Gestational diabetes mellitus: different management strategies should be adopted for different subsets of patients diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance test

Gestational diabetes: One size does not fit all-an observational study of maternal and neonatal outcomes by maternal glucose profile

OBJECTIVES

To examine obstetrical and neonatal outcomes across maternal glucose profiles at the population level and to explore insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function across profiles in an independent, well-phenotyped cohort for potential pathophysiologic explanation.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Observational cohort study of all pregnancies with gestational diabetes screening between October 2008 and December 2018 resulting in live singleton birth in Alberta, Canada (n = 436,773) were categorized into seven maternal glucose profiles: (1) normal 50 g-glucose challenge test (nGCT), (2) normal 75-g OGTT (nOGTT), (3) isolated elevated 1 h post-load glucose (ePLPG1), (4) isolated elevated 2 h post-load glucose (ePLPG2), (5) elevated 1 and 2 h post-load glucose (ePLPG12), (6) isolated elevated FPG (eFPG), and (7) elevated FPG + elevated 1-h and/or 2-h PLG (Combined). Primary outcomes were large for gestational age (LGA) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission rates. An independent observational cohort of 1451 women was examined for measures of beta-cell function (ISSI-2, insulinogenic index/HOMA-IR) and insulin sensitivity/resistance (Matsuda index, HOMA-IR) by similar maternal glucose profiles.

RESULTS

Pregnancies with elevated FPG, either isolated or combined, had higher adverse events and lower insulin sensitivity. The combination of elevated FPG + elevated 1-h and/or 2-h PLG had the highest rates of LGA(20.9%), NICU admissions (14.7%), and lowest insulin sensitivity as measured by Matsuda index and HOMA-IR, and beta-cell function as measured by ISSI-2 and Insulinogenic index/HOMA-IR.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated fasting plasma glucose, either alone or combined with post-load glucose elevation is associated with worse outcomes than isolated post-load glucose elevation, possibly due to higher degrees of insulin resistance. Future work is needed to better understand these differences, and explore whether tailored treatment of GDM can improve neonatal outcomes.

Effect of the IADPSG screening strategy for gestational diabetes on perinatal outcomes in Switzerland

AIMS

To evaluate the impact adoption of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria on prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and risks of perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospectively, 155,103 women screened with selective two step criteria in Switzerland in period 1 (2005-2010) were compared to 170,427 women screened with IADPSG criteria in period 2 (2012-2017). GDM prevalence over time was established and multivariable regression used to assess variation in risks for GDM related events and perinatal outcomes.

RESULTS

GDM prevalence increased steadily over both study periods from 1.8% to 9.0%. A risk reduction of GDM-related events was shown only for women with one or two risk factors for GDM present (relative risk (95% confidence interval)): (0.93 (0.90,0.97), 0.90 (0.83,0.96)). The comparison of perinatal outcomes between the two study periods revealed a significant lower risk for newborns large for gestational age (LGA) (0.93 (0.91-0.95)), pre-term delivery (0.94 (0.92-0.97)) and neonatal hypoglycemia (0.83 (0.77-0.90)) in period 2.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of the IADPSG criteria for the screening of GDM increased prevalence by threefold with no substantial improvements in GDM related events for women without risk factors but reduced the risks for LGA, neonatal hypoglycemia and preterm birth.

Sonographic and other nonglycemic factors can predict large-for-gestational-age infants in diet-managed gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common complications of pregnancy. Left untreated or poorly controlled, GDM results in adverse infant outcomes such as large for gestational age (LGA). This study aims to identify nonglycemic maternal and fetal factors predictive of LGA outcomes in pregnancies complicated by diet-managed GDM.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies complicated by diet-managed GDM from 2004 to 2015. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed on maternal and perinatal factors to identify risk factors for LGA. In addition, a subset univariate analysis was conducted for pregnancies in which fetal ultrasound abdominal circumference measurements were available at gestational weeks 18 to 22, 24 to 28, and 29 to 33.

RESULTS

A total of 1064 women were included, delivering 123 LGA infants. Women with higher parity (odds ratio [OR] 1.44; CI, 1.23-1.68; P < .001) and higher prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.09; CI, 1.06-1.12; P < .001) were more likely to have LGA infants. Maternal smoking (OR 0.30; CI, 0.14-0.62; P = .001) and higher gestational age at birth (OR 0.91; CI, 0.84-0.99; P = .018) were associated with reduced risk. Subset univariate analysis showed that fetal abdominal circumference measurements at weeks 24 to 28 and 29 to 33 beyond the 75th percentile (OR 5.92 and 13.74, respectively) and 90th percentile (OR 4.57 and 15.89, respectively) were highly predictive of LGA.

CONCLUSIONS

Parity, smoking status, maternal BMI, gestational age, and ultrasound fetal abdominal circumference measurements were identified as useful predictors of LGA. Presence of these predictors may prompt closer monitoring of pregnancy and early therapeutic intervention to improve management and reduce the risk of adverse fetal and maternal outcomes.

Determinants of the persistency of macrosomia and shoulder dystocia despite treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus

Aims

to identify potentially modifiable risk factors associated with the persistency of macrosomia and/or shoulder dystocia in infants born to women treated for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Methods

this case-control retrospective study included 113 cases complicated by macrosomia (ponderal index ≥97^th percentile) and/or shoulder dystocia, and 226 controls without these complications. Factors associated with macrosomia and/or shoulder dystocia and with failure of diabetes management were assessed by multivariable analyses.

Results

Macrosomia and/or shoulder dystocia were associated with previous delivery of a large for gestational age (LGA) infant (adjusted odds ratio, 2.34, 95% confidence interval [1.01–5.45]), three abnormal glucose values during oral glucose tolerance test (2.83 [1.19–6.72]), a higher gestational weight gain before treatment (1.08 [1.01–1.15]), and failure of diabetes management (2.68 [1.32–5.45]). A non-Euro Caucasian origin (3.08 [1.37–6.93]), previous delivery of a LGA infant (3.21 [1.31–7.87]), institution of treatment after 32 weeks of gestation (3.92 [1.86–8.25]), and insulin therapy (2.91 [1.20–7.03]) were associated with failure of diabetes management.

Conclusions

supportive care in at risk women, limitation of weight gain in early pregnancy, shortened delay between diagnosis and treatment of GDM, and intensive insulin dosage adjustments might be means to improve the neonatal prognosis of GDM.