A novel bedside test for ACPA: the CCPoint test is moving the laboratory to the rheumatologist’s office

Anti-CCP biosensors in rheumatoid arthritis

Biosensors are unique analytical tools for the detection of biomarkers. Of these, autoantibodies against citrullinated proteins (ACPA) are useful for the differential diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The autoantibodies may be detected by immunoassay technology using synthetic cyclic citrullinated peptides (CCP), ie, anti-CCP. Recently, several biosensors have been developed for anti-CCP using CCP and mutated citrullinated vimentin (MCV) as recognition elements. In this review we highlight all currently available ACPA biosensor technology including those based on fluorescence, chemiluminescence, electrochemiluminescence (ECL), surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-based, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), lateral flow immunoassays (LFIA), and electrochemical. We explore various peptides as recognition elements, electrode modifiers and signal amplification systems thus providing new opportunities for next-generation biosensor design in RA.

Remote self-collection of capillary blood using upper arm devices for autoantibody analysis in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, usability and acceptability of two upper arm self-sampling devices for measurement of autoantibodies and C reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs).

Methods

70 consecutive patients with IMRD with previously documented autoantibodies were assigned to supervised and unsupervised self-collection of capillary blood with the Tasso+ or TAP II device. Interchangeability of 17 biomarkers with standard venesection was assessed by: concordance, correlation, paired sample hypothesis testing and Bland-Altman plots. Patients completed an evaluation questionnaire, including the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Net Promoter Score (NPS).

Results

While 80.0% and 77.0% were able to safely and successfully collect capillary blood using the Tasso+ and TAP II within the first attempt, 69 of 70 (98.6%) patients were successful in collecting capillary blood within two attempts. Concordance between venous and capillary samples was high; 94.7% and 99.5% for positive and negative samples, respectively. For connective tissue disease screen, anti-Ro52 and anti-proteinase 3 autoantibody levels, no significant differences were observed. Self-sampling was less painful than standard venesection for the majority of patients (Tasso+: 71%; TAP II: 63%). Both devices were well accepted (NPS; both: +28%), usability was perceived as excellent (SUS; Tasso+: 88.6 of 100; TAP II: 86.0 of 100) and 48.6 %/62.9% of patients would prefer to use the Tasso+/TAP II, respectively, instead of a traditional venous blood collection.

Conclusions

Remote self-collection of capillary blood using upper arm-based devices for autoantibody and CRP analysis in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases is feasible, accurate and well accepted among patients.

Trial registration number

WHO International Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00024925).

Measuring attack on self: The need for field-friendly methods development and research on autoimmunity in human biology

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune and inflammatory disorder (AIID) prevalence appears to be increasing in all but the world's poorest regions and countries. Autoimmune diseases occur when there is a breakdown in processes that regulate inflammation and self-recognition by immune cells. Very few field-based studies have been conducted among Indigenous populations and underserved communities with limited access to medical care. This is due, in part, to the fact that autoimmune diseases are difficult to diagnose, even in clinical settings. In remote field settings these difficulties are compounded by the absence of infrastructure necessary for sample storage and analysis, and the lack of hospital/clinic access for more invasive diagnostic procedures. Because of these limitations, little is known about the prevalence of autoimmunity outside wealthy regions and clinical settings.

AIMS

The present paper discusses why AIID are of critical importance in human biology research and why more work needs to be devoted to validating, testing, and utilizing methods for detecting autoantibodies and other biomarkers related to autoimmunity in field-friendly, minimally invasively-collected samples. This paper reviews some of the methods used to diagnose AIIDs in clinical settings, and highlights methods that have been used in studies within human biology and related fields, emphasizing the invasiveness of specific methods and their feasibility in remote field settings.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Risk for AIID is affected by several reproductive, dietary, environmental, and genetic factors. Human biologists have unique perspectives that they can bring to autoimmunity research, and more population-based studies on autoimmunity are needed within these and related fields.

Detection in whole blood of autoantibodies for the diagnosis of connective tissue diseases in near patient testing condition

A novel technology, photonic ring immunoassay (PRI), for detecting 12 autoantibodies simultaneously in whole blood in less than 15 minutes was evaluated by comparing results from 235 clinically diagnosed patients with standard laboratory tests. The overall agreement was greater than 91% for 10 of the 12 assays, with positive percent agreement greater than 89% for 9 of the assays and negative percent agreement greater than 91% for 10 of them. Thus, the clinical sensitivities and specificities were similar for the 2 methods. In addition, 199 normal blood donors were tested on the ANA 12 PRI, yielding specificities greater than 97.5% for all assays. This proof of concept study shows that this new system is suitable for point of care testing for clinically useful autoantibodies, allowing the doctor to have test results in minutes rather than days.

Could Lymphocyte Profiling be Useful to Diagnose Systemic Autoimmune Diseases?

Considering the implications of B, T, and natural killer (NK) cells in the pathophysiology of systemic autoimmune diseases, the assessment of their distribution in the blood could be helpful for physicians in the complex process of determining a precise diagnosis. In primary Sjögren's syndrome, transitional and active naive B cells are increased and memory B cells are decreased compared to healthy controls and other systemic diseases. However, their utility to improve the accuracy of classification criteria has not been proven. In early untreated rheumatoid arthritis, proportions of regulatory T cells are constantly reduced, but other patterns are difficult to determine given the heterogeneity of published studies. In systemic lupus erythematosus, the lack of studies using large cohorts of patients and the diversity of the possible pathological mechanisms involved are also important impediments. Nevertheless, transitional B cell and plasma cell proportions are increased in most of the studies, the CD4/CD8 ratio is decreased, and the number of NK cells is reduced. Despite the low number of studies, anomalies of lymphocyte subset distribution was also described in ANCA-associated vasculitis, systemic scleroderma, and myositis. For now, flow cytometric analysis of lymphocyte subsets has focused mainly on specific subpopulations and is more useful for basic and translational research than for diagnostics in clinical practice. However, new modern methods such as mass cytometry and bioinformatics analyses may offer the possibility to simultaneously account for the relative proportions of multiple lymphocyte subsets and define a global profile in homogeneous groups of patients. The years to come will certainly incorporate such global lymphocyte profiling in reclassification of systemic autoimmune diseases.

Anti-carbamylated protein antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with articular involvement

Objective Several studies have evaluated the prevalence of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated proteins antibodies (ACPA) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients but no data are available on the anti-carbamylated proteins (anti-CarP), a new biomarker for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We evaluated the anti-CarP prevalence in SLE patients with joint involvement and the associations with different phenotypes. Methods Seventy-eight SLE patients with joint involvement were enrolled (F/M 73/5; mean ± SD age 47.6 ± 11.2 years; mean ± SD disease duration 214.3 ± 115.6 months). As control groups, we evaluated SLE patients without joint manifestations ( N = 15), RA ( N = 78) and healthy individuals (HS, N = 98). Anti-CarP were assessed by home-made ELISA in all patients and controls, RF and ACPA in SLE patients with joint involvement (commercial ELISA kit). Results The prevalence of anti-CarP in SLE patients with joint involvement was similar to RA ( p = NS) and significantly higher compared with SLE without joint involvement and HS ( p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, respectively). Four patients were positive for all three antibodies: seventy-five percent of these showed Jaccoud arthropathy. Fourty-five percent of ACPA-ve/RF-ve patients were anti-CarP + ve. Conclusions The evaluation of anti-CarP in SLE joint involvement demonstrated a prevalence of almost 50%, similar to RA and significantly higher than SLE without joint involvement and HS.