An Enzyme Immunoassay for Determining Immunoreactive Trypsinogen (IRT) in Dried Blood Spots on Filter Paper Using an Ultra-Microanalytical System

Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023)

Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) began in the early 1960s based on the work of Dr. Robert "Bob" Guthrie in Buffalo, NY, USA. His development of a screening test for phenylketonuria on blood absorbed onto a special filter paper and transported to a remote testing laboratory began it all. Expansion of NBS to large numbers of asymptomatic congenital conditions flourishes in many settings while it has not yet been realized in others. The need for NBS as an efficient and effective public health prevention strategy that contributes to lowered morbidity and mortality wherever it is sustained is well known in the medical field but not necessarily by political policy makers. Acknowledging the value of national NBS reports published in 2007, the authors collaborated to create a worldwide NBS update in 2015. In a continuing attempt to review the progress of NBS globally, and to move towards a more harmonized and equitable screening system, we have updated our 2015 report with information available at the beginning of 2024. Reports on sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean, missing in 2015, have been included. Tables popular in the previous report have been updated with an eye towards harmonized comparisons. To emphasize areas needing attention globally, we have used regional tables containing similar listings of conditions screened, numbers of screening laboratories, and time at which specimen collection is recommended. Discussions are limited to bloodspot screening.

Measuring of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Concentration by Nephelometry or Turbidimetry

Most clinical laboratories quantify alpha-1 antitrypsin using either nephelometry or turbidimetry techniques because they are commercially available, amenable to automation, and precise. Both methods are based on light scatter. The foundation of both techniques is based on incubation of the specimen with anti-AAT polyclonal antibody solution, a polymer matrix between endogenous AAT and the reagent antibodies forms, leading to production of light-scattering large particles. Although these two terms are sometimes used synonymously, technically speaking they are not.Nephelometry measures the amount of turbidity or cloudiness of a solution by directly quantifying the intensity of the light scattered by insoluble particles in the sample. Therefore, this technique measures the light that passes through the sample, with the detector being placed at an angle from the sample. Turbidimetry is the process of measuring the loss of intensity of the light transmitted linearly through a sample caused by the scattering effect of insoluble particles. The decrease in light transmission is measured compared to a reference, and the absorbed light is quantified.Beyond specific technical differences between both techniques, there are two major differences between the two procedures that may influence the results. First, the concentration of the sample and the resulting intensity of scattered light relative to the intensity of the light source is one major factor. Second, the size of the scattering particles is also a key differentiating factor. This chapter describes the technical requirements, the different protocols, and the clinical applicability of these two techniques in the diagnosis of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency.

Pilot study for cystic fibrosis neonatal screening: the Cuban experience

Background In Cuba, no screening program for cystic fibrosis (CF) has been implemented yet. The ultramicro enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (UMELISA)® TIR NEONATAL has been developed for the measurement of immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) in dried blood spots on filter paper. The analytical performance of the kit was evaluated in the national network of laboratories. Methods Newborn dried blood samples (DBS) were evaluated in 16 laboratories. An IRT/IRT/DNA protocol was followed using a cut-off value of 50 ng/mL. The mean, median and percentiles of the distribution were calculated and a two-sample t-test with unequal variance was used for statistical analysis. Influence of perinatal factors on IRT levels was analyzed. Results From January to June 2018, 6470 newborns were studied, obtaining a mean IRT value of 12.09 ng/mL (ranging 0-358 ng/mL) and a median of 8.99 ng/mL. Fifty-two samples (0.78%) were above the cut-off level and 16 samples (0.24%) were elevated in the re-screening process. One of them was confirmed positive by molecular biology (phe508del/c.3120 + 1G > A), constituting the first newborn screened and diagnosed early in Cuba. Second DBS samples were collected on average at 14 days and processed in the laboratory at 16 days of birth. Significant differences were observed (p < 0.05) when evaluating the influence of gender, birth weight (BW) and gestational age (GA) on the IRT values. Lower IRT concentrations were found in samples processed after 10 days of collection. Conclusions The performance of UMELISA® TIR NEONATAL in the laboratories has been satisfactory; hence CF newborn screening (NBS) was extended throughout the country from January 2019.