Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis-a Specific Set of Markers to Detect Primary Tumor Sites

The Complex Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Spectrum of Neuroendocrine Tumors-An Overview of the Latest Classifications

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) originate from the neuroendocrine cell system, which may either take the shape of organoid cell aggregations or be composed of dispersed cells across various organs. Therefore, these tumors are heterogenous regarding the site of origin, functional status, degree of aggressiveness, and prognosis. When treating patients with neuroendocrine tumors, one of the most significant challenges for physicians is determining the correct tumor grade and thus classifying patients into risk categories. Over the years, the classification of these tumors has changed significantly, often causing confusion due to clinical, molecular, and immunohistochemical variability. This review aims to outline the latest NENs classifications regardless of their site of origin. Thus, an overview of the key histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics of NENs could pave the way to validate possible predictive and prognostic markers and also guide the therapeutic conduct.

Second-Generation Neuroendocrine Immunohistochemical Markers: Reflections from Clinical Implementation

Simple Summary

Neuroendocrine tumors are a collection of neoplastic lesions arising in cells with traits similar to hormone-producing and nerve cells with the ability to secrete peptide hormones using an intricate vesicle transportation system. From a clinical standpoint, neuroendocrine tumors are unique in terms of therapeutic modalities, and a correct diagnosis is therefore imperative in order for the patient to obtain the most efficient treatment. In this process, the pathologist can analyze if the tumor cells express Chromogranin A and Synaptophysin, two proteins associated with the regulation of secretory vesicles. Unfortunately, these markers are not always present in neuroendocrine tumors, and non-neuroendocrine tumors may also occasionally express Chromogranin A or Synaptophysin—making the diagnosis difficult to make for certain cases. Recently, three proteins termed ISL1, INSM1 and Secretagogin were found to be selectively expressed in neuroendocrine cells, and subsequent studies have identified their potential as markers of neuroendocrine differentiation in the clinical setting. In this commentary, the benefits of these novel “second-generation” markers are briefly discussed from a clinical context.

Abstract

When analyzing tumors by histopathology, endocrine pathologists have traditionally been restricted to a few key immunohistochemical markers related to secretory vesicles in order to pinpoint neuroendocrine differentiation—most notably Chromogranin A (CGA) and Synaptophysin (SYP). Although proven of great clinical utility, these markers sometimes exhibit tissue-specific patterns depending on tumor origin, and non-neuroendocrine tumors might sometimes display focal expression. Moreover, CGA and SYP might be partially or totally absent in highly proliferative neuroendocrine carcinomas, making the diagnosis particularly challenging on small biopsies of metastatic lesions with unknown location of the primary tumor. The advent of second-generation neuroendocrine markers ISL LIM Homeobox 1 (ISL1), INSM Transcriptional Repressor 1 (INSM1) and Secretagogin (SECG) have expanded the pathology toolbox considerably, constituting markers that often retain expression even in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. As non-neuroendocrine tumors seldom express these antigens, the specificity of ISL1, INSM1 and SECG make them welcome additions to clinical practice. In this commentary, recent advances of this field as well as initial clinical experiences from a tertiary neuroendocrine center are discussed.

Primary hepatic neoplasms arising in cirrhotic livers can have a variable spectrum of neuroendocrine differentiation

Primary hepatic neoplasms with neuroendocrine differentiation are extremely rare. Their clinicopathological features and molecular genetic basis are largely unknown. We identified four cases of primary hepatic neoplasms with neuroendocrine differentiation. Electronic medical records were reviewed for clinical history, imaging findings, laboratory results, and follow-up. Pathology slides, immunohistochemistry, and ancillary studies were reviewed. There were two females and two males with age ranging from 52 to 74 years. There was one amphicrine carcinoma with tumor cells simultaneously demonstrating both hepatocellular and neuroendocrine differentiation, one mixed hepatocellular-neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) with hepatocellular component intermingled with neuroendocrine component, one small cell NEC, and one well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor. Next- generation sequencing of the mixed hepatocellular-NEC and small cell NEC showed molecular/genetic alterations commonly seen in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). All four cases arose in a background of cirrhosis. Primary hepatic neoplasms arising in cirrhotic livers can have a spectrum of neuroendocrine differentiation. Presence of a NEC component may be an indicator of aggressiveness. In addition, primary hepatic carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation likely share the same molecular pathways as HCC.

How to Manage Small Intestine (Jejunal and Ileal) Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Presenting with Liver Metastases?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (siNENs) are slowly growing tumours with a low malignant potential. However, more than half of the patients present with distant metastases (stage IV) and nearly all with locoregional lymph node (LN) metastases at the time of surgery. The value of locoregional treatment is discussed controversially.

RECENT FINDINGS

In stage I to III disease, locoregional surgery was currently shown to be curative prolonging survival. In stage IV disease, surgery may prolong survival in selected patients with the chance to cure locoregional disease besides radical/debulking liver surgery. It may improve the quality of life and may prevent severe local complications resulting in a state of chronic malnutrition and severe intestinal ischaemia or bowel obstruction. Locoregional tumour resection offers the opportunity to be curative or to focus therapeutically on liver metastasis, facilitating various other therapeutic modalities. Risks and benefits of the surgical intervention need to be balanced individually.