Clinical presentation, genotype-phenotype correlations, and outcome of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome

The genetic differences between types 1 and 2 in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome: comprehensive meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease are at risk of developing tumors in the eye, brain, kidney, adrenal gland, and other organs based on their gene mutations. The VHL tumor suppressor gene contains pathogenic variants responsible for these events. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the genetic differences among the various types of VHL syndrome and their correlation with the location of mutations (exons and domains) in the VHL gene.

METHOD

Papers eligible for publication until September 2023 were identified using the electronic databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and EMBASE. The Random Effect model was utilized to evaluate the genetic differences between type 1 and type 2 VHL syndromes.

RESULTS

The prevalence of missense mutations (MSs) was found to be 58.9% in type 1, while it was 88.1% in type 2. Interestingly, the probability of observing MSs in type 1 was 0.42 times lower compared to type 2. The mutation hotspots of the VHL gene were R167Q/W, Y98H, R238W, and S65L, respectively. Although type 2 had a high presentation of Y98H and R238W, it did not have a higher S65L than type 1. The analysis demonstrated a statistically significant higher prevalence of truncated mutations (PTMs) in type 1. Among type 1, large/complete deletions (L/C DELs) were found in 16.9% of cases, whereas in type 2 only 3.7%. This difference was statistically significant with a p-value < 0.001. Overall, the probability of identifying mutations in domain 2 compared to domain 1 was found to be 2.13 times higher in type 1 (p-value < 0.001). Furthermore, the probability of detecting exon 1 in comparison with observing exon 2 in type 1 was 2.11 times higher than type 2 and revealed a statistically significant result (p-value < 0.001). The detection of exon 2 was 2.18 times higher in type 1 (p-value < 0.001). In addition, the likelihood of discovering exon 2 compared with others was significantly lower in type 1 compared with type 2 VHL (OR = 0.63, p-value = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

We have revealed a comprehensive genetic difference between types 1 and 2 of VHL syndrome. The significant differences in MS, PTMs, L/C DELs, and the location of the mutations between type 1 and type 2 VHL patients in the Asian, European, and American populations emphasize the genetic heterogeneity of the syndrome. These findings may pave the way for the diagnosis, treatment, and further investigation of the mechanisms behind this complex genetic disorder.

Diversities of Mechanism in Patients with VHL Syndrome and diabetes: A Report of Two Cases and Literature Review

Background

Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome is characterized by tumorous lesions affecting multiple organs. Pancreatic involvement in VHL syndrome can present as endocrine tumors and pancreatic cysts, which can interfere with both exocrine and endocrine functions of the pancreas. Diabetes is an uncommon complication of VHL syndrome.

Purpose

This study aims to summarize the various mechanisms of diabetes in VHL syndrome by reporting two cases and conducting a literature review.

Methods

We analyzed the clinical and imaging data of two patients with VHL syndrome and diabetes. Additionally, we reviewed the existing literature to explore the clinical diversities and management strategies for VHL syndrome complicated with diabetes.

Results

The first patient presented with liver metastasis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and multiple pheochromocytoma. After surgery, the patient's diabetic control improved, as evidenced by a significant reduction in insulin dosage. This indicates a potential insulin resistance due to elevated metanephrine levels prior to surgery and partial insulin deficiency caused by distal pancreatectomy. The second patient had multiple hemangioblastomas, as well as multiple pancreatic cysts and positive pancreatic islet autoantibodies. Diabetes in this case may be attributed to pancreatic lesions and the coexistence of autoimmune insulitis. A literature review of other patients with VHL combined with diabetes revealed multiple mechanisms, including increased catecholamine levels, pancreatic lesions, surgical removal of pancreatic tissue, endocrine treatment, and possibly the coexistence of autoimmune insulitis.

Conclusion

VHL syndrome complicated with diabetes involves diverse mechanisms.

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society 2023 guidance paper for functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour syndromes

This ENETS guidance paper aims to provide practical advice to clinicians for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of functioning syndromes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET). A NET-associated functioning syndrome is defined by the presence of a clinical syndrome combined with biochemical evidence of inappropriately elevated hormonal levels. Different hormonal syndromes can be encountered in pancreatic NET patients, including insulinoma, gastrinoma as well as the rare glucagonoma, VIPoma, ACTHoma, PTHrPoma, carcinoid syndrome, calcitoninoma, GHRHoma and somatostatinoma. The recommendations provided in this paper focus on the biochemical, genetic and imaging work-up as well as therapeutic management of the individual hormonal syndromes in well-differentiated, grade 1-3, functioning NET with the primary tumour originating in the pancreas, and for specific subtypes also in the duodenum.

Unique Characteristics of Patients with Von Hippel-Lindau Disease Defined by Various Diagnostic Criteria

Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease diagnosis is based on two criteria sets: International criteria (IC, two hemangioblastomas, one hemangioblastoma plus one visceral lesion, or VHL family history/pathogenic variant plus hemangioblastoma/visceral lesion); or Danish criteria (DC, two clinical manifestations, or VHL family history/pathogenic variant plus hemangioblastoma/visceral lesion). We aimed to compare the characteristics of patients with VHL-related pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (vPNET) meeting either the clinical Danish criteria only (DOC) or IC to those with sporadic PNET (sPNET). The cohort included 33 patients with VHL (20 vPNETs) and 65 with sPNET. In terms of genetic testing and family history of VHL, 90.0% of the patients with vPNET in the IC group had a germline VHL pathogenic variant, and 70.0% had a family history of VHL vs. 20% and 10% in the DOC group, respectively (p < 0.05 for both). Patients with vPNET were younger at diagnosis compared with sPNET (51.6 ± 4.1 vs. 62.8 ± 1.5 years, p < 0.05). Patients in the IC group were younger at diagnosis with VHL, vPNET, pheochromocytoma, or paraganglioma (PPGL) and renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) than those in the DOC group (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The most prevalent presenting manifestations were hemangioblastoma (42.8%) and PPGL (33.3%) vs. RCC (58.3%) and PNET (41.7%) in the IC vs. DOC groups. In conclusion, patients with vPNET meeting DOC criteria show greater similarity to sPNET. We suggest performing genetic testing, rather than solely using clinical criteria, for establishing the diagnosis of VHL.

What Are the Place and Modalities of Surgical Management for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms? A Narrative Review

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors derived from cells with neuroendocrine differentiation. They are considered malignant by default. However, their outcomes are variable depending on their presentation in the onset of hereditary syndromes, hormonal secretion, grading, and extension. Therefore, although surgical treatment has long been suggested as the only treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, its modalities are an evolving landscape. For selected patients (small, localized, non-functional panNENs), a "wait and see" strategy is suggested, as it is in the setting of multiple neuroendocrine neoplasia type 1, but the accurate size cut-off remains to be established. Parenchyma-sparring pancreatectomy, aiming to limit pancreatic insufficiency, are also emerging procedures, which place beyond the treatment of insulinomas and small non-functional panNENs (in association with lymph node picking) remains to be clarified. Furthermore, giving the fact that the liver is generally the only metastatic site, surgery keeps a place of choice alongside medical therapies in the treatment of metastatic disease, but its modalities and extensions are still a matter of debate. This narrative review aims to describe the current recommended surgical management for pancreatic NENs and controversies in light of the actual recommendations and recent literature.