MSC-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Preclinical Animal Models of Bone Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Plasma-derived exosomes of Edwardsiella piscicida challenged olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus): Characterization and miRNA profiling for potential biomarkers screening

Exosomes are released from multiple cell types as part of their normal physiology as well as during acquired abnormalities. In this study, we investigated the effect of pathogenic Edwardsiella piscicida infection on olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) exosomes at morphometric, physicochemical, and molecular levels. Unique cup-shaped exosomes were isolated from the plasma of non-infected (PBS-Exo) and E. piscicida experimentally challenged (Ep-Exo) olive flounder using ultracentrifugation. The average particle size, concentration, and zeta potential were 150.9 ± 6.9 nm, 5.67 × 1010 particles/mL, and -25.6 ± 1.36 mV for PBS-Exo while 138.7 ± 1.9 nm, 1.22 × 1011 particles/mL, and -35 ± 1.82 mV for Ep-Exo, respectively. Expression of tetraspanin markers (CD81, CD9, and CD63) confirmed the presence of olive flounder exosomes. Differentially expressed (DE) known (9) and novel (29) miRNAs (log2 fold change ≥1; p < 0.05) were identified in the Ep-Exo that could be potential as diagnostic biomarkers for the infection. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analyses revealed that the predicted target genes of the DE miRNAs were highly enriched in metabolic and immune roles. Both PBS-Exo and Ep-Exo were non-toxic in vitro (up to 100 μg/mL) and in vivo (up to 400 μg/mL). Compared to the vehicle, PBS-Exo at 50 μg/mL induced Nf-kB (>1.50-fold) while at 100 μg/mL, Il8, Il10, Nf-kB, P53, and Inf were induced (>1.50-fold) in fathead minnow cells (FHMs). This suggests that the PBS-Exo contains molecules that moderately stimulate gene expression. In the future, validating the exact olive flounder immune response target genes that interact with DE miRNAs in Ep-Exo will be crucial for investigating the host-pathogen interactions, immune defense mechanisms, and therapeutic targets for olive flounder against E. piscicida infection.

Therapeutic Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in sepsis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a life-threatening disorder with no definitive cure. Preclinical studies suggest that extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stromal cells (EV-MSCs) can mitigate inflammatory conditions, potentially leading to increased survival and reduced organ dysfunction during sepsis. Our aim to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis is assessing the EV-MSCs therapeutic efficacy in sepsis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, WOS and ProQuest databases and also Google Scholar search engine were searched for published articles. We used hazard ratio (HR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) as effect sizes to evaluate the therapeutic effect of EV-MSCs on survival rate and determine their effect on reducing organ dysfunction, respectively. Finally, we employed GRADE tool for preclinical animal studies to evaluate certainty of the evidence.

RESULTS

30 studies met the inclusion criteria for our article. Our meta-analysis results demonstrate that animals treated with MSC-EVs have better survival rate than untreated animals (HR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.27-0.41). Our meta-analysis suggests that EV-MSCs can reduce organ dysfunctions in sepsis, such as the lung, kidney, and liver. Additionally, EV-MSCs decrease pro-inflammatory mediators like TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that EV-MSCs can be as promising therapy for sepsis management in animal models and leading to increased survival rate and reduced organ dysfunction. Furthermore, our study introduces a novel tool for risk of bias assessment and provides recommendations based on various analysis. Future studies with aiming to guide clinical translation can utilize the results of this article to establish stronger evidence for EV-MSC effectiveness.

Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for treatment of bone loss within periodontitis in pre-clinical animal models: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) represent an effective and promising strategy for periodontitis, although studies remain pre-clinical. Herein, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of MSC-EVs in animal models of periodontitis.

METHODS

The PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase electronic databases were searched up to Dec 2022 to retrieve preclinical studies examining the use of MSC-EVs for periodontitis treatment. Meta-analyses and sub-group analyses were performed to assess the effect of MSC-EVs on Bone Volume/Total Volume (BV/TV) or the distance between the cementoenamel junction and alveolar bone crest (CEJ-ABC) in pre-clinical animal models of periodontitis.

RESULTS

11 studies published from Mar 2019 to Oct 2022 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, MSC-EVs contributed to periodontal bone regeneration in the inflammatory bone loss area due to periodontitis, as represented by a weighted mean difference (WMD) of 14.07% (95% CI = 6.73, 21.41%, p < 0.001) for BV/TV and a WMD of -0.12 mm (95% CI= -0.14, -0.11 mm, p < 0.001) for CEJ-ABC. However, sub-analysis suggested that there was no significant difference in CEJ-ABC between studies with bioactive scaffolds and studies without bioactive scaffolds (p = 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that MSC-EVs may represent an attractive therapy for the treatment of inflammatory bone loss within periodontitis.

Extracellular Vesicle Heterogeneity and Its Impact for Regenerative Medicine Applications

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are cell-derived membrane-enclosed particles that are involved in physiologic and pathologic processes. EVs are increasingly being studied for therapeutic applications in the field of regenerative medicine. Therapeutic application of stem cell-derived EVs has shown great potential to stimulate tissue repair. However, the exact mechanisms through which they induce this effect have not been fully clarified. This may to a large extent be attributed to a lack of knowledge on EV heterogeneity. Recent studies suggest that EVs represent a heterogeneous population of vesicles with distinct functions. The heterogeneity of EVs can be attributed to differences in their biogenesis, and as such, they can be classified into distinct populations that can then be further subcategorized into various subpopulations. A better understanding of EV heterogeneity is crucial for elucidating their mechanisms of action in tissue regeneration. This review provides an overview of the latest insights on EV heterogeneity related to tissue repair, including the different characteristics that contribute to such heterogeneity and the functional differences among EV subtypes. It also sheds light on the challenges that hinder clinical translation of EVs. Additionally, innovative EV isolation techniques for studying EV heterogeneity are discussed. Improved knowledge of active EV subtypes would promote the development of tailored EV therapies and aid researchers in the translation of EV-based therapeutics to the clinic. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Within this review we discuss the differences in regenerative properties of extracellular vesicle (EV) subpopulations and implications of EV heterogeneity for development of EV-based therapeutics. We aim to provide new insights into which aspects are leading to heterogeneity in EV preparations and stress the importance of EV heterogeneity studies for clinical applications.

Registered clinical trials investigating treatment with cell-derived extracellular vesicles: a scoping review

BACKGROUND AIMS

Interest in cell-based therapy using extracellular vesicles (EVs) is intensifying, building upon promising preclinical research and a handful of published clinical studies. Registered clinical trials remain small, heterogeneous in design and underpowered to determine safety and efficacy on their own. A scoping review of registered studies can identify opportunities to pool data and perform meta-analysis.

METHODS

Registered trials were identified by searching clinical trial databases (Clinicaltrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry) on June 10, 2022.

RESULTS

Seventy-three trials were identified and included for analysis. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) were the most common cell type from which EVs were derived (49 studies, 67%). Among the 49 identified MSC-EV studies, 25 were controlled trials (51%) with a combined total of 3094 participants anticipated to receive MSC-derived EVs (2225 in controlled studies). Although EVs are being administered to treat a broad range of conditions, trials treating patients with coronavirus disease-2019 and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome were observed most commonly. Despite heterogeneity between studies, we anticipate that at least some of the studies could be combined in meaningful meta-analysis and that a combined sample size of 1000 patients would provide the ability to detect a ≥5% difference in mortality with MSC-EVs compared to controls and could be achieved by December 2023.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review identifies potential barriers that may stall clinical translation of EV-based treatment, and our analysis calls for more standardized product characterization, use of quantifiable product quality attributes and consistent outcome reporting in future clinical trials.

The Hunt Is On! In Pursuit of the Ideal Stem Cell Population for Cartilage Regeneration

Cartilage injury and degeneration are hallmarks of osteoarthritis (OA), the most common joint disease. OA is a major contributor to pain, loss of function, and reduced quality of life. Over the last decade, considerable research efforts have focused on cell-based therapies, including several stem cell-derived approaches to reverse the cartilage alterations associated with OA. Although several tissue sources for deriving cell-based therapies have been identified, none of the resident stem cell populations have adequately fulfilled the promise of curing OA. Indeed, many cell products do not contain true stem cells. As well, issues with aggressive marketing efforts, combined with a lack of evidence regarding efficacy, lead the several national regulatory bodies to discontinue the use of stem cell therapy for OA until more robust evidence becomes available. A review of the evidence is timely to address the status of cell-based cartilage regeneration. The promise of stem cell therapy is not new and has been used successfully to treat non-arthritic diseases, such as hematopoietic and muscle disorders. These fields of regenerative therapy have the advantage of a considerable foundation of knowledge in the area of stem cell repair mechanisms, the role of the stem cell niche, and niche-supporting cells. This foundation is lacking in the field of cartilage repair. So, where should we look for the ideal stem cell to regenerate cartilage? It has recently been discovered that cartilage itself may contain a population of SC-like progenitors. Other potential tissues include stem cell-rich dental pulp and the adolescent growth plate, the latter of which contains chondrocyte progenitors essential for producing the cartilage scaffold needed for bone growth. In this article, we review the progress on stem cell therapies for arthritic disorders, focusing on the various stem cell populations previously used for cartilage regeneration, successful cases of stem cell therapies in muscle and hemopoietic disorders, some of the reasons why these other fields have been successful (i.e., "lessons learned" to be applied to OA stem cell therapy), and finally, novel potential sources of stem cells for regenerating damaged cartilage in vivo.