“Shaken baby syndrome” and forensic pathology

Evaluating the evidentiary value of the analysis of skeletal trauma in forensic research: A review of research and practice

Understanding bone trauma characteristics is a fundamental component of forensic investigations that can assist in understanding the nature of blunt trauma related deaths. The variation of each blunt force trauma (BFT) injury is dependent on a magnitude of factors including, age, sex, health, angle of impact, impact mechanism, impact force and clothing, making BFT one of the more difficult area of trauma to interpret solely based on skeletal fractures. A detailed literature review was performed to assess the value and scientific rigour of the current research in forensic anthropology, forensic pathology and biomechanics that attempts to provide an objective framework in which forensic practitioners can assess and interpret BFT injuries. Four areas of research which investigate the analysis of BFT are examined. These included research involving experiments on animal models; experiments on human models (and synthetic models); computer modelling, and research/publications including 'mild', 'moderate' and 'severe' as descriptions of impact force, resulting from trauma. Also briefly discussed is how BFT research is framed within medicolegal contexts. While many published works have contributed to the understanding of the biomechanics of BFT, more research that can provide an objective means to accurately assess and interpret BFT injures is required.

A Conceptual Overview of Axonopathy in Infants and Children with Allegedly Inflicted Head Trauma

Fatal, allegedly inflicted pediatric head trauma remains a controversial topic in forensic pathology. Recommendations for systematic neuropathologic evaluation of the brains of supposedly injured infants and children usually include the assessment of long white matter tracts in search of axonopathy - specifically, diffuse axonal injury. The ability to recognize, document, and interpret injuries to axons has significant academic and medicolegal implications. For example, more than two decades of inconsistent nosology have resulted in confusion about the definition of diffuse axonal injury between various medical disciplines including radiology, neurosurgery, pediatrics, neuropathology, and forensic pathology. Furthermore, in the pediatric setting, acceptance that "pure" shaking can cause axonal shearing in infants and young children is not widespread. Additionally, controversy abounds whether or not axonal trauma can be identified within regions of white matter ischemia - a debate with very significant implications. Immunohistochemistry is often used not only to document axonal injury, but also to estimate the time since injury. As a result, the estimated post-injury interval may then be used by law enforcement officers and prosecutors to narrow "exclusive opportunity" and thus, identify potential suspects. Fundamental to these highly complicated and controversial topics is a philosophical understanding of the diffuse axonal injury spectrum disorders.

The optic nerve sheath hemorrhage is a non-specific finding in cases of suspected child abuse

In young infants, the triad consisting of acute encephalopathy, retinal hemorrhages, and a subdural hematoma is a nonspecific finding. It has traumatic and non-traumatic etiologies. The triad may be found among a vast spectrum of natural diseases. Optic nerve sheath hemorrhage in infants is typically detected at autopsy. It is a nonspecific finding that can be found in traumatic and non-traumatic etiologies. Neither the triad nor the ONSH are pathognomonic for an abusive head injury. Opposite to the triad, the spectrum of non-traumatic etiologies of ONSH is limited. In infants ONSH rarely occurs in spontaneous subarachnoidal hemorrhage or in infectious conditions. Our results show that the clinical significance of the optic nerve sheath hemorrhage in the forensic work-up of fatal cases of alleged abusive head injury is its limited differential diagnosis. Only after careful differential diagnosis ONSH may contribute to the diagnosis of AHT. However, the main limitation of our study is the sampling bias, as the eyes are usually removed when abusive head trauma is suspected.

Abusive head trauma: a review of the evidence base

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the constellation of findings of abusive head trauma, which may be accompanied by injuries to the appendicular and axial skeleton, brain and spinal cord, and retina. Additional common features include skin and soft-tissue injury, visceral findings, and evidence of oral trauma.

CONCLUSION

The evidence base for abusive head trauma encompasses diverse disciplines, including diagnostic imaging, pathology, pediatrics, biomechanics, ophthalmology, epidemiology, and orthopedics. When the varied sources of evidence are pieced together and taken in toto, abusive head trauma is often readily differentiated from alternative explanations of an infant's injuries.