Fibrin-sealant-delivered cisplatin chemotherapy versus cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer without peritoneal metastases: a randomized phase-II clinical trial with a 40-month follow-up

Exploring the Efficacy of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Perfusion Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer: Meta-analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

Based on randomized clinical trials, this meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of intent-to-cure or prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of gastric cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase databases were all systemically searched from 2004 to 2023. The quality of the study was assessed by using the Cochrane risk of bias method. The certainty of the evidence was determined by using the GRADE evaluation.

RESULTS

In this study, 12 articles with a total of 1181 patients were analyzed based on the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed that HIPEC had a higher survival rate (risk ratio [RR] 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.43, 0.86], P = 0.005, RR 0.82; 95% CI [0.70, 0.97], P = 0.02, RR 0.83; 95% CI [0.71, 0.96], P < 0.01, and RR 0.63 [0.54, 0.73], P < 0.00001) after 1, 2, 3, and 5 years compared with the control group. The RR was statistically significant for 1, 2, 3, and 5 years. Furthermore, the observed overall recurrence rate for the HIPEC group was lower than control group and statistically significant (RR 0.59; 95% CI [0.50, 0.68], P < 0.0001). Higher disease-free survival rate (RR 1.42; 95% CI [1.07, 1.89], P < 0.01) was observed in the HIPEC group and statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric cancer patients treated with HIPEC have shown promising outcomes with regard to survival, recurrence, disease-free survival, and adverse reactions. However, multicenter trials with larger sample sizes consisting of different ethnicities is suggested.

The 2022 PSOGI International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: HIPEC Technologies

This manuscript reports the results of an international consensus on technologies of hyperthermic intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) performed with the following goals: To provide recommendations for the technological parameters to perform HIPEC. To identify the role of heat and its application forms in treating peritoneal metastases. To provide recommendations regarding the correct dosimetry of intraperitoneal chemotherapy drugs and their carrier solutions. To identify for each intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen the best dosimetry and fractionation. To identify areas of future research pertaining to HIPEC technology and regimens. This consensus was performed by the Delphi technique and comprised two rounds of voting. In total, 96 of 102 eligible panelists replied to both Delphi rounds (94.1%) with a consensus of 39/51 questions on HIPEC technical aspects. Among the recommendations that met with the strongest consensus were those concerning the dose of HIPEC drug established in mg/m2, a target temperature of at least 42°C, and the use of at least three temperature probes to pursue hyperthermia. Ninety minutes as the ideal HIPEC duration seemed to make consensus. These results should be considered when designing new clinical trials in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.

Current Evidence for the Use of HIPEC and Cytoreductive Surgery in Gastric Cancer Metastatic to the Peritoneum

Gastric cancer (GCa) is an aggressive malignancy, representing the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. The poor prognosis of GCa can be associated with the prevalence of peritoneal metastasis (PM). Current international and national GCa treatment guidelines only recommend palliative treatment options for patients with PM. Since the 1980s there have been multiple single arm trials, randomized controlled trials, and metanalysis investigating the use of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with advanced GCa, with or without PM. Results from these studies have been encouraging, with some large-volume centers even incorporating HIPEC into their treatment algorithms for patients with advanced GCa. Additionally, there are several ongoing trials that, when completed, will increase our understanding of the efficacy of CRS & HIPEC in patients with GCa metastatic to the peritoneum. Herein we review the current evidence, ongoing trials, consensus guidelines, and future considerations regarding the use of CRS & HIPEC in patients suffering from GCa with PM.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Combined with Surgery: A 12-Year Meta-Analysis of this Promising Treatment Strategy for Advanced Gastric Cancer at Different Stages

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was designed to systematically assess the effectiveness and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) combined with surgery for different stages of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) during the last 12 years.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched online, and papers were retrieved from other sources. Next, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and high-quality nonrandomized controlled trials (NRCTs) were selected for this analysis. The meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan5.4 software.

RESULT

The 10 RCTs and 13 NRCTs selected for the study included 1892 patients. The overall survival rates were higher in the HIPEC group at 1 year (risk ratio [RR], 0.52; P = 0.004) and 3 years (RR, 0.63; P < 0.00001) than in the control group for the patients without peritoneal cancer, and the HIPEC group had a significant reduction in the recurrence rate (RR, 0.60; p < 0.00001). Among the patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), the HIPEC group had significantly higher overall survival rates at 1 year (RR, 0.62; P = 0.00001), 2 years (RR, 0.85; P = 0.002), and 3 years (RR, 0.87; P = 0.0001), with an increase in the overall median survival time of 4.67 months. The two groups showed no statistically significant difference in terms of complications for patients with PC (RR, 1.03; P = 0.93) or without PC (RR, 1.15; P = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

For local AGC without PC, standard surgery combined with prophylactic HIPEC could prolong survival and reduce the recurrence rate without more complications. The prognosis of this treatment strategy for patients with PC is closely related to patient selection. Complete cytoreduction combined with therapeutic HIPEC could prolong survival.

The Effect of Pancreatoduodenectomy Plus Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Perfusion on Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer: Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) has achieved positive results in treating various abdominal cancers but infrequently reported in resectable pancreatic head cancer. This study was designed to explore the safety and efficacy of pancreaticoduodenectomy plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (PD + IPHP) in patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Data of pancreatic cancer patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy were retrospectively analyzed, including PD + IPHP (n = 28) and PD group (n = 29). IPHP was performed during surgery, on postoperative day (POD) 2, and POD 4 with normal saline as the perfusion solution. Complications and overall survival of these patients were observed and recorded.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the incidence of major postoperative complications between PD + IPHP group and PD group. The median overall survival (OS) time of the PD + IPHP group was 19.0 months, the 1-year survival rate was 82.35%, and the 2-year survival rate was 49.41%. The median OS time of the PD group was 13.0 months, the 1-year survival rate was 51.00%, and the 2-year survival rate was 27.33% (Log-rank, P = 0.030; Breslow, P = 0.039). Cox proportional risk model showed that IPHP was an independent factor to improve survival outcomes of these patients (hazard ratio = 0.363, 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.94; P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion significantly improves the survival outcomes of pancreatic head cancer patients undergoing PD and does not bring extra risks of complications.

Prophylactic chemotherapeutic hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion reduces peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer: a retrospective clinical study

Background

Peritoneal metastasis is the most frequent failure in gastric cancer. This study evaluated the role of prophylactic chemotherapeutic hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion (CHIP) in patients after D2 dissection.

Methods

Gastric cancer patients after D2 dissection were enrolled in this study. Patients received either chemotherapy (IV group) or CHIP (CHIP group). Sites of recurrence or metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were evaluated.

Results

Twenty-two patients received CHIP treatment, and 21 patients received chemotherapy alone. The median DFS time was 24.5 and 36.5 months in the IV group and CHIP group (P = 0.044), respectively. The median OS time was 33.1 months in the IV group and not reached in the CHIP group (P = 0.037). We also found that CHIP could reduce the total recurrence/metastasis rate, especially that of peritoneal metastasis. In the subgroup analysis, DFS and OS were both superior in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) patients than in proficient MMR (pMMR) patients.

Conclusion

This hypothesis-generating study indicates that CHIP might be feasible for gastric cancer patients after D2 resection.

Intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy and whole abdominal hyperthermia using external radiofrequency following radical D2 resection for treatment of advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The peritoneum is the most frequent site of disease recurrence in gastric cancer, and the prognosis remains poor. This study assessed the role of adjuvant intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy with whole abdominal hyperthermia using external radiofrequency in gastric cancer patients after D2 dissection.

METHODS

Patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 regional lymph node dissection were enrolled in the study. Patients received IP chemotherapy with whole abdominal hyperthermia. Preheated normal saline containing 75 mg/m² of cisplatin was delivered into the abdominal cavity through a Tenckhoff catheter at McBurney's point. Regional hyperthermia was performed using two sets of orthogonal radiofrequency waves immediately after all saline was irrigated into the abdominal cavity. For each patient, recurrent or metastatic sites and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients were finally included. All patients tolerated hyperthermia well. Only two patients experienced grade 1 superficial thermal injury. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were myelosuppression, nausea/vomiting, trichomadesis and liver dysfunction. We also found IP chemotherapy with whole abdominal hyperthermia could reduce the total recurrent/metastatic rate, especially peritoneal metastasis (4.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

This hypothesis-generating study indicated that IP chemotherapy with whole abdominal hyperthermia might be feasible for gastric cancer patients after D2 resection.

The use of fibrin sealant during non-emergency surgery: a systematic review of evidence of benefits and harms

BACKGROUND

Fibrin sealants are used in different types of surgery to prevent the accumulation of post-operative fluid (seroma) or blood (haematoma) or to arrest haemorrhage (bleeding). However, there is uncertainty around the benefits and harms of fibrin sealant use.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the evidence on the benefits and harms of fibrin sealants in non-emergency surgery in adults.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases [MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, the Health Technology Assessment database and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials)] were searched from inception to May 2015. The websites of regulatory bodies (the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, the European Medicines Agency and the Food and Drug Administration) were also searched to identify evidence of harms.

REVIEW METHODS

This review included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies using any type of fibrin sealant compared with standard care in non-emergency surgery in adults. The primary outcome was risk of developing seroma and haematoma. Only RCTs were used to inform clinical effectiveness and both RCTs and observational studies were used for the assessment of harms related to the use of fibrin sealant. Two reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts to identify potentially relevant studies. Data extraction was undertaken by one reviewer and validated by a second. The quality of included studies was assessed independently by two reviewers using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool for RCTs and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidance for adverse events for observational studies. A fixed-effects model was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included 186 RCTs and eight observational studies across 14 surgical specialties and five reports from the regulatory bodies. Most RCTs were judged to be at an unclear risk of bias. Adverse events were inappropriately reported in observational studies. Meta-analysis across non-emergency surgical specialties did not show a statistically significant difference in the risk of seroma for fibrin sealants versus standard care in 32 RCTs analysed [n = 3472, odds ratio (OR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 1.04; p = 0.13; I² = 12.7%], but a statistically significant benefit was found on haematoma development in 24 RCTs (n = 2403, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.86; p = 0.01; I² = 0%). Adverse events related to fibrin sealant use were reported in 10 RCTs and eight observational studies across surgical specialties, and 22 RCTs explicitly stated that there were no adverse events. One RCT reported a single death but no other study reported mortality or any serious adverse events. Five regulatory body reports noted death from air emboli associated with fibrin sprays.

LIMITATIONS

It was not possible to provide a detailed evaluation of individual RCTs in their specific contexts because of the limited resources that were available for this research. In addition, the number of RCTs that were identified made it impractical to conduct independent data extraction by two reviewers in the time available.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of fibrin sealants does not appear to vary according to surgical procedures with regard to reducing the risk of seroma or haematoma. Surgeons should note the potential risk of gas embolism if spray application of fibrin sealants is used and not to exceed the recommended pressure and spraying distance. Future research should be carried out in surgery specialties for which only limited data were found, including neurological, gynaecological, oral and maxillofacial, urology, colorectal and orthopaedics surgery (for any outcome); breast surgery and upper gastrointestinal (development of haematoma); and cardiothoracic heart or lung surgery (reoperation rates). In addition, studies need to use adequate sample sizes, to blind participants and outcome assessors, and to follow reporting guidelines.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015020710.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Even when a curative gastrectomy is conducted, the majority of advanced gastric cancer patients with invasion die due to peritoneal recurrence. We performed electronic searches to identify randomized controlled trials published through April 2017 evaluating the effect of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) on survival rates. We included 23 trials reporting data on 2,767 patients with advanced gastric cancer. Overall, we noted that patients who received IPC had a significantly increased 1-year survival rate, and the treatment effect of IPC on 1-year survival was most prominent in studies conducted in Japan or those with a mean age of less than 60 years. IPC was also associated with an increased incidence of 2-year survival rate, but it was not seen to have this effect in studies conducted in China or Australia or with a mean age greater than 60 years. Similarly, IPC associated with a significantly increased 3-year survival rate, but this difference was not detected in studies conducted in Austria or with a mean age greater than 60 years. IPC has no significant effect on the 5-year survival rate. Finally, IPC was associated with a lower risk of recurrence in patients with advanced gastric cancer. The findings of this study suggest that gastric cancer patients who receive IPC associate with increased 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates, but this does not extend out to a 5-year survival rate. IPC is also shown to play a protective role against the risk of recurrence in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

The 30-year experience-A meta-analysis of randomised and high-quality non-randomised studies of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of gastric cancer

IMPORTANCE

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been used within various multimodality strategies for the prevention and treatment of gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the role of HIPEC in gastric cancer and clarify its effectiveness at different stages of peritoneal disease progression.

DATA SOURCES

Medline and Embase databases between January 1, 1985 and June 1, 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised control trials and high-quality non-randomised control trials selected on a validated tool (methodological index for non-randomised studies) comparing HIPEC and standard oncological management for the treatment of advanced stage gastric cancer with and without peritoneal carcinomatosis were considered.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

A random-effects network meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were overall survival and disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes were overall complications, type of complications, and sites of recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 11 RCTs and 21 non-randomised control trials (2520 patients) were included. For patients without the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), the overall survival rates between the HIPEC and control groups at 3 or 5 years resulted in favour of the HIPEC group (risk ratio [RR] = 0.82, P = 0.01). No difference in the 3-year overall survival (RR = 0.99, P = 0.85) in but a prolonged median survival of 4 months in favour of the HIPEC group (WMD = 4.04, P < 0.001) was seen in patients with PC. HIPEC was associated with significantly higher risk of complications for both patients with PC (RR = 2.15, P < 0.01) and without (RR = 2.17, P < 0.01). This increased risk in the HIPEC group was related to systemic drugs toxicity. Anastomotic leakage rates were found to be similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates a survival advantage of the use of HIPEC as a prophylactic strategy and suggests that patients whose disease burden is limited to positive cytology and limited nodal involvement may benefit the most from HIPEC. For patients with extensive carcinomatosis, the completeness of cytoreductive surgery is a critical prognostic factor for survival. Future RCTs should better define patient selection criteria.