Cancerous leptomeningitis and familial congenital hypopituitarism

Pituitary tumors and the risk of other malignancies: is the relationship coincidental or causal?

Pituitary adenomas are benign neoplasms of the pituitary. The most prevalent are prolactinomas and non-functioning pituitary adenomas, followed by growth hormone- and ACTH-secreting adenomas. Most pituitary adenomas seem to be sporadic and their persistent growth is very atypical. No molecular markers predict their behavior. The occurrence of pituitary adenomas and malignancies in the same patient can be either pure coincidence or caused by shared underlying genetic susceptibility involved in tumorigenesis. Detailed family history on cancers/tumors in the first, second and third generation of family members on each side of the family has been reported in a few studies. They found an association of pituitary tumors with positive family history for breast, lung and colorectal cancer. We have reported that in about 50% of patients with pituitary adenomas, an association with positive family history for cancer has been found independent of secretory phenotype (acromegaly, prolactinoma, Cushing's disease or non-functioning pituitary adenomas). We also found earlier onset of pituitary tumors (younger age at diagnosis of pituitary tumors) in patients with a strong family history of cancer. In our recent unpublished series of 1300 patients with pituitary adenomas, 6.8% of patients were diagnosed with malignancy. The latency period between the diagnosis of pituitary adenoma and cancer was variable, and in 33% of patients, it was longer than 5 years. Besides the inherited trophic mechanisms (shared underlying genetic variants), the potential influence of shared complex epigenetic influences (environmental and behavioral factors - obesity, smoking, alcohol intake and insulin resistance) is discussed. Further studies are needed to better understand if patients with pituitary adenomas are at increased risk for cancer.

Hypopituitarism in five PROP1 mutation siblings: long-lasting natural course and the effects of growth hormone replacement introduction in middle adulthood

Twenty years after the first description of combined hypopituitarism (CPHD) caused by PROP1 mutations, the phenotype of affected subjects is still challenging for clinicians. These patients suffer from pituitary hormone deficits ranging from IGHD to panhypopituitarism. ACTH deficiency usually develops later in life. Pituitary size is variable. PROP1 mutation is the most frequent in familial congenital hypopituitarism (CH). Reports on initiation of hormonal replacement including growth hormone (GH) in adults with CH are scarce. We identified 5 adult siblings with CPHD due to PROP1 mutation (301-302delAG), aged 36-51 years (4 females), never treated for hormone deficiencies. They presented with short stature (SD from - 3.7 to - 4.7), infantile sexual characteristic, moderate abdominal obesity and low bone mineral density in 3 of them. Complete hypopituituitarism was confirmed in three siblings, while two remaining demonstrated GH, TSH, FSH and LH deficiencies. Required hormonal replacement including rhGH was initiated in all patients. After several months necessity for hydrocortisone replacement developed in all patients. After 2 years of continual replacement therapy, BMD and body composition (measured by DXA-dual X-ray absorptiometry) improved in all subjects, most prominently in two younger females and the male sibling. Besides rhGH therapy, these three patients have received sex hormones contributing to the favorable effect. The male sibling was diagnosed with brain glioblastoma two years following complete hormonal replacement. This report provides important experience regarding hormonal replacement, particularly rhGH treatment, in adults with long-term untreated CH. Beneficial effect of such therapy are widely acknowledged, yet these subjects could be susceptible to certain risks of hormonal treatment initiated in adulthood. Careful and continual clinical follow-up is thus strongly advised.

Controversies in the risk of neoplasia in GH deficiency

Growth hormone (GH) replacement in GH deficient (GHD) children secures normal linear growth, while in GHD adults it improves metabolic status, body composition and quality of life. Safety of GH treatment is an important issue in particular concerning the controversy of potential cancer risk. Unlike in congenital IGF-1 deficiency, there is no complete protection against cancer in GHD patients. Important modifiable risk factors in GHD patients are obesity, insulin resistance, sedentary behavior, circadian rhythm disruption, chronic low grade inflammation and concomitant sex hormone replacement. Age, family history, hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes or cranial irradiation may present non-modifiable risk factors. Quantifying the risk of cancer in relation to GH therapy in adult GHD patients is complex. There is evidence that links GH to cancer occurrence or promotion, but the evidence is progressively weaker when moving from in vitro studies to in vivo animal studies to epidemiological studies and finally to studies on GH treated patients. GH-IGF inhibition in experimental animals leads to decreased cancer incidence and progression. Epidemiological studies suggest an association of high normal circulating IGF-1 or GH to cancer incidence in general population. Data regarding cancer incidence in acromegaly are inconsistent but thyroid and colorectal neoplasias are the main source of concern. Replacement therapy with rhGH for GHD is generally safe. Overall the rate of de novo cancers was not increased in studies of GH-treated GHD patients. Additional caution is mandated in patients with history of cancer, strong family history of cancer and with advancing age. Childhood cancer survivors may be at increased risk for secondary neoplasms compared with general population. In this subgroup GH therapy should be used cautiously and with respect to other risk factors (cranial irradiation etc). We believe that the benefits of GH therapy against the morbidity of untreated GH deficiency outweigh the theoretical cancer risk. Proper monitoring of GH treatment with diligent cancer surveillance remains essential.