The aldosterone to renin ratio in the evaluation of patients with incidentally detected adrenal masses

Diagnostic value of aldosterone to renin ratio calculated by plasma renin activity or plasma renin concentration in primary aldosteronism

Background:

Since the diagnostic value of aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR) calculated by plasma renin concentration (PRC) or plasma renin activity (PRA) is still inconclusive, we conducted a meta-analysis by systematically reviewing relevant literature to explore the difference in the diagnostic efficacy of ARR calculated by PRC or PRA, so as to provide guidance for clinical diagnosis.

Methods:

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from the establishment of the database to March 2021. We included studies that report the true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative values for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism, and we excluded duplicate publications, research without full text, incomplete information, or inability to conduct data extraction, animal experiments, reviews, and systematic reviews. STATA 15.1 was used to analyze the data.

Results:

The pooled results showed that ARR (plasma aldosterone concentration [PAC]/PRC) had a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78–0.86), a specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.95), a positive-likelihood ratio (LR) of 12.77 (95% CI: 7.04–23.73), a negative LR of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.07–0.17), and symmetric area under the curve (SAUC) of 0.982, respectively. Furthermore, the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of ARR (PAC/PRC) was 180.21. Additionally, the pooled results showed that ARR (PAC/PRA) had a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86–0.95), a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.90–0.93), a positive LR of 7.30 (95% CI: 2.99–17.99), a negative LR of 0.10 (95% CI: 0.04–0.26), and SAUC of 0.976, respectively. The DOR of ARR (PAC/PRA) was 155.52. Additionally, we conducted a subgroup analysis for the different thresholds (<35 or ≥35) of PAC/PRC. The results showed that the DOR of the cut-off ≥35 groups was higher than the cut-off <35 groups (DOR = 340.15, 95% CI: 38.32–3019.66; DOR = 116.40, 95% CI = 23.28–581.92).

Conclusions:

The research results suggest that the determination of ARR (PAC/PRC) and ARR (PAC/PRA) was all effective screening tools for PA. The diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic value of ARR (PAC/PRC) are higher than ARR (PAC/PRA). In addition, within a certain range, the higher the threshold, the better the diagnostic value.

Primary aldosteronism in patients with adrenal incidentaloma: Is screening appropriate for everyone?

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a common form of secondary hypertension. Several guidelines recommend that patients with adrenal incidentaloma have a high probability of suffering from PA. We conducted a prospective study of 269 consecutive adults with adrenal incidentaloma to investigate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of PA. In total, 9 participants were detected with PA, suggesting a prevalence of 3.35% among the study population. PA participants had a higher blood pressure level by 14/20.8 mm Hg and a lower serum potassium level by 0.8 mmol/L (P < .05). Importantly, all patients with PA presented with concurrent indications (hypertension with or without hypokalemia) for screening of the disease, but they have not undergone relative screening by the referring physician, thus casting doubts about the appropriate implementation of current guidelines in real-life practice. Intense efforts are needed to familiarize physicians with recommendations for PA to minimize undiagnosed cases and the detrimental sequelae of this endocrine form of hypertension.

Adrenal incidentalomas: A guide to assessment, treatment and follow-up

Adrenal incidentalomas are clinically unsuspected lesions that are detected in adrenal glands during imaging procedures for other causes. With widespread use of imaging - both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - adrenal incidentalomas are now a common clinical problem. The two main clinical issues to be determined in this setting are the risk of malignancy and the hormonal activity of these lesions. The answers to these two questions, along with the clinical characteristics of each individual patient and co-morbidities, will guide the treatment strategy, which can vary from simple follow-up to surgical resection. The objective of this article is to present updated information on the definition, prevalence, imaging and functional features of adrenal incidentalomas and to provide a guide to their optimal assessment, treatment and follow-up. This review collected, analyzed and qualitatively re-synthesized information regarding: (1) the various clinical entities known as "adrenal incidentalomas", (2) the initial assessment of risk of malignancy, (3) the initial assessment of whether the lesion is hormonally active or non-functioning, (4) the absolute and relative indications for surgical treatment, (5) the follow-up of patients who are not deemed to need surgical treatment after initial assessment, and (6) the post-operative follow-up of patients who undergo surgical treatment. The evidence calls for clinicians to bear in mind the Hippocratian advice "ωϕελέειν ή μη βλάπτειν" ("first do no harm").

Aldosterone/direct renin concentration ratio as a screening test for primary aldosteronism: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The accuracy of aldosterone/direct renin concentration ratio (ADRR) as a screening test in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) varies widely across the studies. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of ADRR.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library published between April 1971-February 2016. Studies focusing on the accuracy of ADRR for PA screening were included. Two authors independently extracted information regarding patient characteristics, antihypertensives status, true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. The random-effects model was used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression.

RESULTS

Nine studies involving 974 patients were included. The overall sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, and diagnostic odds ratio of ADRR were 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.93), 0.96 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), 0.985 and 324 respectively, with substantial heterogeneity. Meta-regression showed that antihypertensive status affects the ADRR and may account for the heterogeneity (p=0.03). Subgroup analysis of patients who discontinued the antihypertensives revealed a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00) and a specificity of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the efficacy of ADRR as a screening test for PA. However, as antihypertensive drugs can interfere with the interpretation of ADRR, it is recommended to interrupt therapy or at least replace with analogues that do not significantly affect the ADRR value.

Clinical and endocrinological characteristics of adrenal incidentaloma in Osaka region, Japan

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and endocrinological characteristics of adrenal incidentalomas in Osaka region, Japan. The study was a multicenter retrospective analysis of 150 patients with adrenal incidentalomas who underwent radiographic and endocrine evaluations between 2005 and 2013. Most adrenal incidentalomas were discovered by computed tomography (77.0%) and the rest were identified by abdominal ultrasonography (14.6%), magnetic resonance imaging (4.2%), or positron emission tomography (4.2%). Adrenal incidentalomas were more frequently localized on the left side than on the right. The average diameter of tumors was 21 ± 11 mm. On endocrinological evaluation, 14 patients were diagnosed with primary aldosteronism (9.3%), 10 with subclinical Cushing's syndrome (6.7%), 7 with pheochromocytoma (4.7%), 7 with Cushing's syndrome (4.7%), 2 with both subclinical Cushing's syndrome and primary aldosteronism (1.3%), and 110 with non-functioning tumors (73.3%). Patients with functioning tumors were significantly younger and had larger tumor diameters than those with non-functioning tumors. Except for hypertension, complications were comparable between patients with functioning and non-functioning tumors, including the presence of glucose intolerance, cardiovascular disease, and dyslipidemia. In conclusion, a higher prevalence of primary aldosteronism was observed compared with a previous report. Complications were comparable between patients with functioning and non-functioning tumors, including the frequencies of glucose intolerance, cardiovascular disease, and dyslipidemia. Long-term follow-up is required in patients with non-functioning tumors because the frequency of complications, such as glucose intolerance, cardiovascular disease, and dyslipidemia, was equal to that in patients with functioning tumors.

Analysis of various etiologies of hypertension in patients hospitalized in the endocrinology division

This research aimed to analyze the clinical data of various etiologies of hypertension in patients hospitalized in the Endocrinology Division. The differences between essential and secondary hypertension were examined to provide a basis for clinical differential diagnosis. The data from all the inpatients with hypertension of unknown origin admitted in the Endocrinology Division of the First Affiliated Hospital of the Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2001 to May 2011 were reviewed. The patients were classified into either essential or secondary hypertensive groups. The differentiating parameters of these forms of hypertension were analyzed using the one-factor and multi-factor logistic regression analysis. A total of 1,001 cases were selected in which 346 cases (34.6%) were essential hypertensive and 655 cases (65.4%) were secondary hypertensive. Adrenal hypertension was the primary cause of secondary hypertension, followed by renal artery, central, psychogenic, and renal hypertension as well as others that have not been classified systematically. Using one-factor analysis, significant differences were found among duration of hypertension, age, the onset age, family history of hypertension, diastolic pressure on admission, Cushing syndrome, body mass index (BMI), urine protein, serum creatinine, orthostatic aldosterone, ratio of orthostatic aldosterone to renin activity, incidence of fatty liver displayed by type-B ultrasound, and computed tomography adrenal masses incidence (P < 0.05). Multi-factor regression analysis showed that family history of hypertension (OR = 7.196) and BMI above the normal range (OR = 15.124) were the independent factors that predicted essential hypertension, but failed to determine any other valid predictors of secondary causes except adrenal masses (OR = 10.114), orthostatic aldosterone value >200 pg/ml (OR = 9.742), and a ratio of orthostatic aldosterone and renin activity >40 (OR = 4.723).