Endoscopic surveillance alone is feasible and safe in type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms less than 10 mm in diameter

Diagnostic performance and clinical impact of 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide in a large cohort of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: A prospective single-center study

Purpose: Somatostatin receptor imaging with 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide (18F-AlF-OC) has shown promising performance in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). In this study, we aim to investigate the diagnostic performance and clinical impact of 18F-AlF-OC in a large prospective cohort of patients with NEN. Methods: Between January 2023 and November 2023, a total of 219 patients with confirmed or suspected NEN were enrolled prospectively and underwent 18F-AlF-OC PET/CT at 2 h post-injection. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. An additional primary endpoint was the impact of 18F-AlF-OC on clinical management. The reference standard was based on the results of histopathology or radiological follow-up. Results: 205 patients were included in the final analysis. The patient-level sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-AlF-OC PET/CT compared with contrast-enhanced CT/MRI were 90.5% vs. 81.8%, 93.1% vs. 71.1%, and 91.2% vs. 79.4%, respectively. 26 patients had tiny gastrointestinal NENs (smaller than 1 cm in diameter). The patient-based sensitivity of 18F-AlF-OC PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT/MRI were 61.5% (16/26) and 37.5% (9/24), respectively. The smallest diameter of gastrointestinal NEN detected by 18F-AlF-OC PET/CT was 0.6 cm in the rectum, 0.3 cm in the stomach, and 0.5 cm in the duodenum. 18F-AlF-OC PET/CT results led to changes in clinical management in 19.5% of patients (40/205), owing mainly to new or unexpected findings compared to contrast-enhanced CT/MRI. Conclusion: 18F-AlF-OC PET/CT demonstrated great diagnostic performance in patients with NEN, particularly for detecting tiny gastrointestinal NEN. Furthermore, 18F-AlF-OC PET/CT impacted the therapeutic management in 19.5% of patients. Our results further validate the role of 18F-AlF-OC as a somatostatin receptor imaging tracer in clinical practice.

Multimodal management of foregut neuroendocrine neoplasms

The foregut, which includes the esophagus, stomach and duodenum, represents one of the most common sites for neuroendocrine neoplasms. These are highly heterogenous with different risk of progression depending on location, cell-type of origin, size, grade and other factors. Various endoscopic and imaging modalities exist to inform therapeutic decision-making, which may be in the form of surgical or endoscopic resection and medical therapy depending on the extent of the disease after diagnostic evaluation. This narrative review aims to explore the literature on the multimodal management of such foregut neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Advances in Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms refer to a group of diseases that are relatively rare. They can be classified into three subtypes based on their clinical and histopathological features, and there are significant differences in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis among the different subtypes. The incidence of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms has been increasing globally in recent years with the localized disease being particularly evident. Gastrointestinal endoscopy is of irreplaceable importance for the diagnosis and management of g-NENs. Endoscopy with biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of g-NENs. Ultrasound endoscopy can assess the depth of tumor invasion and the presence of lymphatic metastases, which is important for the development of treatment strategies. Meanwhile, for some small and low-risk lesions, endoscopic surveillance or endoscopic resection has satisfactory therapeutic results and prognosis. This means that even though the incidence has increased, advances in endoscopic techniques have allowed more patients to adopt a relatively conservative treatment strategy. However, the criteria for patients suitable for endoscopic surveillance or endoscopic resection remain controversial.

Management of type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors: an 11-year retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

Type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare to the extent that some physicians have little experience in diagnosing and treating them. The purpose of this study was to increase the understanding of the disease by analyzing and summarizing the management and prognoses of patients with type 1 gastric NETs at our center.

METHODS

The data of 229 patients (59.4% female) with type 1 gastric NETs who were treated at our center during 2011-2022 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The average patient age was 50.5 ± 10.8 years. Multiple tumors affected 72.5% of the patients; 66.4% of the tumors were < 1 cm, 69.4% were NET G1, and 2.2% were stage III-IV. A total of 76.9% of the patients had received endoscopic management, 60.7% had received traditional Chinese medicine treatment, 10.5% received somatostatin analogues treatment, and 6.6% underwent surgical resection. Seventy patients (41.2%) experienced the first recurrence after a median follow-up of 31 months (range: 2-122 months), and the median recurrence-free time was 43 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative recurrence-free survival rates were 71.8%, 56.8%, and 50.3%, respectively. During a median follow-up of 39 months (range: 2-132 months), one patient had bilateral pulmonary metastasis, and no disease-related deaths were observed.

CONCLUSION

Type 1 gastric NETs have a high recurrence rate and a long disease course, underscoring the importance of long-term and comprehensive management.

Therapeutic Challenges for Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Take It or Leave It?

Background and Objectives: Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (gNENs) represent rare but increasingly recognized tumors. They are distinguished into three main clinical types (type-1, type-2, and type-3) according to gastrin level and at histological evaluation in well-differentiated G1, G2, or G3 lesions, as well as poorly-differentiated lesions. Small type-1 and type-2 neoplasms with low proliferation indices demonstrated excellent survival without progression during an extended follow-up period, and for these reasons, active endoscopic observation or endoscopic resection are feasible options. On the other hand, surgery is the treatment of choice for more aggressive type-3, G3, or infiltrating neoplasms. The present study aims to comprehensively review and compare the available therapeutic strategies for gNENs. Materials and Methods: A computerized literature search was performed using relevant keywords to identify all of the pertinent articles with particular attention to gNEN endoscopic treatment. Results: In recent years, different endoscopic resective techniques (such as endoscopic mucosal dissection, modified endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic full-thickness resection) have been developed, showing a high rate of complete resection for advanced and more aggressive lesions. Conclusions: Overall, gNENs represent a heterogeneous group of lesions with varying behavior which require personalized management. The non-operative approach for small type-1 gNENs seems to be feasible and should be promoted. A step-up approach with minimally invasive endoscopic therapies might be proposed, particularly for type-1 gNEN. On the other hand, it is important to recognize the negative prognostic factors in order to identify those rare cases requiring more aggressive approaches. A possible therapeutic algorithm for localized gNEN management is provided.