P = 0.015), with the highest in type Ia and the lowest in type IIc. The less of the viable epiphysis retained, the worse the knee function was at long-term follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

The suggested classification can guide surgical strategy and is convenient for comparison of the functional results.

Vascularized fibular grafts for the treatment of long bone defects: pros and cons. A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To quantify union rate, complication rate, reintervention rate, as well as functional outcome after vascularized fibular bone grafts (VFGs) for the treatment of long-bone defects.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to August 18, 2020. Randomized controlled trials, comparative studies, and case series describing the various techniques available involving VFGs for the reconstruction of segmental long-bone defects were included. A meta-analysis was performed on union results, complications, and reinterventions. Assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence was performed with the Downs and Black's "Checklist for Measuring Quality".

RESULTS

After full-text assessment, 110 articles on 2226 patients were included. Among the retrieved studies, 4 were classified as poor, 83 as fair, and 23 as good. Overall, good functional results were documented and a union rate of 80.1% (CI 74.1-86.2%) was found, with a 39.4% (CI 34.4-44.4%) complication rate, the most common being fractures, non-unions and delayed unions, infections, and thrombosis. Donor site morbidity represented 10.7% of the total complications. A 24.6% reintervention rate was documented (CI 21.0-28.1%), and 2.8% of the patients underwent amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis documented good long-term outcomes both in the upper and lower limb. However, VFG is a complex and demanding technique; this complexity means an average high number of complications, especially fractures, non-unions, and vascular problems. Both potential and limitations of VFG should be considered when choosing the most suitable approach for the treatment of long-bone defects.

Factors Influencing Nonunion and Fracture Following Biological Intercalary Reconstruction for Lower-Extremity Bone Tumors: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine nonunion rate, fracture rate, and their risk factors following biological intercalary reconstruction for lower extremity bone tumors.

METHODS

A systematic review and pooled analysis were conducted. PubMed, Embase, and Wiley Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to June 01, 2020. Studies concerning biological intercalary reconstruction after resection of lower extremity bone tumors were included. Overall nonunion and fracture rates were calculated. For studies reporting patient outcomes individually with precise graft characteristics and fixation methods, the individual data were extracted. Patients with demographical and clinical characteristics, including age, sex, tumor location, graft characteristics, and fixation method, were pooled for a multivariate analysis. For each factor of interest, odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and p-value from logistic regression were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 2776 articles were identified from the initial literature search and 76 studies (2052 patients) were included. Sixty-nine studies were case series and seven were comparative studies. The overall nonunion rate was 19% (382/2052; range: 0%-53%), and the overall fracture rate was 17% (344/2052; range: 0%-75%). Thirty of the 76 studies (362 patients) reported patients' characteristics individually and were thus included in the pooled multivariate analysis. Intramedullary nail fixation was associated with a significantly higher nonunion rate compared to plate fixation (OR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.23-4.10, p = 0.009). Reconstruction with a vascularized fibula graft had a statistically non-significant lower nonunion rate than reconstruction without the graft (OR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.34-1.07, p = 0.086). Devitalized autografts had a lower fracture risk than allografts (OR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.14-0.64, p = 0.002), and males tended to have higher fracture risk than females (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.00-4.44, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction with intramedullary nail fixation is related to an elevated risk of nonunion. Allografts and males have a higher fracture risk than devitalized autografts and females, respectively. Further high-quality comparative analyses with large sample sizes and adequate follow-up duration are needed to validate these findings.

Hip-preserving reconstruction using a customized cemented femoral endoprosthesis with a curved stem in patients with short proximal femur segments: Mid-term follow-up outcomes

Background

Short metaphyseal segments that remain following extensive distal femoral tumor resection can be challenging to manage, as the residual short segments may not be sufficient to accept an intramedullary cemented stem of standard length. The present study was developed to detail preliminary findings and experiences associated with an intra-neck curved stem (INCS) reconstructive approach, with a particular focus on mechanical stability.

Method

From March 2013 to August 2016, 11 total patients underwent reconstructive procedures using a customized cemented femoral endoprosthesis (CCFE) with an INCS. Measurements of femoral neck-shaft angle values were made before and after this procedure. Radiological outcomes associated with this treatment strategy over an average 63-month follow-up period were additionally assessed. Functionality was assessed based upon Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores, while a visual analog scale (VAS) was used to rate pre- and postoperative pain, and any complications were noted.

Results

Relative to the preoperative design, no significant differences in femoral neck–shaft angle were observed after this reconstructive procedure (p = 0.410). Postoperatively, the tip of the stem was primarily positioned within the middle third of the femoral head in both lateral and posterior-anterior radiographic, supporting the accuracy of INCS positioning. The average MSTS score for these patients was 25 (range: 21–28), and VAS scores were significantly reduced after surgery (p &lt; 0.0001). One patient exhibited local disease recurrence and ultimately succumbed to lung metastases, while two patients exhibited aseptic loosening. None of the treated patients exhibited complications such as infections, periprosthetic fractures, or prosthetic fractures as of most recent follow-up.

Conclusion

CCFE with an INCS represents a viable approach to massive femoral diaphyseal defect with short proximal femur repair, as patients can achieve good functional outcomes and early weight-bearing with proper individualized rehabilitative interventions, all while exhibiting low rates of procedure-related complications.

A comparison of cemented and cementless intra-neck curved stem use during hip-preserving reconstruction following massive femoral malignant tumor removal

Background

Patients who undergo massive femoral malignant tumor (MFMT) resection often exhibit shortened femoral metaphyseal juxta-articular segments. The use of a customized femoral endoprosthesis (CFE) with an intra-neck curved stem (INCS) has emerged as a viable reconstructive surgical strategy for these individuals. Relative to a cemented INCS, it remains unclear as to whether cementless INCS use is associated with improvements in functionality or reconstructive longevity. As such, the present study was conducted to compare functional outcomes, endoprosthetic survival, and endoprosthesis-related complication rates in patients undergoing cemented and cementless INCS implantation.

Methods

A total of 24 patients undergoing lower limb salvage and reconstructive surgical procedures utilizing cemented or cementless INCS endoprostheses were retrospectively included. Patient-functional outcomes, endoprosthetic survival, and complication rates were compared as a function of age; diagnosis; the length of femoral resection; residual proximal femur length; Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores; visual analog scale (VAS) scores; and the rates of implant breakage, periprosthetic infections, periprosthetic fractures, and aseptic loosening.

Results

The mean follow-up was 56 months. Significant differences in the length of femoral resection (p&lt;0.001) and residual proximal femur length were observed (p&lt;0.001) between the cemented and cementless INCS groups. There were no differences in overall patient survival and aseptic loosening-associated endoprosthesis survival in the cemented and cementless groups. None of the included patients experienced periprosthetic fractures, infections, or implant breakage. Average respective MSTS and VAS scores did not differ between groups.

Conclusion

For patients undergoing treatment for MFMTs, the use of a CFE with an INCS has emerged as a viable approach to hip-preserving reconstructive surgery. With appropriately designed individualized rehabilitative programs, good functional outcomes can be achieved for these endoprostheses, which are associated with low complication rates. Moreover, the selection between cemented or cementless INCS in the clinic should be made based on patient-specific factors, with cementless INCS implementation being preferable in younger patients with good-quality bone, the potential for long-term survival, and the osteotomy site near the lesser trochanter, whereas cemented INCS use should be favored for individuals who are older, have a shorter life expectancy, or have poor bone quality.

Intramedullary Fixation of Double-Barrel Vascularised Fibula Grafts With Subsequent Lengthening for Reconstruction of the Distal Femur in Patients With Osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

The use of vascularised fibula grafts is an accepted method for reconstructing the distal femur following resection of malignant childhood tumors. Limitations relate to the mismatch of the cross-sectional area of the transplanted fibula graft and the local bone, instability of the construct and union difficulties. We present midterm results of a unique staged technique-an immediate defect reconstruction using a double-barrel vascularised fibula graft set in in A-frame configuration and a subsequent intramedullary femoral lengthening.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 10 patients (mean age 10 y) with an osteosarcoma of the distal femur, who were treated according to the above-mentioned surgical technique. All patients were evaluated with regards to consolidation of the transplanted grafts, hypertrophy at the graft-host junctions, leg length discrepancies, lengthening indices, complications as well as functional outcome.

RESULTS

The mean defect size after tumor resection was 14.5 cm, the mean length of the harvested fibula graft 22 cm, resulting in a mean (acute) shortening of 4.7 cm (in 8 patients). Consolidation was achieved in all cases, 4 patients required supplementary bone grafting. Hypertrophy at the graft-host junctions was observed in 78% of the evaluable junctions. In total 11 intramedullary lengthening procedures in 9 patients had been performed at the last follow up. The mean Muskuloskeletal Society Rating Scale (MSTS) score of the evaluable 9 patients was 85% (57% to 100%) with good or excellent results in 7 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A-frame vascularised fibula reconstructions showed encouraging results with respect to defect reconstruction, length as well as function and should therefore be considered a valuable option for reconstruction of the distal femur after osteosarcoma resection. The surgical implementation is demanding though, which is emphasized by the considerable high number of complications requiring surgical intervention, even though most were not serious.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

Intercalary reconstruction of long bones by massive allograft: Comparison of construct stability ensured by three different host-graft junctions and two types of fixations in a synthetic femur model

An intercalary segmental allograft is an option for limb salvage in bone tumours. Stable and congruent intercalary reconstructions are a prerequisite for achieving host-graft union. However, a too rigid fixation could increase the risk of late complications correlated with negative bone remodelling. This study compared the reconstruction stiffness achieved by three different host-graft junctions, namely, end-to-end, modified step-cut, and taper. A low-stiffness bone plate was used as the fixation method, except for the taper junction where a low-stiffness intramedullary nail was also used to investigate the effects of different types of fixation on construct stiffness. Composite femora were tested under four loading conditions to determine coronal and sagittal bending stiffness, as well as torsional stiffness in opposite directions. Stiffness values were expressed as a percentage of intact host bone stiffness (%IBS). While a reduction of coronal bending stiffness was found with taper junctions (76%IBS) compared with the high values ensured by end-to-end (96%IBS) and modified step-cut junctions (92%IBS), taper junctions significantly increased stiffness under sagittal bending and torsion in intra- and extra-direction: end-to-end 29%IBS, 7%IBS, 7%IBS, modified step-cut 38%IBS, 20%IBS, 21%IBS, and taper junction 52%IBS, 55%IBS, 56%IBS, respectively. Construct stiffness with taper junctions was decreased by 11-41%IBS by replacing the bone plate with an intramedullary nail. Taper junctions can be an alternative to achieve intercalary reconstructions with more homogeneous and, in three out of four loading conditions, significantly higher construct stability without increasing bone plate stiffness. The risk of instability under high torsional loads increases when taper junctions are associated with a low-stiffness intramedullary nail.

Hip-preserving reconstruction of the proximal femur with a vascularized fibula autograft and liquid-nitrogen-treated tumor bearing bone

A five-year-old boy with Ewing sarcoma of the proximal femur was operated at our institution with limb-sparing surgery and biological reconstruction of the proximal femur with a vascularized fibular autograft. During this procedure, the proximal femur was soaked in liquid nitrogen which was subsequently fixed to the fibular autograft, while the epiphysis of the femoral head was spared. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of epiphysis-sparing surgery of the proximal femur via a vascularized fibular autograft surrounded by a liquid nitrogen-treated tumor bearing bone autograft. Three years postoperatively, the patient remains disease-free, has a full weight-bearing extremity with good function, and a remodeled proximal femur with minimal deformity. There are no radiological or clinical signs indicative of femoral head osteonecrosis. In conclusion, hip-sparing biological reconstruction is a successful method of limb preservation as an alternative to tumor endoprostheses.

Intercalary reconstruction of the distal femur with or without physeal preservation: results and impact on limb growth

PURPOSE

Allograft reconstruction with or without vascularized fibula can be a valuable solution to treat childhood intercalary tumours of the distal femur. We aimed to assess the oncological status, complication rate and survival of distal femur intercalary reconstruction after trans-metaphyseal (TMR) and trans-epiphyseal resection (TER). We also evaluated the impact of distal temporary graft fixation on skeletal growth after TMR.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 23 skeletally immature patients affected by distal femur osteosarcoma (18) and Ewing sarcoma (5). Mean patients age was 10.3 years. In 11 cases, TMR was performed with physis preservation and temporary distal graft fixation. In 9 patients, TER was performed with growth plate sacrifice. The last 3 cases were treated with TMR and sliding plate fixation.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 8.4 years. No deaths occurred, but 3 patients presented lung metastasis and 2 cases presented local recurrence in soft tissues. 10 implant-related complications occurred, all surgically treated. At skeletal maturity, mean femoral dysmetria was 2.3 cm after TMR and temporary epiphysiodesis, and 3.1 cm after TER. In TMR group, a strong trend towards physeal recovery was observed after epiphyseal screws removal (p = 0.061), but valgus deformity in distal femur was more frequent (p = 0.049). MSTS score was good or excellent in all patients, with no statistically significant difference between TMR and TER.

CONCLUSIONS

Intercalary graft reconstruction after TMR and TER allows good local disease control and excellent functional results with long-term follow-up. Temporary distal fixation might reduce the final limb discrepancy after TMR, but valgus deformity could develop.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Periosteal osteosarcoma of the femur treated with modified capanna procedure: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Periosteal osteosarcoma is a rare type of primary bone tumor. A vascularized fibula graft incorporates this revolutionary approach with a traditional massive allograft to reconstruct large femur and tibia defects during oncological resection. A structurally competent reconstruction with improved vascular and osteogenic capacities with the ability to achieve lower rates of fracture, infection, and non-union is obtained by integrating the benefits of this separate components.

METHOD

A 16-year-old female diagnosed with periosteal osteosarcoma of the left shaft femur. We performed neoadjuvant chemotherapy, limb salvage surgery consists of surgical resection and reconstruction, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy post operatively. We used the modified Capanna procedure to salvage the femur.

RESULT

Post-operative evaluation showed stable fixation clinically and radiologically. There were no complications observed during recovery, as both distal motor and sensory are normal eventhough the patient were still limited in the motion of the hip and knee at the time due to post-operative pain.

DISCUSSION

Cappana procedure has been known as a novel surgical method that could decrease the risk of complications results from classic reconstruction method, such as fracture, non-union, and infection.

CONCLUSION

Modified Cappana procedure which introduce the use liquid nitorgen-recycled autograft from the resected affected bone as a peripheral shell supporting a centrally placed vascularized fibular graft to fill the massive bone defect left by surgical resection, had successfully performed in our patient whom previously diagnosed with periosteal osteosarcoma of femoral shaft.

Prevention and Management of Complications of Tissue Flaps

In this article, we discuss 4 common free flaps performed in reconstructive surgery: the anterolateral thigh flap, the radial forearm flap, the fibula flap, and the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous/deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Donor and recipient complications for each flap type and strategies on how to prevent and manage such complications are discussed.

Preliminary Results of the "Capasquelet" Technique for Managing Femoral Bone Defects-Combining a Masquelet Induced Membrane and Capanna Vascularized Fibula with an Allograft

We describe the preliminary results of a novel two-stage reconstruction technique for extended femoral bone defects using an allograft in accordance with the Capanna technique with an embedded vascularized fibula graft in an induced membrane according to the Masquelet technique. We performed what we refer to as "Capasquelet" surgery in femoral diaphyseal bone loss of at least 10 cm. Four patients were operated on using this technique: two tumors and two traumatic bone defects in a septic context with a minimum follow up of one year. Consolidation on both sides, when achieved, occurred at 5.5 months (4-7), with full weight-bearing at 11 weeks (8-12). The functional scores were satisfactory with an EQ5D of 63.3 (45-75). The time to bone union and early weight-bearing with this combined technique are promising compared to the literature. The osteoinductive role of the induced membrane could play a positive role in the evolution of the graft. Longer follow up and a larger cohort are needed to better assess the implications. Nonetheless, this two-stage technique appears to have ample promise, especially in a septic context or in adjuvant radiotherapy in an oncological context.

Vascularized Pedicled Fibula for Pediatric Tibia Reconstruction

This video reviews the technique of a vascularized fibula flap for pediatric tibia reconstruction. A 4-year-old boy with a history of a left tibial infected nonunion status after multiple debridements presented with segmental bone loss and difficulty with ambulation. An ipsilateral vascularized fibula flap was used for reconstruction. The patient proceeded to union and was independently ambulatory with bracing.

Composite-Free Vascularized Fibular Epiphyseal Flap and Proximal Humeral Allograft for Proximal Humerus Reconstruction in a Pediatric Patient

Tumors involving the epiphysis in children present a reconstructive challenge. A free vascularized fibula epiphyseal transfer offers a means for biological reconstruction and longitudinal growth; however, it is often complicated by graft fracture and limited shoulder motion. Here, we present a case of a composite structural allograft with free vascularized fibula epiphyseal transfer for proximal humeral reconstruction. At 27-month follow-up, there was longitudinal growth, hypertrophy of the epiphysis, shoulder function which allowed activities of daily living, and no graft fracture.

Does the Addition of a Vascularized Fibula Improve the Results of a Massive Bone Allograft Alone for Intercalary Femur Reconstruction of Malignant Bone Tumors in Children?

BACKGROUND

Massive bone allograft with or without a vascularized fibula is a potentially useful approach for femoral intercalary reconstruction after resection of bone sarcomas in children. However, inadequate data exist regarding whether it is preferable to use a massive bone allograft alone or a massive bone allograft combined with a vascularized free fibula for intercalary reconstructions of the femur after intercalary femur resections in children. Because the addition of a vascularized fibula adds to the time and complexity of the procedure, understanding more about whether it reduces complications and improves the function of patients who undergo these resections and reconstructions would be valuable for patients and treating physicians.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In an analysis of children with bone sarcomas of the femur who underwent an intercalary resection and reconstruction with massive bone allograft with or without a vascularized free fibula, we asked: (1) What was the difference in the surgical time of these two different surgical techniques? (2) What are the complications and number of reoperations associated with each procedure? (3) What were the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores after these reconstructions? (4) What was the survival rate of these two different reconstructions?

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2016, we treated 285 patients younger than 16 years with a diagnosis of osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma of the femur. In all, 179 underwent resection and reconstruction of the distal femur and 36 patients underwent resection and reconstruction of the proximal femur. Additionally, in 70 patients with diaphyseal tumors, we performed total femur reconstruction in four patients, amputation in five, and a rotationplasty in one. The remaining 60 patients with diaphyseal tumors underwent intercalary resection and reconstruction with massive bone allograft with or without vascularized free fibula. The decision to use a massive bone allograft with or without a vascularized free fibula was probably influenced by tumor size, with the indication to use the vascularized free fibula in longer reconstructions. Twenty-seven patients underwent a femur reconstruction with massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula, and 33 patients received massive bone allograft alone. In the group with massive bone allograft and vascularized fibula, two patients were excluded because they did not have the minimum data for the analysis. In the group with massive bone allograft alone, 12 patients were excluded: one patient was lost to follow-up before 2 years, five patients died before 2 years of follow-up, and six patients did not have the minimum data for the analysis. We analyzed the remaining 46 children with sarcoma of the femur treated with intercalary resection and biological reconstruction. Twenty-five patients underwent femur reconstruction with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula, and 21 patients had reconstruction with a massive bone allograft alone. In the group of children treated with massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula, there were 17 boys and eight girls, with a mean ± SD age of 11 ± 3 years. The diagnosis was osteosarcoma in 14 patients and Ewing sarcoma in 11. The mean length of resection was 18 ± 5 cm. The mean follow-up was 117 ± 61 months. In the group of children treated with massive bone allograft alone, there were 13 boys and eight girls, with a mean ± SD age of 12 ± 2 years. The diagnosis was osteosarcoma in 17 patients and Ewing sarcoma in four. The mean length of resection was 15 ± 4 cm. The mean follow-up was 130 ± 56 months. Some patients finished clinical and radiological checks as the follow-up exceeded 10 years. In the group with massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula, four patients had a follow-up of 10, 12, 13, and 18 years, respectively, while in the group with massive bone allograft alone, five patients had a follow-up of 10 years, one patient had a follow-up of 11 years, and another had 13 years of follow-up. In general, there were no important differences between the groups in terms of age (mean difference 0.88 [95% CI -0.6 to 2.3]; p = 0.26), gender (p = 0.66), diagnosis (p = 0.11), and follow up (mean difference 12.9 [95% CI-22.7 to 48.62]; p = 0.46). There was a difference between groups regarding the length of the resection, which was greater in patients treated with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula (18 ± 5 cm) than in those treated with a massive bone allograft alone (15 ± 4 cm) (mean difference -3.09 [95% CI -5.7 to -0.4]; p = 0.02). Complications related to the procedure like infection, neurovascular compromise, and graft-related complication, such as fracture and nonunion of massive bone allograft or vascularized free fibula and implant breakage, were analyzed by chart review of these patients by an orthopaedic surgeon with experience in musculoskeletal oncology. Survival of the reconstructions that had no graft or implant replacement was the endpoint. The Kaplan-Meier test was performed for a survival analysis of the reconstruction. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The surgery was longer in patients treated with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula than in patients treated with a massive bone allograft alone (10 ± 0.09 and 4 ± 0.77 hours, respectively; mean difference -6.8 [95% CI -7.1 to -6.4]; p = 0.001). Twelve of 25 patients treated with massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula had one or more complication: allograft fracture (seven), nonunion (four), and infection (four). Twelve of 21 patients treated with massive bone allograft alone had the following complications: allograft fracture (five), nonunion (six), and infection (one). The mean functional results were 26 ± 4 in patients with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula and 27 ± 2 in patients with a massive bone allograft alone (mean difference 0.75 [95% CI -10.6 to 2.57]; p = 0.39). With the numbers we had, we could not detect a difference in survival of the reconstruction between patients with a massive bone allograft and free vascularized fibula and those with a massive bone allograft alone (84% [95% CI 75% to 93%] and 87% [95% CI 80% to 94%], respectively; p = 0.89).

CONCLUSION

We found no difference in the survival of reconstructions between patients treated with a massive bone allograft and vascularized free fibula and patients who underwent reconstruction with a massive bone allograft alone. Based on this experience, our belief is that we should reconstruct these femoral intercalary defects with an allograft alone and use a vascularized fibula to salvage the allograft only if a fracture or nonunion occurs. This approach would have resulted in about half of the patients we treated not undergoing the more invasive, difficult, and risky vascularized procedure.Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

Intercalary reconstruction following resection of diaphyseal bone tumors: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The options for the reconstruction of diaphyseal defects following the resection of bone tumors include biological or prosthetic implants. The purpose of our study was to evaluate different types of intercalary reconstruction techniques, including massive bone allograft, extracorporeal devitalized autograft, vascularized free fibula, and modular prosthesis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of articles using the terms diaphyseal bone tumor and intercalary reconstruction. All the studies reporting the non-oncological complications such as infection, nonunion and fracture of the intercalary reconstructions were included. We excluded articles published before 2000 or did not involve humans in the study. Case reports, reviews, technique notes and opinion articles were also excluded based on the abstracts. Thirty-three articles included in this review were then studied to evaluate failure rates, complications and functional outcome of different surgical intercalary reconstruction techniques.

RESULTS

Nonunion rates of allograft ranged 6%-43%, while aseptic loosening rates of modular prosthesis ranged 0%-33%. Nonunion rates of allograft alone and allograft with a vascularized fibula graft ranged 6%-43% and 0%-33%, respectively. Fracture rates of allograft alone and allograft with a vascularized fibula graft ranged 7%-45% and 0%-44%, respectively. Infection rates of allograft alone and allograft with a vascularized fibula graft ranged 0%-28% and 0%-17%, respectively. All of the allograft (range: 67%-92%), extracorporeal devitalized autograft including irradiation (87%), autoclaving (70%), pasteurization (88%), low-heat (90%) or freezing with liquid nitrogen (90%), and modular prosthesis (range: 77%-93%) had similar Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional scores. Addition of a vascularized fibula graft to allograft did not affect functional outcome [allograft with a vascularized fibula graft (range: 86%-94%) vs. allograft alone (range: 67%-92%)].

CONCLUSION

Aseptic loosening rates of modular prosthesis seem to be less than nonunion rates of allograft. Adding a vascularized fibula graft to allograft seems to increase bone union rate and reduce the risk of fractures and infections, though a vascularized fibula graft needs longer surgical time and has the disadvantage of donor site morbidity. These various intercalary reconstruction techniques with or without a vascularized fibula autograft had similar functional outcome.

Intercalary Allograft Reconstruction of the Proximal Tibia With and Without a Free Fibula Flap in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage of the proximal tibia can be difficult due to the growth potential of and functional demands of the pediatric patients. Multiple reconstruction techniques exist, however, the ideal form of reconstruction is yet to be elucidated. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate outcomes in patients with an intercalary resection of the proximal tibia reconstructed with an allograft with or without a free vascularized fibula flap (FVF).

METHODS

Seventeen pediatric patients (9 males, 8 females) underwent lower extremity limb salvage with the use of intercalary cadaveric allograft at a mean age of 12±4 years. The most common diagnoses were osteosarcoma (n=6) and Ewing sarcoma (n=6). Patients were reconstructed with an allograft alone (n=6) or supplemented with an FVF (n=11).

RESULTS

All surviving patients had at least 2 years of clinical follow-up, with the mean follow-up of 12±7 years. The mean time to union of the allograft was 11±4 months, with 6 patients requiring additional bone grafting. There was no difference in the need for an additional bone graft (odds ratio=1.14, P=1.0) between patients with an FVF and those without. Four patients underwent an amputation, all with an allograft alone, due to disease recurrence (n=2) and due to infection (n=2). As such, there was a higher 10-year overall limb-salvage rate when the allograft was combined with an FVF compared with an allograft alone (100% vs. 33%, P=0.001). At last follow-up, the mean Mankin and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society rating was 86%, with a higher mean score in patients reconstructed with an FVF (94% vs. 70%, P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Use of an intercalary allograft supplemented with an FVF to reconstruct the proximal tibia provides a durable means of reconstruction with an excellent functional outcome following oncologic proximal tibia resection in a pediatric population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-therapeutic level.

Combined Massive Allograft and Intramedullary Vascularized Fibula as the Primary Reconstruction Method for Segmental Bone Loss in the Lower Extremity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of segmental bone loss due to malignancy, infection, or trauma is a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. The combination of a vascularized fibular flap with a cortical allograft provides a reliable reconstructive option in the lower extremity. In this systematic review, we describe the outcome of this technique for the treatment of segmental bone loss.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on the use of a combined massive allograft and intramedullary vascularized fibula as a reconstruction method for large bone defects. We used PubMed, Embase, and the Wiley Cochrane Library.

RESULTS

Seventeen clinical articles were included between 1997 and 2017, reporting 329 cases of lower-extremity reconstructions. A meta-analysis was performed on primary union rates. The main outcome measures were primary union rate, complication rate, reintervention rate, and function after reconstruction. All publications showed relatively high complication (5.9% to 85.7%) and reintervention rates (10% to 91.7%) with good primary union rates (66.7% to 100%) and functional outcome (range of mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society [MSTS] scores, 24 to 29 points).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of a massive allograft with intramedullary vascularized fibula provides a single-step reconstruction method for large bone defects (>6 cm) in the lower extremity, with good long-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Free Vascularized Fibula Graft with Femoral Allograft Sleeve for Lumbar Spine Defects After Spondylectomy of Malignant Tumors: A Case Report

CASE

We present a 65-year-old man with an L4 conventional chordoma. Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of the involved vertebral bodies and surrounding soft tissues with reconstruction of the spine using a free vascularized fibula autograft (FVFG) is a proven technique, limiting complications and recurrence. However, graft fracture has occurred only in the lumbar spine in our institutional cases. We used a technique in our patient to ensure extra stability and support, with the addition of a femoral allograft sleeve encasing the FVFG.

CONCLUSIONS

Our technique for the reconstruction of the lumbar spine after TES of primary malignant spinal disease using a femoral allograft sleeve encasing the FVFG is viable to consider.

Joint-preservation surgery for pediatric osteosarcoma of the knee joint

The multi-disciplinary approach involving imaging, multi-agent chemotherapy, meticulous surgical procedures, and careful postoperative care has facilitated an increase in the use of limb-sparing surgery for pediatric osteosarcoma. Osteosarcoma usually occurs around the metaphysis of the distal femur or proximal tibia and needs wide excision with the adjacent joint and replacement by a megaprosthesis. The recent advancement in imaging modalities and surgical techniques supports joint-preservation surgery (JPS), involving the preservation of the adjacent epiphysis, for select patients following careful assessment of the tumor margins and precise tumor excision. An advantage of this surgery is that it maintains the adjacent joint and preserves the growth of the residual epiphysis, which provides excellent limb function. Various reconstruction options are available, including allograft, tumor-devitalized autograft, vascularized fibula graft, distraction osteogenesis, and custom-made implants. However, several complications are inevitable with these options, such as loosening, non-union at the host-graft junction, infection, fracture, implant loosening, breakage, deformity, limb-length discrepancy related to the reconstruction methods, or patient growth in pediatric osteosarcoma. Surgeons should fully understand the advantages and disadvantages of this procedure. In this review, we discuss the concept of JPS, types of reconstruction methods, and current treatment outcomes. It is our opinion that the further analysis by multi-institutional setting is necessary to clarify long-term outcomes and establish global guidelines on the indications and surgical procedure for JPS.

Limb Salvage Using Liquid Nitrogen-Treated Tumour-Bearing Autograft: A Single Institutional Experience of 10 Patients

BACKGROUND

Many reconstruction methods have evolved to offer limb salvage surgery (LSS) to patients with musculoskeletal sarcomas. It can be achieved using endoprosthesis or biological reconstruction methods like allograft or autograft or a combination of both. In carefully selected patients, resected bone can be recycled and reimplanted after sterilisation using methods like irradiation, autoclaving, pasteurisation or liquid nitrogen.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2016, 10 patients with primary musculoskeletal sarcoma underwent limb salvage surgery (LSS) by wide resection of the tumour and reconstruction using recycled autograft treated with liquid nitrogen. Intercalary resection was carried out in six patients and intra-articular in four. The resected bone was dipped in liquid nitrogen for 25 min, thawed at room temperature for 15 min followed by dipping in vancomycin-mixed saline for 10 min. The recycled bone was re-implanted into its original site and stabilised with internal fixation.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up period of 39.6 months (range 6-97 months), all patients had a good function (mean functional score of 80%) with no evidence of local recurrence in the re-implanted bone or otherwise. Union was achieved at 15 of the 16 osteotomy sites with a mean union time of 5.2 months (range 4-7 months) without any additional surgical interventions. In none of the patient, augmentation with vascularised/non-vascularised fibula was done. No complication like fracture of the autograft, implant failure or deep/superficial infection was reported in any patient.

CONCLUSION

Recycled tumour-bearing autograft after treatment with liquid nitrogen is an anatomical, cost-effective, relatively simpler and reliable technique for reconstruction of bone defect after resection in selective primary musculoskeletal sarcoma patients.

The process of bone regeneration from devitalization to revitalization after pedicle freezing with immunohistochemical and histological examination in rabbits

The pedicle freezing procedure by liquid nitrogen is a method for the reconstruction of tumor-bearing bone after malignant tumor resection. However, the regenerative mechanism of bone after the pedicle freezing procedure is unclear. We investigated the complete process from devitalization to revitalization of bone after the pedicle freezing procedure in 13 rabbits. After osteotomy the 5 mm distal femurs were immersed in liquid nitrogen, and the specimens were divided into frozen area and sub-frozen area. The bilateral femurs were harvested for evaluation of bone regeneration by histological and immunohistochemical examination (VEGF, CD31, BMP-2 and Runx2) from 1 week to 52 weeks. The diameter of operating femurs was compared with contralateral femurs from 6 weeks to 52 weeks. No viable cells could be found from 1 to 8 weeks in the frozen area, and a mean 1.83 cm necrotic range were detected in the sub-frozen area. The periosteal reaction, massive fibrous tissue and immature bone matrix invaded from the normal area to the necrotic area from 12 weeks. Subsequently, the necrotic bone was gradually replaced by newly formed bone by creeping substitution, with endochondral and intramembrane bone formation. The diameter of frozen femurs was significantly larger than the contralateral femur at the same period from 8 weeks to 52 weeks (P < 0.01). All immunohistochemical factors were positively expressed in both areas at different time points. The active osteoblasts and microvessel migrated from marrow cavity and periosteum into dead bone. This study suggested that the frozen bone not only provides a scaffold but also possesses excellent osteoinductive properties.

Factors Influencing Osseous Union Following Surgical Treatment of Bone Tumors with Use of the Capanna Technique

BACKGROUND

The Capanna technique involves the use of a vascularized fibular graft inlaid in a massive bone graft in intercalary reconstruction for diaphyseal long-bone defects caused by tumor resection. Allograft-host union time varies in different reports, and few studies have focused on the underlying factors affecting union time. The purpose of the present study was to analyze factors relevant to union time and to report complications of the Capanna technique.

METHODS

We identified 60 patients who underwent segmental reconstruction with use of the Capanna technique following tumor resection (in the humerus in 10 patients, the femur in 33 patients, and the tibia in 17 patients). Multivariable linear multiple regression model analysis was performed with allograft-host osseous union time as the dependent variable. Union time was evaluated on radiographs. Independent variables included age, tumor site, adjuvant treatment, a previous surgical procedure, defect length, fixation method, and fibular viability. A retrieved specimen of the composite was histologically assessed.

RESULTS

The mean defect length was 16 cm. All allografts and host bone united, with the mean time to union of 13 months (range, 6 to 27 months). Prolonged union time was associated with devitalization of the fibular graft (p < 0.001), use of chemotherapy (p = 0.031), and a previous surgical procedure (p = 0.048). Patient age (p = 0.742), amount of resection (p = 0.907), operative site (p = 0.508), and fixation method (p = 0.105) were not associated with union time. On histological analysis, we found that the allograft-host cortical junction was united by callus from both periosteum of the host bone and the fibula.

CONCLUSIONS

The Capanna technique appears to be a reliable method for intercalary reconstruction with a low rate of complications. Devitalization of the transplanted fibula, chemotherapy, and a previous surgical procedure are adverse factors leading to prolonged union time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Epiphyseal distraction and hybrid reconstruction using polymethyl methacrylate construct combined with free non-vascularized fibular graft in pediatric patients with osteosarcoma around knee: A case report

BACKGROUND

In children with osteosarcoma around the knee joint without epiphysis involvement, joint-sparing surgery seems to be an ideal way to retain knee joint function. However, there are two points of debate with regard to the technique: How to accurately achieve a safe surgical margin, and how to achieve intercalary reconstruction of the massive bone defect following resection of the tumor.

CASE SUMMARY

We present the case of an 8-year-old girl with osteosarcoma of the distal femur without involvement of the epiphysis. Epiphyseal distraction was applied to separate the epiphysis and metaphysis, and this provided a safe surgical margin. The massive bone defect was reconstructed with a custom-made antibiotic-loaded polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) construct combined with a free non-vascularized fibular graft. Six months after surgery, bone union between the autograft and host bone was confirmed in both the proximal and distal femur by computer tomography (CT) examination. Moreover, considerable callus formation was found around the PMMA construct. After 28 mo of follow-up, there was no sign of recurrence or metastasis. The patient could walk without any aid and carry out her daily life activities satisfactorily.

CONCLUSION

In cases of osteosarcoma without epiphysis involvement, epiphyseal distraction can be easily applied to obtain a safe margin. Hybrid reconstruction with an antibiotic-loaded PMMA construct combined with a free non-vascularized fibular graft has the advantages of being easy to manufacture, less time-consuming to place, and less likely to get infected, while also ensuring bone union. Our case provides an alternative technique for biological reconstruction after joint-sparing surgery in patients with osteosarcoma around the knee without epiphyseal involvement.

Malignant distal femur tumors management in children, low cost innovations with affordable care in a tertiary care hospital, a cross sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Malignant musculoskeletal tumors in children are mostly comprised of Osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma and distal femur is the most common site for primary bone tumors. This study examined the surgical management outcomes of pediatric patients (<18 years) presented in our setup with malignant distal femur tumors.

METHODOLOGY

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with malignant sarcomas of distal femur and younger than 18 years of age who underwent limb salvage surgery during June 2009-June2017.

RESULTS

There were 31 pediatric patients who had distal femur malignant tumors and out of them 20 patients were selected who underwent limb salvage as a primary surgery. The mean age (range) of patients was 11.90 (6-17) years. Seventeen had osteosarcoma and three had Ewing's sarcoma. In surgery all patients were offered reconstruction. Post-operative complications were observed in (50%) patients while other 50% patients had no complications. Wound infection, flap necrosis, broken plates with non-union and recurrence of disease were the reported complications. Revision surgery was performed in 10 patients out of 20 patients.

CONCLUSION

Salvage was the primary option in our surgery and revision surgery was performed in the cases due to complications. Small sample size was the limitation of the study.

Microsurgical reconstruction with vascularized fibula and massive bone allograft for bone tumors

INTRODUCTION

Combining massive bone allograft and vascularized fibula in intercalary reconstruction following resection of bone tumors represents a complex reconstructive procedure that requires specialists in microvascular surgery as well as orthopedic surgery. The purpose of our study was to examine the outcomes using this surgical technique in patients with bone tumors in terms of oncologic results, complications related to surgery, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores and duration of surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 81 patients with femoral or tibial sarcomas who underwent intercalary resection and microsurgical reconstruction with massive bone allograft and vascularized fibula. There were 56 boys and 25 girls with a mean age of 13.4 years at the time of surgery. The patients' medical records were reviewed for clinical and functional outcomes as well as postoperative complications. The study group was comprised of 33 patients who underwent reconstruction of the femur with massive bone allograft and free vascularized fibula and 48 patients who underwent reconstruction of the tibia with massive bone allograft and free or pedicle vascularized fibula. The mean length of resection was 15.9 cm (8-31 cm). The functional evaluation of the patients was done at the end of the follow-up using MSTS score for the lower limb. All patients had at least a 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The overall limb salvage rate was 94%, although many patients required re-operation after the procedure. Complications occurred in 24 patients, 18 of which underwent additional surgical procedures. They included fractures of the massive bone allograft-vascularized fibula construct with or without implant failure (19) and deep infection (5). After surgical or conservative treatment, all the fractures successfully healed. The overall MSTS functional score was good to excellent in 91% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of massive bone allograft and vascularized fibula seems to be a reasonable option for reconstruction of diaphyseal defects following intercalary resection of bone tumors. Although there was a high rate of complications and therefore re-operations, the biology of vascularized fibula was able to save the reconstruction in most of the cases that had complications.

Managing large bone defects in children: a systematic review of the 'induced membrane technique'

Thirty years after its description by Masquelet in 1986, this is the first systematic review aiming to critically evaluate the 'induced membrane technique' effectiveness in achieving bone union in children. Only six papers fulfilled our inclusion criteria (54 patients). The relatively small number of reported cases did not allow a formal meta-analysis. The tibia was the most involved bone. Most frequent aetiologies were congenital pseudoarthrosis and tumour resections. Although effective in achieving bone healing in ∼91% of the patients (bone defects ≤24 cm long), the induced membrane technique was associated with a high rate of complications (54% of patients).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Reverse-reamed Intercalary Allograft: A Surgical Technique

Allograft reconstruction of large segmental intercalary bone defects after tumor resection is a well-accepted surgical technique. Although results generally have been satisfactory, nonunion at the allograft-host bone junction site remains a notable concern. Various reports have described attempts to enhance junctional healing with a variety of complex osteotomies, often complicating an already complex procedure. The use of an innovative reverse reaming technique can decrease the level of intraoperative difficulty mating the allograft-host junction and theoretically may improve junctional healing by enhancing stability and increasing the contact surface area.

Single stage reconstruction of post traumatic and post excisional composite perigenual defects using chimeric pedicled propelled osteomyocutaneous fibula flap

INTRODUCTION

Composite perigenual defects (CPGDs) are exacting the expertise of the reconstructive surgeons. Segmental skeletal defects continue to be a challenge for both orthopedic and plastic surgeons. There are many techniques available for the reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects in the perigenual region. This study explores the outcomes of pedicled chimeric propelled osteomyocutaneous fibula flap reconstruction of post traumatic and post excisional composite perigenual defects (CPGDs) MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a retrospective study conducted from 2011 to 2016 including 16 patients (5 post excisional defects and 11 post traumatic defects). 14 males and 2 females were included. Ages of the patients were ranging from 24 to 46 years. All had their CPGDs reconstructed with chimeric pedicled propelled fibula osteomyocutaneous flap RESULTS: All 15 patients on an average of 26 months follow-up assumed pain free unrestrictive walking. Fracture of hardware and transferred fibula occurred in one case 2 ^1/2 years following the surgery. Other patients had good functional recovery in an average of 26 months follow up. The average MSTS score of 15 patients was 23.9.

CONCLUSION

This anatomically construed procedure will be addendum to the armamentarium of reconstruction in both post excisional limb salvage milieu and secondary posttraumatic context for the perigenual composite defects. With high healing potential, infection culling capacity, high osteogenic potential and good supportive hardwares the pedicled osteomyocutaneous fibula flap may usher in better outcome in composite perigenual defects reconstruction.

A Modification of an Established Method of Intercalary Extremity Bone Defect Reconstruction: The "Hemi-Capanna" Technique

BACKGROUND

Skeletal reconstruction of segmental defects of the appendicular skeleton is among the most challenging tasks in reconstructive surgery. A popular method of reconstruction of large osseous defects is the combination of massive allografts and vascularized bone transfer. We present and discuss our experience with a modification of the traditional Capanna technique in which the allograft is split in half longitudinally to provide for more space for postoperative fibula hypertrophy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent reconstruction of segmental intercalary defects of the tibia using our modified technique were retrospectively identified. The following parameters were retrieved: patient age, race, sex, length of skeletal defect, recipient vessels, type of microsurgical anastomosis, union rate, complication rate, ambulation (yes/no), and follow-up (in months).

RESULTS

Two male patients underwent reconstruction of the tibia via the modified "hemi-Capanna" technique. The tibia defect measured 12 and 13 cm, respectively. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were encountered. Osseous union was obtained in both patients who are both ambulatory.

CONCLUSION

The hemi-Capanna technique not only leaves more room for hypertrophy of the vascularized fibula, but also simplifies the technique of combining an allograft with vascularized bone transfer in reconstructions of segmental skeletal defects of the appendicular skeleton.

Intercalary reconstruction of femur after tumour resection: is a vascularized fibular autograft plus allograft a long-lasting solution?

Aims

After intercalary resection of a bone tumour from the femur, reconstruction with a vascularized fibular graft (VFG) and massive allograft is considered a reliable method of treatment. However, little is known about the long-term outcome of this procedure. The aims of this study were to determine whether the morbidity of this procedure was comparable to that of other reconstructive techniques, if it was possible to achieve a satisfactory functional result, and whether biological reconstruction with a VFG and massive allograft could achieve a durable, long-lasting reconstruction.

Patients and Methods

A total of 23 patients with a mean age of 16 years (five to 40) who had undergone resection of an intercalary bone tumour of the femur and reconstruction with a VFG and allograft were reviewed clinically and radiologically. The mean follow-up was 141 months (24 to 313). The mean length of the fibular graft was 18 cm (12 to 29). Full weight-bearing without a brace was allowed after a mean of 13 months (seven to 26).

Results

At final follow-up, the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score of 22 evaluable patients was 94% (73 to 100). Eight major complications, five fractures (21.7%), and three nonunions (13%) were seen in seven patients (30.4%). Revision-free survival was 72.3% at five, ten, and 15 years, with fracture and nonunion needing surgery as failure endpoints. Overall survival, with removal of allograft or amputation as failure endpoints, was 94.4% at five, ten, and 15 years.

Discussion

There were no complications needing surgical revision after five years had elapsed from surgery, suggesting that the mechanical strength of the implant improves with time, thereby decreasing the risk of complications. In young patients with an intercalary bone tumour of the femur, combining a VFG and massive allograft may result in a reconstruction that lasts a lifetime. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:378-86.

Osteogenesis induced by a three-dimensional bioimplant composed of demineralised bone matrix, collagen, hydroxyapatite, and bone marrow-derived cells in massive bone defects: An experimental study

Treatment of massive bone defects is one of the most difficult problems to solve in orthopedics. At present, there is no consensus on the best way to resolve these problems. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of a three-dimensional bioimplant over massive bone defects, and to analyse if it improves the speed and quality of integration in recipient bone compared to allograft treatment. Fifteen female lambs with massive bone defects, surgically created in their tibias, were randomly divided into three groups of five lambs each: Group I -treated with the bioimplant; Group 2 -treated with the bioimplant plus nucleated cells of autologous bone marrow; Group 3 -treated with a frozen allograft. Radiographs were taken post-treatment at weeks 1, 6, and 12. Animals were euthanized to obtain the studied bone segment for morphological analyses.

TREATMENT

with bioimplants vs. bioimplant plus bone marrow nucleated cells (BMNCs) showed a notorious osteogenic effect, but with greater osteoid synthesis and cellularity in the latter. These results suggest that combined treatment with bioimplants and BMNCs have an additive effect on massive bone defects in lambs. These experimental results could be applied to repair damaged human bone.

The role of the periosteal sleeve in the reconstruction of bone defects using a non-vascularised fibula graft in the pediatric population

BACKGROUND

Following resection of large benign bone tumors surgeons are confronted with bone defects severely affecting the stability of a limb. To restore the mechanical continuity of the bone different treatment methods using bone grafts have been described. In pediatric patients the thick periosteal sleeve is thought to contribute to bone formation.

HYPOTHESIS

An intact periosteal sleeve is crucial in bone remodelling around a non-vascularised fibular graft used to bridge large bone defects.

METHODS

We present a treatment technique applied in 6 cases comprising of subperiosteal tumor resection at the diaphyseal or metaphyseal level of long bones followed by defect bridging with a non-vascularised fibula graft inserted into the periosteal sleeve of the resection zone. Elastic intramedullary nails or plates were used for stabilisation.

RESULTS

Due to the intact periosteum at the resection site bone integration occurred quickly and full remodelling was seen in all but one case. Tumor location in this case was at the metaphyseal level resulting in tumor resection at the growth plate. Although bone healing at the distal resection site was seen after a few weeks proximal consolidation was only partial. Full reconstitution of the fibula in the remaining periosteal sleeve was seen in 5 cases, partial reconstitution in 1 case.

DISCUSSION

In the pediatric patient, the described technique is an effective and reliable treatment method for large benign bone tumors requiring resection. However, great diameter discrepancy of the donor and recipient site and a thin periosteum can be a limiting factor for its application.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV clinical study.

Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: clinical and tissue engineering perspectives

Critical-sized bone defects are defined as those that will not heal spontaneously within a patient's lifetime. Current treatment options include vascularized bone grafts, distraction osteogenesis, and the induced membrane technique. The induced membrane technique is an increasingly utilized method with favorable results including high rates of union. Tissue engineering holds promise in the treatment of large bone defects due to advancement of stem cell biology, novel biomaterials, and 3D bioprinting. In this review, we provide an overview of the current operative treatment strategies of critical-sized bone defects as well as the current state of tissue engineering for such defects.