Proton pump inhibitors: impact on glucose metabolism

Benefits and risks of drug combination therapy for diabetes mellitus and its complications: a comprehensive review

Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disease, and its therapeutic goals focus on the effective management of blood glucose and various complications. Drug combination therapy has emerged as a comprehensive treatment approach for diabetes. An increasing number of studies have shown that, compared with monotherapy, combination therapy can bring significant clinical benefits while controlling blood glucose, weight, and blood pressure, as well as mitigating damage from certain complications and delaying their progression in diabetes, including both type 1 diabetes (T1D), type 2 diabetes (T2D) and related complications. This evidence provides strong support for the recommendation of combination therapy for diabetes and highlights the importance of combined treatment. In this review, we first provided a brief overview of the phenotype and pathogenesis of diabetes and discussed several conventional anti-diabetic medications currently used for the treatment of diabetes. We then reviewed several clinical trials and pre-clinical animal experiments on T1D, T2D, and their common complications to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different classes of drug combinations. In general, combination therapy plays a pivotal role in the management of diabetes. Integrating the effectiveness of multiple drugs enables more comprehensive and effective control of blood glucose without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia or other serious adverse events. However, specific treatment regimens should be tailored to individual patients and implemented under the guidance of healthcare professionals.

Network pharmacology analysis reveals potential targets and mechanisms of proton pump inhibitors in breast cancer with diabetes

Breast cancer and diabetes are significant health challenges, and effective treatments for both diseases are lacking. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have demonstrated anticancer and hypoglycemic effects, but their mechanisms of action are not yet fully understood. We used the GeneCards and PharmMapper databases to identify therapeutic targets for diabetes,  breast cancer and PPIs. We identified common targets and constructed a regulatory network of diseases and drugs using the STRING database and Cytoscape software. We also explored the binding between small molecule ligands and protein receptors using Discovery Studio software. We identified 33 shared targets for breast cancer, diabetes, and PPIs including lansoprazole, omeprazole, and pantoprazole, which play a critical role in fatty acid transport, insulin resistance, apoptosis, and cancer-related signaling pathways. Our findings demonstrated that PPIs had a strong affinity for AKT1 and MMP9. This study provides insights into the mechanisms of action of PPIs in breast cancer and diabetes and identifies AKT1 and MMP9 as critical targets for future drug development. Our findings highlight the potential of PPIs as a novel therapeutic approach for these challenging diseases.

Association between clinical use of lansoprazole and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pharmacoepidemiological cohort study

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are common and widely used for gastrointestinal-related disorders. Lansoprazole is one of PPIs with potential benefits of anti-inflammation, reduced oxidative stress, and anti-diabetes. The aims of this study are to determine whether lansoprazole imparts differential risk of type 2 diabetes as compared with other PPIs.

METHODS

A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Patients who received lansoprazole more than 90 days and without records of use of other PPIs between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2005 (the exposure period) were considered as the exposed cohort (n = 1668). In comparison, patients who received other PPIs more than 90 days and without use of lansoprazole in the exposure period were treated as the comparison cohort (n = 3336).The primary outcome was the new-onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The association between use of lansoprazole and the risk of T2DM was determined by hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) derived from multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The lansoprazole cohort showed a significantly reduced risk of T2DM with an adjusted HR of 0.65 (95% CI 0.56-0.76). Interestingly, the inverse association between use of lansoprazole and risk of T2DM was observed in both genders and in various age groups.

CONCLUSION

The present study findings suggest that lansoprazole was associated with a reduced risk of T2DM compared with other PPIs. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical implications of the present study.

Effects of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Glycemic Control and Incident Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Whether proton pump inhibitors (PPI) can improve glycemic control among individuals with diabetes or decrease the risk of incident diabetes in the general population is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of PPI therapy on glycemic control among individuals with diabetes and the risk of diabetes among those without diabetes.

RESULTS

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to November 21, 2020. We included studies comparing glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) or fasting blood glucose (FBG) among individuals with diabetes treated with and without PPI therapy as an add-on to standard therapy. Studies evaluating the risk of incident diabetes among individuals taking PPI were assessed. We performed dual independent review, data extraction, and quality assessment. Weighted mean differences between groups or relative risks were imputed using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Seven studies (n = 342) for glycemic control and 5 studies (n = 244 439) for risk of incident diabetes were included. Compared with standard therapy, add-on PPI was associated with a significant decrease in HbA1c (WMD, -0.36 %; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.05; P = 0.025) and FBG (WMD, -10.0 mg/dL; 95% CI, -19.4 to -0.6; P = 0.037). PPI use did not reduce the risk of incident diabetes (pooled RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.34; P = 0.385).

CONCLUSION

Add-on PPI improved glycemic indices among individuals with diabetes but did not alter the risk of incident diabetes. The effects of PPI on glycemic control should be considered when prescribing antacids to patients with diabetes.

Effect of Proton-Pump Inhibitors on Glucose and Insulin Metabolism on Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Some studies have revealed an improvement in glucose metabolism after proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) therapy; however, this evidence is inconclusive and limited.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to examine the effect of PPI on glucose and insulin metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Only randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of PPI on glucose or insulin concentrations in type 2 diabetes were searched in PubMed-Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model and generic inverse variance method. Sensitivity analysis was performed using the leave-one-out method.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis revealed no significant effect of PPI intervention on fasting glucose (mean difference [MD] -11.42 [95% CI, -29.68 to 6.83], I2 = 80%, p = 0.22), fasting insulin (MD 1.51 [95% CI, -0.36 to 3.37], I2 = 32%, p = 0.11), HOMA-IR (MD -0.16 [-0.98 to 0.65], I2 = 0%, p = 0.70), HOMA-β (MD 19.97 [-21.59 to 61.52], I2 = 71%, p = 0.35), and HbA1c concentrations (MD -0.34 [-0.99 to 0.31], I2 = 89%, p = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

The treatment with PPI, in the short term, had no significant effects on glucose and insulin metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Association of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use With Serum Biomarkers of Inflammation, Insulin Resistance, Cardiovascular Risk, and Renal Function

BACKGROUND AND GOALS

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use has been associated with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and dementia. Prior studies did not account for key confounders and little is known about the association of PPIs with serum biomarkers of inflammation, insulin resistance, cardiovascular risk, and renal function. Our aims were to investigate differences in these biomarkers between PPI users and nonusers.

METHODS

Our data are from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a complex cross-sectional multistage probability sample of the US civilian population. We used data on 5189 eligible adults aged 18 to 85 years. Appropriate survey commands were used and potential confounding variables (including BMI, duration of PPI use, use of other non-PPI medications, and health behaviors) were included in multivariable regression models assessing biomarker outcomes.

RESULTS

PPI use was associated with differences in mean (±SE) fasting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (by 11.7±3.7 mg/dL; P=0.006), and apolipoprotein B (by 7.6±2.6 mg/dL; P=0.01). PPI use was not associated with significant differences in total cholesterol (P=0.13), high-density lipoprotein (P=0.27), triglycerides (P=0.70), c-reactive protein (P=0.52), the homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (P=0.48), hemoglobin A1c (P=0.39), or homocysteine (P=0.87). PPI use was associated with a decrease in blood urea nitrogen (by 1.0±0.3 mg/dL; P=0.008) but not creatinine (P=0.38) or uric acid (P=0.34).

CONCLUSION

PPI was not associated with clinically significant differences in serum biomarkers of inflammation, insulin resistance, cardiovascular risk, and renal function. Rather, increasing BMI was strongly associated with PPI use and clinically significant differences in these biomarkers.

The Influence of Proton-Pump Inhibitors on Glycemic Control: A Systematic Review of the Literature and a Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) have shown antihyperglycemic effects by stimulating insulin secretion. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of PPIs on glucose metabolism in general and any potential antidiabetes effects in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and PubMed. Studies using PPIs as interventions and reporting glucose levels, glycated hemoglobin (A1C) levels and insulin levels were selected. Weighted-mean differences (WMDs) were calculated for all outcomes. A random-effects model was used for moderate and high heterogeneity and a fixed-effects model for low heterogeneity data.

RESULTS

The research included 9 studies have involving 320 patients in total. Among patients with type 2 diabetes, those exposed to PPIs did not see significant reductions in A1C levels; WMD -0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.87, 0.15; p=0.17. Pantoprazole resulted in a statistically significant reduction in A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes when compared to control interventions; WMD -0.93, 95% CI -1.49, -0.37; p=0.001. There was no statistically significant difference in other outcomes (p≥0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that PPIs, in general, do not decrease A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, pantoprazole produced significant reductions in A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. Given the limitations and the presence of bias in the primary studies, larger and better-quality studies are warranted.

Renoprotective effect of lansoprazole in streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy in wistar rats

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have exhibited glucose lowering action in animal models of diabetes; however, their potential in diabetes-related complications has not yet been evaluated. Hence, the present study has been undertaken to investigate the renoprotective potential of lansoprazole in streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy in wistar rats. Diabetic nephropathy was induced with a single injection of streptozotocin (STZ, 45 mg/kg, i.p.). Lansoprazole (40 mg/kg; 80 mg/kg, p.o.; 4 weeks) was administered to diabetic rats after 4 weeks of STZ treatment. A battery of biochemical tests such as serum glucose, glycated hemoglobin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, albumin, and kidney weight/body weight (%) ratio were performed to evaluate the renal functions. Oxidative stress was determined by estimating renal thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS) and reduced glutathione (GSH) levels. Lipid profile was assessed by determining serum cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). The STZ-treated rats demonstrated deleterious alterations in kidney functions, enhanced oxidative stress, and disturbed lipid profile. Administration of lansoprazole to diabetic rats significantly reduced serum glucose, glycated hemoglobin, BUN, creatinine, albumin levels, and oxidative stress. Serum lipids like TC and TG were decreased, and HDL was enhanced in lansoprazole-treated STZ rats. The findings of our study indicate that renoprotective effects of lansoprazole may be attributed to its glucose-lowering, lipid-lowering, and antioxidative potential.

Combination immunotherapies for type 1 diabetes mellitus

Immunotherapies for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) have been the focus of intense basic and clinical research over the past few decades. Restoring β-cell function is the ultimate goal of intervention trials that target the immune system in T1DM. In an attempt to achieve this aim, different combination therapies have been proposed over the past few years that are based on treatments tackling the various mechanisms involved in the destruction of β cells. The results of clinical trials have not matched expectations based on the positive results from preclinical studies. The heterogeneity of T1DM might explain the negative results obtained, but previous trials have not addressed this issue. However, novel promising combination therapies are being developed, including those that couple immunomodulators with drugs that stimulate β-cell regeneration in order to restore normoglycaemia. This strategy is an encouraging one to pursue the goal of finding a cure for T1DM. This Review summarizes the available data about combination immunotherapies in T1DM, particularly addressing their clinical importance. The available data supporting the use of registered drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors and incretin-based agents, that have been shown to induce β-cell regeneration will also be discussed.

The effect of proton pump inhibitors on glycated hemoglobin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

Gastrin increases the growth and neogenesis of the islets of Langerhans. Oral proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) increase the circulating gastrin level in animals and humans, but the therapeutic benefit of PPIs for diabetes mellitus has not been resolved. We examined whether treatment with a PPI for ≥2 months affected the glycated hemoglobin (A1C) level in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

The electronic medical records of patients treated at the Busan Paik Hospital in South Korea were examined. The primary outcome measure was the change in A1C before and after PPI treatment for ≥2 months. We also tested if the primary outcome measure was affected by sex, age, duration of diabetes, body mass index, PPI molecule, duration of treatment with PPI or concurrent therapy with other antidiabetes agents.

RESULTS

In total, 43 patients (17 men and 26 women) were studied (mean age 63.8 years). Patients were treated with a PPI for a mean of 180 days. The A1C levels before and after treatment were not significantly different (6.86%±1.10% and 6.77%±1.07%, respectively; p=0.406). Metformin monotherapy did not lower A1C levels as compared with a combination therapy including metformin and antidiabetes medication not including metformin.

CONCLUSIONS

Proton pump inhibitor treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes did not reduce A1C levels. The data of this study were obtained from a retrospective chart review and included a small number of subjects. Furthermore, large randomized controlled studies are needed to define the effect of PPIs for type 2 patients with diabetes.

Lansoprazole enhances the antidiabetic effect of sitagliptin in mice with diet-induced obesity and healthy human subjects

OBJECTIVES

Proton pump inhibitors as adjunctive therapy would improve diabetes control and could enhance the hypoglycaemic activity of DPP-4 inhibitors. The aim of the study was to investigate the short-term effects of lansoprazole (LPZ), sitagliptin (SITA) and their combination therapy on glucose regulation and gut peptide secretion.

METHODS

Glucose and gut peptide were determined and compared after short-term administration of LPZ or SITA, or in combination to mice with diet-induced obesity (DIO) and to healthy human subjects (n = 16) in a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) by a crossover design.

KEY FINDINGS

In DIO mice, LPZ significantly improve glucose metabolism, increase plasma C-peptide and insulin compared with vehicle treatment. Furthermore, the combination of LPZ and SITA improved glucose tolerance additively, with higher plasma insulin and C-peptide levels compared with SITA-treated mice. Similarly, in human in the OGTT, the combination showed significant improvement in glucose-lowering and insulin increase vs SITA-treated group. However, no significant differences in area under curve (AUC) of insulin, glucose and C-peptide between the LPZ-treated group and baseline, except that mean AUCgastrin was significantly increased by LPZ.

CONCLUSIONS

LPZ and SITA combination therapy appears to have complementary mechanisms of action and additive antidiabetic effect.