Partial empty sella syndrome, GH deficiency and transient central adrenal insufficiency in a patient with NF1

Idiopathic isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency: a systematic review of a heterogeneous and underreported disease

Isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency (IAD) is considered to be a rare disease. Due to the nonspecific clinical presentation, precise data on the prevalence and incidence are lacking. In this systematic review, we aimed to analyse the clinical characteristics, association with autoimmune diseases, and management of acquired idiopathic IAD cases. A structured search was conducted after developing a search strategy combining terms for acquired (idiopathic) IAD. Articles describing an adult case with a diagnosis of ACTH deficiency using dynamic testing, no deficiency of other pituitary axes, and MRI of the brain/pituitary protocolled as normal, were included. Exclusion criteria were cases describing congenital IAD, cases with another aetiology for IAD, and articles where full text was not available. In total 42 articles were included, consisting of 85 cases of acquired idiopathic IAD. Distribution by sex was approximately equal (F:M; 47:38). Lethargy was the most common presenting symptom (38%), followed by weight loss (25%), anorexia (22%), and myalgia/arthralgia (12%). Eight cases (9.5%) presented with an Addison crisis. 31% of cases had an autoimmune disease at diagnosis of which Hashimoto hypothyroidism was the most frequent. Data about follow-up was scarce; dynamic testing was repeated in 4 cases of which 2 showed recovery of the adrenal axis. We report the largest case series of acquired idiopathic IAD to date. Our systematic review highlights the lack of a clear definition and diagnostic work-up. Based on the findings in this review a proposition is made for a flowchart to diagnose acquired idiopathic IAD.

Whole Exome Sequencing Uncovered the Genetic Architecture of Growth Hormone Deficiency Patients

PURPOSE

Congenital growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a rare and etiologically heterogeneous disease. We aim to screen disease-causing mutations of GHD in a relatively sizable cohort and discover underlying mechanisms via a candidate gene-based mutational burden analysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 109 short stature patients associated with hormone deficiency. All patients were classified into two groups: Group I (n=45) with definitive GHD and Group II (n=64) with possible GHD. We analyzed correlation consistency between clinical criteria and molecular findings by whole exome sequencing (WES) in two groups. The patients without a molecular diagnosis (n=90) were compared with 942 in-house controls for the mutational burden of rare mutations in 259 genes biologically related with the GH axis.

RESULTS

In 19 patients with molecular diagnosis, we found 5 possible GHD patients received known molecular diagnosis associated with GHD (NF1 [c.2329T>A, c.7131C>G], GHRHR [c.731G>A], STAT5B [c.1102delC], HRAS [c.187_207dup]). By mutational burden analysis of predicted deleterious variants in 90 patients without molecular diagnosis, we found that POLR3A (p = 0.005), SUFU (p = 0.006), LHX3 (p = 0.021) and CREB3L4 (p = 0.040) represented top genes enriched in GHD patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed the discrepancies between the laboratory testing and molecular diagnosis of GHD. These differences should be considered when for an accurate diagnosis of GHD. We also identified four candidate genes that might be associated with GHD.

Genetic and Epigenetic Causes of Pituitary Adenomas

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) can be classified as non-secreting adenomas, somatotroph adenomas, corticotroph adenomas, lactotroph adenomas, and thyrotroph adenomas. Substantial advances have been made in our knowledge of the pathobiology of PAs. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of the molecular biological characteristics of different types of PAs, we reviewed the important advances that have been made involving genetic and epigenetic variation, comprising genetic mutations, chromosome number variations, DNA methylation, microRNA regulation, and transcription factor regulation. Classical tumor predisposition syndromes include multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and type 4 (MEN4) syndromes, Carney complex, and X-LAG syndromes. PAs have also been described in association with succinate dehydrogenase-related familial PA, neurofibromatosis type 1, and von Hippel-Lindau, DICER1, and Lynch syndromes. Patients with aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) mutations often present with pituitary gigantism, either in familial or sporadic adenomas. In contrast, guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) subunit alpha (GNAS) and G protein-coupled receptor 101 (GPR101) mutations can lead to excess growth hormone. Moreover, the deubiquitinase gene USP8, USP48, and BRAF mutations are associated with adrenocorticotropic hormone production. In this review, we describe the genetic and epigenetic landscape of PAs and summarize novel insights into the regulation of pituitary tumorigenesis.